Criticism of Dutch 'Black Pete' tradition grows

AMSTERDAM (AP) - Foreigners visiting the Netherlands in winter are often surprised to see that the Dutch version of St. Nicholas' helpers have their faces painted black, wear Afro wigs and have thick red lips - in short, a racist caricature of a black person.
The overwhelming majority of Dutch are fiercely devoted to the holiday tradition of "Zwarte Piet" - whose name means "Black Pete" - and insist he's a harmless fictional figure who doesn't represent any race. But a growing number are questioning whether "Zwarte Piet" should be given a makeover or banished from the holiday scene, seeing him as a blight on the nation's image as a bulwark of tolerance.
"There is more opposition to Zwarte Piet than you might think," says Jessica Silversmith, director of the regional Anti-Discrimination Bureau for Amsterdam. She said that historically her office received only one or two complaints per year, but the number jumped to more than 100 last year, and will escalate much further this year.
"It's not only Antilleans or Surinamers who are complaining," she said, referring to people descended from the former Dutch colonies that once traded in slavery. "It's all kinds of Dutch people."
There are various versions of the history of St. Nicholas - "Sinterklaas" in Dutch - and of Zwarte Piet, who made his debut as an African servant in an 1850 book.
"Nobody is against the Sinterklaas celebration or is calling people who celebrate it racist," said Silversmith. "But it is time to consider whether this is offensive, whether there actually are racist ideas underlying Zwarte Piet."
The debate comes after a decade in which the Dutch have rolled back many aspects of their famed tolerance policies, and in which anti-immigrant sentiment has risen sharply. Zwarte Piet is frequently defended as part of Dutch cultural heritage, and those who don't like it are often bluntly invited to leave the country. Many Dutch say Pete's black face derives from the soot he picked up climbing down chimneys to deliver presents - although that hardly explains the frizzy hair and big lips.
In the U.S., stereotypical black makeup - called blackface - was phased out in the civil-rights era. But in Britain, a TV show featuring blackface lasted until the late 1970s before the practice became taboo. Blackface crops up in other European countries from time to time, such as in a theater performance in Germany this year, but it's only in the Netherlands that it's institutionalized in the form of Black Pete.
A sea-change may have occurred here during last year's festivities, when four men were arrested for wearing T-shirts bearing the slogan "Zwarte Piet is Racism" outside a store during an appearance of Sinterklaas - and charged with protesting without a permit.
Police threw one, Quinsy Gario, to the ground, and kneed him in the back repeatedly as they dragged him away, though he offered no resistance. A video of the incident was placed on YouTube, and the slogan began trending.
Although police were later found to have acted wrongly, many parents still felt that it was inappropriate to protest during the holiday or when children were present. Gario responds that Dutch people won't discuss the matter the rest of the year, so his protest was the only way to broach the subject.
This year the debate has clearly escalated.
For the first time, a white politician has openly challenged the tradition: "The Sinterklaas celebration once began without Zwarte Piet," Amsterdam councilwoman Andree van Es said in an interview with newspaper Het Parool this week. "It's time it continues without Zwarte Piet."
Two major chains of stores, Blokker and V&D, now use images of kids with ash-smudged cheeks in their sales catalogues, rather than Petes with black faces. And in a first this weekend, a documentary laying out arguments against Zwarte Piet aired on national television.
The county's most widely read news blog, "GeenStijl" launched a blistering campaign against Black Pete- surprising because GeenStijl prides itself on being tasteless and politically incorrect, and had mocked Gario after the 2011 incident.
"Zwarte Piet is nothing more than a repulsive parody of a slave, fine-tuned to indoctrinate schoolchildren into the finer points of racism," it wrote in its first posting in a series. "The sooner we get rid of Zwarte Piet, the sooner we won't look like idiots to the rest of the world."
While the author, who uses the pen name Johnny Quid, uses the satirical blog also to skewer Black Pete opponents, he has deeply antagonized the blog's mostly conservative-leaning reader base.
Despite the growing anti-Pete movement, the tradition finds a strong bedrock of support in mainstream Dutch society, meaning it's unlikely to disappear any time soon.
In 2008, a Museum in Eindhoven called off an anti-Pete exhibition after protests. The foreign artists received death threats. And when Victoria's Secret model Doutzen Kroes said on national television in 2009 that Zwarte Piet is the one thing that has ever made her feel ashamed of being Dutch, the studio audience laughed at her.
