Obama unveils executive actions, legislation aimed at gun violence

WASHINGTON (AP) - Braced for a fight, President Barack Obama on Wednesday unveiled the most sweeping proposals for curbing gun violence in two decades, pressing a reluctant Congress to pass universal background checks and bans on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity ammunition magazines like the ones used in the Newtown, Conn., school shooting.
A month after that horrific massacre, Obama also used his presidential powers to enact 23 measures that don't require the backing of lawmakers. The president's executive actions include ordering federal agencies to make more data available for background checks, appointing a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and directing the Centers for Disease Control to research gun violence.
But the president, speaking at White House ceremony, focused his attention on the divided Congress, saying only lawmakers could enact the most effective measures for preventing more mass shootings.
"To make a real and lasting difference, Congress must act," Obama said. "And Congress must act soon."
The president vowed to use "whatever weight this office holds" to press lawmakers into action on his $500 million plan. He is also calling for improvements in school safety, including putting 1,000 police officers in schools and bolstering mental health care by training more health professionals to deal with young people who may be at risk.
Even supportive lawmakers say the president's gun control proposals - most of which are opposed by the powerful National Rifle Association - face long odds on Capitol Hill.
House Speaker John Boehner's office was non-committal to the president's package of proposed legislation, but signaled no urgency to act. "House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said. "And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that."
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said ahead of Obama's presentation that he didn't know whether an assault weapons ban could pass the Senate, but said there are some measures that can, such as improved background checks.
"There are some who say nothing will pass. I disagree with that," Leahy, D-Vt., told students at Georgetown University Law Center. "What I'm interested in is what we can get."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called Obama's package "thoughtful recommendations" and said the Senate would consider legislation addressing gun violence early this year.
"The tragedy at Sandy Hook was just the latest sad reminder that we are not doing enough to protect our citizens - especially our children - from gun violence and a culture of violence, and all options should be on the table moving forward," he said.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus dismissed Obama's measures as "an executive power grab."
"He paid lip service to our fundamental constitutional rights," Priebus said of the president, "but took actions that disregard the Second Amendment and the legislative process."
Acknowledging the tough fight ahead, Obama said there will be pundits, politicians and special interest groups that will seek to "gin up fear" that the White House wants to take away the right to own a gun.
"Behind the scenes, they'll do everything they can to block any commonsense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever," he said. "The only way we will be able to change is if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different, that this time we must do something to protect our communities and our kids."
The president was flanked by children who wrote him letters about gun violence in the weeks following the Newtown shooting. Families of those killed in the massacre, as well as survivors of the shooting, were also in the audience, along with law enforcement officers and congressional lawmakers.
"This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe," Obama said. "This is how we will be judged."
Seeking to expand the impetus for addressing gun violence beyond the Newtown shooting, the president said more than 900 Americans have been killed by guns in the month since the elementary school massacre.
"Every day we wait, the number will keep growing," he said.
The White House has signaled that Obama could launch a campaign to boost public support for his proposals. Nearly six in 10 Americans want stricter gun laws in the aftermath of the Newtown shooting, with majorities favoring a nationwide ban on military-style, rapid-fire weapons and limits on gun violence depicted in video games, movies and TV shows, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.
A lopsided 84 percent of adults would like to see the establishment of a federal standard for background checks for people buying guns at gun shows, the poll showed.
The president based his proposals on recommendations from an administration-wide task force led by Vice President Joe Biden. His plan marks the most comprehensive effort to address gun violence since Congress passed the 1994 ban on high-grade, military-style assault weapons. The ban expired in 2004, and Obama wants lawmakers to renew and expand it.
Other measures Obama wants Congress to take up include limiting high-capacity ammunition magazines and requiring background checks for all gun buyers in an attempt to close the so-called "gun-show loophole" that allows people to buy guns at trade shows and over the Internet without submitting to background checks.
Obama also intends to seek confirmation for B. Todd Jones, who has served as acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives since 2011.
The president's plan does little to address violent images in video games, movies and entertainment, beyond asking the CDC to study their impact on gun crimes. Some pro-gun lawmakers who are open to addressing stricter arms legislation have insisted they would do so only in tandem with recommendations for addressing violence in entertainment.
