East Coast cities begin to stir as superstorm moves north
»Play Video
NEW YORK (AP) — Two days after superstorm Sandy brought New York to a standstill, residents itching to get back to work and their old lives noticed small signs that the city might be getting back to — well, not quite normal.
Morning rush-hour traffic appeared thicker than on an ordinary day as people started to return to work in a New York without functioning subways. Cars were bumper to bumper on several major highways.
Mayor Michael Bloomberg planned to ring the bell at the New York Stock Exchange to reopen it after a rare two-day closure.
Perhaps most promising, though, was the people waiting at bus stops — a sign that mass transit was trying to resume even as the subway system and some vehicle tunnels remained crippled by Sandy's record storm surge.
Rosa Diaz, a 58-year-old diabetic, waited for a bus to take her to the Bronx so she could she could keep an appointment with her endocrinologist. She lives in the Flushing section of Queens but is staying with her mother, who lives in a senior residence in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood — with no power.
"It's horrible," she said. "Thank God, I bought gallons and gallons of water to drink and to wash with."
Even though workaday life was slowly returning, there was little false hope.
"Clearly, the challenges our city faces in the coming days are enormous," Bloomberg said Tuesday as officials warned that power might not be back until the weekend for hundreds of thousands of people accustomed to their cosmopolitan lives.
Time-lapse of the storm hitting New York City. It hits hardest at about the 1-minute mark:
While some bus service resumed and some bridges reopened, transit officials said they couldn't predict when the subway would run again after suffering the worst damage in its 108-year history.
The storm's deadly impact grew grimly clearer as the worst of it moved off: The death toll rose to 22 in the city, including two people who drowned in a home and one who was in bed when a tree fell on an apartment. A fire destroyed as many as 100 houses in a flooded beachfront neighborhood in Queens, while firefighters used boats to rescue people in chest-high water.
For the 8 million people who live here, the city was a different place one day after being battered by the megastorm — a combination of Hurricane Sandy, a wintry storm and a blast of arctic air.
Schools were shut for a second day and were closed Wednesday, too. And people inside and outside the city scrambled to find ways to get to work.
In lower Manhattan where power was out, traffic streamed off the Brooklyn Bridge but slowed as it approached downtown. There were few signs that traffic was being directed by police through intersections with darkened stoplights.
Buses have resumed partial service and are free, for now. And the city has modified taxi rules and encouraged drivers to pick up more than one passenger at a time.
Jeff Storey, of Goshen in the Hudson Valley north of the city, is a regular on the Metro-North Railroad and has been forced to work from home this week. He may have to switch to a bus until commuter rail service is running again, he told the Times-Herald Record of Middletown.
For Jill Meltz, a 45-year-old resident of the Upper West Side who works in advertising, Wednesday was the first day she felt good about going out. But it wasn't quite business as usual.
"It'll be back to normal when Starbucks opens," she said, glancing at a still-dark coffee shop.
Faced with the prospect of days without power and swaths of the city plunged into darkness at night, police brought in banks of lights and boosted patrols to reassure victims of a monster storm that they won't be victims of crime.
Some prominent galleries in Manhattan's Chelsea neighborhood hired private security and apartment building superintendents suddenly became guards. In Coney Island, about 100 police officers stood on corners or cruised in cars to guard a strip of vandalized stores and a damaged bank, to the relief of shaken residents.
"We're feeling OK, but at first we felt worried," 12-year-old Oleg Kharitmov said Tuesday as he walked his dog with his parents by the bank. "I'm pretty happy that the cops are here."
There was little sign of a crime wave, although police made multiple arrests in the city Monday and Tuesday, officials said. Charges included burglary, criminal mischief and trespassing. In one incident, three men were arrested on burglary charges after they struck a Radio Shack in Rockaway Beach, Queens, on Tuesday morning.
As night fell, nerves frayed.
