Dozens interested in being Washington's pot consultant
TACOMA, Wash. (AP) - The job description requests an unlikely mix of skills: five years of regulatory experience, with a law degree preferred, and extensive knowledge of all things marijuana.
But that didn't stop dozens of people from turning out Wednesday - in flannel and suits, ponytails and hemp necklaces - to find out more about becoming Washington state's official marijuana consultant.
As officials figure out how to regulate the state's newly legal marijuana, they're hiring an adviser to fill in the gaps of the typical bureaucrat's education: how cannabis is best grown, dried, tested, labeled, packaged, regulated and cooked into brownies.
The Liquor Control Board, the agency charged with developing rules for the marijuana industry, reserved a convention center hall for a state bidding expert to take questions about the position and the hiring process.
"Since it's not unlikely with this audience, would a felony conviction preclude you from this contract?" asked Rose Habib, an analytical chemist from a marijuana testing lab in Missoula, Mont.
The answer: It depends. A pot-related conviction is probably fine, but a "heinous felony," not so much, responded John Farley, a procurement coordinator with the Liquor Control Board.
Washington and Colorado this fall became the first states to pass laws legalizing the recreational use of marijuana and setting up systems of state-licensed growers, processors and retail stores where adults over 21 can walk in and buy up to an ounce of heavily taxed cannabis.
Both states are working to develop rules for the emerging pot industry. Up in the air is everything from how many growers and stores there should be, to how the marijuana should be tested to ensure people don't get sick.
Sales are due to begin in Washington state in December.
Washington's Liquor Control Board has a long and "very good" history with licensing and regulation, spokesman Mikhail Carpenter said.
"But there are some technical aspects with marijuana we could use a consultant to help us with," Carpenter said.
The board has advertised for consulting services in four categories. The first is "product and industry knowledge" and requires "at least three years of consulting experience relating to the knowledge of the cannabis industry, including but not limited to product growth, harvesting, packaging, product infusion and product safety."
Other categories cover quality testing, including how to test for levels of THC, the compound that gets marijuana users high; statistical analysis of how much marijuana the state's licensed growers should produce; and the development of regulations, a category that requires a "strong understanding of state, local or federal government processes," with a law degree preferred.
Farley said the state hopes to award a single contract covering all four categories, but if no bidder or team of bidders has expertise in all fields- regulatory law, statistical analysis and pot growing - multiple contracts could be awarded. Or bidders who are strong in one category could team up with those who are strong in another. Bids are due Feb. 15, with the contract awarded in March.
Habib, the chemist, said she's part of a team of marijuana and regulatory experts from Montana who are bidding for the contract. They're fed up with federal raids on medical dispensaries there.
"We want to move here and make it work. We want to be somewhere this is moving forward and being embraced socially," she said.
Khurshid Khoja, a corporate lawyer from San Francisco, wore a suit and sat beside a balding, ponytailed man in a gray sweatshirt - Ed Rosenthal, a co-founder of High Times magazine and a recognized expert on marijuana cultivation. They're on a team bidding for the contract.
"I've seen the effect of regulation of marijuana all my life," Khoja said. "I'd like to see a more rational, scientific approach to it."
Several people asked whether winning the contract, or even subcontracting with the winning bidder, would preclude them from getting state licenses to grow, process or sell cannabis. Farley said yes: It would pose a conflict of interest to have the consultant helping develop the regulations being subject to those rules. But once the contract has expired, they could apply for state marijuana licenses, he said.
After the questions ended, the bidders mingled, exchanging business cards and talking about how they might team up. One Seattle-area marijuana grower, a college student who declined to give his name after noting that a dispensary he worked with had been raided by federal authorities in 2011, approached Rosenthal star-struck.
"It would be my dream to smoke a bowl with you after this," he said.
Marijuana is for losers.
I'd like to nominate Snoop Dogg
Could ya let me know when they need a frying pan consultant? Looking for only a pot consultant is a bit biased, no?
From the picture I though they were casting "The Grinch who stole Marijuana".
Only "dozens" are interested? Â I'd think there'd be a line around the block for that position.
Bill Clinton has a law degree but he didn't inhale.
 @Pointblank I figure any time someone drags my buddy Bill Clinton into a totally-unrelated comment, they're suffering BlowieEnvy.  Say it ain't so. Â
I have a friend that knows more than this guy. He is actually a genius when it comes to growing, and does not look like a dirty bird.  Dude, show some class, at look like you showered.
This comment has been deleted
Actually Jeff Spicoli is still in the running.
 @gunnutz HAHA!!
Â
First of all I do not feel Washington went the right way in legalizing to be controlled by the ATF and should of went for full decriminalization so that it would not be regulated as alcohol is. This is a medicinal and recreational plant. It is a natural occurring herb that grows like a weed on this earth and everyone who would like to use it should not have to jump through Government hoops to get to it. By legalizing it and controlling it as alcohol Wash. just gave the federal government ownership and control for producing and making profit off a plant that should be free to grow, consume, use for medicine or recreationally as any other God given herb bearing seed. This is just asking for a lot of trouble in the long run. I do not see this going well. Cannabis is STILL illegal in the sight of the US FEDERAL GOVERNMENT and the UNITED NATIONS. How is that going to work out? I don't see the Feds just allowing this to happen with hopes that all goes well with the state's plan. And as far as a "pot" consultant for the Liquor Commission...lmao! No way, as a private cannabis consultant would I want the job. It feels like being set up to take a fall for failure before even being appointed. I look at how well the Government takes care of its' programs already and I just say NO to them controlling my medicine or any other plant growing in my garden. Cannabis should be taken seriously as medicine even it is to re "create" your state of well being. It is not the joke it has been presented to us as for just over 100 years of its' criminalization. It needs to be decriminalized and I unfortunately I do not see any long term good from the legalization and would not want a position with any of this and am completely over qualified to be a "pot" consultant and have the business background but would not want to be the patsy when this all blows up.