The president's long list of executive orders also include:
- Ordering tougher penalties for people who lie on background checks and requiring federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.
- Ending limits that make it more difficult for the government to research gun violence, such as gathering data on guns that fall into criminal hands.
- Requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.
- Giving schools flexibility to use federal grant money to improve school safety, such as by hiring school resource officers.
- Giving communities grants to institute programs to keep guns away from people who shouldn't have them.
A month after that horrific massacre, Obama also used his presidential powers to enact 23 measures that don't require the backing of lawmakers. The president's executive actions include ordering federal agencies to make more data available for background checks, appointing a director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, and directing the Centers for Disease Control to research gun violence.
But the president, speaking at White House ceremony, focused his attention on the divided Congress, saying only lawmakers could enact the most effective measures for preventing more mass shootings.
"To make a real and lasting difference, Congress must act," Obama said. "And Congress must act soon."
The president vowed to use "whatever weight this office holds" to press lawmakers into action on his $500 million plan. He is also calling for improvements in school safety, including putting 1,000 police officers in schools and bolstering mental health care by training more health professionals to deal with young people who may be at risk.
Even supportive lawmakers say the president's gun control proposals - most of which are opposed by the powerful National Rifle Association - face long odds on Capitol Hill.
House Speaker John Boehner's office was non-committal to the president's package of proposed legislation, but signaled no urgency to act. "House committees of jurisdiction will review these recommendations," Boehner spokesman Michael Steel said. "And if the Senate passes a bill, we will also take a look at that."
Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy said ahead of Obama's presentation that he didn't know whether an assault weapons ban could pass the Senate, but said there are some measures that can, such as improved background checks.
"There are some who say nothing will pass. I disagree with that," Leahy, D-Vt., told students at Georgetown University Law Center. "What I'm interested in is what we can get."
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., called Obama's package "thoughtful recommendations" and said the Senate would consider legislation addressing gun violence early this year.
"The tragedy at Sandy Hook was just the latest sad reminder that we are not doing enough to protect our citizens - especially our children - from gun violence and a culture of violence, and all options should be on the table moving forward," he said.
Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus dismissed Obama's measures as "an executive power grab."
"He paid lip service to our fundamental constitutional rights," Priebus said of the president, "but took actions that disregard the Second Amendment and the legislative process."
Acknowledging the tough fight ahead, Obama said there will be pundits, politicians and special interest groups that will seek to "gin up fear" that the White House wants to take away the right to own a gun.
"Behind the scenes, they'll do everything they can to block any commonsense reform and make sure nothing changes whatsoever," he said. "The only way we will be able to change is if their audience, their constituents, their membership says this time must be different, that this time we must do something to protect our communities and our kids."
The president was flanked by children who wrote him letters about gun violence in the weeks following the Newtown shooting. Families of those killed in the massacre, as well as survivors of the shooting, were also in the audience, along with law enforcement officers and congressional lawmakers.
"This is our first task as a society, keeping our children safe," Obama said. "This is how we will be judged."
Seeking to expand the impetus for addressing gun violence beyond the Newtown shooting, the president said more than 900 Americans have been killed by guns in the month since the elementary school massacre.
"Every day we wait, the number will keep growing," he said.
The White House has signaled that Obama could launch a campaign to boost public support for his proposals. Nearly six in 10 Americans want stricter gun laws in the aftermath of the Newtown shooting, with majorities favoring a nationwide ban on military-style, rapid-fire weapons and limits on gun violence depicted in video games, movies and TV shows, according to a new Associated Press-GfK poll.
A lopsided 84 percent of adults would like to see the establishment of a federal standard for background checks for people buying guns at gun shows, the poll showed.
The president based his proposals on recommendations from an administration-wide task force led by Vice President Joe Biden. His plan marks the most comprehensive effort to address gun violence since Congress passed the 1994 ban on high-grade, military-style assault weapons. The ban expired in 2004, and Obama wants lawmakers to renew and expand it.
