Battle over Christmas nativity display goes to LA court

LOS ANGELES (AP) - Damon Vix didn't have to go to court to push Christmas out of the city of Santa Monica. He just joined the festivities.
The atheist's anti-God message alongside a life-sized nativity display in a park overlooking the beach ignited a debate that burned brighter than any Christmas candle.
Santa Monica officials snuffed the city's holiday tradition this year rather than referee the religious rumble, prompting churches that have set up a 14-scene Christian diorama for decades to sue over freedom of speech violations. Their attorney will ask a federal judge Monday to resurrect the depiction of Jesus' birth, while the city aims to eject the case.
"It's a sad, sad commentary on the attitudes of the day that a nearly 60-year-old Christmas tradition is now having to hunt for a home, something like our savior had to hunt for a place to be born because the world was not interested," said Hunter Jameson, head of the nonprofit Santa Monica Nativity Scene Committee that is suing.
Missing from the courtroom drama will be Vix and his fellow atheists, who are not parties to the case. Their role outside court highlights a tactical shift as atheists evolve into a vocal minority eager to get their non-beliefs into the public square as never before.
National atheist groups earlier this year took out full-page newspaper ads and hundreds of TV spots in response to the Catholic bishops' activism around women's health care issues and are gearing up to battle for their own space alongside public Christmas displays in small towns across America this season.
"In recent years, the tactic of many in the atheist community has been, if you can't beat them, join them," said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center and director of the Newseum's Religious Freedom Education Project in Washington. "If these church groups insist that these public spaces are going to be dominated by a Christian message, we'll just get in the game - and that changes everything."
In the past, atheists primarily fought to uphold the separation of church and state through the courts. The change underscores the conviction held by many nonbelievers that their views are gaining a foothold, especially among young adults.
The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released a study last month that found 20 percent of Americans say they have no religious affiliation, an increase from 15 percent in the last five years. Atheists took heart from the report, although Pew researchers stressed that the category also encompassed majorities of people who said they believed in God but had no ties with organized religion and people who consider themselves "spiritual" but not "religious."
"We're at the bottom of the totem pole socially, but we have muscle and we're flexing it," said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation. "Ignore our numbers at your peril."
The trouble in Santa Monica began three years ago, when Vix applied for and was granted a booth in Palisades Park alongside the story of Jesus Christ's birth, from Mary's visit from the Angel Gabriel to the traditional crèche.
Vix hung a simple sign that quoted Thomas Jefferson: "Religions are all alike -- founded on fables and mythologies." The other side read "Happy Solstice." He repeated the display the following year but then upped the stakes significantly.
In 2011, Vix recruited 10 others to inundate the city with applications for tongue-in-cheek displays such as an homage to the "Pastafarian religion," which would include an artistic representation of the great Flying Spaghetti Monster.
The secular coalition won 18 of 21 spaces. The two others went to the traditional Christmas displays and one to a Hanukkah display.
The atheists used half their spaces, displaying signs such as one that showed pictures of Poseidon, Jesus, Santa Claus and the devil and said: "37 million Americans know myths when they see them. What myths do you see?"
Most of the signs were vandalized and in the ensuing uproar, the city effectively ended a tradition that began in 1953 and earned Santa Monica one of its nicknames, the City of the Christmas Story.
The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee argues in its lawsuit that atheists have the right to protest, but that freedom doesn't trump the Christians' right to free speech.
"If they want to hold an opposing viewpoint about the celebration of Christmas, they're free to do that - but they can't interfere with our right to engage in religious speech in a traditional public forum," said William Becker, attorney for the committee. "Our goal is to preserve the tradition in Santa Monica and to keep Christmas alive."
The city doesn't prohibit churches from caroling in the park, handing out literature or even staging a play about the birth of Jesus and churches can always set up a nativity on private land, Deputy City Attorney Jeanette Schachtner said in an email.
The decision to ban the displays also saves the city, which had administered the cumbersome lottery process used to award booths, both time and money while preserving the park's aesthetics, she said.
For his part, Vix is surprised - and slightly amused - at the legal battle spawned by his solitary act but doesn't plan anything further.
"That was such a unique and blatant example of the violation of the First Amendment that I felt I had to act," said the 44-year-old set builder. "If I had another goal, it would be to remove the 'under God' phrase from the Pledge of Allegiance - but that's a little too big for me to take on for right now."
The atheist's anti-God message alongside a life-sized nativity display in a park overlooking the beach ignited a debate that burned brighter than any Christmas candle.
