Elections to look different as face of U.S. changes

WASHINGTON (AP) - It's not just the economy, stupid. It's the demographics - the changing face of America.
The 2012 elections drove home trends that have been embedded in the fine print of birth and death rates, immigration statistics and census charts for years.
America is rapidly getting more diverse, and, more gradually, so is its electorate.
Nonwhites made up 28 percent of the electorate this year, compared with 20 percent in 2000. Much of that growth is coming from Hispanics.
The trend has worked to the advantage of President Barack Obama two elections in a row now and is not lost on Republicans poring over the details of Tuesday's results.
Obama captured a commanding 80 percent of the growing ranks of nonwhite voters in 2012, just as he did in 2008.
Republican Mitt Romney couldn't win even though he dominated among white men and outperformed 2008 nominee John McCain with that group. It's an ever-shrinking slice of the electorate and of America writ large.
White men made up 34 percent of the electorate this year, down from 46 percent in 1972.
"The new electorate is a lagging indicator of the next America," says Paul Taylor of the Pew Research Center. "We are midpassage in a century-long journey from the middle of the last century, when we were nearly a 90 percent white nation, to the middle of this coming century, when we will be a majority minority nation."
Another trend that will be shaping the future electorate is the stronger influence of single women. They vote differently from men and from women who are married. Fifty-four percent of single women call themselves Democrats; 36 percent of married women do.
With women marrying later and divorcing more, single women made up 23 percent of voters in the 2012 election, compared with 19 percent in 2000.
The changing electorate has huge implications for public policy and politics.
Suddenly, immigration overhaul seems a lot more important, for one thing.
Ask white voters about the proper role of government, for another, and 60 percent think it should do less. Ask Hispanics the same question, and 58 percent think the government should do more, as do 73 percent of blacks, exit polls show.
You can hear it in the voice of Alicia Perez, a 31-year-old immigration attorney who voted last week at a preschool in Ysleta, Texas.
"I trust the government to take care of us," she said. "I don't trust the Republican Party to take care of people."
Sure, the election's biggest issue, the economy, affects everyone. But the voters deciding who should tackle it were quite different from the makeup of the 1992 "It's the economy, stupid" race that elected Democrat Bill Clinton as president.
Look no further than the battleground states of Campaign 2012 for political ramifications flowing from the country's changing demographics.
New Western states have emerged as the Hispanic population there grows. In Nevada, for example, white voters made up 80 percent of the electorate in 2000; now they're at 64 percent. The share of Hispanics in the state electorate has grown to 19 percent; Obama won 70 percent of their votes.
Obama won most of the battlegrounds with a message that was more in sync than Romney's with minorities, women and younger voters, and by carefully targeting his grassroots mobilizing efforts to reach those groups.
In North Carolina, where Romney narrowly defeated Obama, 42 percent of black voters said they had been contacted on behalf of Obama, compared with just 26 percent of whites, exit polls showed. Obama got just 31 percent of the state's white vote, but managed to keep it competitive by claiming 96 percent of black voters and 68 percent of Hispanics.
Young voters in the state, two-thirds of whom backed Obama, also were more often the target of Obama's campaign than Romney's: 35 percent said they were contacted by Obama, 11 percent by Romney. Among senior citizens, two-thirds of whom voted Republican, 33 percent were contacted by Obama, 34 percent by Romney.
Howard University sociologist Roderick Harrison, former chief of racial statistics at the Census Bureau, said Obama's campaign strategists proved themselves to be "excellent demographers."
"They have put together a coalition of populations that will eventually become the majority or are marching toward majority status in the population, and populations without whom it will be very difficult to win national elections and some statewide elections, particularly in states with large black and Hispanic populations," Harrison said.
One way to see the trend is to look at the diversity of young voters. Among voters under 30 years old this year, only 58 percent are white. Among senior voters, 87 percent are white.
Brookings Institution demographer William H. Frey says policymakers and politicians need to prepare for a growing "cultural generation gap."
"Both parties are getting the message that this is a new age and a new America," says Frey. "Finally, the politics is catching up with the demography."
Just as Republicans need to do a better job of attracting Hispanics, says Frey, Democrats need to do more to reach out to whites.
