No charges in overpass shooting that erupted over misunderstanding

WOODBURN, Ore. - No charges will be filed against two men involved in a shooting following a fender bender.
The incident happened in early February on the Interstate 5 overpass in Woodburn.
LeJeune Bryant, 37, was headed eastbound on the overpass and rear-ended a vehicle driven by 31-year-old Ethan Carey. Bryant said he looked away for a moment and didn't see that traffic in front of him had stopped.
The two men got out and exchanged information but what happened next was the result of a misunderstanding, investigators say. Here's the account from the Marion County District Attorney's Office:
Yesterday a Marion County Grand Jury heard evidence of a non-fatal shooting that occurred on February 9, 2013. On that day Ethan Carey, 31, of Tigard, Oregon, shot LeJeune Bryant, 37, of Woodburn, Oregon, after a minor traffic accident on the Interstate 5 overpass in Woodburn, Oregon.
After hearing all of the evidence, including the testimony of both Mr. Carey and Mr. Bryant the grand jury found that the use of force was justified under the circumstances and declined to file any charges against either party.
The facts of the incident are essentially undisputed and are as follows:
On February 9, 2013, Mr. Bryant was traveling eastbound on Newberg Highway over Interstate 5 at approximately 7:00 p.m. It was dark and wet, and the traffic flow was heavy.
Mr. Bryant looked away from the road momentarily, failed to see that traffic had stopped and accidentally rear-ended the car ahead of him. Mr. Carey was in the front passenger seat of that car, his wife was driving and their two small children were in the backseat. No one was injured in this initial accident and Mr. Bryant and Mr. Carey both got out to inspect their vehicles.
Mr. Bryant and Mr. Carey did not know each other prior to this incident and they agree that neither of them were upset and that they did not argue. Both parties had valid driver's licenses and insurance so they agreed to pull out of traffic and exchange information at a gas station just east of the overpass.
Prior to leaving the scene, Mr. Carey got back out of his car and walked between the two vehicles to take a photograph of Mr. Bryant's front license plate, (this was done to identify the car, in case Mr. Bryant did not go to the gas station as agreed). Mr. Bryant's front license plate appeared bent backwards, and to get an appropriate angle for the photograph Mr. Carey had to kneel down between the two vehicles.
Just as Mr. Bryant was placing his car in drive to leave the scene, he noticed Mr. Carey was again out of his car. Mr. Bryant got out of his car to ask if everything was okay, not realizing his vehicle was still in drive. His car rolled forward and pinned Mr. Carey between the two vehicles.
Mr. Bryant then jumped into his car to back it away from Mr. Carey. His foot, however, slipped from the brake to the gas pedal and he instead drove forward, now crushing Mr. Carey and breaking his collarbone in multiple places.
Mr. Carey heard the engine rev, felt his bones break and believed at that time that Mr. Bryant was trying to kill him.
When Mr. Bryant took his foot off the gas the pressure between the two vehicles lessened and Mr. Carey was able to stand up. As he stood, Mr. Carey reached for his concealed firearm with his right hand. Mr. Bryant, meanwhile, placed his car into reverse.
Upon hearing Mr. Bryant's engine rev, (this time as it went into reverse) Mr. Carey believed he was about to be crushed again and he fired three shots at Mr. Bryant, through the windshield. Mr. Bryant was hit in the chest, the right elbow and the right side of his jaw.
Mr. Carey then told his wife to call 9-1-1, laid his weapon down on the pavement, aimed away from any parties, and waited for the police and ambulance to arrive.
Mr. Carey and Mr. Bryant were both cooperative with the investigation and gave voluntary statements to law enforcement. Both denied alcohol and drug use prior to the incident, and further investigation confirmed that to be the case.
At the time of the incident Mr. Carey had a valid concealed weapons permit. He has never used his weapon in a use of force situation previously, and although he target shoots regularly he has no formal law enforcement or military experience.
Neither Mr. Carey nor Mr. Bryant has any criminal history.
The incident was investigated by the Woodburn Police Department. The Marion County District Attorney's Office presented the evidence to the grand jury and provided them with the applicable law for them to make their decision.
Under Oregon law: "a person is justified in using physical force upon another person for self-defense . . . from what the person reasonably believes to be the use or imminent use of unlawful physical force, and the person my use a degree of force which the person reasonably believes to be necessary . . . ." (emphasis added). Therefore, the question before the grand jury was whether Mr. Carey's use of force was reasonable under the circumstances as he reasonably perceived them to be.
