Answering some questions on the Russian meteor strike

I guess it's fitting a meteorology blog would finally get to use the whole "meteor" part of it...
A meteor exploded in the sky above Russia's Ural Mountains on Friday, causing a shockwave that blew out countless windows and injured hundreds of people with flying glass and created quite a few questions since human sightings of meteor explosions are quite rare.
Q: How big was the meteor?
According to NASA, it was about 15 meters across, or about 50 feet. That's roughly 1/4 the size of the asteroid 2012 DA14 that is making a close pass Friday. Or, on more Earthly terms, it's almost the size of 3 Buicks -- 2.76 1999 Buick LeSabres to be exact (or 2 1/2 Ford Excursions). The meteor was estimated to weigh about 7,000 tons. (Note: Original reports only gave it a 10-ton weight)
Q: How fast was it going?
Again according to NASA, the meteor was going about 33,000 mph when it exploded at somewhere around 100,000-150,000 feet above the ground. At that altitude, the speed of sound is about 660 mph so it was going about Mach 50. (Note, speed of sound is variable based on temperature and is about 761 mph at sea level.)
To compare, the Space Shuttle was usually going about 3,000 mph on blast off when it's at about 28 miles high. The SR-71 would go about Mach 3.2, while some X-aircraft, using rocket power, have reportedly approached Mach 10.
Q: Why was there such an explosive sound?
In addition to the light show, there was a deafening explosion sound that wiped out about 1 million square feet of glass across the town of Chelyabinsk
What everyone heard was an incredibly intense sonic boom.
Sonic booms are created when objects reach the speed of sound -- at that precise moment, sound waves that normally would be racing out ahead of an object get sandwiched on top of each other (for lack of better term) and intensify, much like if you were to take the three ocean waves and combine their energy into one.
But if you think a sonic boom from a jet plane breaking the sound barrier was loud (many of you might remember the Sonic booms when fighter jets scrambled to intercept a plane that encroached on restricted air space over Seattle during a President Obama visit in 2010) try taking something of much larger mass and much less aerodynamics and shove that through the sound barrier at super-super-sonic speeds.
You can find more information on what causes sonic booms at this relatively laymen term example, or for more of the physics geeks, a more technical explanation.
Or, maybe it was just simple marketing?
@scottskomo I really think people trying to bring the Sonics back to Seattle might have gone a little far with this sonic boom advertising:)
— Pam Stucky (@pamstucky) February 15, 2013
Here are some other questions and answers, courtesy of Associated Press writer Frank Jordans:
___
Q. What's the difference between a meteor and a meteorite?
A. Meteors are pieces of space rock, usually from larger comets or asteroids, which enter the Earth's atmosphere. Many are burned up by friction and the heat of the atmosphere, but those that survive and strike the Earth are called meteorites. They often hit the ground at tremendous speed - up to 30,000 kilometers an hour (18,650 mph) - releasing a huge amount of energy, according to the European Space Agency.
Q: How common are meteorite strikes?
A: Experts say smaller strikes happen five to 10 times a year. Large meteors such as the one Friday in Russia are rarer, but still occur about every five years, according to Addi Bischoff, a mineralogist at the University of Muenster in Germany. Most of them fall over uninhabited areas where they don't injure humans.
Q: How big was Friday's bang in Russia, and why did it cause so many injuries?
A: Alan Harris, a senior scientist at the German Aerospace Center in Berlin, said most of the damage would have been caused by the blast - or blasts - as the meteor broke up in the atmosphere. The rapid deceleration of the meteor released a huge amount of energy that would have been heard and felt many miles away. Witnesses say it shattered windows and sent loose objects flying through the air.
While estimates of the mass of the meteor range from 10-100 tons, and it is still unclear if it was made of rock or iron, "the explosive force of the airburst might have been some 10 kilotons of TNT," said Harris. But he noted that since the blast occurred several miles above the Earth, the damage isn't comparable to an explosion of that magnitude on the Earth' surface.
By comparison, the U.S. bomb dropped over Hiroshima during World War II had an explosive force of about 15 kilotons, but it detonated just 2,000 feet above a densely populated city.