Other measures Obama wants Congress to take up include limiting high-capacity ammunition magazines and requiring background checks for all gun buyers in an attempt to close the so-called "gun-show loophole" that allows people to buy guns at trade shows and over the Internet without submitting to background checks.
Obama also intends to seek confirmation for B. Todd Jones, who has served as acting director of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives since 2011.
The president's plan does little to address violent images in video games, movies and entertainment, beyond asking the CDC to study their impact on gun crimes. Some pro-gun lawmakers who are open to addressing stricter arms legislation have insisted they would do so only in tandem with recommendations for addressing violence in entertainment.
The president's long list of executive orders also include:
- Ordering tougher penalties for people who lie on background checks and requiring federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.
- Ending limits that make it more difficult for the government to research gun violence, such as gathering data on guns that fall into criminal hands.
- Requiring federal law enforcement to trace guns recovered in criminal investigations.
- Giving schools flexibility to use federal grant money to improve school safety, such as by hiring school resource officers.
- Giving communities grants to institute programs to keep guns away from people who shouldn't have them.
Stop human violence in movie's and on television. Boycott Hollyweird. Outlaw stupid politicians from holding office. The planned agenda is easy for all to see. O'bummer will need to release more of his medicated psycho mind controlled killers to advance the agenda. Outlaw SSRI drugs. You know, those so called anti-depressants that cause depression and thoughts of suicide. All these mass shooting started around 1988 when SSRI drugs were released upon the public. Wake up! First the guns then your precious metals and finally your children. As a government collapses the leaders always loot the people.
This comment has been deleted
 @Fed up Fed Read between the lines.  It's all right there.
Obama surrounding himself with children, playing the heart strings of everyone. And since when did children start writting letters again? It's all Email these dayz. Propaganda Propaganda......
Â
FORWARD !
I will NOT vote for any of this ridiculousness.  Solve the problem, if you can.  Crazy people with weapons.  Don't throw a sheet over a dog and call it a ghost so you can scare people into taking your viewpoint. That is brainwashing and coercion. Didn't their parents teach them any better?  The real truth is, this is just a ploy by the Obama administration to add another, "Notch" to their belts. Â
Â
Worse yet, where is this $500 million going to come from? Â Obviously we don't have the money for this. Â So where? Â It has to come from somewhere. Â We are already in debt Trillions, I say vote out ANY new legislation that calls for dollars not already available.
Â
It's not rocket science. Â You cannot spend more than you take in continually and eventually not, "Pay the price." Â This administration needs to recognize that before they run this country right into the ground.
Congress needs to start blackballing any new bills or legislation that calls for additional revenue.Â
Â
CUT spending, not INCREASE. Â This is simple business practice.
Â
I am outraged at anyone that votes or condones this type of stupidity.
Â
Something I forgot to address.
One of the authors of the 10 round clip limitation recently stated on video that, since hunters are limited to 5 round magazines, why would anyone need more? The simple answer, Deer don't shoot back!
If all of these things where put into place 3 months ago do you really think that it would have stopped Sandy Hook? Remeber those guns where legal till he killed his mom and stole the weapons to go on a rampage...
Our politicians in DC are embarassing! They think, for what ever reason, that preventing law abiding citizens from owning certain weapons or accessories (large clips) will magically prevent criminals from commiting crimes. HELLO, they're commiting crimes, do you really think they care? All this legislation does is create more victims, since citizens are deprived of the means to defend themselves and tell the criminals that they won't encounter any armed resistance.
I noticed how, during the Clackamas Town Center shootings, the press downplayed the effect a private citizen with a Consealed Carry Permit had in ending the shootings, I suppose it's inconvenient for the agenda at hand.
I also wonder if the Nation's Police Officers will have to give up their Baretta's (Standard Military Issue) or Clock's that always hold more than 10 rounds?
Wow, 510 comments in such a short time. Free speech, isn't it great! First Amendment in the Bill of Rights. Everyone who's willing to accept limits on this right please delete all comments and posts. Cancel your Facebook and twitter accounts. Don't even think about attending any protest marches. Keep your opinions to yourself. If you give up one right you must be willing to give up all. Just because it hasn't happened doesn't mean it can't. Bend over for Barry and Joe.