Jan Pronk, a leftist politician who once served as the U.N. envoy to Sudan, dismissed her viewpoint on the show. "These are very old traditions," he said, "I don't think it's so bad."
A Facebook page with the slogan "Zwarte Piet is Racism" has become a major platform for debate this year, though moderators have begun removing hate speech and personal threats.
One organization reinforcing the Zwarte Piet image is educational broadcaster NTR, which also airs "Sesame Street" in the Netherlands. It has developed a popular fake news program for kids, devoted to the doings of the wise white Sinterklaas and his many bumbling Petes, all with the traditional blackface look.
The program starts in early November and airs nightly until kids open their presents on Dec. 5. (Although the Dutch Sinterklaas is the source of the American Santa Claus, Christmas is a separate holiday in the Netherlands, where the present-opening tradition happens three weeks earlier.) The show draws more than a million viewers in a country of 16 million, and its spokeswoman, Helen Albada, said she was unaware of any complaints about its depiction of Zwarte Piet.
Several years ago, the broadcaster experimented with a story line in which the Petes were turned different colors after sailing through a magical rainbow. That drew thousands of complaints, in part because the backlash against immigration was cresting at the time: Fans said changing Pete was sacrificing Dutch cultural heritage to the forces of multiculturalism.
"We didn't intend that either," Albada said. "Kids don't see Pete as black, it's the adults that give it a racial meaning."
In a recent editorial, one columnist for the NRC Handelsblad newspaper questioned whether the country really is as tolerant as it likes to style itself. He deplored the fact that even as the U.S. has re-elected a black president, not a single member of the Netherlands' new Cabinet is of non-Dutch ancestry.
"That's because we, unlike other countries, have become completely colorblind," Bas Heijne wrote ironically. "We don't need a black minister, let alone a black prime minister: We have Zwarte Piet."
The overwhelming majority of Dutch are fiercely devoted to the holiday tradition of "Zwarte Piet" - whose name means "Black Pete" - and insist he's a harmless fictional figure who doesn't represent any race. But a growing number are questioning whether "Zwarte Piet" should be given a makeover or banished from the holiday scene, seeing him as a blight on the nation's image as a bulwark of tolerance.
"There is more opposition to Zwarte Piet than you might think," says Jessica Silversmith, director of the regional Anti-Discrimination Bureau for Amsterdam. She said that historically her office received only one or two complaints per year, but the number jumped to more than 100 last year, and will escalate much further this year.
"It's not only Antilleans or Surinamers who are complaining," she said, referring to people descended from the former Dutch colonies that once traded in slavery. "It's all kinds of Dutch people."
There are various versions of the history of St. Nicholas - "Sinterklaas" in Dutch - and of Zwarte Piet, who made his debut as an African servant in an 1850 book.
"Nobody is against the Sinterklaas celebration or is calling people who celebrate it racist," said Silversmith. "But it is time to consider whether this is offensive, whether there actually are racist ideas underlying Zwarte Piet."
The debate comes after a decade in which the Dutch have rolled back many aspects of their famed tolerance policies, and in which anti-immigrant sentiment has risen sharply. Zwarte Piet is frequently defended as part of Dutch cultural heritage, and those who don't like it are often bluntly invited to leave the country. Many Dutch say Pete's black face derives from the soot he picked up climbing down chimneys to deliver presents - although that hardly explains the frizzy hair and big lips.
In the U.S., stereotypical black makeup - called blackface - was phased out in the civil-rights era. But in Britain, a TV show featuring blackface lasted until the late 1970s before the practice became taboo. Blackface crops up in other European countries from time to time, such as in a theater performance in Germany this year, but it's only in the Netherlands that it's institutionalized in the form of Black Pete.
A sea-change may have occurred here during last year's festivities, when four men were arrested for wearing T-shirts bearing the slogan "Zwarte Piet is Racism" outside a store during an appearance of Sinterklaas - and charged with protesting without a permit.
Police threw one, Quinsy Gario, to the ground, and kneed him in the back repeatedly as they dragged him away, though he offered no resistance. A video of the incident was placed on YouTube, and the slogan began trending.
Although police were later found to have acted wrongly, many parents still felt that it was inappropriate to protest during the holiday or when children were present. Gario responds that Dutch people won't discuss the matter the rest of the year, so his protest was the only way to broach the subject.
