'Damn shame:' Looming automatic budget cuts find few fans

WASHINGTON (AP) - The automatic budget cuts set to take hold this week were roundly condemned Sunday as governors, lawmakers and administration officials hoped for a deal to stave off the $85 billion reduction in government services.
Suggestions intended to instill a spirit of compromise included bringing all sides to the bargaining table, where they could act like "adults, a presidential summit at Camp David and even a field trip to watch "Lincoln."
The alternative, as the White House outlined, is a damaging impact on everything from commercial flights to classrooms and meat inspections.
With Friday's deadline nearing, few in the nation's capital were optimistic that a realistic alternative could be found. Instead of dealing with problem at hand, both sides made assigning blame a priority as the clock ticked down.
"Unless the Republicans are willing to compromise and do a balanced approach, I think it will kick in," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
No, it's the Democrats who are to blame, the GOP countered.
"The reason there is no agreement is because there's no leadership from the president on actually recognizing what the problem is," said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.
The administration warned of the approaching economic fallout.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said travelers could see delayed flights. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said 70,000 fewer children from low-income families would have access to Head Start programs. Furloughed meat inspectors could leave plants idled.
"It's senseless and it doesn't need to happen," said Gov. Martin O'Malley, D-Md., during the annual meeting of the National Governors Association this weekend.
"And it's a damn shame, because we've actually had the fastest rate of jobs recovery of any state in our region. And this really threatens to hurt a lot of families in our state and kind of flat line our job growth for the next several months."
Some governors said the impasse was just the latest crisis in Washington that is keeping businesses from hiring and undermining the ability of state leaders to develop their own spending plans.
"I've not given up hope, but we're going to be prepared for whatever comes," said Gov. Brian Sandoval, R-Nev. "There will be consequences for our state."
Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy said it is past time for both sides to sit down to help dodge cuts that will hurt all states' budgets.
"Come to the table, everyone. Everybody. Let's work this thing out. Let's be adults," Malloy said.
Obama has not been able to find success for his approach of reducing deficits through a combination of targeted savings and tax increases. House Republicans have said reduced spending needs to be the focus and have rejected the president's demand to include higher taxes as part of a compromise.
LaHood warned travelers could face delays because the Federal Aviation Administration is in line for $600 million in spending cuts.
"We're going to try and cut as much as we possibly can out of contracts and other things that we do," said LaHood, a Republican serving in the Democratic Obama administration. "But in the end, there has to be some kind of furlough of air traffic controllers, and that then will also begin to curtail or eliminate the opportunity for them to guide planes in and out of airports."
Duncan said school districts were already bracing for fewer teachers when school starts in the fall but urged lawmakers to return to negotiations.
"This is not rocket science. We could solve this tomorrow," Duncan said.
There are fewer signs of urgency among congressional leaders, who have recently indicated their willingness to let the cuts take effect and stay in place for weeks, if not much longer.
"It will kick in, but at a pro rata rate. So, you're not going to see $85 billion all of a sudden shrink from the federal government," Coburn said, suggesting the reality would not turn dire immediately.
The cuts would trim from domestic and defense spending alike, leading to furloughs for hundreds of thousands of workers. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said the cuts would harm the readiness of U.S. fighting forces.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called those defense cuts "unconscionable" and urged Obama to call lawmakers to the White House or the presidential retreat of Camp David for a last-minute budget summit.
"I won't put all the blame all on the president of the United States. But the president leads. The president should be calling us over somewhere - Camp David, the White House, somewhere - and us sitting down and trying to avert these cuts," McCain said.
LaHood, who served as a Republican representing Illinois in the U.S. House, urged his colleagues to watch "Lincoln," Steven Spielberg's film about President Abraham Lincoln's political skills.
"Everybody around here ought to go take a look at the 'Lincoln' movie, where they did very hard things by working together, talking together and compromising," LaHood said. "That's what's needed here."
McCaskill and Coburn appeared on "Fox News Sunday." Malloy and McCain were interviewed on CNN's "State of the Union." LaHood spoke with CNN and NBC's "Meet the Press." Duncan spoke to CBS' "Face the Nation."
Suggestions intended to instill a spirit of compromise included bringing all sides to the bargaining table, where they could act like "adults, a presidential summit at Camp David and even a field trip to watch "Lincoln."
The alternative, as the White House outlined, is a damaging impact on everything from commercial flights to classrooms and meat inspections.
With Friday's deadline nearing, few in the nation's capital were optimistic that a realistic alternative could be found. Instead of dealing with problem at hand, both sides made assigning blame a priority as the clock ticked down.
"Unless the Republicans are willing to compromise and do a balanced approach, I think it will kick in," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
No, it's the Democrats who are to blame, the GOP countered.
"The reason there is no agreement is because there's no leadership from the president on actually recognizing what the problem is," said Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla.
The administration warned of the approaching economic fallout.
Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said travelers could see delayed flights. Education Secretary Arne Duncan said 70,000 fewer children from low-income families would have access to Head Start programs. Furloughed meat inspectors could leave plants idled.
"It's senseless and it doesn't need to happen," said Gov. Martin O'Malley, D-Md., during the annual meeting of the National Governors Association this weekend.
"And it's a damn shame, because we've actually had the fastest rate of jobs recovery of any state in our region. And this really threatens to hurt a lot of families in our state and kind of flat line our job growth for the next several months."
Some governors said the impasse was just the latest crisis in Washington that is keeping businesses from hiring and undermining the ability of state leaders to develop their own spending plans.
"I've not given up hope, but we're going to be prepared for whatever comes," said Gov. Brian Sandoval, R-Nev. "There will be consequences for our state."
Connecticut Gov. Dan Malloy said it is past time for both sides to sit down to help dodge cuts that will hurt all states' budgets.
"Come to the table, everyone. Everybody. Let's work this thing out. Let's be adults," Malloy said.
Obama has not been able to find success for his approach of reducing deficits through a combination of targeted savings and tax increases. House Republicans have said reduced spending needs to be the focus and have rejected the president's demand to include higher taxes as part of a compromise.
LaHood warned travelers could face delays because the Federal Aviation Administration is in line for $600 million in spending cuts.
"We're going to try and cut as much as we possibly can out of contracts and other things that we do," said LaHood, a Republican serving in the Democratic Obama administration. "But in the end, there has to be some kind of furlough of air traffic controllers, and that then will also begin to curtail or eliminate the opportunity for them to guide planes in and out of airports."
Duncan said school districts were already bracing for fewer teachers when school starts in the fall but urged lawmakers to return to negotiations.
"This is not rocket science. We could solve this tomorrow," Duncan said.
There are fewer signs of urgency among congressional leaders, who have recently indicated their willingness to let the cuts take effect and stay in place for weeks, if not much longer.
"It will kick in, but at a pro rata rate. So, you're not going to see $85 billion all of a sudden shrink from the federal government," Coburn said, suggesting the reality would not turn dire immediately.
The cuts would trim from domestic and defense spending alike, leading to furloughs for hundreds of thousands of workers. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has said the cuts would harm the readiness of U.S. fighting forces.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., called those defense cuts "unconscionable" and urged Obama to call lawmakers to the White House or the presidential retreat of Camp David for a last-minute budget summit.
"I won't put all the blame all on the president of the United States. But the president leads. The president should be calling us over somewhere - Camp David, the White House, somewhere - and us sitting down and trying to avert these cuts," McCain said.
LaHood, who served as a Republican representing Illinois in the U.S. House, urged his colleagues to watch "Lincoln," Steven Spielberg's film about President Abraham Lincoln's political skills.
"Everybody around here ought to go take a look at the 'Lincoln' movie, where they did very hard things by working together, talking together and compromising," LaHood said. "That's what's needed here."
McCaskill and Coburn appeared on "Fox News Sunday." Malloy and McCain were interviewed on CNN's "State of the Union." LaHood spoke with CNN and NBC's "Meet the Press." Duncan spoke to CBS' "Face the Nation."
So why does the US need to spend more than all countries combined on military spending ??
while the working poor suffer??
Oh Wait I know so we can borrow money fron china to give the rich tax cuts...
Well now it all makes sense
Ha ha ha ha
"Unless the Republicans are willing to compromise and do a balanced approach, I think it will kick in," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.
No, it's the Democrats who are to blame, the GOP countered.
The rich should pay No tax and throw grandma under the bus..
And who was it who said when we bailed out the banks the money went to the Cayman Islands??
Oh right mitt..
The headline is false. Â We need the cuts. Â It wont hurt anything. Â The liberals are always saying the sky is falling.
85 Billion in cuts  on a 3,800 Billion dollar budget is only a 2% cut
I'd stay its a pretty safe bet  there is  A LOT  of  fear mongering  going on by the left
@kramr
Yep, for example: Fewer TSA inspectors is going to lead to HUGE delays at the airports.@WebFootSTi @kramr ~ Let's get rid of the TSA...  Â
17 TRILLION ALREADY IN THE HOLE.....and still borrowing  35cents +/- for every dollar  the feds spend
Cuts in spending is the only responsible thing to do
@kramr So we should NOT borrow money from china to make up for the tax cuts to the rich..????
Yea try getting the republicans to go for that..ha ha ha.
It will not matter in a few short years the choice will be made for us.......
