40 years after Roe v. Wade, abortion foes march on

TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) - Abortion opponents marked the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade on Tuesday with workshops, prayers and calls for more legislation chipping away at the abortion rights the U.S. Supreme Court decision seemed to guarantee.
Many looked to Kansas, where Republican Gov. Sam Brownback has signed a series of tough, anti-abortion measures during his first two years in office. Much to the dismay of abortion-rights advocates, Kansas has been part of a wave in which states with Republican governors and GOP-controlled Legislatures enacted new restrictions on abortion providers.
Hundreds of abortion opponents gathered in Topeka for a rally with Brownback, who has called on lawmakers to create "a culture of life" and is expected to support whatever further restrictions they approve. Kansans for Life, the most influential of the state's anti-abortion groups, plans to ask lawmakers to enact legislation ensuring that the state doesn't finance abortions even indirectly, such as through tax breaks or allowing doctors-in-training at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kan., to perform them on the center's time. The group also wants to strengthen a state law dictating what information must be provided to abortion patients.
"There are still things we can do," Mary Kay Culp, the group's executive director, said before Tuesday's events, which also included workshops and prayer gatherings.
Abortion rights advocates have celebrated the Jan. 22, 1973, Roe v. Wade decision because it declared women have a constitutional right to abortions in some circumstances and prevented states from banning it.
Across the nation, many events were scheduled Tuesday by advocacy groups on the two sides of the debate. The National Organization for Women, for example, planned a candlelight vigil at the Supreme Court to commemorate the Roe ruling, which it supports. The annual March for Life, which traditionally draws several hundred thousand abortion opponents to Washington, D.C., is scheduled for Friday.
"It should be honored - not trying to find loopholes, " said Rep. Emily Perry, a lawyer and Democrat from the Kansas City suburb of Mission, Kan., who supports abortion rights. "I wish the amount of energy put into narrowing Roe v. Wade would be put into school funding or our budget."
In the four decades since Roe v. Wade, a series of court decisions have narrowed its scope. With each decision, lawmakers in multiple states have followed up by making abortions more difficult to obtain or imposing restrictions on providers.
According to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive-rights think tank, 135 laws aimed in some way at restricting access to abortion were enacted in 30 states - most of them with Republican-controlled legislatures - in 2011 and 2012. More such measures already have been proposed in several states this year.
In Wyoming, for example, a pending bill would prohibit abortions after a fetal heartbeat is audible. A similar "heartbeat" bill is pending in Mississippi and one was debated but later sidetracked in Ohio last year.
In Texas, Republican Gov. Rick Perry has told lawmakers that he expects more anti-abortion laws during the 2013 session to work toward his goal "to make abortion at any stage a thing of the past." Anti-abortion activists have pledged to use every legal means possible to make obtaining abortions difficult, if not impossible, to obtain.
It's far rarer for bills strengthening access to abortion to be enacted these days, but there are some pending proposals. In their state of the state speeches this month, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo endorsed a bill that would further entrench the right to abortion in state laws, while Washington state's new governor, Jay Inslee, said he wants to enact a measure that would require insurers who cover maternity care - which Washington insurers are mandated to provide - to also pay for abortions. Both Inslee and Cuomo are Democrats.
A majority of states now impose a waiting period for patients wishing to obtain an abortion, and three-quarters require parental involvement before a minor can obtain an abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute. All such policies are in place in Kansas.
Kansas has three abortion clinics, all of them in the Kansas City area. An abortion rights group, Trust Women, plans to open a new clinic in Wichita in the building where the late Dr. George Tiller performed late-term procedures until he was murdered in 2009 by a man professing strong anti-abortion views. But the new clinic doesn't plan to end pregnancies as late as Tiller did - and couldn't in most cases under a 2011 state law restricting such procedures at or after the 22nd week of pregnancy.
The American Civil Liberties Union recently dropped a federal lawsuit against a state law restricting private health insurance coverage for abortions, after a judge's ruling limited the issues to be decided at trial. A challenge to state regulations specifically for abortion providers is still pending in the state's courts.
Many looked to Kansas, where Republican Gov. Sam Brownback has signed a series of tough, anti-abortion measures during his first two years in office. Much to the dismay of abortion-rights advocates, Kansas has been part of a wave in which states with Republican governors and GOP-controlled Legislatures enacted new restrictions on abortion providers.
Hundreds of abortion opponents gathered in Topeka for a rally with Brownback, who has called on lawmakers to create "a culture of life" and is expected to support whatever further restrictions they approve. Kansans for Life, the most influential of the state's anti-abortion groups, plans to ask lawmakers to enact legislation ensuring that the state doesn't finance abortions even indirectly, such as through tax breaks or allowing doctors-in-training at the University of Kansas Medical Center in Kansas City, Kan., to perform them on the center's time. The group also wants to strengthen a state law dictating what information must be provided to abortion patients.