The face of Congress is changing more slowly than the electorate or the population, but changing it is.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California was happy to highlight the news that for the first time in history, more than half the members of her caucus next year will be women, black, Hispanic or Asian. She said it "reflects the great diversity and strength of our nation."
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, whose caucus is far more white and male, said Republicans need to learn to "speak to all Americans - you know, not just to people who look like us and act like us."
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, one of the GOP's most prominent black women, said the party needs to understand that "the changing demographics in the country really necessitate an even bigger tent for the Republican Party."
"Clearly we are losing important segments of that electorate and what we have to do is to appeal to those people not as identity groups but understanding that if you can get the identity issue out of the way, then you can appeal on the broader issues that all Americans share a concern for," she said.
All sides know the demographic trends are sure to become more pronounced in the future.
In the past year, minority babies outnumbered white newborns for the first time in U.S. history. By midcentury, Hispanics, blacks, Asians and multiracial people combined will become the majority of the U.S.
Since 2000, the Hispanic and Asian populations have grown by more than 40 percent, fueled by increased immigration of younger people as well as more births.
Currently, Hispanics are the largest minority group and make up 17 percent of the U.S. population, compared with 12 percent for blacks and 5 percent for Asians. Together minorities now make up more than 36 percent of the population.
Hispanics will make up roughly 30 percent of the U.S. by midcentury, while the African-American share is expected to remain unchanged at 12 percent. Asian-Americans will grow to roughly 8 percent of the U.S.
"The minorities will vote," said demographer Frey. "The question is will their vote be split more across the two parties than it was this time?"
For both Republicans and Democrats, he said, the 2012 election is a wake-up call that will echo through the decades.
___
AP Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta, Associated Press News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius and writer Hope Yen contributed to this report.
The 2012 elections drove home trends that have been embedded in the fine print of birth and death rates, immigration statistics and census charts for years.
America is rapidly getting more diverse, and, more gradually, so is its electorate.
Nonwhites made up 28 percent of the electorate this year, compared with 20 percent in 2000. Much of that growth is coming from Hispanics.
The trend has worked to the advantage of President Barack Obama two elections in a row now and is not lost on Republicans poring over the details of Tuesday's results.
Obama captured a commanding 80 percent of the growing ranks of nonwhite voters in 2012, just as he did in 2008.
Republican Mitt Romney couldn't win even though he dominated among white men and outperformed 2008 nominee John McCain with that group. It's an ever-shrinking slice of the electorate and of America writ large.
White men made up 34 percent of the electorate this year, down from 46 percent in 1972.
"The new electorate is a lagging indicator of the next America," says Paul Taylor of the Pew Research Center. "We are midpassage in a century-long journey from the middle of the last century, when we were nearly a 90 percent white nation, to the middle of this coming century, when we will be a majority minority nation."
Another trend that will be shaping the future electorate is the stronger influence of single women. They vote differently from men and from women who are married. Fifty-four percent of single women call themselves Democrats; 36 percent of married women do.
With women marrying later and divorcing more, single women made up 23 percent of voters in the 2012 election, compared with 19 percent in 2000.
The changing electorate has huge implications for public policy and politics.
Suddenly, immigration overhaul seems a lot more important, for one thing.
Ask white voters about the proper role of government, for another, and 60 percent think it should do less. Ask Hispanics the same question, and 58 percent think the government should do more, as do 73 percent of blacks, exit polls show.
You can hear it in the voice of Alicia Perez, a 31-year-old immigration attorney who voted last week at a preschool in Ysleta, Texas.
"I trust the government to take care of us," she said. "I don't trust the Republican Party to take care of people."
Sure, the election's biggest issue, the economy, affects everyone. But the voters deciding who should tackle it were quite different from the makeup of the 1992 "It's the economy, stupid" race that elected Democrat Bill Clinton as president.
Look no further than the battleground states of Campaign 2012 for political ramifications flowing from the country's changing demographics.
New Western states have emerged as the Hispanic population there grows. In Nevada, for example, white voters made up 80 percent of the electorate in 2000; now they're at 64 percent. The share of Hispanics in the state electorate has grown to 19 percent; Obama won 70 percent of their votes.
Obama won most of the battlegrounds with a message that was more in sync than Romney's with minorities, women and younger voters, and by carefully targeting his grassroots mobilizing efforts to reach those groups.
