Clinton leaves office with slap at Benghazi critics

WASHINGTON (AP) - Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is leaving office with a slap at critics of the Obama administration's handling of the September attack on a U.S. diplomatic mission in Libya. She told The Associated Press that critics of the administration's handling of the attack don't live in an "evidence-based world" and their refusal to "accept the facts" is unfortunate and regrettable for the political system.
In her last one-on-one interview before she steps down on Friday, Clinton told the AP that the attack in Benghazi was the low point of her time as America's top diplomat. But she suggested that the furor over the assault would not affect whether she runs for president in 2016.
Although she insisted that she has not decided what her future holds, she said she "absolutely" still plans to make a difference on issues she cares about in speeches and in a sequel to her 2003 memoir, "Living History," that will focus largely on her years as secretary of state.
Clinton spoke to the AP Thursday in her outer office on the seventh floor of the State Department less than 24 hours before she walks out for a final time as boss. She was relaxed but clearly perturbed by allegations from Republican lawmakers and commentators that the administration had intentionally misled the public about whether the attack was a protest gone awry or a terrorist attack, or intentionally withheld additional security for diplomatic personnel in Libya knowing that an attack could happen.
An independent panel she convened to look into the incident was scathing in its criticism of the State Department and singled out four officials for serious management and leadership failures. But it also determined that there was no guarantee that extra personnel could have prevented the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans. Clinton herself was not blamed, although she has said she accepted responsibility for the situation.
"I was so unhappy with the way that some people refused to accept the facts, refused to accept the findings of an independent Accountability Review Board, politicized everything about this terrible attack," she said. "My job is to admit that we have to make improvements and we're going to."
Clinton faced a barrage of hostile questions about Benghazi from Republican lawmakers when she testified before Congress recently in appearances that were delayed from December because of illness. Afterward, some lawmakers continued to accuse her and the administration of withholding evidence. Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., told a television interviewer that he thought Clinton was getting "away with murder."
In the interview, Clinton had little patience for such allegations.
"There are some people in politics and in the press who can't be confused by the facts," she said. "They just will not live in an evidence-based world. And that's regrettable. It's regrettable for our political system and for the people who serve our government in very dangerous, difficult circumstances."
At the same time, Clinton said she refused to be "discouraged by the fact that they are never going to accept the facts and the limitations of the facts." She added that "you have to get up every day and work to do best you can and communicate that to the vast majority of fair-minded Americans whether they're in Congress, in the press or in the public."
Because of that, she said, the partisan divide should not dissuade anyone with a cause from getting involved in politics and she hinted strongly that a divisive atmosphere would not stop her in any future endeavor. "You have to have a thick skin because (politics) is just going to be a contact sport as far as we can look into the future."
Clinton is no stranger to partisan politics. As first lady, she railed in 1998 against a "vast right-wing conspiracy" that she asserted had been attacking her husband, Bill Clinton, ever since he had become president.
But the woman who was once considered a divisive figure in American politics, yet leaves office as one of its most popular, remained coy about whether she would run for president in 2016.
"I am making no decisions, but I would never give that advice to someone that I wouldn't take myself," she said. "If you believe you can make a difference, not just in politics, in public service, in advocacy around all these important issues, then you have to be prepared to accept that you are not going to get 100 percent approval."
Asked if she still thought she could make a difference, Clinton replied, "Absolutely," but added quickly that she hadn't yet decided how.
"I have deliberately cabined it off," she said. "I am going to be secretary of state until the very last minute when I walk out the door. And then I am going to take the weekend off and then I may start thinking about all the various offers and requests and ideas that have come my way.
"I have made no decisions and I just can't until I have time to think it through and see how I am going to put it all together. I will certainly write something. I will certainly speak. Those are givens, but the rest of it I don't have in mind. And I hope through my writing and speaking to continue making a difference as well."
