Washington counties dropping marijuana cases

SEATTLE (AP) — Misdemeanor cases of marijuana possession will be dropped in Washington's largest counties after voters legalized the drug, prosecutors said Friday.
King County was dropping 175 cases, prosecutor Dan Satterberg said. Pierce County prosecutor Mark Lindquist said his office will do the same, but he didn't immediately know the number of cases affected.
Under Initiative 502, possession of an ounce or less of marijuana will be legal for people 21 years or older after Dec. 6. The initiative passed on Tuesday with 55 percent of the vote.
"Although the effective date of I-502 is not until Dec. 6, there is no point in continuing to seek criminal penalties for conduct that will be legal next month," Satterberg said in a statement.
The cases in King County involve people over 21 who possessed one ounce or less of marijuana. Dropping those pot cases won't ease caseload, said prosecutor's office spokesman Dan Donohoe, noting that 6,700 misdemeanor cases were tried in 2011.
Lindquist cautioned, however, that cases of possession of marijuana linked to other charges, such as drunken driving for example, would proceed. The cases affected are solely marijuana possession, he said.
In Snohomish County, chief criminal deputy prosecutor Joan Cavagnaro said her office is in a "holding pattern." A call to the Spokane County prosecutor's office was not immediately returned.
Along with Washington, Colorado also legalized recreational use of marijuana on Tuesday. A legalization measure was defeated in Oregon.
Besides de-criminalizing possession, Washington's initiative also sets up a state-run regulatory system that will license growing and stores to sell marijuana.
State officials, however, are awaiting a response on the initiative from the federal government, which still considers the drug illegal and could intervene in court.
Some legal experts believe that the de-criminalization provision in the law could survive a legal challenge.
"The parts that are more likely to be enjoined are probably the parts where you got states actually authorizing the growing, the sales — with pretty direct conflict with federal law," said Mary Fan, a University of Washington law professor and former federal prosecutor.
Earlier this week, the Seattle Police Department said it was not arresting people for marijuana possession.
Seattle defense attorney Steve Karimi commended Satterberg for setting an example and following the will of the people on this issue.
Karimi, who says 15 to 20 percent of his cases involve marijuana, predicted prosecutors in smaller counties may not be as cooperative and forward-thinking.
Case law is not crystal clear on whether marijuana cases can still be effectively prosecuted after the law changes, he said, adding that most alcohol possession cases evaporated when Prohibition ended.
Misdemeanor possession cases may not seem like a big deal to the general public, but Karimi noted the results can be disastrous for people who have certain jobs, such as teachers. Immigrants have also been deported over possession convictions, he noted.
___
Associated Press writer Donna Gordon Blankinship contributed to this report.
___
Manuel Valdes can be reached at http://twitter.com/ByManuelValdes
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
What are the people going to do to the EXTREMELY EVIL Powers That Be who destroyed so many good people's lives & burdened them with lifelong/life-limiting criminal records?
Â
There's still plenty to do....
If they build that light rail from Vancouver to will be plagued by all those white people high on marijuana and bringing CRIME to Portland. Stop light rail now!
 @realoldguy Not sure habitual users are likely to increase any crime measure other than Cheetohs theft.
 @Festivus  @realoldguy Snickers delivery truck drivers should stay on the lookout as well. Hey, August, don't confuse "pot" with "crack." Not the same thing. Not even remotely.
I don't  drink or do pot for many a decade now, yet I do know that prohibition of alcohol has created an entrenched organized crime syndicate.
The  Volstead Act and the preceding Eighteenth Amendment also enabled corruption among law enforcement officials.
Â
With that said, Washington has the right idea.
Taxing the grow operation and controlling the distribution is why the law has legs.
But the biggest reason the Washington law is acceptable (to me) is the  under the influence testing for drivers.
I operate heavy machinery, and I the thought of my co-workers getting fired for smoking pot over the week-end is NOT something I can fully support.
Yet, I have seen good workers fired because of just that!
Â
The blood test to verify if they are under the influence of THC while operating a vehicle is why I can support their law!Â
Â
In the early eighties, the US Army was working on a test strip that could detect trace amounts of THC from saliva.
