Oregon, California require transgender health coverage
SALEM, Ore. (AP) — Regulators in Oregon and California have quietly directed some health insurance companies to stop denying coverage for transgender patients because of their gender identity.
The states aren't requiring coverage of specific medical treatments. But they told some private insurance companies they must pay for a transgender person's hormone therapy, breast reduction, cancer screening or any other procedure deemed medically necessary if they cover it for patients who aren't transgender.
The changes apply to companies insuring about a third of Oregonians and about 7 percent of Californians, but not to people on Medicare and Medicaid or to the majority of Californians who are insured through a health management organization, or HMO.
Advocacy groups said the action is a major step forward in their long battle to win better health care coverage for transgender Americans.
"It's just a matter of fairness," said Ray Crider, a 28-year-old transgender man from Portland. "I just never felt that I was like anybody else. I see everybody else being taken care of without having to fight the system."
Officials in both states said the new regulations aren't new policies but merely a clarification of anti-discrimination laws passed in California in 2005 and in Oregon two years later.
Many health insurance policies broadly exclude coverage of gender identity disorder or classify it as a pre-existing condition. Transgender patients are often denied coverage for medical procedures unrelated to a gender transition, advocacy groups said, because insurance companies deem the condition to be related to their sex reassignment.
Some transgender patients also have trouble getting access to gender-specific care. A person who identifies as a man might be denied coverage for ovarian cancer screening or a hysterectomy. A transgender woman might be denied a prostate screening.
The state insurance regulators said those procedures, if covered for anybody, must be covered for all patients regardless of their gender.
Masen Davis, director of the Transgender Law Center in San Francisco, said he's unaware of insurance regulators in any other state taking similar action.
The California regulations took effect in September and apply only to insurance products regulated by the California Department of Insurance. The agency primarily regulates preferred provider plans, or PPOs, that covered about 7 percent of the population in 2010, according to data from the California Health Care Foundation.
The agency that regulates California HMOs has discussed transgender care with consumer groups and health plans, "but no regulations have yet been proposed or adopted," said Marta Bortner Green, a spokeswoman for the Department of Managed Health Care.
The Oregon Insurance Division issued its guidance last month in the form of a bulletin to insurers. It applies to commercial insurance companies that cover about a third of the state's population; the rest are uninsured, on Medicare or Medicaid, or work for a large employer that's self-insured.
"This is a very historic bulletin, and it really indicates that the tide is turning on this issue," said Tash Shatz, transgender justice program manager at Basic Rights Oregon, an advocacy group.
Transgender advocates say gender reassignment, through hormone treatment or surgery, is medically necessary, and they've long fought insurance companies that argue the procedures are cosmetic. They hope the new state regulations will mean fewer procedures are refused and make it easier to appeal a denial.
The transgender community has picked up significant momentum securing health coverage in recent years. San Francisco in 2001 became the first U.S. city to cover sex reassignment surgeries for government employees. Seattle, Portland, Ore. and Berkeley Calif., have followed suit.
Large employers are increasingly offering coverage for a broad spectrum of care, including gender reassignment surgeries.
State regulators don't have authority to force insurance companies to cover specific procedures, like hormone therapy or genital reconstruction. But they've told insurers that if they provide breast reduction for patients with back pain, they can't deny it for a gender reassignment that's been deemed medically necessary. Insurers could unilaterally exclude coverage of, say, breast implants, but it would have to apply to all policyholders equally, including breast-cancer patients.
"We've received the Oregon Insurance Division's directive to implement this new mandate, and we are working to ensure that our members' future coverage aligns," Scott Burton, a spokesman for Regence BlueCross BlueShield of Oregon, said in a statement.
"We're still assessing the impact of the ruling, and will continue to monitor state and federal guidance on this topic," said Kathy Born, a spokeswoman for LifeWise, another large insurer in Oregon.
When Ray Crider heard the news, he danced around his apartment with his wife. A 28-year-old transgender man living in Portland, Crider fought a long battle to convince a previous employer to include transgender services in his policy.
