Critics divided over Duchess of Cambridge portrait

LONDON (AP) - The Duchess of Cambridge seems to like her first official portrait, which is lucky for the artist. Many critics don't.
Paul Emsley's portrait of the former Kate Middleton shows the 31-year-old royal against a dark background, her lips pursed into a wry smile, with an ethereal light against her face and hair. Her pale complexion brings out the fine lines under the eyes, and the light adds a hint of silver to her rich brown hair.
Shortly after the portrait was unveiled Friday at the National Portrait Gallery in London, critics began grousing.
"It's a great, great opportunity missed," British Art Journal editor Robin Simon said. "The best thing you can say about it is that she doesn't actually look like that."
In a telephone interview, Simon said that Kate's nose was too large and that the painting drained the duchess of her sparkle.
Kate "transmits a sense of joie-de-vivre," he said. "This is dead, dead, dead."
Guardian arts writer Charlotte Higgins picked up on that theme, saying the portrait had a "sepulchral gloom" about it.
"Kate Middleton is - whatever you think of the monarchy and all its inane surrounding pomp - a pretty young woman with an infectious smile, a cascade of chestnut hair and a healthy bloom," she wrote in a post to her newspaper's website. "So how is it that she has been transformed into something unpleasant from the 'Twilight' franchise?"
Emsley told reporters at the opening that it was always going to be tough painting Kate, who sat for the portrait last year, before she became pregnant.
"A person whose image is so pervasive, for an artist it is really difficult to go beyond that and find something which is original," he said. "You have to rely on your technique and your artistic instincts to do that and I hope I've succeeded."
Royal portraits tend to veer between the staid and the controversial. Lucian Freud's 2001 portrait of Queen Elizabeth II remains a particularly notorious example, with some describing the heavy, severe painting of the monarch as deeply unflattering and others calling it groundbreaking.
In fairness to Emsley, some artists had praise for his work.
"I liked it, very much so," said Richard Stone, who has frequently painted members of the royal family. "So often with official portraits they can be rather stiff and starchy, but this has a lovely informality about it, and a warmth to it."
In any case, Emsley appeared to have won over his most important audience. Kate, who was with her husband, Prince William, at the gallery earlier Friday, called the portrait "just amazing." William liked it too, saying it was "absolutely beautiful."
Paul Emsley's portrait of the former Kate Middleton shows the 31-year-old royal against a dark background, her lips pursed into a wry smile, with an ethereal light against her face and hair. Her pale complexion brings out the fine lines under the eyes, and the light adds a hint of silver to her rich brown hair.
Shortly after the portrait was unveiled Friday at the National Portrait Gallery in London, critics began grousing.
"It's a great, great opportunity missed," British Art Journal editor Robin Simon said. "The best thing you can say about it is that she doesn't actually look like that."
In a telephone interview, Simon said that Kate's nose was too large and that the painting drained the duchess of her sparkle.
Kate "transmits a sense of joie-de-vivre," he said. "This is dead, dead, dead."
Guardian arts writer Charlotte Higgins picked up on that theme, saying the portrait had a "sepulchral gloom" about it.
"Kate Middleton is - whatever you think of the monarchy and all its inane surrounding pomp - a pretty young woman with an infectious smile, a cascade of chestnut hair and a healthy bloom," she wrote in a post to her newspaper's website. "So how is it that she has been transformed into something unpleasant from the 'Twilight' franchise?"
Emsley told reporters at the opening that it was always going to be tough painting Kate, who sat for the portrait last year, before she became pregnant.
"A person whose image is so pervasive, for an artist it is really difficult to go beyond that and find something which is original," he said. "You have to rely on your technique and your artistic instincts to do that and I hope I've succeeded."
Royal portraits tend to veer between the staid and the controversial. Lucian Freud's 2001 portrait of Queen Elizabeth II remains a particularly notorious example, with some describing the heavy, severe painting of the monarch as deeply unflattering and others calling it groundbreaking.
In fairness to Emsley, some artists had praise for his work.
"I liked it, very much so," said Richard Stone, who has frequently painted members of the royal family. "So often with official portraits they can be rather stiff and starchy, but this has a lovely informality about it, and a warmth to it."
In any case, Emsley appeared to have won over his most important audience. Kate, who was with her husband, Prince William, at the gallery earlier Friday, called the portrait "just amazing." William liked it too, saying it was "absolutely beautiful."
From the photographs I have seen of her I think she has a much warmer and freindly expression then what is depicted in the painting. The expression just isnt quite right !
I'm betting a new portrait will be done. That "smile" of hers makes her appear snooty, which she clearly isn't. Her eyes make her look sleepy (or doped up)...which she also clearly isn't. It's almost a look like..."ho hummm, here we go again" kind of look. Don't like it one bit. And I agree that the royals are being very diplomated and gracious in their assessment of this failed portrait.
She was probably way too kind to say anything not too nice about her portrait. She should have smiled as she always do. Can't help but noticed that one of her eyes is little larger that's all. Maybe she should get another new portrait while she is pregnant this year?
Totally a shame. Â It simply doesn't do her justice.
It does look like it might have been painted ten years from now and makes her look tired. Â But as long as she likes it, I suppose that's all that matters. Â (Although from what I've read about her, if she didn't like it, she's too kind to say so.)
To me, she's the most beautiful woman on earth. Why did he do this? She looks way older than her years in this portrait. Just because he took a lot of photos of her different expressions, doesn't mean that he should put them all in one painting. It's very bad.
Â
It makes her look puffy, smirky, and 20 years older. No good.
Damn, lighten the hair and it could be a nice cover for a Bananarama album. It's a cruel... cruel portrait...
For having such a beautiful model to work with, why did he make her look so constipated? She looks like she should be wearing one of those "I pooped today" tee shirts.
 @sebastian cervantes If she's constipated, it wouldn't make any sense for her to wear a shirt that said that....
He made her look like a man. It looks like her, only he made her uglier, her nose, cheeks and chin aren't that big. She must be sweet and gracious to pretend to like it.
For sure, where is her pretty smile, that is a smirk.
Not a fan of her mouth painted that way. She has a gorgeous smile, as kramr said, that it pains people to see this portrait done this way.
Â
Was it supposed to imitate Mona Lisa?
Â
Obviously the portrait is very well done,.... but she has such a pretty smile, I'd rather that was the portrait.Â
Â
but who knows, more of a straight face might be the way all the others have been done.
 @kramr I agree - I do wish her smile was there, but it could be that this is the typical way to do the photos. I really like her eyes in the portrait - they seem almost like a photograph rather than a portrait.
 @kramr Whoops, don't know why I said photos - I meant portraits.
She's pregnant. Pregnant women aren't supposed to be beautiful during that time.
 @JLO Pregnant women are always beautiful during that time.
 @Quaoptician  @JLO When a woman who is in her third trimester , naked and laying on her back , she looks just like Thanksgiving turkey about to slide into an oven. Unless of course she has a golden tan, then she looks ready for dinner.
@Quaoptician @JLO Amen!
 @JLO She sat for the portrait before she was pregnant.