Kitzhaber sends Congress options for timber county funding

GRANTS PASS, Ore. (AP) — Gov. John Kitzhaber on Thursday gave members of Congress a menu of options for increasing logging on the so-called O&C timberlands in western Oregon to help rural counties shore up cash-strapped budgets and produce logs for local mills.
The governor said he hopes Oregon's congressional delegation will use the options to produce legislation resolving the funding problem for Oregon timber counties. They have struggled nearly two decades since logging cutbacks were adopted on federal lands to protect the northern spotted owl and salmon.
Kitzhaber said he thinks options from the report can be put together that respect conservation values and still produce more than $70 million for the O&C counties.
That amounts to about double their last payment under a safety net that is expiring, and about 10 times the amount they would get from a direct sharing of federal timber revenues. It is far short of the $110 million the counties have been shooting for.
The 94-page report was the product of three months of work by a taskforce put together by Kitzhaber that included representatives of timber counties, the timber industry, and conservation groups.
The report did not reach consensus on a specific proposal for the 2.5 million-acre patchwork of federal timberlands in Western Oregon and Klamath County.
But it did offer various options, including variations on a plan from three Oregon congressmen that would split the lands in two, with half going to a trust dedicated to timber harvest, and half to be managed for fish and wildlife habitat and clean water.
Members of Oregon's congressional delegation welcomed the report as useful.
"After looking over the materials, I'm optimistic," Democratic Rep. Peter DeFazio said in a statement. "The report confirms that there are shared goals and there is common ground among Oregon counties, environmentalists, and the timber industry."
Douglas County Commissioner Doug Robertson, who served on the taskforce and is president of the Association of O&C counties, said he was happy that the report included all options considered by the taskforce, including those that would produce $110 million for the counties while waiving environmental laws such as the Endangered Species Act.
"If these lands are not exempt in some way from some of the federal rules and regulations, the status quo will remain in place," he said. "The only meaningful change is going to be some modification that provides an opportunity to manage these lands for their stated purposes."
A bill on the O&C lands is likely to be attached to legislation being put together by Rep. Doc Hastings, R-Wash., to increase logging on national forests nationwide. Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore., a key player as chairman of the Energy and Natural Resources Committee, has said any bill would have to comply with existing environmental laws.
"A successful solution will balance economic, recreation and environmental interests, treat federal taxpayers, counties and private landholders fairly, and lay the foundations for growth in Oregon's O&C counties," Wyden spokesman Tom Towslee said in an email. "The governor's efforts have helped move the ball forward."
Andy Kerr, a conservation consultant and veteran of the 1990s court battles over the spotted owl, said there was no way to solve the funding problems faced by rural timber counties by increasing logging.
"To get the counties the revenue they need, you need to drive species into extinction and you need to pollute a lot of streams," said Kerr, who was not on the taskforce. "You also need a huge increase in funding from Congress to log at those levels. You need to resume logging old growth forests to generate enough revenues. Those things aren't going to happen."
Five conservation groups that did serve on the taskforce said in a joint statement that while all sides moved closer together, they failed to agree on important issues, such as protecting old growth forests, designing timber sales to improve ecological conditions, protecting key salmon habitat, complying with the Endangered Species Act, and protecting clean drinking water.
The American Forest Resource Council, a timber industry group, said the O&C lands have the potential to sustainably produce five times the timber they do now.
Since 1937, the 18 O&C counties have received half the revenues from timber cut on a patchwork of federal lands in Western Oregon that reverted to the federal government after the bankruptcy of the Oregon and California railroad.
The lands are managed by the U.S. Bureau of Land Management. When logging was booming in the 1970s, some counties did not have to charge property taxes.
Since cutbacks to protect the northern spotted owl and salmon, the payments dropped precipitously, forcing many of the counties to make deep cuts, particularly in law enforcement. Voters have refused to plug the gap with new taxes.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
Kitzhaber killed the Gillnet fleet and is now looking to find the pot of gold in other areas.His projects all are in the millions, yet the small businesses that he ruins limit the amount collected in taxes.Yet every news article he's included in has his hand in everyone's pocket. Doesn't he know that we've been in a recession for the last few years and no one has extra to give. Limit the spending,do something about PERS and lower the tax burden on every Oregonian.
they need to lay off some government staff that make hundreds of thousands of dollars... there is lot of them that just do nothing... i think after some lay offs we would have enough money in the state to cover important things... and we cant let logging start happening again
Kitzgrabber also sent Congress a menu to balance their incredibly bloated budget that unions have vowed to fight. Wait a second, Uncle John could care less about numerous lawsuits since us taxpayers get to foot the bill as long as he looks good in his make believe world...