In addition to the testimony of Mr. Carey and Mr. Bryant, the grand jury had access to photographs, diagrams, medical records and toxicology reports. They also heard evidence from one other witness as well as the lead detective. At the conclusion of the evidence, they determined that Mr. Bryant's actions were accidental and not criminal and that Mr. Carey's use of force was reasonable under the circumstances as he believed them to be at the time.
Mr. Bryant  shouldn't be driving! he's a menace!
@beesknees A Horrible driver!
This just proves that ALL people should pack heat, just in case some idiot powering a 3,000 lb chunk of metal comes at you.
"Hey, sorry I crushed you between two cars."
"Ah, heck, no problem. Accidents happen. Sorry I almost killed you with my gun."
"Water under the bridge, Buddy. All a misunderstanding."
"Yeah. Now, about the insurance?"
"Well, here's mine. Oh, jeez. Kinda hard to read with all the blood all over it, sorry."
Makes perfect sense to me.
dumb and dumber
As I repeat - lower the speed limit to 5 MPH and save lives.
hey finally Katu reported on a positive gun story. ..Oh my...What a shock..this deserves a screen shot lol.
So does this mean we can shoot at a car attempting to run us down deliberately ?
@lee986321Â Yes, but unless you're pinned like Mr. Carey, it's probably best to just run and/or jump out of the way.
Wow that was a convoluted story!
Now...let me throw this out there. Â What if Mr. Bryant was killed?? Â Would there be any charges? Â Probably...since Mr. Bryant wouldn't have been around to clarify his side of the story and save Mr. Carey some jail time.
@PD1202Â Nope, story would have been that he was rammed by the other driver and therefore the death would have been 100% justifiable.
@PD1202Â I'm pretty sure the broken collar bone would be some pretty strong exculpatory evidence.
Wow... I was a bit incensed by the headline, but after reading the facts in the jury opinion, I can honestly say that I agree with it. Luckily for Mr Bryant, Mr Carey wasn't a better shot.Â
@MarkKpic Sounds like he hit his target just fine, especially considering his injuries and the chaos of the situation. It often takes several hits to the vitals to cause death.
Now if he was not texting he wouldn't have hit the guy in front of him in the first place.
Life... it teaches you the lesson but tests you first...
LMFAO
 Truth is stranger than fiction. Or maybe it's a giant cover-up. Who knows. Either way, this a the hugest cluster-f**k I've heard about in a LONG time!
Also, amazing good shooting to hit 3 out of 3 times after being hit by a car - and through a car windshield at that, which tends to cause problems for bullets.
@mine9 indeed nice grouping.Â
This is why it's usually best to take off after a car accident, if possible - you never know if the person who hit you is an armed maniac. It's better not to get involved with that kind of stuff, even if you yourself are armed. Yes, it's technically "against the law," but you have to put your priorities in order - obey traffic laws, or end up in a shootout?
This is America, not Canada or something - you have to assume that EVERYONE is armed, and act accordingly.Â
@Whobeke you just described a hit an run..you would be illegal for doing so..this guy was not a maniac. if you think this and you think leaving a scene is legal , the by all means please do so with the continued blessing of Law enforcement officers and the will encarnate you to the California Hotel with complimentary 3 hots and a kot. You will be well loved by many.
@lee986321 @Whobeke Finally deporting the californians
@Whobeke I thought I saw a gun and ran. Brilliant
We can expect more stories like this one now that we have thousands of untrained civilians packing heat...If Mr Carey had not been carrying a gun there would have been only one seriously injured person, not two.
Making it possible for so many people to carry concealed handguns is one of the worst ideas ever. These days I am more worried about getting accidentally shot by someone with a concealed carry permit than I am about being hurt by a criminal.
@State of Jefferson There are already thousands of civilians carrying concealed handguns and this is the first I've ever heard of a story like this one. So, no I don't think it's reasonable to expect more stories like this. If you're so worried about getting shot by the thousands of CHL holders out there, maybe you should never leave your cave.
@Mickeyyy Well Mickeyyy...you need to get caught up on the news...a year or so ago, in Gresham a bright CHL holder decided to fire at a car driven by a few kids who stole some iphones out of an AT&T store...he said, he was trying to shoot out their tires....brilliant.  Luckily no one was hit by this moron. How bout this one...in Ohio, I believe...an elderly man in a motorized wheelchair was backed into..on accident, by a nice lady at a gas station..she got out to see if he was ok..and he shot and killed her point blank.  There are many more, just not making the news today..which is shocking.  State of Jefferson has a point to some extent.