Whoopi Goldberg wants the job.
The only job where if you fail the drug test, you get the job......we have  come a long ways BABY !!
 @bat54 I had thought about the irony if the state of WA required a drug test prior to employment with them for such positions.Â
 @MarkKpic  @bat54 The state will support ANYTHING as long as they make a cut:  Alchohol, gambling, tobacco, soon pot...why not throw in prostitution..
Could Sammy Adams be nominated for the position? Â
@jpk No, he confuses bong and dong.
The state is acting like a bunch of bureaucrats when they should be acting like businessmen.Â
Â
Weed is a guaranteed profit center and it will have guaranteed customers...all the same factors and reasons that the state demanded to be in the alcohol business and take their cut. duh!
Â
The State shouldn't be hiring one guy they should be hiring as many as they can. Hire the bakers, and the growers, the cloners, the trimmers, and the guys who know how to refine and make quality hash. And, pay them well.
Â
It is just good business sense to drain the competitive market of the best competitive producers and to develop a robust and interesting market.Â
Â
Let these 'professionals' produce for the state and pay them well and let them smoke some weed but, like any illicit organization, if they are caught selling on the side or competing then they are cut off for life.
Â
Sure the state could make money selling a generic brand of one kind of weed but as soon as one guy finds that it isn't at par with the local peddler and more expensive....everybody will know.Â
Â
The state needs to establish regional grow facilities across the state each specializing in particular varieties of plant and exploiting the clones of already established growers. Stop worrying about non-issues like goods leaving the state...it's stupid....everybody comes to Oregon to shop tax-free and nobody pays the state tax on the way back to Washington.
Â
The only guys that are capable of screwing this perfect business model, this sure thing, this guaranteed profit monster up are the bureaucrats running the show....10:1 they figure out a way to do it...because they're bureaucrats and that's what they do. If they can't talk it to death then they can damn sure run it so badly that they need tax payer support, and if that doesn't kill it then they'll make a scandal of it. They're bureaucrats that's what they do.
Â
Give me $5M in start up capital and I'll return $50M in two years....guaranteed. Give me $50M and I'll return $500M in four years.
 @Icarus Right now, the Feds are playing 'no news is good news', and letting WA and CO move forward. What I'm really wondering is if they're going to wait until the states begin to see taxes and  revenue generated, then come in and seize it all, and go after the dealers and growers under RICO statutes. Kinda the reason that I'm taking more of a wait and see approach to it. Look what they've done in states with medical MJ programs.Â
Â
It is still against federal law to possess, grow or use MJ. The DEA & DOJ would be within their charter and federal code to do such a thing.Â
Mark, there are a lot of federal laws that the present Aministration chooses not to enforce. Don't hold your breath on them enforcing any of this, until they find out how many Dem votes it will cost them!
 @MarkKpicÂ
Â
Sell bonds with a high rate of return to finance the capital improvements but at a small maximum investment that expires if the Feds bust it. Then the maximum number of citizens would be motivated to see that it works and low risk for the State general fund.
 @Icarus You should have applied...
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer  ;-)
@Icarus
 Didn't, I'll bet, because, "No winner rides a green horse."
--Old jockey's saying
(Green, of course, meaning a horse never ridden.)
As evidence of my claim that the bureaucrats will screw it up...look at what happened to the Liquor Control Board. It was run so badly that the citizens of Washington, the Tax payers, the Customers, the drunks, ended it. The people voted to eliminate that bureaucracy because it was so badly run and costly and added absolutely no value to the product, in fact, that agency was a drain.Â
Â
But, those same bureaucratic losers just hung around the backdoor like a so many feral cats meowing for government cream because they won't chase mice. And, the government gave them this guaranteed profit center and cushy government job to manage the legal sale and distribution of MJ as the people asked. And, these bureaucrats are humming and hawing and worrying about the possibility of fly speck in the pepper.
Â
Washington should be the envy of every state in the Union but this sure thing profit center for the state is almost guaranteed to turn into a cluster fister flock that drains money from the people simply because the responsibility for it was placed into the hands of numbnutz.  Already the boners are wringing their hands confused as to who they can find to manage it for them.Â
Look what happens when you smoke too much pot.
@sortbait That was quite funny, but he just looks like your typical hippy. :)
cant wait til Oregon gets on board, and the feds actually listen to the people- legalize it.!!
I've been looking for ways to write off my Amsterdam trips as a business expense, I think I finally found a way.
 @deejm2112 Someone told me the don't sell to tourists anymore or are thinking about not selling to tourists anymore.  If that's true there is one less thing on my bucket list!
True!
However, I'm sure you could find someone to sell it to you for a pile of Euros. Where there's money to be made, they will make it at your expense.
Hint to the "prospective consultants" - this is like a business dealing with another business. Be professional. Wear a suit and tie, will ya? Even if you have to go buy one from Goodwill, chances are that you *might* get the job based on a better appearance level than the next guy - no matter what your qualifications are.Â
I wonder if they will drug test.
How did I know the weed guy was the one on the right?
 @old_dollor Is it because he looks like that mean old guy at Hogwarts?
 @Jumpin' Jehosophat  @old_dollor What's/where's Hogwarts?  Please don't say it's from one of those movies.......
 @Sundowner  It's a classic Whozit. Anymore little questions?
 @Jumpin' Jehosophat Now I'm curious -- what's your avatar? Â
 @Sundowner Just something I've heard about, you know . . . out back of the barn? <ahem>