Selling a house? It's a seller's market right now in Portland

PORTLAND, Ore. - Low inventories continue to plague Portland’s residential market, with one broker forecasting a “severe seller’s” market continuing into spring.
Nick Krautter of Keller Williams Realty said the combination of few new listings coupled with strong buyer activity promises to keep the inventory of homes low in the coming months.
Every Portland neighborhood is affected by low inventories, which is measured in terms of how many months the current number of homes would last given demand. The market is balanced when the inventory level is at six months.
Downtown Portland, with a 5.8-month inventory, is the only market that comes close to favoring buyers.
Other markets are marked by extremely low inventories:
- Overlook 0.4 months
- Sellwood/Eastmoreland 0.9 months
- Irvington/Grant Park 1.0 months
- Ladds/Hawthorne 1.1 months
- Piedmont/Concordia 1.1 months
- Foster/Powell/Brentwood 1.1 months
- Rose City Park/Hollywood 1.3 months
- Beaverton 1.5 months
- Kerns/Laurelhurst 1.6 months
- Arbor Lodge/Kenton 1.6 months
- East and West Cully 1.7 months
- St. Johns 1.9 months
- West Hills/Goose Hollow 2.2 months
- Gresham 2.6 months
- Vancouver 2.7 months
- Multnomah Village/Southwest 3.1 months
- Nob Hill/Northwest 3.9 months
- Happy Valley 4.3 months
----
More from the Portland Business Journal: A word with New Seasons' new boss
The Portland Business Journal is a KATU.com news partner
The new lower price equals sellers market in the "new economy". Marketing shills at it again. Wait until you can no longer take the interest as a tax deduction. This will really heat up the sellers market! I see more empty houses now than in anytime in the last 50 years. Please explain.
Well, in Clark County a broker will find a place, hype it up with a very low selling price and then sit back and wait for all fools that get caught-up in a bidding war and end up paying way more than the place is worth. You don;t think that is going on over in the PDX Area do you??
"New Price" per the sign certainly doesn't mean the price has gone up. Sellers normally don't need to reduce prices in a "sellers" market.
Wow, a broker trying to manipulate the market? Say it ain't so!
Don't forget where the info is coming from. Â A real estate broker. Â They will tell you anything to sell a home. Â Heck, just before home sales plummeted in 2008, they were telling everyone that the drops in prices had bottomed out and we all should be buying. Â A short time after that, the bottom completely fell out and hasn't recovered.
Of course, the sellers are taking a big hit. Â This is a good time to buy because the prices are at a all time low. Â Just be careful about short sales. Â They can be a good way to go sometimes, but more than likely, it will bring nothing but frustration unless you are very very patient and lucky. Â If you can, get a real estate company and sales person that won't screw you over. Â They are so desperate now that they will tell you anything you want to hear and many times it will be nothing but lies.Â
there are so many brand new and nice apartments in the area with vacancies but the rents are just plain ridiculous.
Something is going on. Property values don't seem to be rising with demand yet, but, we're in the market right now and a house that we found which had been up for 90 days without any interest suddenly has a bunch of people bidding on it.
Â
Â
I just bought a house and I can testify to the truth of this article. I looked for 3 months and in that time I saw prices rise and inventory drop dramatically. I checked new listings twice a day and I can tell you some houses were selling before I could even get out to look at them. I think I bought at exactly the right time.
 @ormom You did, indeed, buy at exactly the right time. Those who had the means to take advantage of the opportunity are doing just fine with this economy. For others it's been a matter of timing but it's certainly not too.
It's a seller's market in certain parts of Portland. Overall, the cost of housing in Portland has not dropped like it has in other parts of the country. It's still overpriced. Way back in the old days, they use to tell you that you could afford a house that was 2.5 times your income. So, if you were making 7,500 in 1972 (a decent wage for one person but not an extraordinary wage at the time) you could afford a house for 18,750. And, the thing is, you could find a decent house in a decent neighborhood for that cost - maybe not new but still in good condition. Nowadays, using the same criteria (house cost 2.5 times salary), even if you were lucky to find a decent house in a decent neighborhood for as low as $150,000, you would have to make $60,000 per year as a single person. So, already, the house isn't affordable to many single people because they aren't making that much money. What happened over time seems that instead of houses being kept at reasonable prices, the banks lowered standards for borrowing so that people could buy houses they really couldn't afford. That drove the costs of houses higher as there was an artificial demand to purchase houses. Now, look at where you can get a less expensive house in Portland (and to me, less expensive means under $100,000) and you will usually find it is either located in a bad area like "felony flats" or that the house is extremely small or not in good shape. Also, Portland seems to have this quirky thing going on where they count all the square feet they possibly can to make it seem like the house has more space than it does. In other states, the square feet of the house is the actual footprint of the main floor - not the attic, not the basement, not the enclosed back porch like they seem to include here.