In her last one-on-one interview before she steps down on Friday, Clinton told the AP that the attack in Benghazi was the low point of her time as America's top diplomat. But she suggested that the furor over the assault would not affect whether she runs for president in 2016.
Although she insisted that she has not decided what her future holds, she said she "absolutely" still plans to make a difference on issues she cares about in speeches and in a sequel to her 2003 memoir, "Living History," that will focus largely on her years as secretary of state.
Clinton spoke to the AP Thursday in her outer office on the seventh floor of the State Department less than 24 hours before she walks out for a final time as boss. She was relaxed but clearly perturbed by allegations from Republican lawmakers and commentators that the administration had intentionally misled the public about whether the attack was a protest gone awry or a terrorist attack, or intentionally withheld additional security for diplomatic personnel in Libya knowing that an attack could happen.
An independent panel she convened to look into the incident was scathing in its criticism of the State Department and singled out four officials for serious management and leadership failures. But it also determined that there was no guarantee that extra personnel could have prevented the deaths of the U.S. ambassador to Libya, Chris Stevens, and three other Americans. Clinton herself was not blamed, although she has said she accepted responsibility for the situation.
"I was so unhappy with the way that some people refused to accept the facts, refused to accept the findings of an independent Accountability Review Board, politicized everything about this terrible attack," she said. "My job is to admit that we have to make improvements and we're going to."
Clinton faced a barrage of hostile questions about Benghazi from Republican lawmakers when she testified before Congress recently in appearances that were delayed from December because of illness. Afterward, some lawmakers continued to accuse her and the administration of withholding evidence. Sen. Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., told a television interviewer that he thought Clinton was getting "away with murder."
In the interview, Clinton had little patience for such allegations.
"There are some people in politics and in the press who can't be confused by the facts," she said. "They just will not live in an evidence-based world. And that's regrettable. It's regrettable for our political system and for the people who serve our government in very dangerous, difficult circumstances."
At the same time, Clinton said she refused to be "discouraged by the fact that they are never going to accept the facts and the limitations of the facts." She added that "you have to get up every day and work to do best you can and communicate that to the vast majority of fair-minded Americans whether they're in Congress, in the press or in the public."
Because of that, she said, the partisan divide should not dissuade anyone with a cause from getting involved in politics and she hinted strongly that a divisive atmosphere would not stop her in any future endeavor. "You have to have a thick skin because (politics) is just going to be a contact sport as far as we can look into the future."
Clinton is no stranger to partisan politics. As first lady, she railed in 1998 against a "vast right-wing conspiracy" that she asserted had been attacking her husband, Bill Clinton, ever since he had become president.
But the woman who was once considered a divisive figure in American politics, yet leaves office as one of its most popular, remained coy about whether she would run for president in 2016.
"I am making no decisions, but I would never give that advice to someone that I wouldn't take myself," she said. "If you believe you can make a difference, not just in politics, in public service, in advocacy around all these important issues, then you have to be prepared to accept that you are not going to get 100 percent approval."
Asked if she still thought she could make a difference, Clinton replied, "Absolutely," but added quickly that she hadn't yet decided how.
"I have deliberately cabined it off," she said. "I am going to be secretary of state until the very last minute when I walk out the door. And then I am going to take the weekend off and then I may start thinking about all the various offers and requests and ideas that have come my way.
"I have made no decisions and I just can't until I have time to think it through and see how I am going to put it all together. I will certainly write something. I will certainly speak. Those are givens, but the rest of it I don't have in mind. And I hope through my writing and speaking to continue making a difference as well."
Once a man has sold his soul, be it for a cause or favor, there is no action or inaction taken by the buyer that cannot be rationalized by the seller.
Â
For those who owe that soul to Mrs. Clinton, no action taken by her will be condemed by them.