AR dose not stand for Assult Rifle its stands for ArmaLite the company that sold the rights and design to Colt.
A "clip "Â is not a magazine
A clip clip is a device that is used to store multiple rounds of ammunition together as a unit, ready for insertion into the magazine or cylinder of a firearm
A magazine is built into or is detachable from the weapon used to store the ammo
Â
The more you know
This comment has been deleted
Its called education / information something that the news like to leave out. Thats all. Nothing pro or anti gun. People will chose to belive what is already in their mind and no talking will fix a closed mind.
Having been a student that has been thru and witness a school shooting, google Garddard Kansas, nothing compared to whats happed but it happened and I was there. I know from my personnal experanice that there was a lot of information and misinformation being left out and out right ignord by the media and that created alot of fear.
Fear is what we are seeing from BOTH sides.
Now for a little reality:  Have you read âThe Art of Warâ? Â
Read it in context with the current state of events.  Itâll open your eyes.  Itâs going âby the bookâ.
With children on stage during his shot at glory - abhorrence at its finest!! Good Lord, using children to make some kind of statement is about as low as a politician can sink that does not have a real case to make and relies on emotions. Yup, yup and I was a sheriff and a marshal and every gun I used while on duty that I still own will be illegal in New York in 12 months - the beginning of the next revolution and The Kenyan set-up the governor big time...
There is deff. stink rising from Washington D.C.
Just looked at all 23 newly minted executive orders. Most of them are just telling various agency and organizations to do their jobs. Oh, and here is $5 billion (PBS) out of petty cash to do it.
Â
The most objectionable parts require an act of Congress. Good luck with that.
Â
0bama isn't just a tax and spend guy. He wants to be a tax spend and have Congress ban things guy.
Â
NY may have passed a virtual gun ban, but according to the Oregonian our democratic government leaders will follow, but not lead on more strict gun control measures.
 @WebFootSTi Today wall all about saving face. He wanted to pass all kinds of gun bans, but found that he didn't have the support he needed. Today's EOs were just about making people believe he was actually doing something.
 @HuskyKMA  @WebFootSTi Studies, funding, and letters of clarification.... yawn. Wait till 2014... I sense a change in the Senate...
None of this is going to make it through Congress and Obama knows it.
 @HuskyKMA But he'll do a foot stomping, saying how "hard he tried" and how "Congress is so devisive".
Â
Meanwhile... what fiscal cliff? What debt ceiling? How about all those jobs he created?
He is setting up the argument of those dirty republicans...
I was in the Military, I have owned an Assault Weapon, I see no reason to own one or anything with a high capacity magazine. They are not legal to hunt with, ammo is too expensive and I really do not need a Penis Extension.
 @swede760  Exactly Right.  They aren't legal to hunt with - but great defense.   An XM-214 Micro takes care of the perimeter and a sawed-off 12 G takes care of closer.  Outside the house I like the 18 ", inside, the 10 " is fine.  With the XM (@ $3 a shot) a 2 foot tree doesn't help 'em and at 4,000 rounds a minute it only takes a second.   (Of course then I have to sell the car.)  ;-) ;-)Â
 @swede760 How big is it? Most guys like to extend at least a little.... ;)
 @AmiM Most men like women with large breasts and small, you know what because mosty men have big mouths and small Penises. I have no need or desire to brag or posture and I am certainly happy with what I have and have had no complaints. This is a question that can only be answered in person to the right person.
 @DadInPDX :snork:: Naw, just hijacking the thread and having a laugh. Certainly enough stuff on this thread to cry over. :(Why do you need 10 Ferraris? Are they just really, er, small?
 @swede760  @AmiM Wow... trolling for dates on Livefyre??? *facepalm* Now I've seen it all.
Â
PS: I'm on the internet! I have 10 Ferraris!
 @swede760 Um, yes it is legal to hunt with semi-automatic rifles, and yes it is legal to hunt with 30rd standard capacity magazines. And while you may be too poor to afford the ammo, not all of us are.
