Dem leader disowns 2 senators now working with GOP

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) - Two Democrats in the Washington state Senate abandoned their caucus Monday, vowing to work with Republicans to control the chamber and push conservative budgeting principles.
Democratic Sens. Rodney Tom of Bellevue and Tim Sheldon of Potlatch said the bipartisan cooperation would drive better policies. Under the new plan, Republicans will chair six committees, including the panel that controls the state budget, while Democrats will control another six committees. The parties will split control of three other panels, though Sheldon is on two of those committees.
"This is not about power. This is not about control," said Tom, who will rise to serve as the new majority leader. "This is about governing in a collaborative manner."
Democrats have a small majority in the Senate, controlling 26 of 49 seats. With the moves by Tom and Sheldon, Republicans effectively hold a 25-24 advantage.
Along with sustainable budgets, the lawmakers said they want to promote job growth, reform the education system, and hold state government accountable.
Sen. Ed Murray, the Democratic leader in the chamber, said in a statement that he doesn't believe the Republicans' "take-it-or-leave-it plan" is the right way forward.
"We recognize that any majority in the Senate will be an unstable one, and we are committed to forming a mutually agreed-upon way for Republicans and Democrats to work together," Murray said.
Meanwhile, the chairman of the Washington State Democrats disowned the two defecting senators.
Dwight Pelz said he's long viewed Sheldon as a Republican, but the party had invested money to re-elect Tom this year. Pelz says that won't happen again, and the party will draft a candidate to oust him next time.
"This is a decision by Rodney Tom to switch parties back again," Pelz said. "Rodney Tom is a Republican now."
Tom was initially elected as a Republican but switched parties in 2006. Pelz said he believes the latest move was simply a way for Tom to fulfill his personal ambitions.
Senate Republican Leader Mark Schoesler said the new approach is the sort of cooperation the people of Washington and the country want to see.
"I look forward to showing you that the Senate can put politics aside and provide a responsible, bipartisan approach to the coming session," Schoesler said.
Democrats comfortably control the state House. The new legislative session begins in January.
One Republican committee chair is Sen. Pam Roach, who was kicked out of her caucus two years ago because of accusations of mistreating staff. She was allowed back in this year during the Republican budget coup last year, but she is still barred from interacting with Senate staff.
Mike Hoover, a senior Republican attorney for the Senate, had sued the chamber earlier this year and said he was subjected to a hostile and abusive workplace because of Roach. Under a settlement announced in September, the Senate reaffirmed its sanctions against Roach.
Tom said that would change, and the Senate committee that handles personnel matters would lift sanctions against Roach. He declined to assess how that decision could impact the lawsuit settlement, but he said Roach has vowed to run the committee appropriately.
"She's going to act in a professional manner," Tom said. "She has served her two-year period, and I think it's time to move on."
Hoover, who now works for the House, declined comment.
___
AP Writer Rachel La Corte contributed to this report.
Democratic Sens. Rodney Tom of Bellevue and Tim Sheldon of Potlatch said the bipartisan cooperation would drive better policies. Under the new plan, Republicans will chair six committees, including the panel that controls the state budget, while Democrats will control another six committees. The parties will split control of three other panels, though Sheldon is on two of those committees.
"This is not about power. This is not about control," said Tom, who will rise to serve as the new majority leader. "This is about governing in a collaborative manner."
Democrats have a small majority in the Senate, controlling 26 of 49 seats. With the moves by Tom and Sheldon, Republicans effectively hold a 25-24 advantage.
Along with sustainable budgets, the lawmakers said they want to promote job growth, reform the education system, and hold state government accountable.
Sen. Ed Murray, the Democratic leader in the chamber, said in a statement that he doesn't believe the Republicans' "take-it-or-leave-it plan" is the right way forward.
"We recognize that any majority in the Senate will be an unstable one, and we are committed to forming a mutually agreed-upon way for Republicans and Democrats to work together," Murray said.
Meanwhile, the chairman of the Washington State Democrats disowned the two defecting senators.
Dwight Pelz said he's long viewed Sheldon as a Republican, but the party had invested money to re-elect Tom this year. Pelz says that won't happen again, and the party will draft a candidate to oust him next time.