Q: Is there any link between this meteor and the asteroid fly-by taking place later Friday?
A: No, it's just cosmic coincidence. According to NASA, the trajectory of the Russian meteorite was significantly different than that of asteroid 2012 DA14. "In videos of the meteor, it is seen to pass from left to right in front of the rising sun, which means it was traveling from north to south. Asteroid DA14's trajectory is in the opposite direction, from south to north," the U.S. space agency said.
Q: When was the last comparable meteorite strike?
A: In 2008, astronomers spotted a meteor similar to the one in Russia heading toward Earth about 20 hours before it entered the atmosphere. It exploded over the vast African nation of Sudan, causing no known injuries.
The largest known meteor in recent times caused the "Tunguska event" - flattening thousands of square miles of forest in remote Siberia in 1908. Nobody was injured by the meteor blast, or by the Sikhote-Alin meteorite that fell in eastern Siberia in 1947.
Scientists believe that a far larger meteorite strike on what today is Mexico's Yucatan Peninsula may have been responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs about 66 million years ago. According to that theory, the impact would have thrown up vast amounts of dust that blanketed the sky for decades and altered the climate on Earth.
Q: What can scientists learn from Friday's strike?
A: Bischoff says scientists and treasure hunters are probably already racing to find pieces of the meteorite. Some meteorites can be very valuable, selling for up to $670 per gram, depending on their origin and composition. Because meteors have remained largely unchanged for billions of years - unlike rocks on Earth that have been affected by erosion and volcanic outbreaks - scientists will study the fragments to learn more about the early universe.
Harris, of the German Aerospace Center, says some meteorites are also believed to carry organic material and may have influenced the development of life on Earth.
Q: What would happen if a meteorite hit a city?
A: A blast at low altitude or on the surface would result in many casualties and cause serious damage to buildings. The exact extent would depend on many factors, including the mass of the meteorite, its speed and composition, said Harris.
Scientists have been discussing for several years how to prepare for such an event - however remote. European Space Agency spokesman Bernhard von Weyhe says experts from Europe, the U.S. and Russia are working on way to spot potential threats sooner and avert them. But don't expect a Hollywood-style mission to fly a nuclear bomb into space and blow up the asteroid, like the movie "Armageddon."
"It's a global challenge and we need to find a solution together," he said. "But one thing's for sure, the Bruce Willis 'Armageddon' method won't work."
Here is a question for Scott Sistek: Why does the headline read "...Russian meteor strike?" By definition a Russian meteor would have to originate in Russia.  This was a meteor strike in Russia but it was not a Russian meteor; an important distinction for a scientist.
@I812 Nobody cares. There's that.
Well. The glass shop guys in that city are going to be working overtime and making hands over fists in profit trying to fix 1 million sq ft of broken glass around the city!
Soon I heard this and in Russia.. I was reminded of the X-Files. :D
NASA confirmed that the blast from the meteor incident was not the meteor exploding.... Russian news admits that Russian Missile Defenses shot the meteor.
@Johnny O'Malley LOL!Â
Why call it a Russian meteor? Russia isn't responsible for it!
@Ashley Sampson It broke - that is why it can be called russian
Actually it was a news anchor on CNN that asked if it were an effect of global warming, which was corrected on air by Bill Nye as having no correlation whatsoever. Global warming shouldn't even be on this thread, what should be is the question: Why do we continue to cut the budget of NASA (2012 was $17.7 billion) compared to our military spending, which is over $1 trillion for 2012? Who cares what country wins in a "war on terror" when we can't even properly track space debris anymore? Privatizing space is not the answer.
there was one poster that blamed the meteor on global warming and said it was our fault the thing landed! not in those exact words but it was the gist of it. I wondered when the alarmists were going to strike.
Maybe we saw a spaceship! lol...and I can't see Russia from the porch. You'd have to ask Sarah about that! LOL
@Tracy Schroder Maybe Sarah shot it. If not she will still get my vote
@Tracy Schroder A funny figure of speech but everyone got the meaning. Although there is one island in Alaska, which sits across from its sister island which is in "Russia". So from there.. you can see Russia. Just not in Wasilla. :D
Article is Wrong. The speed of sound is roughly 720 mph at STP. It's temp AND pressure dependant. NASA uses high pressure in it's hypersonic wind tunnels at Ames. It helps with the simulations.