Here is your slap back, madam secretary: You never did say WHO, is responsible for LYING about Benghazi, WHO authorized it? You went out of your way to make speeches, while being questioned, and you feigned outrage, which was quite an impressive acting job. Did you practice that in front of a mirror? Even as you exit, you continue the coverup and the lies.YOU ARE DISGRACFUL." What difference does it make?" You'll find out in the future.Â
And don't let the door hit you on the way out! Go somewhere and grow flowers! You were useless as First Lady, and you are not getting any better. Go buy cigars for Bill and stay out of politics in the future!
Thank goodness that the pendulum of politics swings both ways. I can't wait for the swing back to the right!
 @jpk So we can have more recessions and wealthy people pay no taxes while the middle class gets shrunk even faster?
I sure hope this old biddy doesn't plan to run for President of this USA!
 @jpk Put up an actual moderate candidate, and not one that attempts to pander to the extremist, vocal minority and make it a fight. Sadly the GOP will do the same thing they always do, pick the candidate that is most out of touch with the average, middle class, working American, and they will lose again.
@Ramsesthegreat Once the middle class awakens from their stupor of getting everything they want by depending on the government dole and doing nothing because they believe they are in the majority, watch out. Mess with the middle class, and liberal progressives will have no one to support them except illegal aliens and non-functional. non-thinking clueless Americans.
@B Smizzle @KHEB @Ramsesthegreat @jpk But we are not talking about him. We are discussing Mrs. Clinton. A lie told by another does not justify the lie told by any other. Your deflection hints that it does. Whom do you serve?
Thanks for digging up the video, but I tend to believe that like at intersections, right has the right of way! LOL
 @KHEB  @Ramsesthegreat  @jpkÂ
"don't you get tired of being lied to?"
Kind of reminds me of this guy....left, right does not matter they all lie! Â You just seem to be outraged when the left does it!
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CP9_kkzfN-w
@Ramsesthegreat @jpk ......I seem to recall a promise from the "Great One" that there would be no new taxes on the middle-class...howâs that working out for you by the way...don't you get tired of being lied to?
I find it hard to believe people have become so gullible...In some way it has to go back to parents and teachers, lack of respect, and all the little clichés that has allowed this to happen and the result is a generation of young people like your-self....
 @jpk  @Ramsesthegreat Except the middle class is the most heavily taxed group in the nation. They are not dependent on the government for their livelihood. The poorest of the nation however are, usually because they work for companies headed by conservatives who adamantly refuse to pay a decent wage or benefits for fear that it might lower their profit margins from astronomical to simply massive.
Â
Wal-Mart alone costs the U.S. Taxpayers nearly $200 Billion per year due to them not paying a livable wage to their employees.
Â
The illegal alien vote (voter fraud) accounts for less than .1% of the total vote. And I've noticed that most of the non-thinking, clueless American's have a propensity to vote overwhelmingly Republican. Just look at most of the South for your proof.
@jpk who cares if she runs. 2016 is are year, we are a sure thing. Unless we really screw the pooch on something.
The disgraceful outburst by Hillary Clinton in her testimony before the Senate subcommittee is a perfect example of the breakdown in accountability in our government. To say âWhat difference, at this point, does it make?â could excuse anyone in a responsible of virtually any act - whether it be of omission or commission. Couldnât the murderer ask the same question at his trial? Mrs. Clinton has a long list of diversions of this kind, going back to Whitewater and the Monica Lewinsky/Starr cover-up. During the Lewinsky/Starr incident the leftwing organization/website MoveOn(.org) was started to provide support for Bill Clinton and his wife. I wonder if we will see a new website called WHATDIFFERENCEDOESIT MAKE.ORG in the soon.
If there is any kind of silver lining to come out of this story is that Hillary has lied and cried her way completely out of contention for President in 2016. The Progressives know that the Benghazi story will not ever really go away and if Hillary tries to run in 2016 it will resurface in a series of ad's that show her sound asleep when that 3:AM phone call came.  Chris Stevens and Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty and Sean Smith, all four Americans who were murdered by Islamic Terroristsâ¦."What difference at this point does it make?"â¦Believe me, it makes a BIG difference and does not deserve to be pushed under the rug as Hillary would like to see doneâ¦..
