'Melrose Place' actress convicted of vehicular homicide

SOMERVILLE, N.J. (AP) - A former "Melrose Place" actress who was driving drunk when her SUV plowed into another car, killing a woman, was convicted Tuesday of vehicular homicide and jailed after her bail was revoked. She was acquitted of a more serious charge of aggravated manslaughter.
Amy Locane-Bovenizer, 40, had sought to shift blame for the fatal accident to a third motorist whose car she had rear-ended and who had been pursuing the actress, and also to the husband of the car accident victim for making what witnesses said was a slow turn in front of her SUV.
But the conviction on a charge of death by auto, also known as vehicular homicide, was as a matter of law a "rejection of that defense," Assistant Prosecutor Matthew Murphy said following the verdict.
Locane-Bovenizer's blood-alcohol level was nearly three times the legal limit when the crash occurred in 2010 on a dark two-lane road in Montgomery Township, in central New Jersey, according to evidence presented at the trial.
The defense did not dispute she was drunk, arguing only that she should not be held criminally responsible.
Locane-Bovenizer, who did not testify at the trial, appeared in 13 episodes of TV's "Melrose Place" and in movies including "Cry-Baby," ''School Ties" and "Secretary."
She faces five to 10 years in prison on the vehicular homicide count and must serve a minimum of 85 percent of that sentence without parole. She also faces three to five years in prison for her conviction on a second count of assault by auto, which stemmed from injuries she caused the husband of the woman killed in the crash. Sentencing was set for March 1; motor vehicle charges are also pending.
Helene Seeman, 60, was killed in the accident, and her husband, Fred Seeman, was seriously injured. He was turning their car into their driveway when Locane-Bovenizer's SUV slammed into them.
"This is a sad day for the Seeman Family. There were no winners declared by the verdict. There are only losers," Murphy said. "A husband lost his dear wife; his two children lost their mother; and Helene's mother lost her daughter. That loss can never be rectified by a verdict."
The trial began in early October, with more than 50 witnesses taking the stand. Murphy said the Somerset County prosecutor's office was committed to spend "whatever public funds were necessary to match the financial resources available to the defense team."
To prove her guilty of aggravated manslaughter, the prosecution had to show Locane-Bovenizer not only caused Seeman's death, but also that she did so under circumstances showing extreme indifference to human life and by acting recklessly.
A mother of two living in Hopewell Township and acting in community theater, Locane-Bovenizer had begun drinking the night of the accident at a cast party, testimony showed. Witnesses said she also drank at a barbecue she later attended with her family before leaving on her own.
The defense sought to place much of the blame on the accident on the third motorist, Maureen Ruckelshaus, who was pursuing Locane-Bovenizer after being rear-ended.
Ruckelshaus said she had told the clearly intoxicated driver to turn off her SUV, but that the woman drove off.
"I knew how drunk she was," Ruckelshaus testified. "My reaction was, 'Oh my God, I have to figure out a way to get her to pull over.'"
The defense portrayed Ruckelshaus as a vigilante who frightened the former actress by trying to grab her keys from the ignition and then giving chase. The defense said Locane-Bovenizer even offered Ruckelshaus her cellphone to call police.
Ruckelshaus denied reaching in for the keys. "I said, 'I don't want your cellphone. ... I want you to turn your car off,'" she testified.
Ruckelshaus followed the former actress for about four miles, with both going about the speed limit of 35 mph for most of the way until a car in front of them moved out of the way and Locane-Bovenizer accelerated to more than 50 mph just prior to the crash, according to evidence presented at the trial.
Amy Locane-Bovenizer, 40, had sought to shift blame for the fatal accident to a third motorist whose car she had rear-ended and who had been pursuing the actress, and also to the husband of the car accident victim for making what witnesses said was a slow turn in front of her SUV.
But the conviction on a charge of death by auto, also known as vehicular homicide, was as a matter of law a "rejection of that defense," Assistant Prosecutor Matthew Murphy said following the verdict.
Locane-Bovenizer's blood-alcohol level was nearly three times the legal limit when the crash occurred in 2010 on a dark two-lane road in Montgomery Township, in central New Jersey, according to evidence presented at the trial.
The defense did not dispute she was drunk, arguing only that she should not be held criminally responsible.
Locane-Bovenizer, who did not testify at the trial, appeared in 13 episodes of TV's "Melrose Place" and in movies including "Cry-Baby," ''School Ties" and "Secretary."
She faces five to 10 years in prison on the vehicular homicide count and must serve a minimum of 85 percent of that sentence without parole. She also faces three to five years in prison for her conviction on a second count of assault by auto, which stemmed from injuries she caused the husband of the woman killed in the crash. Sentencing was set for March 1; motor vehicle charges are also pending.