Santa Monica officials snuffed the city's holiday tradition this year rather than referee the religious rumble, prompting churches that have set up a 14-scene Christian diorama for decades to sue over freedom of speech violations. Their attorney will ask a federal judge Monday to resurrect the depiction of Jesus' birth, while the city aims to eject the case.
"It's a sad, sad commentary on the attitudes of the day that a nearly 60-year-old Christmas tradition is now having to hunt for a home, something like our savior had to hunt for a place to be born because the world was not interested," said Hunter Jameson, head of the nonprofit Santa Monica Nativity Scene Committee that is suing.
Missing from the courtroom drama will be Vix and his fellow atheists, who are not parties to the case. Their role outside court highlights a tactical shift as atheists evolve into a vocal minority eager to get their non-beliefs into the public square as never before.
National atheist groups earlier this year took out full-page newspaper ads and hundreds of TV spots in response to the Catholic bishops' activism around women's health care issues and are gearing up to battle for their own space alongside public Christmas displays in small towns across America this season.
"In recent years, the tactic of many in the atheist community has been, if you can't beat them, join them," said Charles Haynes, a senior scholar at the First Amendment Center and director of the Newseum's Religious Freedom Education Project in Washington. "If these church groups insist that these public spaces are going to be dominated by a Christian message, we'll just get in the game - and that changes everything."
In the past, atheists primarily fought to uphold the separation of church and state through the courts. The change underscores the conviction held by many nonbelievers that their views are gaining a foothold, especially among young adults.
The Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life released a study last month that found 20 percent of Americans say they have no religious affiliation, an increase from 15 percent in the last five years. Atheists took heart from the report, although Pew researchers stressed that the category also encompassed majorities of people who said they believed in God but had no ties with organized religion and people who consider themselves "spiritual" but not "religious."
"We're at the bottom of the totem pole socially, but we have muscle and we're flexing it," said Annie Laurie Gaylor, co-president of the Wisconsin-based Freedom from Religion Foundation. "Ignore our numbers at your peril."
The trouble in Santa Monica began three years ago, when Vix applied for and was granted a booth in Palisades Park alongside the story of Jesus Christ's birth, from Mary's visit from the Angel Gabriel to the traditional crèche.
Vix hung a simple sign that quoted Thomas Jefferson: "Religions are all alike -- founded on fables and mythologies." The other side read "Happy Solstice." He repeated the display the following year but then upped the stakes significantly.
In 2011, Vix recruited 10 others to inundate the city with applications for tongue-in-cheek displays such as an homage to the "Pastafarian religion," which would include an artistic representation of the great Flying Spaghetti Monster.
The secular coalition won 18 of 21 spaces. The two others went to the traditional Christmas displays and one to a Hanukkah display.
The atheists used half their spaces, displaying signs such as one that showed pictures of Poseidon, Jesus, Santa Claus and the devil and said: "37 million Americans know myths when they see them. What myths do you see?"
Most of the signs were vandalized and in the ensuing uproar, the city effectively ended a tradition that began in 1953 and earned Santa Monica one of its nicknames, the City of the Christmas Story.
The Santa Monica Nativity Scenes Committee argues in its lawsuit that atheists have the right to protest, but that freedom doesn't trump the Christians' right to free speech.
"If they want to hold an opposing viewpoint about the celebration of Christmas, they're free to do that - but they can't interfere with our right to engage in religious speech in a traditional public forum," said William Becker, attorney for the committee. "Our goal is to preserve the tradition in Santa Monica and to keep Christmas alive."
The city doesn't prohibit churches from caroling in the park, handing out literature or even staging a play about the birth of Jesus and churches can always set up a nativity on private land, Deputy City Attorney Jeanette Schachtner said in an email.
The decision to ban the displays also saves the city, which had administered the cumbersome lottery process used to award booths, both time and money while preserving the park's aesthetics, she said.
For his part, Vix is surprised - and slightly amused - at the legal battle spawned by his solitary act but doesn't plan anything further.
"That was such a unique and blatant example of the violation of the First Amendment that I felt I had to act," said the 44-year-old set builder. "If I had another goal, it would be to remove the 'under God' phrase from the Pledge of Allegiance - but that's a little too big for me to take on for right now."
Working in the restaurant/bar business forever,It's been my expereince that the closer to Jesus' birthday the more rude and meaner people get.There is this expectation that everything has to go perfect and if not,the world is falling apart.Or the fact that people drink ten times the amount that they would normally drink.
