Tank leaking high-level radioactive waste at Hanford

OLYMPIA, Wash. (AP) — The long-delayed cleanup of the nation's most contaminated nuclear site became the subject of more bad news Friday, when Washington Gov. Jay Inslee announced that a radioactive waste tank there is leaking.
The news raises concerns about the integrity of similar tanks at south-central Washington's Hanford nuclear reservation and puts added pressure on the federal government to resolve construction problems with the plant being built to alleviate environmental and safety risks from the waste.
The tanks, which are already long past their intended 20-year life span, hold millions of gallons of a highly radioactive stew left from decades of plutonium production for nuclear weapons.
On Friday, the U.S. Department of Energy said liquid levels are decreasing in one of 177 underground tanks at the site. Monitoring wells near the tank have not detected higher radiation levels, but Inslee said the leak could be in the range of 150 gallons to 300 gallons over the course of a year and poses a potential long-term threat to groundwater and rivers.
"I am alarmed about this on many levels," Inslee said at a news conference. "This raises concerns, not only about the existing leak ... but also concerning the integrity of the other single shell tanks of this age."
Inslee said the state was assured years ago that such problems had been dealt with and he warned that spending cuts — particularly due to a budget fight in Congress — would create further risks at Hanford. Inslee said the cleanup must be a priority for the federal government.
"We are willing to exercise our rights using the legal system at the appropriate time. That should be clear," Inslee said.
Inslee said the state has a good partner in Energy Secretary Steven Chu but that he's concerned about whether Congress is committed to clean up the highly contaminated site.
The tank in question contains about 447,000 gallons of sludge, a mixture of solids and liquids with a mud-like consistency. The tank, built in the 1940s, is known to have leaked in the past, but was stabilized in 1995 when all liquids that could be pumped out of it were removed.
Inslee said the tank is the first to have been documented to be losing liquids since all Hanford tanks were stabilized in 2005. His staff said the federal government is working to assess other tanks.
At the height of World War II, the federal government created Hanford in the remote sagebrush of eastern Washington as part of a hush-hush project to build the atomic bomb. The site ultimately produced plutonium for the world's first atomic blast and for one of two atomic bombs dropped on Japan, effectively ending the war.
Plutonium production continued there through the Cold War. Today, Hanford is the nation's most contaminated nuclear site. Cleanup will cost billions of dollars and last decades.
Central to that cleanup is the removal of millions of gallons of a highly toxic, radioactive stew — enough to fill dozens of Olympic-size swimming pools — from 177 aging, underground tanks. Many of those tanks have leaked over time — an estimated 1 million gallons of waste — threatening the groundwater and the neighboring Columbia River, the largest waterway in the Pacific Northwest.
Twenty- eight of those tanks have double walls, allowing the Energy Department to pump waste from leaking single-shell tanks into them. However, there is very little space left in those double-shell tanks today.
In addition, construction of a $12.3 billion plant to convert the waste to a safe, stable form is years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget. Technical problems have slowed the project, and several workers have filed lawsuits in recent months, claiming they were retaliated against for raising concerns about the plant's design and safety.
"We're out of time, obviously. These tanks are starting to fail now," said Tom Carpenter of the Hanford watchdog group Hanford Challenge. "We've got a problem. This is big."
Inslee said he would be traveling to Washington D.C. next week to discuss the problem further.
Wonder how many PPB samples on the soil. And they crucify the homeowner for a oiltank leak. LOL
Well, we could have put it at Yucca Mountain. Harry Reid and Company shut the facility down in 2010 after highly-paid union workers nearly completed the facility at the cost to taxpayers approaching one hundred billion dollars.
Reid didn't shut it down until the money was spent and the construction was done. So now the country is broke, and we have to come up with more money to fix the problem we already thought we were fixing, when it was just a obvious union/political pork.
The Wikipedia entry for Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Repository states:
"However, under the Obama Administration[2] funding for development of Yucca Mountain waste site was terminated effective via amendment to the Department of Defense and Full-Year Continuing Appropriations Act, passed by Congress on April 14, 2011. The US GAO stated that the closure was for political, not technical or safety reasons.[2] This leaves United States civilians without any long term storage site for high level radioactive waste, currently stored on-site at various nuclear facilities around the country..."