In North Carolina, where Romney narrowly defeated Obama, 42 percent of black voters said they had been contacted on behalf of Obama, compared with just 26 percent of whites, exit polls showed. Obama got just 31 percent of the state's white vote, but managed to keep it competitive by claiming 96 percent of black voters and 68 percent of Hispanics.
Young voters in the state, two-thirds of whom backed Obama, also were more often the target of Obama's campaign than Romney's: 35 percent said they were contacted by Obama, 11 percent by Romney. Among senior citizens, two-thirds of whom voted Republican, 33 percent were contacted by Obama, 34 percent by Romney.
Howard University sociologist Roderick Harrison, former chief of racial statistics at the Census Bureau, said Obama's campaign strategists proved themselves to be "excellent demographers."
"They have put together a coalition of populations that will eventually become the majority or are marching toward majority status in the population, and populations without whom it will be very difficult to win national elections and some statewide elections, particularly in states with large black and Hispanic populations," Harrison said.
One way to see the trend is to look at the diversity of young voters. Among voters under 30 years old this year, only 58 percent are white. Among senior voters, 87 percent are white.
Brookings Institution demographer William H. Frey says policymakers and politicians need to prepare for a growing "cultural generation gap."
"Both parties are getting the message that this is a new age and a new America," says Frey. "Finally, the politics is catching up with the demography."
Just as Republicans need to do a better job of attracting Hispanics, says Frey, Democrats need to do more to reach out to whites.
The face of Congress is changing more slowly than the electorate or the population, but changing it is.
House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi of California was happy to highlight the news that for the first time in history, more than half the members of her caucus next year will be women, black, Hispanic or Asian. She said it "reflects the great diversity and strength of our nation."
House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, whose caucus is far more white and male, said Republicans need to learn to "speak to all Americans - you know, not just to people who look like us and act like us."
Former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, one of the GOP's most prominent black women, said the party needs to understand that "the changing demographics in the country really necessitate an even bigger tent for the Republican Party."
"Clearly we are losing important segments of that electorate and what we have to do is to appeal to those people not as identity groups but understanding that if you can get the identity issue out of the way, then you can appeal on the broader issues that all Americans share a concern for," she said.
All sides know the demographic trends are sure to become more pronounced in the future.
In the past year, minority babies outnumbered white newborns for the first time in U.S. history. By midcentury, Hispanics, blacks, Asians and multiracial people combined will become the majority of the U.S.
Since 2000, the Hispanic and Asian populations have grown by more than 40 percent, fueled by increased immigration of younger people as well as more births.
Currently, Hispanics are the largest minority group and make up 17 percent of the U.S. population, compared with 12 percent for blacks and 5 percent for Asians. Together minorities now make up more than 36 percent of the population.
Hispanics will make up roughly 30 percent of the U.S. by midcentury, while the African-American share is expected to remain unchanged at 12 percent. Asian-Americans will grow to roughly 8 percent of the U.S.
"The minorities will vote," said demographer Frey. "The question is will their vote be split more across the two parties than it was this time?"
For both Republicans and Democrats, he said, the 2012 election is a wake-up call that will echo through the decades.
___
AP Director of Polling Jennifer Agiesta, Associated Press News Survey Specialist Dennis Junius and writer Hope Yen contributed to this report.
That's the spirit, guys!
Â
Timmy, Altazi, Razor - we failed YOU. We voted based on reason rather than hate and faith. Don't spend a second wondering if your party offered nothing to most voters. Instead, keep the insults flying and wallow in xenophobia and conspiracy theories. That's the path for success at polls... for some of us.
 @Max Quinn Ah yes, your "holier than thou" vote.
Â
I just love what GM (union) did for the election. Employees got the day off to vote. Gee I wonder who the vast majority of them voted for? Those who saved them and their unions. Mostly the union.
Â
Pinhead.
This comment has been deleted
@Max Quinn ..You might want to rethink your reasons on the path for success at the polls.Talking about some Obama swing state success,Richard Trumpka said,"We did deliver those states.Without organized labor,none of those would be in the President's column." ......If what he said was true,there won't be a need for other states to cast a ballot.The unions will forever pick our candidates.