Although he was insured, Crider paid thousands of dollars out of his pocket for testosterone treatment and mental health care before winning his fight for coverage of gender identity. He finally got a double mastectomy, covered by insurance, a year ago, he said, but not before the binder he used to flatten his chest required several emergency room trips because it constricted his breathing.
"This was one of the most incredible things that could ever happen," Crider said, "to know that there's a state full of people who won't have to go through what I went through."
Just curious what would happen to a real life Hermaphrodite on born in a natural manner that is?
We shouldn't support this "Unnatural" and "Unclean" procedure. If a person wants a Sex change they should have to pay for everything.Â
Â
I suppose next were going to be covering men having babies...
Thomas Beatie, who is known across the world as 'The Pregnant Man', has announced his split from his wife of nine years.
Â
 With their broad smiles, the Beaties look like any normal, happy family.
Nothing could be further from the truth
And then there is Scott Moore
We shouldn't have to shell out monies for this at all.
 @lee986321 Feel free to change the law if you don't want to pay for it.
 @brendan Oh I'll let nature change the law..and trust me, when these kids grow up confused and have issues ...Turst me.. Natural law is supreme to man's law. Trust me.. Law one way or the other will prevail.. Just wait and see. Oh it may not be right away, but I promise you, if we are going to practice the same thing Sodom Practiced, I promise you things will get very ugly.
 So Unto man I issue this warning, those that mess with the "Laws of Nature" will be so judged by Nature, and Might I add it is very unforgiving.
Â
One may seem that they have "Skirted Natural Selection" but trust me, it will bite man in the Arse when he least expects it.
 @lee986321 Ah, someone with an imaginary friend that they listen to -- who has the mental health issues?
The whole thing makes me gag! If Chaz has a sex change and wants to be considered a man, and have "It's" special man parts covered and left over woman parts covered they should be charged double premiums. It's only fair.
 @The Resistance It's 'Its', for starters - unless of course you meant 'It is special man parts'. (By the way, this is referred to as a red herring; refuting this, in any capacity, does not change the argument below.)
Â
By the same logic, those without either parts get no premiums, right?  Since male and female reproductive (and secondary characteristics) are a minor part of the total sum of a person (let's ballpark it at 10%), increasing premiums by 10% might make sense.
@brendan @The Resistance ---Whaaaaaaaaaat?
@iamtroglodite@yahoo.com --- Thanks! Brain and fingers don't always co-ordinate with each other.
@The Resistance You got busted by the spelling and grammer police! For what it is worth, I understood what you meant AND agree.
The only coverage these people should be receiving is for mental health issues.
All I know is thank God(and yes I said THANK GOD) I know I was born a man, will die a man, no extra parts(fake boobs) no missing parts (you know). Of course, I know there is always the chance of testicular cancer, in which case I could die with missing parts.I will never be a drain on society for frivolus medical crap. Yes, it is a drain on society because every time someone uses insurance for stupid stuff it affect everyone. What a messed up society. Next thing you know, some queer in prison will want tax payers to pay for his sex change... oh, wait! Already happened! Come on, I don't care if your gay, do your thing, but when it comes down to turning yourself into an abomination on our dollar, well your a sick person! Ok! Bring on the name calling and hatefulness, I started it!
 @iamtroglodite@yahoo.com I suppose people do these things because, they are not paying the bill,My insurance a company and union thing (OPEC) has cost me $360000 over the last 35 years.And i have never used it and even it they did would not even begin to pay me back.Â
@Christian perspective $360000 worth of nothing is a whole lot of nothing. I hate insurance. Don't get me wrong, I understand the concept and all, but someone that puts that much in should get something back if they don't need to use it before retiring.
What a sick sick world we live in!
Another sign of the times. What happens when s*rewing with nature causes even more medical issues? Are taxpayers (eventually) supposed to poney up the dough so the poor confused people out there can feel "normal?"
Another evidence of a very sick and confused society ...
