Attorneys paint starkly different pictures of Portland bombing plot
»Play Video
PORTLAND, Ore. - When FBI agents posing as jihad extremists first met with Mohamed Mohamud, they wanted to know if he was true to his talk of committing terrorism, an assistant U.S. attorney told jurors on Friday.
The agents questioned the teenager about choosing Portland’s Christmas tree lighting ceremony, pointing out young children would be there.
“The defendant responded, ‘Yeah, I mean, that’s what I’m looking for,’” Assistant U.S. Attorney Pamala Holsinger recounted Friday afternoon during her opening statement in the trial of the Oregon State University student charged with attempting to bomb the annual celebration in 2010.
The 19-year-old wanted to a place where families were together, enjoying the holidays, Holsinger said.
“Little did they know, the defendant had plotted and schemed for months to kill each and every one of them,” she said.
Chief Deputy Federal Public Defender Stephen Sady, however, in his opening statement, said there was a different guilty party in the case: the government.
“The FBI just went too far,” Sady said. “They created a crime that just wouldn’t have happened.”
Holsinger and Sady presented starkly different accounts of the case in their opening statements in U.S. District Court on Friday afternoon. The statements were heard after a jury of 12 and four alternates were seated in the morning in U.S. Judge Garr King’s courtroom.
Attorneys will begin calling witnesses on Monday morning. The trial is expected to last about four weeks.
As Sady told jurors, the defense doesn’t dispute Mohamud wrote extremists blogs on the Internet prior to the Nov. 26, 2010, event and that he made threats of being violent, as recorded by undercover agents.
What Sady said the defense aimed to prove is that Mohamud did not show signs of violence prior to being contacted by FBI agents. To convict Mohamud, the government must prove he was predisposed to committing terrorism. The defense plans to argue Mohamud was a victim of entrapment.
Mohamud was first contacted over the Internet in November 2009 by an undercover agent, and the public defender said at that point Mohamud was a “manipulable and conflicted teenager.”
“He was not a perfect human being,” Sady said. “But he was not the kind of person who sat around thinking about blowing up his hometown.”
Sady said Mohamud was contacted again in summer 2010 by the next two FBI agents, who ultimately posed as co-conspirators in the tree lighting plot. The defense attorney contends they used psychological tactics, such as isolation and flattery, to induce Mohamud into devising the bomb plot.
“Did the government create the crime?,” Sady said. “Did the FBI foil its own plot?”
Holsinger, on the other hand, said the FBI agents, in their correspondence with him, gave Mohamud multiples times to back out. She said the agents repeatedly questioned whether Mohamud was sure he wanted to carry out the plan.
“He was undeterred,” she said.
Mohamud showed signs that he was capable of terrorism, Holsinger said: He was in contact with an Al-Qaida recruiter and had earlier made plans to travel to Yemen to receive jihad training.
When he began planning the tree lighting plot, Mohamud was the one who coordinated the logistics of where to park the van that held the bomb and also rented a storage unit for equipment, Holsinger said.
“He identified the date, the time, the location and the plan,” she said. “He wanted the people here to get the message that if you kill Muslims in Afghanistan, you weren’t safe. He just needed to right people to help him.”
He pressed the buttons in the hopes that an explosive device would detonate and kill people. Sorry folks but this seems pretty straight forward to me.
You would think that if he was not a violent person then he would have turned in the FBI agents in the beginning.I know if someone contacted me like this I would rat them out fast... With him not calling the police shows his intent to do harm.
Kudos to the FBI for removing this defect from society - sure hope the jury doesn't mess up their good work.
Aside from all the comments - does anyone have any idea how much these defense attorneys are making at taxpayer expense?? You really do not want to know because you would be pissed - six figures times 5...
 @bonedÂ
Â
The prosecuting team makes much more. Â And guess who pays them.
The sketch  is really giving him a huge favor .  He looks on it almost as a human beeing.
"Cleaned up" & even painted a little turned up pixie nose too
No kidding. Really? The prosecuting attorney and the defense attorney are telling two different stories? DANG!! That NEVER happens...
I'll go with guilty. Chop his head off!
Guess why  the FBI didn't contact (me) at any time, I suppose they didn't because I wasn't the one posting threatening messages online about my desire to kill. This guy was bomb ready to blow. He just needed to find an accomplice. Lucky for a few hundred innocent folks, it was the good guys that found him first.Â
 @last boyscout Oh, that reminds me...they stopped by looking for you...totally slipped my mind, LB. Sorry! ;-)
 @last boyscout No jihad training in Yemen for you? lol..
Apparently this terrorist at heart had more to do with the planning than I thought. When, how, where.. This kid wasn't coerced. He thought he'd found exactly what he was looking for. If only we had the ability to identify and stop all mass murderers prior to them killing. If only...
 @last boyscout I dunno. several things smell here. I like the Willy Week's article on this.
the FBI supported the kid. they paid his rent. and of course, anytime any critical conversations for the defense happened, oh, technical difficulties, please stand by.Â
@No_Conservitards @last boyscout all he had to do was not push the button.
@No_Conservitards he could have backed out at any time....