"There are still things we can do," Mary Kay Culp, the group's executive director, said before Tuesday's events, which also included workshops and prayer gatherings.
Abortion rights advocates have celebrated the Jan. 22, 1973, Roe v. Wade decision because it declared women have a constitutional right to abortions in some circumstances and prevented states from banning it.
Across the nation, many events were scheduled Tuesday by advocacy groups on the two sides of the debate. The National Organization for Women, for example, planned a candlelight vigil at the Supreme Court to commemorate the Roe ruling, which it supports. The annual March for Life, which traditionally draws several hundred thousand abortion opponents to Washington, D.C., is scheduled for Friday.
"It should be honored - not trying to find loopholes, " said Rep. Emily Perry, a lawyer and Democrat from the Kansas City suburb of Mission, Kan., who supports abortion rights. "I wish the amount of energy put into narrowing Roe v. Wade would be put into school funding or our budget."
In the four decades since Roe v. Wade, a series of court decisions have narrowed its scope. With each decision, lawmakers in multiple states have followed up by making abortions more difficult to obtain or imposing restrictions on providers.
According to the New York-based Guttmacher Institute, a reproductive-rights think tank, 135 laws aimed in some way at restricting access to abortion were enacted in 30 states - most of them with Republican-controlled legislatures - in 2011 and 2012. More such measures already have been proposed in several states this year.
In Wyoming, for example, a pending bill would prohibit abortions after a fetal heartbeat is audible. A similar "heartbeat" bill is pending in Mississippi and one was debated but later sidetracked in Ohio last year.
In Texas, Republican Gov. Rick Perry has told lawmakers that he expects more anti-abortion laws during the 2013 session to work toward his goal "to make abortion at any stage a thing of the past." Anti-abortion activists have pledged to use every legal means possible to make obtaining abortions difficult, if not impossible, to obtain.
It's far rarer for bills strengthening access to abortion to be enacted these days, but there are some pending proposals. In their state of the state speeches this month, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo endorsed a bill that would further entrench the right to abortion in state laws, while Washington state's new governor, Jay Inslee, said he wants to enact a measure that would require insurers who cover maternity care - which Washington insurers are mandated to provide - to also pay for abortions. Both Inslee and Cuomo are Democrats.
A majority of states now impose a waiting period for patients wishing to obtain an abortion, and three-quarters require parental involvement before a minor can obtain an abortion, according to the Guttmacher Institute. All such policies are in place in Kansas.
Kansas has three abortion clinics, all of them in the Kansas City area. An abortion rights group, Trust Women, plans to open a new clinic in Wichita in the building where the late Dr. George Tiller performed late-term procedures until he was murdered in 2009 by a man professing strong anti-abortion views. But the new clinic doesn't plan to end pregnancies as late as Tiller did - and couldn't in most cases under a 2011 state law restricting such procedures at or after the 22nd week of pregnancy.
The American Civil Liberties Union recently dropped a federal lawsuit against a state law restricting private health insurance coverage for abortions, after a judge's ruling limited the issues to be decided at trial. A challenge to state regulations specifically for abortion providers is still pending in the state's courts.
I believe if a woman is raped it should be her choice. I can totally understand why she might not want to have that child. I am still in a conundrum about those who just decide not to give birth because they change their minds so I can't really give an opinion. I am not in a position to judge having never been in the situation.
 @PointblankÂ
Â
What about minors?
Â
Here is are some terrible questions:
Â
What if a minor child is pregnant? The father is claimed to be an adult male. By definition it is rape (assuming it by law is). Can that person have an abortion? Against the fatherâs will? Reverse that, can a minor father who was raped request an abortion from his rapist? Can he require his rapist to bear the child?
Â
What if a minor girl wants one, and their parent's do not? Reverse that.
Â
What if the parent is the person who may be responsible for the pregnancy (i.e. molestation)?Â
Â
Does the child's advocate (a person paid for by the state) have a say? Would you want a person you pay to advocate for or against an abortion?
Â
Â
These are all rape scenarios. But they add more questions than answers.
Â
Note I have no answers, but these questions bother me.
Â
These self proclaimed do-gooders probably also want to stop women from voting,
re-institute alcohol prohibition, and demand morning christian prayers for schoolchildren
no matter what their family's religious beliefs are.
Here's a thought: If you don't want an abortion, don't get one! I mean, how does the neighbor down the street having an abortion performed on her, have any bearing on anyone else on her block, street, neighborhood? Having a religious belief is fine and dandy, and that's great if you want to use that belief for your own insight and knowledge, but not everyone is required to share your same religious beliefs.