I know it is legal to hunt with Semi Automatic but it is not legal to hunt with Full Automatic is it? Also I would love to see you explain why you have 30 Rounds of Ammo when Hunting to a Wildlife Officer. You can use the Mag but you can olny have 5 Rounds in it. What Moron is going to hunt with a 30 Rd Mag when you can olny have 5 rounds? Also I prefer more refined weapons, I believe in One Shot One Kill no matter what I shoot at, I would be just as happy with a single shot rifle as an Automatic. Like I said before, I do not need a Penis Extension, maybe you do but not me.
 @theprodigal And a single 12ga with Buck would have torn him in half. That is Stopping Power. She had a .38
 @cpt.iceman Hey Cpt. 82-87 The law has Never stopped people from getting Automatic weapons or from modifying Semi Autos into Full Autos. You can legaly possess and fire fully automatic weapons but you have to pay a very hefty tax to do it. One private Machine Gun Owner I know of is Ted Nugent and he owns a bunch of them.
 @DadInPDX Seriously, in 82 they were called the M16, the TOW Gunship I served on was an M151A2 1/4Ton Jeep, we did not have the Humvee yet. Also to qual expert is no more than saying you are very proficient. My one shot one kill philosophy comes from hunting and also the fact that the TOW1 had a range of 2000m where the Soviet T72 had a 3000m Range, you would never get a second chance. I was raised hunting and told never to pull the trigger unles you are sure you will make the hit you want. Now as far as combat goes I thank God I have never seen it, lots of my friends have and we were all taught by the Military that it is better to wound your enemy than kill them because it ties up more personell. Assault weapons are designed to do just that, wound not kill. For self defense I would rather have stopping power than multiple rounds flying.
 @DadInPDX Service Dates 1982-1987 Basic/AIT Fort Benning, Sandhill, MOS 11H, M151A2 Mounted TOW, Rube Launched Optically tracked Wire Command Link Guided. OMA Military Achademy OCS 1986, Camp Withycomb.
The real thing, with real TAC officers and real Demerits and Very Real Training. I do not play Video Games, if you can't do the real thing Stay Home!
@swede760 @Nocturnal Daydreamer "One round should suffice or one for each tresspasser". In a self defense situation, a person doesn't always have the time needed to take an aimed shot. Being that you were in the military, you should know that. Or have you never been in a fire fight?
Â
Still on the "one for each tresspasser" thing, did you not read about the mother who shot an intruder five - yes, FIVE - times and the intruder was still able to walk away?
Unless you have a FFL then you can NOT(NOT) Have or Poss. a Fully Automatic Firearm. As per the 1939 law was inacted.... When did you say you served swede760??? If you served then you know this what I just posted. We are not talking about fully Auto's.........
 @swede760  @Nocturnal Daydreamer Um... When did you go through BMT & AIT? Not Call of Duty or anything... but real, live basic?
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer  @swede760 I kinda pegged him for a troll when he talked about qualifying as expert in TOW and LAW rockets. Not sure what MOS he was, but I'll be damned... I couldn't see anything about qualifying as an expert in either.  Not sure they last time they called it an M16 either... it's mostly the M4 now. ;)
Â
I love "Keyboard Commandos".
 @swede760 Â
Both.
 @swede760 Good Lord, I could not read all of it. We use AR-15's with 20-30 magazines to kill coyotes, rabbits, Richardson ground squirrels, prairie dogs, wood-chucks, turkeys and illegals in Montana, where have you been all your life??
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer Not a troll just experienced in self defense and weapons. Yes in a fire fight of course an assault weapon is the way to go but the chances of ever being in a large scale fire fight at your home are about zero unless you are doing something illegal. I am sure that one 12 ga round is more than enough for most cases of self defense in the home and way less chance of rounds going through walls. The effective range of an M16 is 600 meters, when are you going to need to defend yourself from 600 meters? Never you would go to jail for murder, most self defense situations are extreme close range where an assault weapon is not the most effective. You would be much better off defending your home with an old shotgun than a rifle. That is common sense. Also you think I am not Insulted by these pathetic efforts to refute common sense?
Â
 @HuskyKMA OK what else and where is a 30 round mag legal to hunt with? I feel sorry for you if you need 30 rounds to bring down a whole Squirrel.