 @KHEB Were you as outraged when Bush, Cheney, Condi and the whole gang ignored the Aug. 6th memo and their inaction caused over 3,000 people to die while we all watch on national TV?  Want to talk about inaction....lets talk about Bush reading "My Pet Goat" while the worst terror attack in our history was unfolding. Â
Â
Of course you weren't outrage because as I have proved many times on this message board, you are a hypocrite!
@B Smizzle ... not much to debate here. You are sooo wrong, as usual. May the day come when you will wake up and smell the "truth" of things....You are wrong but want to perpetuate the rumors. How about Willy Clinton letting Ben Laden go three times....?Â
Sorry if Iâm wrong but I personally have never seen you prove one idiotic notion after another, excerpt trying to make yout âgolden idolâ and personal savior, Obama look like some avenger rather than destroying our county and the people in it.
 @KHEB  @B As usual all you can say is "you are wrong"
Â
About what, specifics please! Â What is rumor vs what is fact? Â If it is rumor then it should be easy for you to take apart point by point!
Â
"How about Willy Clinton letting Ben Laden go three times....? "
Again, another example of Republican hypocrisy....when the democrats blame the bad economy on Bush, the Republicans cry foul and say all the Democrats can do is blame Bush....yet that is EXACTLY what they do when reminded that the worst terror attack in our history was carried out under W's watch  hahahaha, that is rich!
Â
"to make yout âgolden idolâ and personal savior, Obama look like some avenger rather than destroying our county and the people in it."
Obviously you can't read as I am very consistent saying BOTH parties are to blame.Â
Â
"Sorry if Iâm wrong but I personally have never seen you prove one idiotic notion after another"
Â
It is one thing to be sorry you are wrong, it is another to be show the truth and still deny it!
Â
August 6th Memo
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CcrgeuLb3dQ
Â
Bush reading my pet goat instead of reacting immediately to the worst terror attack on US soil
http://www.buzzflash.com/editorial/04/08/edi04057.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WztB6HzXxI
Â
Planes hitting the WTC's on TV
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJDDSPYQgQc
Â
So again I have to ask you, what is rumor and what is fact? Â Why the outrage only one way? Â Come on, step up and back up what you say!
Â
 @KHEB Personally I felt it made a difference.
And, she still doesn't get it. It does matter!
I really feel for the 4 families who will never get an answer because of government and the media that is supposed to keep them in check are corrupt to the core.
Â
I feel even sorry for all the idiots who think it is only the other side that is corrupt and then use a few examples in history to try and say see they did it so why can't we.
Â
Well the answer to that is we are not in grade school anymore and we need to hold everyone accountable for their own actions regardless of what anyone else does. This goes for guns and politics...
 @FreedomRocks Fact of the matter is she is a politician. Obama is a politician. Bush is/was a politician. They're all corrupt regardless of what letter they have after their name. Someday the extremists, like USCitizen in his below posts, will get it (we hope). They're all to blame. None of them want to work with the others for the common good. They all just want to follow party lines and not budge.Â
Â
This is one reason of many that I wish we had term limits. I think term limits would force them to work together for the good of the country.
 @scoreboard  @FreedomRocks Bush was not corrupt. Cheney on the other hand was the definition.
So?
@Ramsesthegreat @TreeWizard @scoreboard That would be a huge gift tax hit and I am sure the left and Dems would have been all over that if it happened. So once again I think your wishful thinking here since your politics and the people your trusting to inform you seem to be shall we say not "fair and balanced"...
 @FreedomRocks  @TreeWizard  @scoreboard I could be wrong, but I'm willing to bet that he simply transferred ownership of the stocks to someone else with the intent of retaking them in the future.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @scoreboard  @FreedomRocks I don't think Bush was inept at all.Â
 @Ramsesthegreat  @TreeWizard  @scoreboard http://www.factcheck.org/kerry_ad_falsely_accuses_cheney_on_halliburton.html
 @Ramsesthegreat  @TreeWizard  @scoreboard I believe he did before he became VP but had to sell to avoid conflict of interest when VP.