@pdxd " . . . but not everyone is required to share your same religious beliefs." That is true, pdxd, and the First Amendment was written to guarantee an individual's God-given right to choose what to believe. That being said, what if not just pro-lifers (I realize that not every pro-lifer is a Christian or believes in a diety) but Christians are right and everyone will eventually stand before the God of the Bible to be judged. Do you really want to stand before Him with the blood of innocent children on your hands?
 @theprodigal  @pdxd If he doesn't like abortions, and has the power to end the practice, then he'd best get his butt on down here and turn his wishes into reality.
Â
Someone who has the power to stop an evil act yet does not do so is every bit as culpable as the person doing the act. Â If god exists, then he has on his hands the blood of every Jew killed in the Holocaust, every child aborted, every victim of ethnic cleansing since the dawn of time, and every single innocent life ever taken by another.
Â
Turns out Tarantino has nothing on god for blood lust, apparently
The only time liberals won't use children as a prop is at a 'pro-choice' rally.
 @NGerblanskyÂ
Â
No they do, don't you believe they don't.
Â
They put signs on them just like pro-life folks do. They parade them around like little monuments to their political leanings. They wear slogans like "This Child Was loved. Support the rights of Mothers" and such.
Â
They often complain about their children being exposed to the graphics pro-life people have on their banners and THEIR children are wearing.
Â
Children, puppies, kittens, if it evokes an emotional response, politicos will use it no matter what "side" they are advocating.
Â
Â
Most of the people who oppose abortion do so by projecting their beliefs on the Bible. The Bible clearly states that life begins with the first breath, not before. (READ your Bible) Life at conception is a Catholic Church policy that has no basis in Christ's teaching.
 @david_42 What if you don't believe in the bible and are not a christian?
Read YOUR bible. It's YOURS not mine. It's your right.
Just as it's MY right not to read it or practice anything written in it.
Â
It's a book filled with violence.
I deplore violence.
Â
Â
@david_42 Life begins at first breath according to the Bible? Hmmm . . .
Â
"Before I formed you in the womb I knew you, before you were born I set you apart; I appointed you as a prophet to the nations." (Jeremiah 1:5)
Â
"Thine eyes did see my substance, yet being unperfect; and in thy book all my members were written, which in continuance were fashioned, when as yet there was none of them." (Psalm 139:16)
 @theprodigal  @david_42Â
Â
So by Jeremiah, life happens BOFORE conception?
Â
Or does that apply to Jesus only?
 @Emi-Lynn  @theprodigal  @david_42Â
This is often the criteria for what a doctor uses to determine the age of a fetus.
Â
Itâs a complete SAWG (Scientific Wild A** Guess) to help a woman know a "due date".
Â
 @theprodigalÂ
Â
So by the bible all women are pregnant BEFORE they are pregnant.
Â
It has happened, just not yet. That must be the basis fo the Catholic Churchâs objection to birth control.
Â
âYou canât do that because the baby youâre going to have wonât be born then. â
Â
I am CERTAIN I donât agree with that.
Â
Â
@Repoman@theprodigal@david_42
According to Arizona law it does. Â Their restrictions are based on the date of a woman's last menstrual cycle. So, by the time a woman ovulates, she's already two weeks pregnant according to their state representatives.
Â
@Repoman @david_42 Ok. In Luke Chapter 1, Mary goes to visit her cousin, Elizabeth. Mary is pregnant with Jesus and Elizabeth is pregnant with John the Baptist. In that chapter, Elizabeth states the baby lept in her womb when she heard Mary's greeting. Now, lest people think that is a special circumstance because of Jesus, in Judges 13 we read that Manoah's wife is not supposed to eat or drink certain things because the child she will have is going to be a Nazarite from birth. In Genesis 25, we read that when Rebekah (Isaac's wife) was pregnant with twins, they wrestled in her womb. Seems very clear to me the Bible states life begins at conception.
@Repoman @david_42 Those are just the two most commonly quoted verses used to support life beginning at conception. I will dig deeper into my Bible when I go to lunch (I am at work).
I reject religion and its evil influence on politics.
"Everyone is holding a sign, I'm holding up a baby"
Â
You drop that kid from the ridiculous perch and you have "post-birth" aborted your child.
Â
Maybe someone from DHS can look into the fitness for that man to care for a child.
Â
While everyone CAN have children, some should NOT have children.
Â
I think this moron is one of them who should not.
Â
You sir demonstrate why people have abortions. They know they are idiots.
Â
Â
Â
@Repoman I, too, noticed the way he was holding his child. I would not trust myself to hold a child up with one arm - especially holding the child over my head like that.
 @theprodigal  @RepomanÂ
Â
My kid is strong, tough and healthy, but holding a child like that begs for their injury.
Â
I hope this father gets more sens as his girl grows up.
Â