This year the debate has clearly escalated.
For the first time, a white politician has openly challenged the tradition: "The Sinterklaas celebration once began without Zwarte Piet," Amsterdam councilwoman Andree van Es said in an interview with newspaper Het Parool this week. "It's time it continues without Zwarte Piet."
Two major chains of stores, Blokker and V&D, now use images of kids with ash-smudged cheeks in their sales catalogues, rather than Petes with black faces. And in a first this weekend, a documentary laying out arguments against Zwarte Piet aired on national television.
The county's most widely read news blog, "GeenStijl" launched a blistering campaign against Black Pete- surprising because GeenStijl prides itself on being tasteless and politically incorrect, and had mocked Gario after the 2011 incident.
"Zwarte Piet is nothing more than a repulsive parody of a slave, fine-tuned to indoctrinate schoolchildren into the finer points of racism," it wrote in its first posting in a series. "The sooner we get rid of Zwarte Piet, the sooner we won't look like idiots to the rest of the world."
While the author, who uses the pen name Johnny Quid, uses the satirical blog also to skewer Black Pete opponents, he has deeply antagonized the blog's mostly conservative-leaning reader base.
Despite the growing anti-Pete movement, the tradition finds a strong bedrock of support in mainstream Dutch society, meaning it's unlikely to disappear any time soon.
In 2008, a Museum in Eindhoven called off an anti-Pete exhibition after protests. The foreign artists received death threats. And when Victoria's Secret model Doutzen Kroes said on national television in 2009 that Zwarte Piet is the one thing that has ever made her feel ashamed of being Dutch, the studio audience laughed at her.
Jan Pronk, a leftist politician who once served as the U.N. envoy to Sudan, dismissed her viewpoint on the show. "These are very old traditions," he said, "I don't think it's so bad."
A Facebook page with the slogan "Zwarte Piet is Racism" has become a major platform for debate this year, though moderators have begun removing hate speech and personal threats.
One organization reinforcing the Zwarte Piet image is educational broadcaster NTR, which also airs "Sesame Street" in the Netherlands. It has developed a popular fake news program for kids, devoted to the doings of the wise white Sinterklaas and his many bumbling Petes, all with the traditional blackface look.
The program starts in early November and airs nightly until kids open their presents on Dec. 5. (Although the Dutch Sinterklaas is the source of the American Santa Claus, Christmas is a separate holiday in the Netherlands, where the present-opening tradition happens three weeks earlier.) The show draws more than a million viewers in a country of 16 million, and its spokeswoman, Helen Albada, said she was unaware of any complaints about its depiction of Zwarte Piet.
Several years ago, the broadcaster experimented with a story line in which the Petes were turned different colors after sailing through a magical rainbow. That drew thousands of complaints, in part because the backlash against immigration was cresting at the time: Fans said changing Pete was sacrificing Dutch cultural heritage to the forces of multiculturalism.
"We didn't intend that either," Albada said. "Kids don't see Pete as black, it's the adults that give it a racial meaning."
In a recent editorial, one columnist for the NRC Handelsblad newspaper questioned whether the country really is as tolerant as it likes to style itself. He deplored the fact that even as the U.S. has re-elected a black president, not a single member of the Netherlands' new Cabinet is of non-Dutch ancestry.
"That's because we, unlike other countries, have become completely colorblind," Bas Heijne wrote ironically. "We don't need a black minister, let alone a black prime minister: We have Zwarte Piet."
There is nothing wrong with this...The cry babies are the real problem.
Black Pete originated in Dutch literature as an African servant who lived in the Dutch colonies before they banished slavery. As such, he portrays a "bumbling character". I can understand how some would see this as racism. At the very least, it is an insulting caricature of a former Black slave. I can understand why some in Holland would like to see this tradition done away with. I think it does make the Dutch look stupid.
i know some guys in the NL and have seen them dressed for this, they really don't think it's racist at all....just because something offends here doesn't mean it's universally offensive.....contrary to what we think, we are not the center of the world.
 @deejm2112 From reading the article, I don't get the impression that it is the United States which is offended by this tradition and asking for a change. Much of the criticism seems to come from within the Netherlands.