"This is a decision by Rodney Tom to switch parties back again," Pelz said. "Rodney Tom is a Republican now."
Tom was initially elected as a Republican but switched parties in 2006. Pelz said he believes the latest move was simply a way for Tom to fulfill his personal ambitions.
Senate Republican Leader Mark Schoesler said the new approach is the sort of cooperation the people of Washington and the country want to see.
"I look forward to showing you that the Senate can put politics aside and provide a responsible, bipartisan approach to the coming session," Schoesler said.
Democrats comfortably control the state House. The new legislative session begins in January.
One Republican committee chair is Sen. Pam Roach, who was kicked out of her caucus two years ago because of accusations of mistreating staff. She was allowed back in this year during the Republican budget coup last year, but she is still barred from interacting with Senate staff.
Mike Hoover, a senior Republican attorney for the Senate, had sued the chamber earlier this year and said he was subjected to a hostile and abusive workplace because of Roach. Under a settlement announced in September, the Senate reaffirmed its sanctions against Roach.
Tom said that would change, and the Senate committee that handles personnel matters would lift sanctions against Roach. He declined to assess how that decision could impact the lawsuit settlement, but he said Roach has vowed to run the committee appropriately.
"She's going to act in a professional manner," Tom said. "She has served her two-year period, and I think it's time to move on."
Hoover, who now works for the House, declined comment.
___
AP Writer Rachel La Corte contributed to this report.
So they jumped ship - now what? Â does that mean they're embracing the opposite views? Â does this signal ANY change at all? Â No, of course not. Â
What it does tell us, at least regarding these two, is that they have no convictions worth keeping, no vision solid enough to support and no loyalty.
Â
How can anyone believe a single thing they say NOW? Â I mean, it sounds nice and all, switching to help serve the people rather than party affiliation, but if they're willing to get elected by supporting one platform, then jumping ship to support another, how can anyone believe them?
Their true colors surface.
It's a shame when you finally get to see the childish ways the political parties tend to operate with. Kind of elementary school playground behavior..... I believe we should totally abolish political parties! Make the politician actually have to earn thier position by doing the right thing. I vote based on what the individual has done in the past. And if they're main point is based on what party they belong to, then they will not get my vote.
Impressive use of common sense, who'd have thunk it.
Pardon me folks, as I am an Oregonian and not from Washington, yet the bigger issue here is I am a Centrist. I believe in voting for and supporting the ideals, measures, candidates that make sense regardless of Party. If some choose to take the Center, is totally ok by me (btw, taking the Center means voting for what folks feel regardless of Party Affiliation.)
Disowned is a funny sounding word. It makes it seem that they once owned the person.
Get rid of political parties, one group, one vote.
What? Politicians acting like representatives of the people instead of their party?
Â
Well, knock me over with a feather!
Surprising article. It has the democrats acting like mature adults and making a compromise to ensure a sound fiscal budget. It also has democrats acting like tantrum throwing children and disowning others in their party for the sake of their party. The second part isn't as surprising as the first.
Â
/Independent
Probably disowned them because he realized they were smarter than him. Good for them.
My party, my party !!! My party !! Screw the people. My party !! My party !!!
 @Rob C 503 "It's my party and I'll lie if I want to, you would lie to if it happened to you!"
Â
Well, at least 2 politicians suck a little bit less today.
@Mikey ....good one.
 @Rob C 503 Exactly. I'm starting to beieve more and more in the whole "Outlaw Political Parties" movement.
 @Peregrine  @Rob C 503 Agreed. There shouldn't be political parties. If you want me to vote for you, tell me what you stand for and what you're going to do. Don't hide behind the labels of "Republican," "Democrat," "Libertarian," "Green Party," "Liberal," "Conservative," etc.
"This is not about power. This is not about control," Stop mincing words. Control is a form of power depending on how it used.
con·trol  /kÉnËtrÅl/NounThe power to influence or direct people's behavior or the course of events.VerbDetermine the behavior or supervise the running of.Synonymsnoun.  check - supervision - command - inspection - managementverb.  govern - check - manage - direct - rule - supervise
This proves that the democrats dont want to work with anyone.....they want to dictate and control everyone.