I met a civilian contractor who worked on the strips, he mentioned that they had a 5% false positive, but with the blood test as back-up the possibilities become more acceptable.
Â
I was also hoping that after 30 years they could get it down to less than 0.05% error rate
Â
I would love to see even Oregon police have access to an efficient field test strip for under the influence of THC.
If Washington and Colorado are serious about this, the test strip will ease my "conservative" ideology on the passing of marijuana usage laws.
Â
Let's face it, drunk drivers have retarded reflexes at best, and with easy access to test strips, pot heads have no excuses to get behind the wheel.
Â
Is not the safety of our roads a good thing?
ALL 12-Step Religious Cult NA Meetings are CANCELLED for Marijuana Smokers....YOU ARE NOT ADDICTED or MENTALLY ILL; you never were....
 @August100 Hahaha, once in awhile, you do put out a good one, Old Friend.
They should legalize opiates, and their derivatives. It would be cool to be able to walk into the
store and buy methadone or oxycontin, ect.
Stage 1 by U.S government is that they are studying and releasing the the laws slowly to give people time to get used to the new law. Stage one? and the feds Know it? I think this means that the stuff is about to become legal Federally.
This is so awesome, I am ecstatic to hear this news and I almost cannot believe it.  I almost want to move out of this state because it seems so silly to have a prohibition against this drug.
 @portlandborn83 Move to Vancouver....get the best of both Worlds!!
Â
It's about time. Â Thank you Colorado!!
Â
And Thank you Washington!! =P
Â
Just means alot more pot addicts around.
 @sortbait Those terrible pot "addicts", addicted to a drug that's non-addictive. Right. And they are sooooo dangerous. Unlike Oxycontin addicts, who would never point a loaded gun at pharmacy workers to get their fix. Yeah, those guys are harmless, just like the LEGAL drug they crave.Â
Â
When are you going o give up this idiotic attack on a drug that brings pain relief and lets face it - HAPPINESS - to so many? Never, I'm sure, and that's too bad. Your mental prison sounds horrible. But I know a cure....
 @sortbait There are a lot of Republicans who are supposedly moving out of our Socialist and Communist Country.  I'm sure you could catch a ride with one of them and make a new start somewhere more conservative with less pot addicts.  Somewhere.  Good luck to you with that!!
hopefully
 @sortbait  That's right and they're everywhere! Your doctors, the nurses, policeman,  fireman, school teachers, lawyers, landscapers, church leaders... they're all in on it. Boy it's gonna get dangerous, you better pack your stuff and move to the south! In fact the problem is so serious, I wouldn't waste any more time. You should move TODAY
sweet
Â
"6,700 misdemeanor cases were tried in 2011."
Â
That means in 2013 there will be about 6700 less people arrested & booked, 6700 less court cases, and 6700 less cases for probation officers to handle. That is a LOT of money saved that can be used to get real criminals off the streets.Â
 @Kennyboy I think you need to re-read it. It states that 6,700 misdemeanor cases were tried in 2011, NOT that 6,700 marijuana cases were tried in 2011. What they are saying is that dropping the marijuana cases really won't have that much impact on the overall caseload, because they're such a small portion of them in relation to the overall number.
@starshadow @Kennyboy You have to go a little further and understand why its not much of an impact. Seattle's Prosecuting DA didnt want anything to do with prosecuting cannabis possession for some time, and the mayor had down right told the police force to stick to working violent crimes.
Purposely creating a legal nightmare? I wonder:
Â
What's going to happen to all of these "dropped" cases when the Superior Court is engulfed with all of the lawsuits this will engender? What's going to happen to all of these "dropped" cases when the legalization is nullified by the Supreme Court?Â
@Gravity Works!  Even IF the Federal government raids the Marijuana stores saying it is illegal (Federally) to SELL pot, it will not cause pot possession under an ounce for people 21 and over to suddenly become illegal again in Washington State.
 @Gravity Works! Nothing and nothing. That's what's going to happen.
 @Lips  Excellent!  I sincerely hope you're correct.