Drink your water, America. Suck it down . This is the order you have established for America.
Get ready for another government cover up.
The Columbia River and all who live within it's basin will be victims of congressional gridlock.Â
@campergeneralThe facility to house it was built. The Democrats shut it down after it was all but built and ready to go. Research Yucca Mountain.
it will only be dangerous for another 750,000 years.
From the government's view we are almost there
Jay needs to talk to Chris. I'm sure she can tell him all about it.
a few gallons here, a gulf oil spill there...a japanese meltdown or 3, us dumping massive amounts of fertilizer and hormones into the water system, litter, coal mines, destruction of forrests...and pretty soon we're talkin bout some serious insults to mother earth. Â
Talk about putting on a happy face! Have a nice day!
@oodathunked Now, theres a thinker. Lets just smile it away. Like B' Ho, lets spend our way to prosperity.Geez.
Ignorance is bliss...right big government???
Gee Hanford poisoning people again? What a shocker. Let's ask the people who were part of the Dwonwinders case how much help and aid they got from Hanford? Oh yea...cancer and related problems. Oh, and such a huge payout from Hanford too. Big whopping 6-10k per person roughly. Not enough to cover their medical bills starting from almost 20 years ago or earlier let alone their pain and suffering since. Hanford is a joke and will continue to poison people because they can get away with it. Yes, I am bitter. I have watched a family member wither away from the radiation in his system and the various diseases caused by Hanford's illegal dumping and their complete disregard for human life. I watched another family member lose her life to cancer that riddled her body from head to toe. The only good thing to do with Hanford is dump tons of cement over it to bury it completely and get as far away from it as possible.
@Kymberlie2873 "Hanford is a joke"
That's an odd sense of humor. Well, Obama and Reid's Congress canceled the safe alternative after it was built, for what the General Accounting Office calls political reasons, so, drink up because this was the alternative your Congress and President chose for you.
New material for the simpsons
This will take care of the invasive species threat
@bert
which one? the border hoppers i hope,,,lol
@Nuclear-XÂ The border hoppers would be easier to spot if they glowed in the dark. Unfortunately this would lead to some type of radioactive profiling.
Holy Crap!! This is all of a sudden incredible breaking news?? I guess what is old comes around again and anyone over the age of 50 has been through this drill before, but there are a few generations that have virtually no clue about the past. Wait a second, my guess there too many folks that are over 50 that have no clue what is going on, anywhere...
This is nothing new. I remember a report in the '80's (I've tried to google it but can't find it...hmmm) about dredging the up river side of , I believe, mcnary and john day dams. It was stated that there were too many contaminates in the material to continue. This included pesticides like ddt and manufaturing waste like pcb's AND radionucleotides ! I did run across this article that states hanford regularly "dumped" radiactive contaminated water into the columbia for years. They even did a "green run" where they released tons of radioative waste into the atmoshere ! The damage seems to already been happening for years !
Just look at the pic if anyone doesn't know how CLOSE the hanford reactors are to the columbia !
http://www.hanfordproject.com/columbia.html
I'm with the government and I'm here to help !
Yeah, right !
@Rob C 503Â Yea, there you go - make some money with the idiocy that abounds all around us...
@boned .....it's amazing isn't it, Boned !
Hanford, one of the original "Superfund" clean up sites first implemented in the 80's. Â
Notice how nothings costs "millions" anymore, its been replaced with the numerator "Billions".
This is America, we just print more money-at a loss. Wow, a daily does of cynicism for you.Â
@Quaoptician You can thank Bernanke and all those at the private-Federal Reserve for destroying the value of the dollar.Â
@Quaoptician Damn-it!! Quit clouding the issue with fact, will you??
SAVE THE FISH SAVE THE WATER STOP THE LEAKS NOW!
@32jim2Â Too far down in the bedrock and it will never happen, Tonto...
Wow, this is crazy. I just did some "Google" research and wow, what a mess!!! We have decades and decades of threat left. It is crazy to me that they put like a 40 year timeline on a project like this. The government is already spending more than $2 Billion(!!!!) per year on this. Just makes me wonder what else and how many more are out there that the most of us don't even know about.