Helene Seeman, 60, was killed in the accident, and her husband, Fred Seeman, was seriously injured. He was turning their car into their driveway when Locane-Bovenizer's SUV slammed into them.
"This is a sad day for the Seeman Family. There were no winners declared by the verdict. There are only losers," Murphy said. "A husband lost his dear wife; his two children lost their mother; and Helene's mother lost her daughter. That loss can never be rectified by a verdict."
The trial began in early October, with more than 50 witnesses taking the stand. Murphy said the Somerset County prosecutor's office was committed to spend "whatever public funds were necessary to match the financial resources available to the defense team."
To prove her guilty of aggravated manslaughter, the prosecution had to show Locane-Bovenizer not only caused Seeman's death, but also that she did so under circumstances showing extreme indifference to human life and by acting recklessly.
A mother of two living in Hopewell Township and acting in community theater, Locane-Bovenizer had begun drinking the night of the accident at a cast party, testimony showed. Witnesses said she also drank at a barbecue she later attended with her family before leaving on her own.
The defense sought to place much of the blame on the accident on the third motorist, Maureen Ruckelshaus, who was pursuing Locane-Bovenizer after being rear-ended.
Ruckelshaus said she had told the clearly intoxicated driver to turn off her SUV, but that the woman drove off.
"I knew how drunk she was," Ruckelshaus testified. "My reaction was, 'Oh my God, I have to figure out a way to get her to pull over.'"
The defense portrayed Ruckelshaus as a vigilante who frightened the former actress by trying to grab her keys from the ignition and then giving chase. The defense said Locane-Bovenizer even offered Ruckelshaus her cellphone to call police.
Ruckelshaus denied reaching in for the keys. "I said, 'I don't want your cellphone. ... I want you to turn your car off,'" she testified.
Ruckelshaus followed the former actress for about four miles, with both going about the speed limit of 35 mph for most of the way until a car in front of them moved out of the way and Locane-Bovenizer accelerated to more than 50 mph just prior to the crash, according to evidence presented at the trial.
What a waste. Way back in the late 80's I saw a movie called Lost Angels that she was in and I thought she was just goegeous.
Wow, fleeing from one accident she caused and managing to cause a second accident while doing so, resulting in the death of someone. Surprised she did not get more time.
Typical liberal, nothing is her fault.
@Beergod well I guess your total lack of intelligent thought is completely your fault.
That's cause and effect for you. She took a risk and it cost someone else their life. The responsibility for that lies on her shoulders no matter which way you cut it. I hope she'll make the best of the next 10 years and come out of it with a better understanding rather than play the "poor me" act for the rest of her life. It's nice to see people own up to something and try and transcend it.
"The defense did not dispute she was drunk, arguing only that she should not be held criminally responsible."
Â
So in essence they are saying that it's okay to drive drunk and kill someone. Even in New Jersey they are not that stupid.
This comment has been deleted
 @HarryJukuÂ
Oregon is trying real hard to be like NJ in that NJ has some of the highest property taxes in the US and is one of the worst states for excessive debt and spending.
Sounds to me like NJ is a paradise of healthy/fit people and no pollution!  Except, I've been to NJ many times while living back east and know better.
then go back where you came from
@RalphCramden No, what I think they were saying is that she nor her intoxication casued the accident so she shouldn't be held criminally liable.
Â
I happen to agree, IF they could prove she wasn't the cause of the accident even in her drunken state.
 @Portlander29 Â
That's a good point but it is difficult to prove without another time line in the alternative universe.
Â
Juries are pretty tired of drunks involved fatalities and the deck was stacked against her from the start.
Â
Â
 @Portlander29  @RalphCramden That's really the best reason not to drive intoxicated. Even if they're hit by someone running a light, if they don't receive all of the fault, they're still going down. Why would people put themselves in that position?
She should have stuck to acting.
It's not her fault; the 12-Step religious AA cult says she is POWERLESS.
@August100 Oh shut up
In hindsight, it would have been best for Maureen Ruckelshaus to have grabbed the keys and then called the police. I doubt they would have charged her for taking the keys since the murderer was blitzed.
You know it is possible even when someone is drunk that an accident is indeed not their fault.
Â
Not saying that is the case here as I don't know much about it...but assuming just because someone is drunk an accident is their fault is ridiculous.
Not in the eyes of the law. If you're drunk, and you're involved in an accident,
and the evidence is produced in court that you were (oxymoron warning)
"LEGALLY drunk" then it's determined that you were not legally on the road,
and therefore, responsible. In other words, if you did not get in your car to
drive, if you stayed where you were, or took a cab, or had a friend drive you,
then the accident would not have happened. You had no legal right to be
on the road at the time you were Driving Under the Influence.
She showed an extreme indifference to human life and acted recklessly when she got into her car to drive drunk. No excuses.
Good to see a celeb is not above the law,
@kramr She is like what...G List?