Feds cut 250 jobs at Hanford site, cleanup likely to be slowed

YAKIMA, Wash. (AP) — Pink slips went out Monday to nearly 250 workers and more than 2,500 others were notified that they face furloughs of several weeks at the nation's most contaminated nuclear site, where cleanup is likely to be slowed because of automatic federal budget cuts.
About 9,000 people work at south-central Washington's Hanford Nuclear Reservation, which produced plutonium for the U.S. nuclear weapons arsenal beginning in World War II and through the Cold War.
Several contractors are digging up contaminated debris and soil, tearing down buildings and mothballing nuclear reactors, treating contaminated groundwater, and removing millions of gallons of radioactive waste from underground tanks for treatment at a plant under construction there.
The plant's construction will not be affected by the budget cuts, because the plant maintains an annual budget of $690 million for design and construction, said Todd Nelson, a spokesman for Bechtel National Inc., the company building the plant.
All other work at the site is likely to be slowed, though it's yet to be seen whether any cleanup deadlines will be missed.
The layoffs will largely affect union employees who practice a particular trade, such as pipefitters, the Energy Department said. The furloughs will target nonunion office workers, including administrative, engineering and safety professionals at the Hanford site and at offices in nearby Richland, Wash.
Central to cleaning up Hanford is the removal of millions of gallons of toxic, radioactive waste from underground tanks. State and federal officials recently announced that six tanks there are leaking, raising concerns about any delays to emptying them.
The layoffs and furloughs are occurring "at precisely the wrong time," Washington Gov. Jay Inslee said Monday.
"These lost jobs and work hours will adversely impact families in the Tri-Cities and will harm economic recovery in the region," he said. "Now is no time to scale back federal commitments to protecting public and environmental health in our state."
The federal government created Hanford in the 1940s as part of the top-secret Manhattan Project to build the atomic bomb. Today, it is the nation's most contaminated cleanup site, with the cleanup effort expected to last decades.
The Department of Energy's Office of River Protection, which oversees tank cleanup and plant construction, said its budget had been cut by $92 million. That money will largely come from tank cleanup, because of the fixed budget for the plant.
Washington River Protection Solutions, the company tasked with emptying those tanks, notified 37 union employees that they were being laid off Monday, company spokesman Jerry Holloway said. Another 33 union workers are expected to be bumped by more senior workers from other Hanford contractors, he said.
Nuclear operators, who move waste between tanks and pump it out, are among those hardest hit, he said.
In addition, Holloway said the company's roughly 900 nonunion employees will be furloughed for varying lengths, ranging from 2 1/2 to 6 1/2 weeks.
Federal officials have proposed a plan to ship waste from five of the six leaking tanks to New Mexico. However, that proposal will take at least two years as the federal government seeks necessary permits.
For that reason, Holloway said, the layoffs and furloughs will not affect the leaking tanks.
Work to evaluate the leaking tanks and to inspect other tanks will continue, he said.
The Energy Department's Richland Operations Office said its budget will be reduced by $79 million. That office oversees three contractors and numerous subcontractors responsible for cleaning up the Columbia River corridor, tearing down buildings, mothballing nuclear reactors, treating groundwater and digging up contaminated debris and soil.
Agency spokesman Cameron Hardy said more than 200 employees will be laid off from those three contractors, and more than 1,700 employees will be furloughed for about five weeks.
The U.S. government spends some $2 billion each year on cleanup at Hanford. That's one-third of its entire budget for nuclear cleanup nationally.
The cuts within the Energy Department's budget are the result of debate in Congress, where Republicans and President Barack Obama are fighting over how to curtail the nation's debt.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
Why cant we just send a bunch of illegal immigrants up there to do the cleanup. Remember they will do the jobs nobody else wants to do, isn't that what everyone claims. I'll head to the cultural center and pick a few up.
Will Homer Simpson be laid off?
Hey...no problem....There's 400+ federal employees that aren't working who can be put on the job immediately, they call themselves Congress. I bet they would find a new level of efficiency for doing their jobs if their only alternative was to do the Hanford job.
