NW longshoremen work despite unpopular contract
PORTLAND, Ore. (AP) - Longshoremen at grain terminals in Portland and Vancouver, Wash., went to work Thursday under the contract terms they soundly rejected last weekend.
The terminal owners implemented the terms of their "last, best and final" offer at 6 a.m. after declaring talks to be at an impasse.
The International Longshore and Warehouse Union could have called for a strike. Instead, the employees showed up for work as the union decides its next move. Options other than a strike include accepting management's offer, filing an unfair labor charge or working under the terms while seeking further talks.
An ILWU spokesman, Jennifer Sargent, declined to discuss union strategy.
The last contract expired Sept. 30, and a disagreement over workplace rules has been the obstacle to a new deal. The pro-management terms implemented Thursday eliminate some employee perks and grievance procedures while giving employers more discretion in hiring and staffing decisions. Management, for example, can expand shifts to 12 hours, if needed, and use elevator employees to help load ships.
More than a quarter of all U.S. grain exports move through nine grain terminals on the Willamette River and Puget Sound. The dispute initially involved six of those terminals that operate under a single collective bargaining agreement with the ILWU: Columbia Grain, based in Portland; United Grain, based in Vancouver; Louis Dreyfus Commodities, which has grain elevators in Portland and Seattle; and Temco, which has elevators in Portland and Tacoma, Wash.
Longshore workers at Columbia Grain and United Grain, both Japanese-owned, arrived for work Thursday, and officials from both ports said there were no slowdowns or workplace disruptions.
"Everything seems to be working just fine," said Theresa Wagner, a Port of Vancouver spokeswoman.
The issue was moot for longshoremen at LD Commodities. The company's terminal in Portland, which handles wheat, is not operating this week because of construction to upgrade its elevator near the Steel Bridge. Its Seattle terminal, which handles corn and soybeans, has been idle for months.
The terms under which Temco employees are working remained a mystery Thursday. The U.S.-owned firm broke away from the alliance earlier this month and it's believed to be negotiating separately with the union.
Farmers from as far away as the Midwest have been keeping abreast of the situation. Besides the labor dispute in the Northwest, they must contend with low-water levels on the Mississippi River, which could impede barge transportation.
"We like to pride ourselves as being the lowest-cost provider, and that's predominantly due to our transportation superiority compared to South America," said Mike Steenhoek, executive director of the Iowa-based Soy Transportation Coalition.
Steenhoek said 78 percent of U.S. soybean exports go down the Mississippi and the rest go through the Pacific Northwest. The harvest season runs inversely to South America so these are the important months for growers and their customers in Asia.
"We're the lowest cost and the most reliable," Steenhoek said. "That's a reputation that's been hard-earned and we don't want to see that challenged."
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
Optics. The owners are trying to maneuver the longshoremen into a strike. The longshoremen are trying to maneuver the owners into a lockout.
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
Â
sometimes people think that workers are over paid. If you work for a company that has it stock traded on the new york exchange go to corporate watch at aflcio.org and see what the ceo of your company makes including stock option , retirement benefits and other yearly perks. I worked at boeing and the ceo there made 22 million dollars in 2011. It would take a worker making $50,000.00 a year 400 years to make what the ceo at boeing is paid in one year. check it out.
Guess they realized how many thousands would apply for their jobs, lol.
Its OK, our Gov will come in and bail them out too on the back of tax payers. Just ask the UAW, we funded their guaranteed retirement, so hell why not all unions. After all they deserve it, right?
No different than any other employer who promises that for x work that one will get x wages and x benefits.
This is far from over !
This comment has been deleted
Just curious; what are those overpaid jobs and killer benefits? You must know what these people make and the benefits they get to use those kinds of terms.
I'm guessing the Longshoremen will want guaranteed work before they report for a call in now since the owners refuse to pay them if they call them, make then drive to work, just to tell them there is no work.