@Â @PD1202 @Mickeyyy Please tell me how that Gresham story is even vaguely similar to this one? A CHL holder trying to be a good samaritan stepped out of the AT&T store to try and shoot out the tires of the getaway car that the robbers were in. They came in and robbed the store of $2,800 worth of cell phones. Not a very bright CHL holder in this instance but where's the similarity to this story?
Oh wait, I get it..they both had guns and a car was involved in the story. I guess it's the same thing. (sarcasm off now).
@State of Jefferson Amen to that. The ONLY reason the gun nuts can give for saying that everyone needs a gun is that they believe everyone should be able to get one.
@Mechanic @State of Jefferson Gunslingers produced legends only country honors the farmer.
@State of Jefferson You're a fool. If someone runs over you with their car AND THEN does it again you would be correct to assume it was on purpose. It's ok though I'm more than happy to have sheep like you be targets for criminals rather than those of us who are armed...
@Shawn Alley @State of Jefferson yeah but the first hit was a fender bender. Usually you exchange insuran$e info not gun fire
@tally@Shawn Alley@State of JeffersonRead the story again, the guy was first lightly pinned, then the other driver slipped on the gas thereby pinning him further, breaking his collar bone. I would consider the first, less offensive pin a mistake, the second one which caused greater trauma, I could consider an affront to my life. The use of deadly force, as applied by the grand jury, was justified.
This is a seriously funny story! Mr Bryant needs some remedial training I would say!
Some people are blaming the driver, and of course he messed up huge, but Carey should have told Bryant that was taking a picture of the plate. I would not just kneel down in front of a car without making sure the driver of said car absolutely knew I was there.
All I can say is, no gun, one less unintentionally injured person (in actuality it was intentional, but misunderstood). I think it's kind of sad that one of the first questions I might have to ask if in an accident is if the person is carrying, if they are I may make sure the police are there before doing anything.
Had this happened in Portland the DA would have sent Mr. Carey to the pen for a long time.
Well...this is just a case where two wrongs proves a no contest.
THAT is a story to tell the grand kids.  It would only be better if the two became friends and Mr. Bryant were to be known as "Uncle Bryant" or something.
Well, they say that truth is stranger than fiction... I don't think even Hollywood at its best could come up with something like this..!  :-)
I think the grand jury called this one right... and I'm very happy that both men, while a bit "worse for wear", survived their encounter with no apparent permanently disabling injuries...Â
@margay1Â Just embarrassment, after everyone reads the story.
I wonder if this is going to make it into a movie. Sure sounds like Hollywood.
Nah, Holywood will make either one was crushed to death or received a bullet right between the eyes.
You can't make this stuff up... Young gentlemen acting appropriately under the circumstances and a judicial system that worked for a change. Anyone who has been involved in a accident already knows the nerves are a tad frayed... One heck of a story and glad all are alive.
Interesting series of events but one thing is clear:Â Mr. Bryant needs to go back to driving school.
A car and gunfight ends in a tie. Sounds like the timbers
If  Bryant was charged with attempted homicide would you vote to send him to the pen?Â
If Carey was charged with attempted homicide would you vote to send him to the pen?
That's what the District Attorney had to look at and what the Grand Jury looked at. I think the Grand Jury got it right.Â
And  I've been a Deputy DA, a Defense Attorney and a juror and a Grand Juror.
@hewhoo I've been on the grand jury.. it sucked. Biggest waste of time for which I wasn't paid enough to park downtown and have lunch.
That is a classic cluster***k. Glad no one died or was crippled.
@Max Quinn     Really curious that the at-fault-driver acknowledged that he wasn't paying attention. Very rare that a driver actually admits to negligence....but it would be really difficult for him to claim to be a good driver considering that he ran the guy over a second time.
@Max Quinn And that would be a perfect example of when to use that word!
Haha, maybe one day these guys can get together and have a beer and talk about how they almost killed each other. They should both take a taxi too :)
@Richard Goezinyah Mr. Bryant should have his license yanked, forced to take drivers ed, and banned from owning/driving/registering/buying a car for 10 years, and then retested at the end of his sentence.
@axpman @Richard GoezinyahAdrenalin happens, hes lucky to be alive, lol I bet hes a very couscous driver when he eventually gets back on the road.