How about Timber Counties use proceeds from Timber Sales for County Funding?
When the environmentalists convinced the government to put the timber industry out of business, the thousands who lost their jobs were promised that they would be retrained and everything would be OK. Â Twenty or so years later, the government admitted they lied and most who lost their jobs ended up in poverty. Â The worthless environmentalists didn't care and neither did the politicians. Â All in the name of a bird that is of no value to anyone, anywhere. Â When you have natural resources and refuse to use them, you are just admitting you are very stupid and the economy in the state of Oregon proves it.
Another failed attempt at county welfare. O&C revenues have been declining for years and been on the chopping block for decades. The counties that have relied on them have quietly ignored reality and failed to move in a different direction that is sustainable, even if it means raising taxes or cutting services or some combination thereof. It is long past time for these counties to find another game. There is no future in this one.Â
 @I812 Forests are a renewable resource.
@Jeepers So are fossil fuels. The question is not what is considered renewable. The questions is what constitutes a perpetually sustainable harvest. If you look at the size of the trees being harvested today versus those that were harvested in the past you can easily discern that the rate of harvest is unsustainable. Beyond that is the considerable environmental damage that will take decades, if not longer, to overcome.
This comment has been deleted
"nearly two decades since" If it can't be stopped two decades later, it will never be stopped. The Feds, now subsidizing poorly managed local government too.
"But it did offer various options, including variations on a plan from three Oregon congressmen that would split the lands in two, with half going to a trust dedicated to timber harvest, and half to be managed for fish and wildlife habitat and clean water."
Â
I'm always a bit aghast at the failure of so many 'experts' to recognize that it is possible to BOTH harvest an abundant and renewable resource (timber), and protect 'fish and wildlife habitat and clean water.'
Â
But, as with so many different issues today, it's difficult to manage any middle ground when both sides of the debate insist that any movement towards the middle is akin to failure of cause or message.Â
Â
Once again, SNAFU.Â
Back when the forests were shut down laying off thousands of workers was no big deal. Now that the state is running out of money logging is back in favor. Just more proof that it's all about the government at the expense of the working people.
Â
We can thank Nixon for the mess he created and put thousands of hard working people out of work.
Â
Government is running out of money. Soon they will have to make major cutbacks that will seriously impact everyone in the nation. It is inevitable and there is no way out of it.
Â
It really is the perfect financial storm.
@RalphCramden The government will (and should) have to cut back. The question will always be how politics influences the priorities chosen. Imagine if people have to be financially responsible for themselves and their offspring. What a concept.
 @I812 Â
Government has little choice in the matter. Money is running out in a time when we need more money and services for all those who are out of work.
Â
The MO of government is spend every dime they have so that there is nothing for the bad times. Now that we are close to another recession things will get even worse.
Â
The really sad part is that no one will learn from this and the whole process will be repeated in the future.
 @I812 Â
Government is being forced to cut back due to finances and I hope that it gets worse for them. Since government does not cut back spending on their own I welcome any recession that forces government to cut back.
Â
You are correct in that hard workers will find work. I have dozens of friends who were laid off and are working albeit at much lower wages, but they are working. Many are working under the table to avoid taxes which puts more in their pocket.
Â
Few learn from history one one reason. Every generation thinks they can do it better than the previous generation. The hubris is why we never seem to learn and is my main argument against evolution. If we were getting better we would have learned from the past. We are not getting better and keep doing the same stupid things over and over.
Â
Work ethic is a worthy goal, unfortunately that is not what is taught in schools or from the government who prefers handouts to working.
@RalphCramden Really good employees have little trouble finding or keeping a job regardless of the times. We don't need more hand out services. We need to teach people work ethics, how to prepare for the workforce, and how to look for a job. Our society is soft.
Â
Government has been spending with little restraint since the Great Depression. Except for the Clinton years, no recent administration has generated a budget surplus regardless of party affiliation.
Â
History is a great teacher but unfortunately few ever learn from history. They just keep repeating the same mistakes. Why? Because it is not politically expedient to make prudent and difficult decisions. Government rarely changes unless forced and that change is virtually always crisis driven.
Â
Â
Good luck with that! I'm sure the new nominee for Secretary of the Interior will jump on that proposal, but only to stomp it flat!