So, what you're telling me is that when a person decides that they are XY when their genome says they're XX, and they begin to administer medications and hormones to that person in an attempt to 'correct' their genetic makeup is causes medical problems?Â
Â
and this reality actually surprises anybody why, exactly?
Â
...and now, OR, WA & CA insurers are being told that they have to cover these medical problems?
Â
I would hope, expect even, that there are at least co-pays in such circumstances and that this isn't yet another hidden mandate within either Obamacare or Lord Kitzhabers Oregon Health Plan Jr.Â
Once again. liberalism gone wild. Next they will have us paying for pedophiles porn supply, because "it makes them feel better about themselves". No doubt Sandusky likes this story.
 @last boyscout Wow, did you even read the article? It is shameful that you would equate someone getting a cancer screening to a pedophile wanting porn because you are a bigot.Â
Quote "procedure deemed medically necessary if they cover it for patients who aren't transgendered"
 @special effects It's a medical catchprase. If someone shops around long enough, the'll find a Dr who is willing to sign off on just about anything being 'medically necessary'.Â
Get the right doctor in this state, and just about anything can be "medically necessary."
Guess who gets to pay for it. Â Those of us who choose to be normal. Â Of course, being normal doesn't get any attention in the news media. Â They prefer weirdness and sensationalism.Â
 @boomer Choose?
 @boomer Choose to be normal? What the heck is normal anymore? It's become "normal" for people in this country to be obese. It's become "normal" to hear that you or a family member or family friend has some type of cancer. Is "normal" back to the days of Hitler where blonde and blue eyed are the approved looks? How "normal" is it if a person is born a hermaphroditie and their parents choose their sex at birth only for them to feel the opposite way inside as they grow up? Don't they have the right to live outwardly as they feel inside? I know that would be a small amount of people, but it is not uncommon to hear of. As for paying for it, my reading of this article said it was addressed to some private healthcare companies so I would presume not welfare therefore not paid by you. Their treatments would be paid just like any other...with possible co-pay/deductible in place. Because a person is different does not make them abnormal. Is cancer screening of any kind to be denied because someone doesn't meet your interpretation of normal? I agree that surgeries for changing of appearance should not be covered but all other medically necessary treatments will be paid by the healthcare and/or the patient...affecting you as anyone else's insurance would affect you.
gender issues aren't a life threatening condition and aren't a physical compromise towards one's well being so i don't think they should be covered. it's called health insurance, not body image insurance. sorry. i mean i wish i had a bigger squarer jaw, were a couple inches taller, more symmetrical features, etc. i could probably make the case that this affects my quality of life too. but would they cover plastic surgery costs? not enuough bleeding heart support for us average joes to get on the special status bandwagon. guess i'll just keep forking over my monthly dues to pay for their reassignment surgeries. on the other hand I hate it when insurance companies don't pay people what they rightfully deserve
How F'd up is our country when the state will require insurance companies to pay for men to get boob jobs but not woman.........
@kramr obviously you're not reading, it states very obviously that insurance companies are only required to offer procedures if they are offered to others of the opposite sex. If they offer it to women they're required to offer it to men, and its the other way around too.
I wouldn't mind coverage for these folks if there were also money somewhere for assisting those legal residents of Oregon who have retired shortly before being eligible for Medicare, but existing tenuously on small pensions and unable to land jobs in this economy. Those folks cannot pay for medical insurance or procedures because they need their pittance of a pension for food and housing. And I'm not even addressing the issue of all those who have to wait for winning the lottery and getting into the Oregon Health Plan. Is transgender reconstruction more important than providing medical services for the vast majority of those unable to pay for it at all?   Â
Â
@jpk While I remain open minded about trans-gender people.I don't believe in dictating people's personal choices,I also will have to agree the priorities are skewed when there are so many people who are going without healthcare or sometimes even being denied transplants and cancer treatments.
My adopted son became my adopted daugthter thanks to transgender surgery. He/she didn't have the benefit of medical insurance assistance, but did it anyway. Shim eventually became enamored with a female lesbian, and committed suicide in 2010. Thank god I have grandsons with both of his previous marriages to actual, card-carrying females. I really don't want to know about transgendered folks anymore!