The federal government faces unfunded liabilities totalling $84 trillion, with more than $30.3 trillion owed to public debt holders, federal employees and current retirees in the form of Social Security and Medicaid benefits, according to a recent report by the nonpartisan National Center for Policy Analysis.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/07/16/report-federal-unfunded-liabilities-total-84-trillion/#ixzz2LsmyP0DE
@GoodbyeOregon Shhhhh.... Right now, the crisis is guns and immigration.Â
C'mon, pal. Stick with the program. We don't want the rabble to actually think.Â
@MarkKpic sorry...my bad...here are some more brain teasers
http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/11/just_how_much_is_15_trillion.html
I bet anyone posting on this thread could do a much better job in making cuts in the budget. WE live in the real world and would have no problem cutting useless funding for useless programs and studies, that would be a good start. But why must we always blame, and point fingers? This is a problem on both sides of the aisle. But always the first to go on the chopping block is the military, seniors on social security (which they PAID into their whole lives) and law enforcement/teachers/children. Scare tactics. Time to get a broom and sweep these useless lawmakers out of DC.
Austerity has proven a dismal failure everywhere it's been tried. But, why would we expect conservatives to notice that? "Cut, cut, cut" is a much easier slogan to comprehend.
@Max Quinn "tax, tax, tax" is even easier to comprehend.Â
Unfortunately for BOTH sides, neither exclusively is going to solve the financial mess the country is in.Â
@Max Quinn getajob.
@Ramona @Max Quinn Try harder...
Do the math.....the budget was 3.68 trillion last year, 85 billion is 2.3% of said budget. Â 85 billion is a drop in the bucket!
Those on welfare, "Darn I better look  for work."  Those layed off feds, "Darn now I might have to get a working job."
The sequester is indeed Obama's idea and it is one of the very few good ideas he has ever had.
Please, please, do the sequester. Â Cut spending and cut some more. Â
If only it could be more than the paltry $85 billion.
@thesixthmoon But those cuts MUST be in the right places. Before looking to cut SS to the elderly and SSDI to the disabled, let's look at how much wasteful spending there is in DC and start the cuts with that. If someone is applying for welfare, SS, or SSDI, make them prove they are in this country legally. When it comes to welfare, it was meant to be a short-term solution until a person could get back on their feet financially. It needs to go back to being a short-term solution instead of a lifestyle.
the federal government should have a lot of its power taken away and given back to the states. the beast in DC has grown too large, politicized, and can't be trusted. governments closer to home are always better kept in check
"It's senseless and it doesn't need to happen,"
No, it's not senseless, and it DOES need to happen.
This quote from the story:Â "Unless the Republicans are willing to compromise and do a balanced approach, I think it will kick in," said Sen. Claire McCaskill, D-Mo.This statement perfectly demonstrates the Liberal modus operandi of lie and blame and lie and blame. Claire McCaskill, you ignorant fool, the sequester is your parties idea, Obama agreed with it, Obama stated that HE would block ANY attempt to stop the sequester cuts. We are sick of you lying liberal democrats trying to blame us for your mistakes.Â
@last boyscout But don't Republicans lie and blame as well?
Cut, cut, cut. The more the better.
Let the cuts happen. Somewhere, somehow the governments need to stop spending and get back to fiscal reality.
@RalphCramden Fiscal reality? The federal government?Â
ROFLMAO!!
Bwaaaaah, ha, ha, ha, ha.... Oh my gawd... THAT'S a riot.
The people living and working in their marbled halls in Washington, DC are about as far removed from 'fiscal reality' as Pluto is from the Earths gravity.
Our government ceased to be founded on fiscal reality when elected office became a paid position with federal benefits. It's been a downhill slide since.Â
"With Friday's deadline nearing, few in the nation's capital were optimistic that a realistic alternative could be found. Instead of dealing with problem at hand, both sides made assigning blame a priority as the clock ticked down." Â (from the story)
Business as usual... if this doesn't convince people that this is nothing but political posturing for the benefit of the politicians on BOTH SIDES, nothing ever will...
@margay1Â But, Margay.... It's all 'their' fault.Â
It's ALWAYS 'their' fault. 'We' are the only ones who have it right....
@MarkKpic @margay1 ~  Yep, that's about the size of it..!   ...sigh...
The typical political reaction, scare the American public, act concerned and spend spend spend
When running for office promise to cut government spending. When faced with budget cuts, always threaten to cut those programs that are most near and dear to the public, thus preventing any cuts. Rinse, repeat.
OH FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!! Each year the Gov. agencies put forth a "budget" of how much "MORE" money they will need to run their dept. the next year. All this sequestration does, is keep the money alloted to last years (2012) amount. In other words, they will ALL have to run their departments with last years budget. I have not made any more money this year than I had last year, and I am expected to pay all my bills and mortgage with the same amount as last year. If we taxpayers can do it, then it's time the government learned to "tighten their belts" ALSO. Get over it, and quit crying about the sky is falling.
@myopinion240  Hard to run based on last years budget when there hasn't been a budget in 4 years. They should have to run based on the last budget that was actually passed. I'm sure that would require much more than the piddly 85 billion they are facing now. I say, CUT AWAY!