 @BarbÂ
Â
The reason why is the footprint of houses in Portland is very small.
Â
Take a bedroom. To be a bedroom it needs only to be 100 square feet. That's it. No closet, no drawers, and if it is "grandfathered" in, not even a window.
Â
Two of those are not uncommon in many single family past-ward dwellings. That and a 90 square foot bathroom, plus a 250 square foot living room, and 200 square foot kitchen and you have described every house on my block.
Â
So people include "sun porches" decks, unfinished basements, crawlspace attics and even uncovered porches.
Â
Because who wants to bother to go look at a 750 square foot home with two small rooms when you can look at a 1500 square foot home with two bedroom and two "bonus" rooms.
Â
And to think the previous mayor wanted to INCREASE house density.
Â
I think its a sellers market if you have a home in those highly desired areas; I think the threshold would be anything below the 1.5 months shown (these homes would sell easily). After that you are comparing something like Beaverton to St. Johns and both are unreasonable places to live due to a variety of factors.
Â
I still walk by this foreclosed home in my neighborhood every day on the way to the bus and it is unoccupied, not on the market, and is owned by the bank. It looks like crud and no one is taking care of it and its appearance. This house is surely for sale if anyone wants it but its not in any kind of shape to inhabit.
Oh and this house is located at a highly desireable location...Alameda neighborhood.
 @portlandborn83 Is it that funky-looking sort of gabled house? It looks pretty sketchy on the inside. I saw it listed online and looked at photos. Needs a complete remodel of the interior. Foreclosed houses are often deliberately trashed on the inside.
@Playanekes There's a yellow house on 33rd that I am talking about...
its another way to start another housing bubble .The banks have not released the 1.5 million foreclosures on the market causing the prices to rise . In california there are 25 to 50 offers on homes this is what got us in trouble and it looks like its taking hold againÂ
Anyone willing to live a little further south can take their pick from hundreds of houses at discounts of 25-40% below the peaks. It's like that whiny article a few moths ago about how there weren't any apartments in the Pearl that the average barista could afford. Apartment complexes around here are giving people a month free.
 @david_42Â
Â
Thing is, they are talking about houses, not apartments.
Â
I don't know the current occupancy rate of apartments, but in my area there are so few houses that have people in them I am afraid squatters are going to start getting really bad.
Â
Like that group yesterday that got caught in that house fire where those boys helped get them out. That was 5 blocks from my home. If that was next door to me, my house would be at risk. The two homes are only about 5 feet apart.
Â
Â
More hype from the Realtors. There are tons of EMPTY houses that are not on the market. Once those hit prices will drop again. It may be a sellers market today but it is artificial.
Bologna.
Â
There are three empty houses ON MY STREET. One has been trying to sell for two years and once again lowered he price (now $105,000 LESS than she paid and that is what I BOUGHT my house for next door).
Â
I noticed they put Powell, Foster and Brentwood together. That's from the 6000 block (Powell) to the 9000 block (Johnson's Creek). From 60th (6000 block), out to the cit limits (120000 block). Those are Powell-Foster, Lents, Glenwood, Brentwood, Darlington, Scott, Woodstock, Creston, Arleta, Kern, Bloomington, West MT Scott, Gilbert and Southgate neighborhoods all in one.1800 Square blocks or nearly half of the SE side.
Â
From working class (Foster-Powell Mt Scott and Arleta), to poorer areas (Brentwood-Darlington and Lents) and even out SE (Bloomington and Gilbert).
Â
And I go back to my opening statement. People on my street can't sell their homes. So if it's a seller's market, it is CERTAINLY not a seller's market on my street.
Â
I would expect a glut once housing prices recover. I know of 2 houses on my street (there's only 10 houses) that are rentals because the prices dropped too low to sell.