 @swede760Â
Anyone, especially prior-service knows that it unfortunately often takes more then one round. You are a troll. That is all.
Â
More insults prove it.
 @swede760  @Nocturnal Daydreamer WHAT??? And just where did THAT come from??Â
Â
"Anyone who KNOWS Weapons does not need full auto or a 30 round Mag for defense. One round should suffice or one for each tresspasser."
Â
This classifies YOU as an utter FOOL. Who knows DICK about weapons.
Â
And just what is your obsession with penises? That's it, just another fool to ignore. Bye bye...
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer Well then according to your logic you should have the right to have a Tank in your front yard, how about Land Mines, maybe a Mortar or two, Claymores anyone? Anyone who KNOWS Weapons does not need full auto or a 30 round Mag for defense. One round should suffice or one for each tresspasser. Are you afraid of 30 people attacking you at once? I am right about the Penis extension part and you guys are just embarrassed, or you are PARANOID AND SHOULD NOT HAVE A WEAPON, Whaaa!
 @swede760 Oh, but I did. The response you just read was posted PRIOR to your response above (if you were to able to scan a page - how did you qualify???). But nice attempt. Now how about responding to MY response above?? (hint look UP...)
 @NotAChance Uh maybe if you could focus enough to read the other replies yes I did answer in detail. If you are not able to spot that how can you feel qualified to send rounds down range?
 @swede760 ODFW only allows 30rd mags for squirrel. But we're not talking about Oregon, we're talking about national laws.
 @swede760 I don't hunt. No need for a weapon to hunt animals with. You still haven't answered the question.  And which "assault" weapon did you own?
 @NotAChance Yep, sure am, it is called Common Sense. I used to shoot competition in the military. I am very serious about the lack of need for a repeating rifle.
 @HuskyKMA Tell me what Game does ODFW allow hunted with a 30 round Mag? I would love to know? What maybe Vermin like rats and gophers? You really need a 5.56mm to kill those? I stand by my Penis Extension comment, maybe you should try something else to boost your self esteem.
 @swede760 You're focussing too much on big game hunting. People hunt other animals as well.
 @swede760 And I now I think you're full of it.Â
 @swede760 And which "assault" weapon did you own?
AA Arms AP 9 9mm Assault Pistol with 20 Round Mag. I would not advise owning one, piece of crap. In the Military I also carried an M16, 1911, qualified on the M60, Ma deuce, M203 Grenade Launcher, Law Rocket, TOW Wire Guided Anti Tank Missile, and all the supporting weapons normally issued. BTW all mentioned I qualified expert in. My favofite Shotgun is the Remington Model 50 and my favorite plinker is the Ruger 10/22. I do know my weapons and I do have common sense.
 @boned Sir you have my thanks and respect, if more people knew what these weapons are capable of in the hands of the wrong people they would not be so hot to own them. I realize that we can not outlaw them and never will but is this where it stops or should we be able to buy Hand Grenades and Land Mines? For self defense of course.
I stand corrected.
Â
 @boned  @swede760 Well, my hats off to you Boned. Thank you.
 @swede760  @NotAChance Wrong. M16 vs AR15 is significantly different. In fact, you wouldn't be able to put the FCG from an M16 into an AR.
 @swede760 I hated the 90mm recoil-less and have the scars to prove it along with several AK rounds and am missing parts of my internals. Please step-up and quit being a pansy, OK? My M-60 saved more than a few American lives and I will never doff my hat to The Kenyan...
 @NotAChance an AR 15 is an M16 with a different Selector Switch. The M16 IS an Assault Rifle issued by the US Military since Vietnam and anyone with any real brains can fabricate a Full Auto Selector Switch. You may be right on technicality but wrong overall. The AR is NOT a Hunting rifle.
 @swede760 All right then, you should know that an AR-15 (which all the hoopla is about), is NOT classified as an assault weapon, regardless of whatever the media talking heads attempt to imprint you with, correct?
 @swede760 And just where were you when it wasn't legal to varmint hunt with "said" weapon? Weird, this wasn't a full automatic was it?Â
Â
Oh, and I note ormom jumped RIGHT ON your comment with a Like. So shocked...LOL...