Â
So I think your being fed a line of BS by left wing news/web sites...
 @TreeWizard  @scoreboard  @FreedomRocks You're correct, I believe that Bush was just inept. Cheney is the very definition of corrupt though. There is a very good reason that nearly every civilian contract for Iraq was a no-bid contract that was handed to Haliburton. (Cheney holds a large percentage of stock in the company)
 @TreeWizard  @FreedomRocks They're all corrupt. Some just more so than others.
And she wants to run for president in 2016? I don't think so......
@scoreboard President of what? Perhaps the best she can hope for is the neighborhood recycling committee!
 @scoreboard No, she more than likely WILL run for President, and the GOP will put up another extreme right candidate or a centrist candidate who will bend over to please the extreme right, and they will lose again.
 @Ramsesthegreat And may God help us all.....
 @Ramsesthegreat I noticed you completed ignored the abortion comment.
Â
 @scoreboard Leviticus is from the old testament which was put to rest with the death and resurrection of Jesus. This is why modern (Non-right wing extremist) churches follow the new testament solely. And as for Jesus allowing gay marriage, since he said that he loved all his followers and wished them nothing but happiness, yes I believe he would approve. However, it doesn't matter because in this country marriage is a civil contract between two consenting adults. NOT a religious ceremony.
 @TreeWizard  @Ramsesthegreat Nope, directed at Ramses....
 @Ramsesthegreat And neither would God.Â
Â
http://bible.cc/leviticus/20-13.htm
 @scoreboard  @Ramsesthegreat it was at me right?
 @TreeWizard  @Ramsesthegreat My comment wasn't actually directed at Ramses.... :)
 @scoreboard  @Ramsesthegreat I really have no idea what Jesus would think. I was just showing him that his party does the same things they blame are party for.
 @Ramsesthegreat Do you think Jesus would have approved of abortions and gay marriage? I doubt it very much.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @scoreboard I don't see Jesus being a fan of drone strikes, assassinations and interventions.
 @scoreboard He's more likely to help Democrats, since they more closely follow the teachings of Jesus. You know, love everyone, take care of the poor, give your life to service, greed is bad. While the most vocal, and therefore the symbol of the party, Republicans seem to believe the exact opposite of all of those things.
Clinton #1 "It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."
Â
Clinton #2 "What does it matter now?"
The run for the 2016 Presidential nominations is already in full swing.
Ignorant liberal fool. What a hack. Have you apologized to their parents yet mrs. Clinton? You know, for that whole "video" thing. And you actually have the audacity to think of running for president? After Obama's disgrace and despair of our economy, what chance would another liberal have of winning anyway.Â
 @last boyscout Do you also believe Condi Rice should apologize to all 9/11 victims parents?  You know, for that whole Aug. 6th "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the United States" memo she and the rest of the presidential cabinet got one month before it happened as well as other memos even earlier than that warning of an imminent attack yet did nothing.  And you want to talk about video feed but no reaction!  The entire nation was watching on TV yet nothing done....no fighters in the air, nothing.  Had they done something the pentagon plane that hit 62 minutes after the WTC attacks might have been intercepted!
Â
Bottom line, they (Republicans and Democrats alike) all look out only for their needs not ours.
Â
Another perfect example of Republican hypocrisy (this coming from a life long Republican) they always say the Democrats always blame Bush.  Yet I remember after 9/11 part of the Bush/Republican/Fox news narrative was it was Clinton's fault because he had a chance to get Bin Laden with a predator drone and he didn't.
Â
They both do the same thing, they both use the same playbook. Â No matter how much you polish a turd, it's still a turd!
@B Smizzle ...You continue to show your lack of knowledge, hypocrisy and all  just hanging out there for all to see....gees....