Yvique Bastien waited outside an apartment complex with her two sons, her daughter, 4-month old grandchild and a pushcart full of supplies, hoping to get a ride to a relative's home from a member of her church. With the power out, it wasn't safe to stay, she said.
"We don't know what can happen to us," she said.
Bloomberg promised "a very heavy police presence" in the darkened neighborhoods, which include much of Manhattan south of the Empire State Building, from the East River to the Hudson River. Even outside the blackout areas, police deployed vans and patrol cars with their roof lights on, along with officers on the streets in a robust show of force.
Problems with high-voltage systems caused by the storm forced the utility to cut power Tuesday night to about 160,000 additional customers in Brooklyn and Staten Island.
Consolidated Edison, the power company, estimated it would be days before the last of the hundreds of thousands of customers in Manhattan and Brooklyn who lost power have electricity again. For the Bronx, Queens, Staten Island and Westchester County, with even more outages, it could take a week.
___
Associated Press writers Meghan Barr, Verena Dobnik, Frank Eltman, Tom Hays, Larry Neumeister, Karen Matthews, Alexandra Olson, Jennifer Peltz, Verena Dobnik and Hal Ritter contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
Al never fails to let me down.
Â
http://www.washingtontimes.com/blog/watercooler/2012/oct/30/picket-al-gore-blames-hurricane-sandy-global-warmi/
Â
He needs to keep promoting alternative energy to make more money. He has made over 100 million on his energy scams.
@RalphCramden This is different from the Koch brothers promoting ideas, that they will profit from, which try to debunk global warming how? I get the same disgusting feeling in my stomach from the Kochs as I do from Gore, maybe thatâs just me.
 @JTesla Â
Anthropogenic global warming is a religion and there is a lot of evidence that the so called warming is actually the earth returning back to normal after a long cooling period. So speaking out against it is like saying that Jesus isn't real. No one can prove it either way.
Â
I could just as well say that the cause of hurricane Sandy was because of the sin in the US. I couldn't prove it and those opposed to that comment could not disprove it.
Â
One thing that is easily proven. Al Gore has made most of his money promoting his anthropogenic global warming and because of that his motives and so called science are highly suspect.
@RalphCramden The link you provide is written as an opinion piece which led me to do a quick Google so I could see the full picture. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-20150316 As for the rest: which came first the science or the Gore? In this case it is the science, in the same methodical method it has almost always used. Those with what they view as a financial stake have ignored the logical approach of questioning the economics of what is proposed, and they instead take the path of denial.
 @JTesla Â
There are two kinds of science.
Â
One is that someone comes up with a theory and then finds data to support it and rejects data that doesn't. This is the Al Gore method.
Â
The other is that a theory is proposed. Then scientific experiments are done to see of they support the theory. All experiments are considered in the study.
Â
Scientific studies that are subject to funding are inherently flawed. If the agency or people that fund the study don't like the results of the study then they may pull the funding. Anthropogenic global warming/cooling/change/whatever fits that situation. Many scientists are afraid of having their funding pulled if the speak out against Al Gore and his powerful minions.
Â
For this reason I am a skeptic for anthropogenic global warming/cooling/change/whatever because I don't think that studies that are contrary to Al Gores "theory" are allowed and therefore the debate is rigged.
Â
At least the UK is finally catching on and has cut funding and permits for wind farms. Al Gore will not be happy.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/debate/article-2225544/Good-riddance-wind-farms--dangerous-delusions-age.html
 @JTesla B. S.
@RalphCramden Alâs motive is money, yet you fail to acknowledge that the arguments put forth by the other side are crafted by those that are motivated by money. Thatâs the basis for my prior post. If there is a religion in this it is the side that refuses to look at data, much in the fashion that real religion has treated real science in the past. Scientists are not motivated by money or fame on this topic; scientists donât make money from being agreeable. Scientist, and labs, and Universities make money by coming forward with theories and ideas that are new or that challenge, perhaps even in the smallest way, existing theories. There is no prize for saying âI agree with what that guy saidâ.