I think this is great. Government actions that drives up the cost of insurance, or anything for that matter, will push more and more people to the point of intolerance for government regulations.
Â
Keep it up. More and more regulations will kill the US cause everyone knows that much of the world doesn't have near the regulations we do. That is a major reason that companies leave the US for friendlier business climates.
 @RalphCramden Ralph you and I probably share the same sentiment. The country is gone.
@Razor1 @RalphCramden --- ditto!
@RalphCramden funny that insurance and healthcare costs were skyrocketing long before the government got involved.
@Ramsesthegreat   """""""" insurance and healthcare costs were skyrocketing long before the government got involved."""""
Â
I call BS on that...... Govt has been heavily involved with healthcare since the fifties and sixties...... please show me some evidence of skyrocketing healthcare prior to 1950 !!
 @margay1  @kramr Well, at least i got an intelligent, reasoned response :)
I'd point out a few things: there are many drugs that have been used for thousands of years; they aren't something new, OTOH, sure the pharmcos do have a vested interest in new uses for new chemicals.
Â
Some people might just like to be that way about themselves) re: every little ache and pain); sure seems like it at least.  I think your most salient point for discussion (and hopefully some research) is your first one.
 @brendan  @kramr ~ Well, I don't think anyone wants diseases like polio or smallpox to come back... and those vaccines were truly medical advances of the highest order..!  Â
I think we've run into problems on several fronts... (1) people are living longer, and because of that, we're seeing more diseases that are a direct result of advanced age and the "wearing out" of the human body... (2) Changes in the food we eat (more chemicals, sugar, sodium, processed foods) that lead to diabetes, heart disease, cancer, etc... (3) the alarming over-use / mis-use of all these pain-killers and mind-and-mood-altering drugs that create their own set of problems, eg: addiction, over-prescription, not properly prescribed (eg: being used as a "panacea"; trying to treat an ailment that does't exist except in the patient's imagination).
I sometimes think that the pharms come up with these meds first; THEN come up with "diseases" to use them for..! Â Â
We dd a lot better, I think, when we concentrated more on the business of living... and LESS on every little ache and pain...Â
 @kramr Yeah, it was way cheaper -- and a lot less effective as well.  I miss Polio & Smallpox <sigh>, don't you?
@knottriel  I do...... its when it was affordable.
 @kramr I don't really want to go back to the health care system of the 1940's.
 @Ramsesthegreat Â
Now that government is involved they are really going up in spite of the promise of them going down.
Â
My copy has gone up and is now double what it was, the out of pocket is 3 times what it was, and premiums are 2 times what they were.
Â
Thankfully the government pays for most of that. It's nice that I don't have to even consider the cost of insurance since it is all free for me for the rest of my life. I intend on using as much of it as I can for as long as I can.
 @Silver Surfer  @RalphCramden  @Ramsesthegreat Tough to be you eh? Why not work 60 hours a week like the people that are paying for the deadbeats? Why not work 80 hours a week like me? I'm a state employee, and a small business owner... just barely getting by, but I'm well insured.
 @Silver Surfer  @RamsesthegreatÂ
Yes you are. The government requires that you pay for my health care. They require a lot of things.
Â
Don't like that plan. Vote in someone else. Pretty simple.
Â
Not to worry though. 0bama will fix everything.
 @RalphCramden  @Ramsesthegreat Meanwhile, guys like myself work 55+ hours a week and still can't afford insurance.  I can barely keep my son insured. Great for guys like yourself to boast about your healthcare access.  But MY generation is paying for your bills.
Â
Â
We as a country have really gone off the deep end...no stopping now might as well hit bottom.
This article leaves me......confused.
 @katufanmanÂ
Â
Hold on...I have a pill for that....
 @Scotty9  @katufanman ~  Yep, but watch out for the side-effects... listed in print so small that no human can read them... and they're probably 100 times worse than whatever ailment you're trying to treat..!
 @katufanman I like it. I was going to say that myself.Â