 @KHEB  @Ramsesthegreat  @B Still waiting for a reply....debating you is like debating a toothless kitten!
 @KHEB  @Ramsesthegreat  @B Meant Aug. 6th not Aug.9th......not like you would have a clue anyway!
 @KHEB  @Ramsesthegreat  @B What conspiracy, KHEB....what was said that is not fact?
Â
Are you saying there was no memo in August 9th 2001 titled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the United States" saying an attack was imminent and that plans to hijack planes and crash them never actually happened?
Â
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US
"The President's Daily Brief (PDB) is a brief of important classified information on national security collected by various U.S. intelligence agencies given to the president and a select group of senior officials. On August 6, 2001, the Central Intelligence Agency delivered a President's Daily Brief to President Bush, who was vacationing at his ranch in Crawford, Texas.[2]"
Â
Hmmmmm, yet saying he was too busy at his ranch and pointing out this memo is conspiracy and not fact......hmmmmmm.....
Â
Next, what is conspiracy about pointing out that 62 minutes passed from the time the first plane hit the WTC until the Pentagon was hit and that NO FIGHTERS were scrambled?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/9/11_timeline
Â
Are you saying the Republicans didn't blame Clinton for 9/11?Â
http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1539771,00.html
http://www.politicususa.com/GOP-9-11-Lies.html
Â
Honestly, lets have a debate....what is conspiracy about these FACTS?  Please, go point by point and back up your claims, even with Fox new articles!  Your silence will be deafening.....like a dog, your bark is worse than your bite!  Easy tiger.....easy.....
Â
Â
 @KHEB  @B What lack of knowledge?  Please be specific, point by point what I said that was wrong and lacked knowledge.  Or are you just talking general knowledge you have from watching fox news?
Â
Go ahead, like I do to you, point by point...what is incorrect! Â
@Ramsesthegreat @B ...ah, now I get it....belong to that conspiracy do you?
 @KHEB  @B Yet everything he just stated about the inaction leading up to the attacks on 9/11 are true. The Bush administration was informed months before that an attack was likely to be carried out with planes against the U.S. and they chose to ignore it because Bush was having too much fun playing on his Ranch for nearly the first 300 days of his presidency to be bothered by it.
 @last boyscout Sadly with the entitlement crowd as large as it is, there is a pretty good chance that it will be awhile before we see a GOP president. Damn bleeding heart liberals......
 @scoreboard  @last boyscout Funny that most of those "entitled" are the wealthy Republicans who believe their entitled to other people's money in the form of government subsidies, and btw, the highest levels of government assistance goes to deep red states. That tells me that the Republicans are the ones taking the most money in government assistance. But don't worry, the GOP will keep telling you it's the other way around, despite the statistics (cause who needs facts anyways) that say it's not, and you'll keep believing it like a good little Republican.
 @scoreboard  @last boyscout Sure thing. Google is a wonderful tool.
http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_reckoning/2012/10/25/blue_state_red_face_guess_who_benefits_more_from_your_taxes.html
 @Ramsesthegreat  @last boyscout Can you prove that?
 @scoreboard  @last boyscout You seem to be missing the point that the vast majority of those "entitled" are from DEEP red states where the Democratic party makes up less than 20% of the population. Seems you should be complaining about Republicans taking your tax money for not working and not Democrats.
Â
On average, Blue states receive $.70 back in federal money for every $1 they pay in taxes, on the contrary, red states receive around $1.20 back in federal money for every $1 they pay in taxes. This is due to a MUCH larger level of poverty and welfare aid in red states.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @last boyscout And on the other side those that think they are entitled think that they don't have to work for their money and that taxpayers like me should pay their way in the form of unemployment, welfare, food stamps, subsidized housing, etc., because they're too damned lazy to get a job.
 @last boyscout Obama and his ilk being in power is scary. What REALLY scares me is that people voted for Obama and his ilk a SECOND time.