Ya got to love the federal government. They purposely cut the important stuff to scare everyone into doing what they want. Instead of cutting silly pet projects and less important programs. Why do we keep re-electing these fools?
@Beergod Mail in ballots
It's not about cutting jobs or trying to save money, it's about government run by partisan politicians who play russian roulette with our lives to win elections and contain power for themselves. This mess is and should be a priority, but it isn't, oh sure it's a third of some budget so we're told, but it's just a chess piece to politicians. So off with 200 peoples heads, no work for you, whether you worked or not because our President and this Congress have bigger fish to fry than to clean up a mess they made in the first place.
@Great now what! Wait...I thought everyone wants Gvt to cut back on spending? Cuts = job loss, period.
@deejm2112 @Great now what! Shovel ready jobs but nobody can work the shovel.
According to some friends who work at Hanford, about half the people working there just stand around watching the other half work. Â Some of this is because of strict rules they must adhere to while working there and some of it is just waste. Â The taxpayers have poured too many millions into this money pit and no end is in sight. Â Unfortunately, much more is wasted on politician's special friend's projects that we rarely hear about. Â When we do, they lie about it and rarely is anyone held responsible.
@Shadow Pick the right 250 people and no slow down?
The layoffs will largely affect union employees who practice a particular trade, such as pipefitters, the Energy Department said. The furloughs will target nonunion office workers, including administrative, engineering and safety professionals at the Hanford site and at offices in nearby Richland, Wash.
Let's target ALL jobs and have a lottery to see who gets laid off instead!
Â
@disgustedman   That contract is under Bechtel and only 20%% of that government contract goes to pay the wages and benefits of the workers doing the work. Under that system Bechtel has no incentive to complete the job....like ever.
And as far as the leaks...Bechtel will continue to find new leaks as soon as the previous contract is due to expire...and that will last forever.Â
@Icarus Exactly. It's just a boondoggle to milk the government dry. And we sit down stream, waiting for the leakage to come our way.
Obama is like a little spoiled kid! If he can't have his way he tries to hurt everyone else! He is not only a fraud, but a brat to boot!
@Freedom1267Â Transparency in the white house but no tours
@Freedom1267 OK, so now you get your spending cuts and are still not happy...jeeze, stick with a plan dude.
Make it hurt. Cut jobs at "the nation's most contaminated nuclear site", cut White House tours. But give money to Egypt and Pakistan, fund food stamp "partnerships" for Mexican immigrants. This administration is so disingenuous.
Yes because we all know there is no waste, pork, or fraud that we could cut first...well at least not without upsetting the crooks we put in office who got it on the tax payers dime in the first place.
Ok so what happened to all that Stimulus money that was supposed to be spent on Infrastructure? I would say our largest Nuclear dump site is an important part of our infrastructure. Especially since I live on the River it is going to contaminate one day.
It all went for cell phones and food stamps
@Sendero The gvt does not pay for those cell phones, it's completely subsidized by the cell phone companies that provide the phones, look at your bill next time if you have said carrier that provides the phones.
@swede760 That was a political stunt and payback to all government employees so they could all keep their jobs it was never about what they said it was.
It would be nice to see a real cleanup effort at Hanford. The government has basically been running a jobs program there for engineers and high powered contractors for the last several decades. The place continues to crumble and waste continues to seep. I'd imagine they could cut 5,000 more jobs and it would leave the Actual "work" progress unchanged. I'd like to see a real cleanup effort there. It scares me to think how many people are downstream of that toxic pool of goo!
Not one person is in PRISON for making that land EXTREMELY TOXIC & DEADLY for the next 93 MILLION YEARS, but if someone throws an apple core on the ground, that will rot-away & disappear COMPLETELY in 2 days, they'll be give a LIFE-LONG & LIFE-LIMITING CRIMINAL RECORD...for littering.
@August100Â That's because it was done in the 40's during World War 2. We know so much more now :(
YEA and all the problems  with Hanford started under Obama ...
Oh Wait that's crap too...
@uknow2 Indeed. Hanford was established by Roosevelt, and he was no Democrat. Oh. Oops, yes he was. My error.