When people can walk right into our country, and get on the welfare wagon they have no incentive to become productive. When being on welfare here is like being a millionaire in their home country they have no reason to become productive citizens. When a political party uses the illegal aliens as a voting block then all is lost. The flood is too far advanced to stop now... we as a country are done for.
 I see no way to stop this madness.
This will likely come down to who has the most bullets left.
This is what happens when you do not protect your borders, language, and culture.
Â
@Altazi you're right, the Native Americans should have protected their borders better and never allowed those illegal Europeans to come in and steal everything from them.
The "what can government do for me?" crowd is slowly overshadowing the "what can we do for our country?" group.
Â
People voted for government's pocket book, race (99% for Obama in Philly) and amnesty this time around.
Â
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2012-11-10/foodstamps-surge-most-one-year-new-all-time-record-delayed-release
Statistically,red states seem to be the "takers" It's puzzling to me why conservatves continue to buy into the moochers=Obama voter rhetoric that they here on am radio and fox news. http://thecentristword.wordpress.com/2012/01/26/red-states-addiction-to-welfare-a-gop-dilema/
@noneofyourbizzness @Ramsesthegreat....On first notice one might think an article by the "The Centrist Word" may be "middle of the ground," but one look says otherwise.Although this article was released on Aug 12 2012,they used a graph based on 2005 data.Got anything more current? Apparently the "The Centrist Word" can't find it......Puzzling?
 Try this. Â
Â
http://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2012/02/12/us/entitlement-map.html
@noneofyourbizzness because it fits into their heavily distorted view of the country where they're the only hard workers in the country, and Reagan was Jesus incarnate.
"I trust the government to take care of us,"   This is why we have seen a rampant progression of illegal immigration, which is draining our once established, strong, society. Â
Â
Give me, give me......... the changing of our society demographics and political ideology.
"""""Elections to look different as face of U.S. changes""""
Â
face of U.S. changes meaning  8% unemployment is the new norm.........
Â
face of U.S. changes meaning 47% OR MORE of our country will have NO skin in the game as far as taxes go
Â
face of U.S. changes meaning We wll have FEWER full time jobs as employers will limit hours to 30 or less to avoid BarryCare
Â
face of U.S. changes meaning Bronco Bamma moves forward with more class envy politics
Â
 @kramr How is it that you guys obsess over the 47% number and then accuse other people of class warfare ("class envy politics")?
Â
Half the 47% are seniors, 35,000 of them are wealthy people that used loopholes to zero-out their tax bills, and the rest are the poor (most of whom work). And the number applies only to one tax - the Federal Income tax, not all taxes.
@kramr
Here's a link from the Maoists at Business Insider:http://www.businessinsider.com/mitt-romneys-47-who-are-dependent-on-the-government-2012-9
Â
Divide the top 1% in half and you'll find that the top half is immensely more wealthy than the bottom half. The tax burden of the 1% is an indication of how unequal income distribution is in this country. Here's a study from UC Santa Cruz.: http://www2.ucsc.edu/whorulesamerica/
@Festivus  """"""" I say crank 'em all up too""""" I meant to say...crank'em up ON EVERYONE, NOT JUST THE 1%
Â
""""""That's not even progressive.""""""
Â
How can you possibly say that when 1/100th of the population pays OVER 1/3 (37%) of all income taxes paid!!!!!!  Add to that the bottom 1/2 of the people only pay 2.25% of all income taxes paid. THAT IS THE DEFINITION OF PROGRESSIVE!!
Â
remember we are talking about progressive federal taxes, not wealth.......
 I say crank 'em all up too.  Are the top earners in the country taxed fairly today?  I say yes - the top 1% controls ~35% of the country's wealth and pay about the same amount of federal taxes.  That's not even progressive.
@Max Quinn  """"then you ought to be in favor of repealing the Bush tax cuts entirely."""""
Â
Personally, I think the fed has enough money, they just need to spend it more efficiently. I would prefer to leave the rates where they are. but if they are going up its either all or nothing.... if the left is dead set on cranking up the highest rates, then crank'em all up.
However far and away my first choice would be the implimentaion of the fair tax.
""""BTW, livefyre won't let me respond directly to you. I'm sure that's not going to ruin your day, but just to let you know..."""""
thats happened to me a few times as well, generally if you just refresh/reload the page and then try and reply again it will have the appropriate response to in the corner.