 @sortbait ...says the guy who wants to dictate and control people through marijuana and gay marriage laws.
This comment has been deleted
 @wahoo The traitors are the ones who forget they work for the PEOPLE, not their PARTY.
I swear I see better behavior in my kids kindergarten class, and they say things like "sharing is caring!, no doubt these "adults" could learn a thing or 2.
Republicans and Democrats working together!!! Oh, the humanity, the humanity!!!!!
Â
Oh please. Working together is what politics is supposed to be about. Different ideas from different sides, trying to figure out the best solution to the problems of (in this case) the state . . . sounds like a great idea to me! Pelz should be the one who gets ousted if he can't work in a bipartisan manner.
Â
Same should be for Washington DC.
@nonpartisan Yeah, who cares about what their electorate wants.
 @JTesla Your comment is the epitome of what is wrong with America today. It's all about ME! ME! ME! ME! ME!
Â
If our representatives don't start working together, this country'll end up going to eternal damnation in a small metacarpal-supported carrying case.
Â
If both sides hate a deal, it's probably a good one.
 @Fed up Fed   @JTesla So . . . how's Washington DC workin' out for ya? How's the fiscal cliff and the debt ceiling? Think anything's gonna get done without bipartisan compromise?
Â
I'm well aware of the political realities, thank you.
 @Fed up Fed  @JTesla Don't be so g*dd*mned obtuse. Unless you truly believe this, in which case I feel sorry for you.
 @Fed up Fed   @JTesla It generally means that neither side got everything they wanted. In other words, they compromised. The result is typically better than if one side got everything they wanted.
 @JTesla Not hate *TO* deal, hate *A* deal. If the two sides compromise on an issue and neither of them likes the result, it's probably a good deal.
@nonpartisan Those two are working for themselves, not the people who elected them, and they are not working for the betterment of their state. The "ME! ME! ME!"'s are those that wish to better their own political position and do not care about the people in the district that elected them. "If both sides hate to deal" then swaping sides does not help.
Sure would be nice to see our elected officials act like adults rather than 'disowning' one another.
"It is time we put aside party dynamics and focus instead on the needs of all Washingtonians," Tom said in a statement."
Â
YAY! Now - let's do this in DC, and see how it works for ALL Americans.Â
 @washcomomÂ
Â
If you ask RalphCramden, gridlock is what he wants from DC.
Â
I disagree. While I don't want any one party to have full control, I prefer co-operation over gridlock.
Â
 @Repoman  @washcomom I think Ralph sealed up his bunker when Obama won....anybody tell him the world didn't end (yet)?
 @oh4FS Come on now, keep it above the belt . . .
@deejm2112 @Repoman @washcomom I think Ralph is trying to get his 11 and 7 year old kids out of trouble.
@Repoman @washcomom  """""gridlock is what he wants from DC."""""
Â
IMHO, it depends on who is in power. With B HO pushing his big govt. tax and spend policies, than ya I'm all over gridlock .... or anything to block his policies for that matter  :)
 @Fed up Fed  @Fed It's generally considered polite that, if you disagree with one's source, you cite another.
Â
My point was that the delta you cited between federal spending and inflation was not nearly what you claimed it to be.
 @Fed up Fed Fabulous reply! I loved it! It was perfect . . . except for being factually incorrect.
Â
http://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/
Â
Unless you mean around 5% given or take about 4%.
Â
Yes, I believe President Obama has done some positive things. He's also done some negative things. So I'm not supporting either of your sides. But to say inflation is around 5% per year is flat out wrong.
@PD1202 âWhen the debate is lost, slander becomes the tool of the loser.â   â   Socrates
Â
Â
@PD1202 @kramr @Repoman So how many obamafoes you got in your purse missy?
 @kramr  @Repoman Gridlock huh?  No, this is an all out "stop anything Obama wants to accomplish"  ploy that the Repukes started in 08'.   Many, many Repukes were quoted as saying.."We will do anything and everything in our power to make sure this President fails"  Hey moron's, when he fails, our Nation fails.....Stop being a big arse blockade and pass the tax on the rich...they ain't gunna miss a cent of it.  And based on your comment and avatar..you are just as much of a moron as they are!  And update your avatar by the way...that was sooooo teaparty 2008...............