If they make cuts where the people will notice it will somehow make everyone understand how important the government is. Lets not cut things like foreign aid lets focus on the important things like Hanford and the White House tours...wouldn't want the public to realize the government can cut back from those unseen costs and expect them to be more efficient.Â
Somehow a 2% hike on mainstream America through the FICA rollback is not going to hurt the people, but to cut 2% from the federal budget is the end of the world.
it's yet to be seen whether any cleanup deadlines will be missed.
Other than the ones we planned in advance.. Â I mean expected....lol
They have, the feds, have had the largest brain trust in NW, more phd's then anywhere else massed there for 30 years and we spent billions but are always the bridesmaid, never the bride, leaky tanks, truth is cynical, written off, but the NW has boomed, now wine grapes all around, how they spin this? Wyden scared them. so now they dug heels in.
As critical as the Hanford work is, I have to point out that 'as long as the project schedule is maintained, there is no reason to keep extraneous personnel.'
I, for one, would scream bloody murder if I heard there were folks getting paid with our tax $$ to lean on shovels or slurp coffee all morning. Â Private sector jobs are severe in their "work for your pay" attitude, and well they should be - I expect no less in a government contract job.
Having said all that, the sequester cuts are a complete joke, and as I've opined before, those cuts will come in the form of 'non-critical' personnel - read: dead-weight / bloat.  The fed NEEDS to have it's food bowl emptied, that's the only way we can reign in an out of control system without taking up arms.  (which I don't want to happen!)
Each side is going to point fingers and blame the other side. Truth be told, they all can be blamed and it starts at the top.
Obama's such a dictator! These across the board cuts were only supposed to affect people and things I don't care about. Can't it all come out of the $20 zillion we spend on foreign aid and giving welfare to illegals?
@Max Quinn Egypt kills soccer fans
This is all about cut it where it hurts the most; make them suffer. a leader who was interested in what's best for the people and the nation would find cuts that would impact the least. This man and his cabinet are no friend of the People.
This comment has been deleted
@Molly Head @Scotty9 You're too fast, see my post below. Yes, we are very selfish, but it doesn't preclude us from helping others out of selfish motives i.e. because we love them.
@Molly Head @Scotty9 I once ran away from home. I came back though.
This comment has been deleted
@Molly Head True, from a national level there is little the average person can do, but on a personal level we can prepare our own families and perhaps encourage our friends and neighbors to prepare; cause sooner or later the other shoe is going to drop.
We cut jobs at Hanford, tuition assistance to our military, education. Yet we can find billions in aid to Egypt, Pakistan, Afghanistan Iraq. We can find the money to make sure those here illegally get reduced or free college tuition. We can continue to hand out money to those that want nothing to do with us, but cant take care of those risk there lives to defend us. We can send money to countries that support terrorism but cut funding to clean up the biggest nuclear mess in the country. We can support using drones to kill US citizens with no trial but help a soldier get an education, or clean up a great mistake, sorry there's no money for that. Our government is as corrupt and inept as it has ever been. Even Clinton with all his flaws in foreign policy was better than this absolute joke of a regime.
@Jeremy  Thank you uncle barry!
@theobserver @JeremyThats Emperor Barry to you peasant. And garry the funny thing about those tours is they were run by VOLUNTEERS. Guess her highness got tired of the serfs touring the castle. Cant be seen mingling with the subjects.
@Jeremy You forgot, the 'JOKE' can spend millions for a 'listen' trip, play golf (which cost millions) but cut White House tours, which is actually owned by the people of these United States, not him. Stay tuned, it will only get worse. One thing I can say, I DID NOT VOTE FOR HIM.
that area is going to turn into the hills have eyes set. I wouldn't be making any road trips through there in the future
Hanford cleanup? Just go a little south to Hermiston Or. There we have REAL problems.
This comment has been deleted
@Molly Head Gee where do they get the water to water them from .???
Oh Wait ..DON'T eat the food from there
I saw this coming a mile away .. they don't want to clean it..hey want to drag there feet..oh woe to those who destroy the Earth. You have been warned and the tme to pay the price is drawing nigh.