 @noneofyourbizzness >'There is this expectation that everything has to go perfect and if not,the world is falling apart'
Â
I'm not sure of the actual sociological title given to it, but I refer to it as 'Norman Rockwell-itis'. And, IMO, you couldn't be more right. There's a theory that's promoted by commercials and media that somehow the holiday season isn't 'right' unless it's filled only with 'hallmark' moments, a perfect turkey, and a bevy of perfectly wrapped presents under the picture-perfect tree.Â
Â
IMO, it's a symptom of the sickness that is becoming the norm in our society. When we cease to measure our happiness by what really matters, and instead only use a societal 'ruler', we cannot help but come up lacking.Â
Â
A quote I read that I really like; We don't need more to be thankful, we just need to be more thankful.Â
After reading these blog's  I am shocked they  missed the most Important  part of  Christmas .America could not survive  without the holiday shopping at Christmas.The money they make on Christmas sales makes up to 50 percent of total year of sales.I will never shop for Christmas presents at a place they don't use the Merry Christmas  they instead to happy holidays.My Jewish friends do   Hanukkah of lighting the candles for 7 days and i am so happy to be able to do Christmas and  Hanukkah  so close together.
 @riderofthelegend >' I am shocked they  missed the most Important  part of  Christmas .America could not survive '
Â
Perhaps you are 'shocked' because you are using the wrong proverbial 'ruler' to measure.Â
Â
To me, and many others, the retail component of Christmas is far from 'the most important part'.Â
Â
As I said below, I am sincerely happy that you enjoy the holidays and the retail component. I too find cause to be joyful in my young daughters delight upon seeing all the sparkle and glitz. Love taking her to Zoo lights, occasionally she may even sit on santas lap (if she wants to). It's exciting to put up lights, and to drive through some neighborhoods where displays are seen..... But, for me and my family, none of that is what the holiday is about.Â
Â
No disrespect intended, but 'the most important part' of Christmas to our family is celebrating the birth of our Lord and Savior, Jesus Christ. If Walmart or Toys R Us makes it's profit margins this year, that's great too. But, it's certainly not 'the most important part' of the holiday for us.Â
@riderofthelegend "America could not survive without the holiday shopping at Christmas." True, but it's the symptom of a bigger problem. America has lost the diversity required to sustain itself through hard times due to its addiction to Christmas tradition. Eventually, like addicts, people will need to spend more and more of what they can't afford in order to "feel the hit" until they're broke, at which point the dealer fails too.
 @riderofthelegend So what you're saying is that if a store advertised "Baby Jesus wants you to spend your money here!" you would be more inclined to shop there? I realize that your command of English leaves something to be desired, but I'm just curious how much you endorse the commercialism of the holiday and how much you'd be willing to spend in order to properly commemorate the birth of your savior. $200 per person? More? I've never known a Christian who believed, to quote you, "the most Important part of Christmas .America could not survive without the holiday shopping". I think it's fascinating that conservatives have become so money-oriented that some, like you, now feel that sales are the "most important part of Christmas" -- and then to take a stand on whether they use the proper greeting when servicing your financial goals? I'm agnostic, so I don't really care, but I thought that most Christians believed there was a deeper meaning. Thanks for being so blunt about your fiscal priorities, and please do elaborate.
@badcat @riderofthelegend what he's saying though is an economic fact: it's called "black Friday" because that's when retailers expect to come out of "the red" and make their profit for the year. It has nothing to do with the birth of Jesus anymore.
 @Playanekes  So you're saying that they should not have the nativity display? I don't understand how the commercial aspect relates to the debate in the article.
Something that's always struck me as odd was the celebration of Christs birth being associated with mass retail hysteria. I'd have to side with the idea that the current version of 'christmas' has less to do with the Celebration of Christs birth, and more to do with rampant commercialism. A fascinating discussion I entered into once was focused on the question of when, seasonally, Christs birth actually would have occurred, and if the winter celebration was simply a means (effective one at that) of the US marketplace 'creating' a cause from which to profit in what was (historically) an off time for retailers.Â
Â
If a public space is going to have a representation of one religeous belief, they must also allow for presentations of all other faiths. That's part of the 1st ammendment;Â
Â
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech'
Â
What's really unfortunate is that some groups have taken it upon themselves to be spiteful and blatantly disrespectful towards others... just because they don't agree. It's also indicative of our culture. Sad, but true. And, yes, I too believe strongly that these people exist on BOTH sides of the theological/ideological line. Something I heard once in a sermon that is (unfortunately) all too true in this day and age is that 'sometimes, the worst examples for Christ are Christians.'
