Is Mill Ends really the world's smallest park? Brits take issue

Is Mill Ends really the world's smallest park? Brits take issue

PORTLAND, Ore. – Mill Ends Park, as most Portlanders know, has a famous distinction: The Guinness Book of World Records calls it the “world’s smallest park.”

Now, some folks on the opposite side of the world are taking issue with that distinction. A United Kingdom official is challenging that title, calling Mill Ends a “glorified flower pot.”

The town of Burntwood, Staffordshire in England believes its own park, Princes Park, should hold the title. It’s larger, but Brits say the plot of land better fits the definition of a real park.

We spoke to British journalist Ross Hawkes via Skype on Tuesday. He said it’s an issue of technicalities.

“You can claim things that aren’t true,” Hawkes said. “We think that a park should be a park. If not, where do we draw the line? Is it a case of who can plant the smallest single individual plant?”

Hawkes said Princes Park has a bench and that Brits can enjoy the park, unlike Mill Ends.

The Brits’ allegations have ruffled some feathers at the Portland Parks Bureau.

“Flower pots don’t have people coming – a whole plaque of information. It doesn’t have a 70-year history. Fifty-nine flower pots don’t have visitors who deliberately come to sit next to it. And flower pots don’t have leprechauns. Sorry cheerio,” said Mark Ross, spokesman for the Portland Parks Bureau.

The leprechaun reference relates to when Mill Ends was dedicated on a St. Patrick’s Day as the only leprechaun colony west of Ireland.

It’s unclear how far the town of Burntwood will take this challenge against our world’s smallest park. But a town councilman has said he supports asking Guiness to look into it.