High court won't hear case against Halliburton

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court has ruled out reviving lawsuits against Halliburton Corp. over insurgent ambushes that killed civilian truck drivers in Iraq.
In its order Tuesday, the court said it will not review a federal appeals court ruling that threw out suits filed by truckers and their families claiming that Halliburton and its former KBR Inc. subsidiary knowingly sent military supply convoys into danger on roads in the Baghdad area.
The attacks killed seven KBR drivers and injured at least 10 others in April 2004.
The appeals court said a federal law prohibits the lawsuits because it provides workers' compensation to civilian employees injured while under contract with defense agencies.
In its order Tuesday, the court said it will not review a federal appeals court ruling that threw out suits filed by truckers and their families claiming that Halliburton and its former KBR Inc. subsidiary knowingly sent military supply convoys into danger on roads in the Baghdad area.
The attacks killed seven KBR drivers and injured at least 10 others in April 2004.
The appeals court said a federal law prohibits the lawsuits because it provides workers' compensation to civilian employees injured while under contract with defense agencies.
http://www.compmanwc.com/
Civilian truck drivers that where imported from the US knew the risks.
This reminds me of and OHSU case.
Â
A doctor, made a significant mistake and a child needlessly died.
Â
Now under law the parents can either, sue the hospital for hiring this person, the doctor directly, or both. In Oregon, state law limits the liability for a state funded agency to $200,000 (at the time, the law is different now). Now OHSU is a state funded agency. So the parents chose to sue to doctor directly.
Â
Now federal law allows a hospital to claim the negligence on their behalf, in essence shielding the doctor who performed the act from direct suit. Thus if a doctor does something that is medically sound, the hospital can defend them to prevent that medical person from losing/increases in insurance and possibly going to another facility (who presumably will defend them in the future).
Â
OHSU did this.
Â
So the parents were written a check by OHSU for $200,000 and shown the door. They sued of the fairness of the law and that $200,000 was not punitive enough to prevent negligent malpractice (as this was even OHSU agreed).
Â
So here's Halliburton defending its subsidiary about lying to truckers who eventually lost their lives.
Â
I wonder what the max is for worker's comp in a death. $200,000?
Â
 @Repoman knowing the government probably $20.00