 @deejm2112 ~  VERY well said, deejm..!   I sometimes think that we (Americans) get a little bit too carried away with ourselves...  I love this country, but we need to remember that our "record" with respect to tolerance hasn't been so great in the past (or even in the present) that we can afford to be too critical of others.   "People who live in glass houses, etc..."
 @margay1  @deejm2112 The Anti-Discrimination Bureau in Holland is not an American-sponsored institution. This is despite the American-sounding name of its spokesperson, "Jessica Silversmith". So this is not an article about American criticism of Black Pete. Much of the criticism comes from within the Netherlands itself.
If you dress up and act as a fool, I'm going to interpret you as a fool.Â
Â
Doesn't matter much to me if you're dressing up like Zwarte Piet, Snookie or Donald Trump.Â
Â
I mean, couldn't the US steriotype of Santa Claus be considered to be offensive to overweight people?
Â
How about the elves? Aren't they offensive and steriotypical to people suffering from dwarfism?
Â
Corraling reindeer in the tundra, and harnessing them once a year to pull a slegh? Jump on, animal rights activists!
Â
The cutting of trees, better call Sierra Club!Â
Â
Somewhere along the line, people seem to have forgotten the most simple of truths... Â Take offense is an active verb.Â
Â
Â
So just by acting black if you are not black now is racist? What a crock of crap. So when Chris Rock or any black comedian goes into thier "white voice" they are being racisist? Yea - lets all hold our breath for that one. The old double standard showing its "racist" side again.
 @wvboyÂ
Itâs not "acting black" it's blackface.
Â
And it's not that blackface being racist alone is the issue. It is the history of blackface, how it was used and its purpose as a tool of racism.
Â
I am guessing you are not well versed in the history of blackface and its use. It was commonly used as a tool not only to replace African Americans in film (and even early TV), but to denigrate them as people. The blackface character is often stupid, lazy and clumsy. All things to undermine any sense of pride of self worth that a person might have. And film and TV weren't the first places it was used. Vaudeville was awash in KKK in the south who would use it as a tool to amp up their people before a rally, or a cross burning.
Â
It was a tool all of its own in the worst of America and indeed of the white, African slave world.
Â
And the Netherlands was the place where those ships originated. The Dutch weren't the first to be part of the "slave triangle", but they were the people who most profited from it (aside from the US colony).
Â
So if you're going to make a comparison, think of it from a more notable example. Think of a German making fun of Jewish people by dressing up in striped clothes and running around saying 'I'm hungry, but I wouldnât be if I wasn't so stupid!"
Â
And I hope you get that reference and why it too is racist.
Â
Â
Â
I am very well versed in the history of black face as well as having grown up in the south in the early 60's with white and black only public accomodations. And am well versed in the history of slavery in this country and its origins in Europe and Africa (in relation to American slavery). Even as a child I knew that was wrong. And had parents that I cannot ever remember saying the "n" word or being overtly racists (for the times). In my day the histroy books used in cassrooms did not gloss over this subject and used the n word. Look at a history book used today. The term African American is used to describe slaves in some. Talk about revisionist history. Kids today are given a sanitized version of history without the reality or nastiness of the times. I maintain my original point. American black face did not originate from this dutch character. It could be argued that its (white use of black face) intent was not even derisive in nature at the time (some intent was there to ridicule blacks - not all in my opinion). Look at some of the plays back then that used this - the black face most times was used to depict a black person singing and acting. It was not possible to have black actors and singers performing together on stage. That is some of the origin. By yours and many apologists definition - it  is racists when any black person, gay person, hispanic person etc depicts anyone not of thier race or gender in public. Or at least for a white person to do so. You seem to want and/or be comfortable with the double standard - I think that that is very wrong and a danger to my civil rights. There are many double standards in life, most very benign. Although in some countries this depiction could get you jail time. If I choose to act the idiot, that is my right. If that tramples on your feelings - oh well - get over it because my right to be an idiot - with racial overtones or to be overtly racists is a protected right under our constitution. As long as I am not inciting a riot. If wanting civil liberties and freedom of expression make me a racists - I proudly wear ithe label. Although I reject your ability to define that label to me.
The Netherlands is second only to Denmark in racism in Europe to my experience.
Â
I recall a "progressive" university instructor I had once lamented how his country was going so "Turkish" because nearly 0.02 of the pollution was not white and in a decade it was going to reach nearly 3%.
Â
Ironically, my experience has been that Germany is one of the most tolerant places in the world.
Â