David Kobbeman Portland
David Kobbeman Portland
David Kobbeman Portland
@David Kobbeman Research Yucca Mountain, why it was built, why it was shut down once it was built, by whom, and how much it costs us. You paid for it.Â
Why do you post your name three times at the end of your posts? Kind of makes you look like a d-bag.
Woe unto those who seek to harm the earth, for God's wrath shall be up on them
@lee986321"God's wrath shall be up on them"   Pssst....God has never wavered from his original plan...and that's to remain invisible. We're going to have to work this out ourselves.
Well, do what the government does best..bulldoze it and cover it up and put up a mall. Call the mall some weird name. and then name the cafe cafe something like "The Radioactive Cafe"
@lee986321
three-eyed cafe and spirits
This is an ongoing problem...get used to it. They only "fixed" some 43 leaks in the last couple of years...and that was a multi-year project.
Just imagine if an unfortunate meteorite squarely hit Hanford it would just vaporize all that contamination and everything would be peachy....right?
Makes ripping out the damns to save salmon seem kinda silly when if we don't fix this we will have 3 headed salmon that glow in the dark.
@FreedomRocks ~  And no doubt some 3-headed people that glow in the dark, too...  Gee, anybody else have any good news for us today..???Â
@margay1 @FreedomRocks Ah you been in downtown Portland lately ?
@Tonk @margay1 @FreedomRocks ~ Actually, Tonk, I haven't been in downtown Portland in almost 2 years...  Has something new been added..?  :-)
Too bad the the federal government is so totally unable to do anything. How many years have they been searching/stalling on a permanent site for radioactive waste storage/disposal? Yucca Mountain was supposed to be the site and work had begun. However, Obama and Sen. Reid "defunded" the project, as Wikipedia puts it, for political reasons not technical problems with the site. NIMBY-ism is going to end up polluting eastern Washington State and a bunch of other areas in the country for purely political gain in Washington, DC.
Maybe you should do a little more research....first obama CAN'T defund the yucca project on his own, congress has the purse strings and THEY drew up a budget without funds for continuation on that project ! Until the republiCONs can be responsible and bring tax levels back to pre "village idiot" rates we will all suffer from the defunding that republiCONs call "we can't tax the rich" !
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2013/jan/21/putting-end-yucca-mountain-project-within-reach-st/
"In September, Congress passed and the president signed a continuing budget resolution that did not contain any money for licensing Yucca Mountain."
@sargerator Obama DIDN'T defund the project on his own. Reid and his congress did. We tried to tell you that.  "tax levels back the village idiot rates" is freakin' meangingless when they spend tens of billions of dollars on something and then shut it down on a political whim.  YOU research it. The GAO called it a political closure.
@sargerator So you admit Obama is part of the problem. He could have easily issued a signing statement funding the bloody thing.
@sargerator So sorry to offend and set off all the labeling and name calling. I copied from Wikipedia, although probably not verbatim.
The problem with nuclear is you can't get the genie back in the bottle, no matter how sorry you are - it's TOO LATE.
And the problem with government secrecy is that it allows problems like these to fester for years - or decades, in the case of Hanford.
Don't you love this quote?
 But the agency says soil testing "have not identified significant changes in concentrations of chemicals or radionuclides in the soil."
I can picture him with his eyes tightly closed and his fingers in his ears, endlessly repeating that the agency sees nothing, hears nothing, and knows nothing.
@alohanÂ
It's just sad that we cannot push it all up Dick Cheney's butt and launch him into the sun; that would be killing two birds with one stone.  Â
I would totally save a fish before I'd save ol' Dead-Eye Dick.
I'd save a turd before I'd even think about saving 5 time deferment dick !
And the nearby river is?
This comment has been deleted
lol ...Nice one Ken.
"The DOE says it's determined one of its single-shell tanks is leaking liquids at the rate of about 150-300 gallons per year."
Do what I do when my ziploc baggy leaks; put it in another baggy. Â Problem solved! Â I'll take my consulting fees in small, unmarked bills.