The rocket plane mentioned is the X-15. It pushed the limits in the sixties. Neal Armstrong was one of the pilots. He didn't amount to much...
This has been running the old movie about orbital ballistic nuclear misses platforms sent up for meteorite defense.
That's all well and good, but that chunk of rock that entered the atmosphere, it becomes a meteorite on entry.
Jimmy Kimmel calls that LieWitness News! But I am sure she saw SOMETHING!
You can visually see >100 meteorites on a nightly basis from anywhere on the planet. It is not unusual, nor was it "busy". It is heightened awareness, and nothing more.
@Christopher Neil BradleyYour right.. take this video for example --> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_d-gs0WoUw
Whether or not Tracy saw it...my kids who happened to be out stargazing last night came home to report that they saw several shooting stars. Busy night in the Cosmos.
thanks for a really good laugh... Actually carI comment maybe she can see Russia from her back porch..
@Tracy, sorry - what you saw and heard was something different. The impact angle was
I just read it hit ground at about 9:20am Russian time, which would be about 9:20pm here. That's about right.
The size of a Greyhound Bus
Last night at about 9pm the brightest meteor flew across the sky. It was so bright you could see it though the clouds and you could actually hear it! If it wasn't that one, then it was another one!
There are probably more than one.. as they drag debris behind them... Besides.. NASA is lacking at tracking...
Maybe she can see Russia from her back porch.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SxdF5ZP4rJw
@Tracy, you couldn't have. It was on the other side of the planet. 33,000 MPH and around 50 feet in diameter.
We saw it and heard it in Ridgefield, WA
It really was a weather balloon
Thank you Scott. Informative and entertaining report. Just the type of event to heighten awareness of just how tenuous our existence is on Earth.
@186272sec And how important it is to maintain a national space program including transporting people and items from place to place in space and on other planets/satellites.  It was one of the only things I supported in the Reagan's "Star Wars" defense plan.
@CTWU' 'Project Spaceguard.' If Arthur C. Clarke were alive today, I am sure he would weigh in on the necessity for an equivalent program.Â
@186272sec @CTWU Absolutely.  It is also a heated source of discussion at most science fiction conventions...  We have answers (that may or may not work -- like teleporting "everyone" safely to another unaffected region) now we need to have the money and government backing behind it, lol!
12-12-2012 was a few weeks off
glad it exploded in the air and not near surface, we would be reading "Meteorite Destroys City", and we would not have video, we would have carnage. and just maybe had it stuck ground on or near that weapons depo...well...Need I say more?
That would be incredibly scary not knowing what made the sound.
I've heard some insane theories on how the Russians air defence shot it down but that is absolutely impossible for an object falling as fast as it would be moving.  I suppose it's slightly more believable than the Iranians shooting it down -- unless they've upgraded their version of Photoshop.
"It's a global challenge and we need to find a solution together," he said. "But one thing's for sure, the Bruce Willis 'Armageddon' method won't work." I know armageddon sick of it!!!
@AmiM I read a book recently that basically says there is nothing we can do about asteroids/meteors. Usually, like in this case, there is no advanced warning. The things are dark colored and not easy to pick out in the zillions of cubic miles of space. Even if we do find it ahead of time, there is no plan. There is no booster that could get to an asteroid far enough from earth to be able to do anything like push it enough to miss earth, blast it to dust (nukes would make radioactive dust anyway), or any other method. And finally, there is not the national will for countries to cooperate in protecting us from an impact. Just think; if a meteor the size of this one were headed for New York City and we were able to divert it so it hit, for example, Kansas City or worse yet some foreign city. The lawsuits would bury the entire court system for hundreds of years and billions of dollars. We might as well worry about things we have some chance of doing, like building a bridge across the Columbia River. Oh. That may be a bad example. We would actually have more success at diverting an asteroid than building the bridge.
@Nobody LOL at your last two sentences. Probably true.