Think of all the money our state and counties will save by no longer having to prosecute people for something whose greatest side effects are bloodshot eyes, drowsiness, and a case of the munchies.Â
Marijuana should have never been criminalized and it wouldn't have except for the work of shysters like Harry J. Anslinger who spewed propaganda like "You smoke a joint and you're likely to kill your brother." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_J._Anslinger
Â
Educate yourself... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gnFJYxCx7zk&feature=related
Â
I understand not persecuting for something that will soon be legal - but I think the bigger issue is persecuting for breaking the law. The law hasn't changed and wasn't changed when these people broke the law. If we want to send illegals away because they are here as law breakers, than those that broke this law (when it was a law) also need to be held accountable.
Â
How, exactly, is this forward thinking?
ashley,
Great point about what is legal or was legal at the time a crime was committed. When the people were arrested...it was "Against the law" or "Illegal". Now that the state had voted to make it "legal", it is a different story. However no matter what, at the time the people broke the law, it was illegal and they knew it.
Let the ones off now who are legal, but hammer them hard if they break the law again. As far as "Illegal Aliens" go, they broke the law knowingly and willingly. They are still breaking the law.
It will be very interesting to see what happens with the pot issue. As far as "ILlegal Aliens", it would probably be best to close the border tightly from the U.S. side, and treat the lawbreakers as other countries treat them. Especially countries to the South
 @ashley Aha... trolling to justify illegals. Niice.
 @Peregrine Ha ha ha, No. It's a good example because it's something people generally feel passionately about one way or the other and the fundamental underlying issue (breaking the law) is the same. Niiiiice try though ;)
 @ashley per·se·cut·ing. 1. to pursue with harassing or oppressive treatment, especially because of religion, race, or beliefs; harass persistently. 2. to annoy or trouble persistently.
Â
I think you mean prosecute. Although persecute is more fitting.
 @Lips Thank you for the definition Lips - and yes, it might be more fitting, lol.
@ashley It is called an unfair and biased law, rather we like it or not once something is legal and you are still tried for it, the county would be sued big time. I guess this means my ex wife can finally possibly even get her kids back.Now there is one thing that is truly going to create Hell...Every one that has had there kids taken for possession of this particular drug will be wanting there kids back.
 @lee986321  It will be interesting to see how that plays out... what will parental negligence look like now and so on. I think it's stupid to remove anyone's child in the first place for simply using pot - but when it becomes negligent, well I hope they had to prove that in the first place?
 @ashley persecuting is what you're doing......... prosecuting is what a judge does.... (food for thought)
 @Funky-Munky I'm not persecuting - I made an error in language selection. Thank you grammar police for pointing out my flaw HA HA HA - see the irony here? :)
 @ashley Get a grip Ashley.... These were misdemeanor cases. (good grief) Go back in your house and quit running naked through the streets frothing and foaming at the mouth. In addition these individuals were twenty-one and over. Blood thirsty much? Like to see others punished for a victimless crime?
 @Funky-Munky Get over yourself. I have no problem with pot use - I just believe in accountability - that's not blood thirsty. Don't even get me started on age, that is the dumbest point.
Â
If someone gets drunk and decides to go out for a drive - should they be given a free pass when they get pulled over just because they weren't in an accident and no one got hurt? If you expect people to have any regard or respect for the law then you have to actually expect people to follow it.
Â
Â
 @ashley  @Funky-Munky It's the opinion of many that it's been an illegal law on the people for decades. Now it's slowly being reversed. People should be held accountable. That doesn't need to include punishing people for overturned, and/or unjust laws. Where's your humanity, ma'am?
Â
Â
 @ashleyÂ
Â
I think that dropping the prosecution is in the spirit of the reform. The people have voted that they don't want tax payer dollars used for persecuting adults who choose to smoke an herb. That is pretty progressive no matter how it is sliced.
Â
Portland and the state of Oregon should also stop persecuting small offenders and focus on those who are obviously in the business of organized crime.Â
Â
Spend all that money on interdiction of Methamphetamine.
 @Icarus Thank you Icarus for your post.
Â
You make some good points - the government actually listening to what the people want is extremely progressive. I'm glad that marijuana will be legalized for several reasons but yes, the resources used to prosecute people for marijuana would be MUCH better used on other issues.
Â
I personally, would still rather see people be held accountable for their actions than given a free pass because it's in the spirit of things; they knew they were breaking the law when they did it.