Â
Here's the thing, it doesn't matter to me if you (second person singular) celebrate Christs birth, winter solstice, Kwanzaa or festivus. In my home, the holiday is a celebration of the Saviors birth. While gifts are exchanged, you will not see anyone from our household frequenting 'black friday' sales, or trampling people to get the lowest priced televisions. We have a tree because it's a beautiful treat for the eyes, and smells great in our home. I hold no malace or disrespect for anyone else in their chosen celebratory style, and I would appreciate a like respect.Â
Â
 @MarkKpic Celebration of Christs birth, and more to do with rampant commercialism.Thats what you wrote Mark.I  love the family coming together at Christmas time as mom alwqays brings the homemade cookies.Black  Friday  is one crazy time of year when normal people go nuts and have  one hell of a good time.Also Mark don't forget  the kids  as they come down Christmas morning with a tree  full of presents from Santa as i still remember those time.
Merry Christmas! May God bless America!
hark the newspapers sing
advertizing many things
 to buy
So long as they allow all, or none, they're good.  It's when they pick and choose that it crosses a line.
@brendan I agree with your point
@Mike_J Indeed!
Merry Stress-mas.
Tis the season to once again draw nigh and engage in our annual ridiculousness over the "War on Christmas," The real threat to Christmas is Santa and the gospel of gimme, gimme, gimme,me,me,me,We've gone from St. Nicholas performing the miracle of bringing butchered and pickled children back to life to sitting on the laps of department store Santas and telling them what you want. And judging from the stress I see in everyone's eyes, the countdown of shopping days, or the commercials ad nauseaum telling me that I need to give my friends and family, it's clear that Jolly Old Saint Nick is winning the War on Christmas, and St. Nicholas is losing.
Personally, I think that Christians should be allowed to celebrate their holiday traditions without being insulted and antagonized. But I sure understand the frustration of the atheists protesting because they're sick of the Christians trying to tell everyone else how they're supposed to live their lives and lobbying for legislation that seriously diminshes the civil rights of others. The Christians in Washington DC are much bigger bullies than the atheists in Santa Monica, no doubt about it. I wish we could just live and let live. Keep religion out of politics and no one will have any reason to fuss about your little Christmas displays. A nativity scene shouldn't be a monument to the systematic oppression of gays and women, but since that's what your religion lobbies for, that's what many see. I'd love for that to change someday.
I'm not a religious person, but this is way over the top. This borderlines on bullying. I encourage AND respect all believes. Who cares. There are more things to worry about than to harrass each other over different points of views regarding religion. We need to be more open minded. You don't have to agree, however you may learn something from each other.
Â
I sure hope these liberal atheists also prevent ALL other religious festivals from occurring, not just Christian ones. As the Middle East becomes more fanatically religious, the West becomes more secular. What would Allah say about this?
 @jpk I wonder if they are in Dearborn, Michigan protesting Muslim Ramadam festivals that shut down several city blocks of public space.
Oh NO ! the muslims are coming, the muslims are coming ! everyone to get from street !
Â
Those muslims are so intolerant of others ! We should do something about them !...D'OH
 @Liberty4_WA  When there are enough Muslims in the US to effectively lobby against civil rights and equal protection, like the Christians do now, I'm certain that the atheists will counter. And just like the Christians in Santa Monica, I have no doubt that the religious zealots will respond with destructive violence. The best solution is to keep ALL religions out of politics, so that no one feels that another person's religious beliefs are a threat to their liberty and civil rights. Otherwise we have to keep all religious displays off public ground, at all times, or allow ALL religions (including non-religions) equal space with equal respect, at all times. What's your preference? Probably burning down any non-Christian displays, but that's how we end up with NO displays as in the above article.
Hate to say it but Christmas lost it's religious message years ago. Nowadays it is a festival of mad credit card spending on gifts, the giving of which has lost its relevance!
"churches can always set up a nativity on private land" Bingo. The city shouldn't be foreced to pay.
 @JTesla Who said the city is paying anything? It's organizations / churches doing it. Just using a public space for the display. Big deal.
@Liberty4_WA @JTesla I'm so hopping mad I'm crosseyed TOO and can't read !
 @Liberty4_WA From the article "The decision to ban the displays also saves the city, which had administered the cumbersome lottery process used to award booths, both time and money while preserving the park's aesthetics, she said"