@kramr
Another reason for the working poor not paying federal income tax is that W used them as a fig leaf to cover the fact that all his other tax cuts favored the wealthy. If you want to return to a situation in which the poor pay a very small percentage, then you ought to be in favor of repealing the Bush tax cuts entirely.
Â
And unless the US adopts the Euro or another currency over which we have no control, the road to Greece is not the fast track.
Â
BTW, livefyre won't let me respond directly to you. I'm sure that's not going to ruin your day, but just to let you know...
@Max Quinn  Bottom line, We can go round and round on statistics..... but IMHO I would hope to get back toward the Reagan years when ~ 81% of people paid  federal income taxes...... even if a good number of them paid a very small percentage.Â
IMHO we are at a very defining moment in time in our country. either the goal is to get more people pulling the cart or if the goal is not..... then I fear we are on the fast track to Greece if we get any closer to half or more of the population sitting in the cart than pulling it.Â
@Max Quinn federal taxes is what the conversation is about. got a link for the senior stat. I haven't heard that before.Â
Â
And yes ourdivider in chief is the king of class envy politics.   The top 1% of wage earners (343k and up) pay ~37%  OF ALL INCOME TAXES PAID???  So the president of class envy is telling us that 1/100th of the population paying MORE THAN 1/3rd of the taxes isn't enough....... HOW MUCH IS ENOUGH???
Â
http://www.ntu.org/tax-basics/who-pays-income-taxes.html
As one of the folks who "liked" your comment said recently on another topic, absolute numbers are meaningless.
Â
The top 1% of wage earners in the US account for roughly 35% of its total wealth and pay 37% of its taxes. Â Doesn't sound so out of balance to me.
"""""""America is rapidly getting more diverse, and, more gradually, so is its electorate.""""""
Putting it nicely........ there are far more people in the cart than pulling it than in days past
 @kramr What better way to destroy the country?
If the GOP wants to be taken seriously, they have to stop pretending that science isn't real and stop attacking women. Any political group whose core beliefs say that evolition and climate change are lies, and that women don't deserve to make their own health care decisions cannot be trusted to take control of this country. If it's really all about the economy, then get your priorities together and ditch the crazies among you. Until then, you're just going to have keep whining about people wanting handouts (like disaster relief, school lunches, and medicare).
 @badcat That's the goofiest thing I've heard in along time. I'm a conservative and I don't know off any other conservatives that have that mindset. You seem to just be parroting what other crackpots have said.
 I suppose next you will be telling us that 911 was a government conspiracy by George Bush to target the peace loving muslims.
 @Razor1 Don't you watch the news? I'm repeating what conservatives like Todd Akin, Paul Ryan, Paul Brown, Richard Mourdock, Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, and many others have said about science and women's rights. You must not know what your party's platform is. Insulting liberals isn't going to change the fact that the GOP has been taken over by religious zealots. There are a lot of fiscal conservatives who just can't get on that bandwagon. Myself included.
Republicans, stand firm!
Â
When faced with facts like 2/3 of young voters went for Obama, fifty-four percent of single women call themselves Democrats, and 70% of Hispanics voted for Obama, don't look inward and wonder if your party offers nothing but blatant giveaways to the wealthy and corporations (quite a sense of entitlement those folks have!) along with reactionary social positions seasoned with a troubling dose of theocracy. No - insult the electorate instead. It worked so well for Willard.
Â
Remember, it's better to think your right and not change than to re-evaluate your views based on facts and logic. Reality has no place in the Republican Party. Build that wall to keep it out!
Nope. Not buying it. The Democratic party is no shining example of truth and virtue - until it is compared to the Republican party.
Â
You guys can't wrap your minds around evolution. Seriously, your party favors Creationism under a euphemistic name. After an economic collapse, you turned to a private equity guy for president and even cheered when he tried to pass himself off as a small business man. Arithmetic favored Obama's policies. In order to believe that a 20% tax cut and $2 trillion in extra defense spending would fix the deficit, you had to rely on faith because facts and logic said otherwise.
Â
It was because he was the better candidate in 2008. And in 2012. Willard did nothing but offer the usual Republican stew of supply side economics - which would be great if they worked. Events have proven that they don't.
Â
I'll say this about evolution. All of the Democratic candidates in the past few presidential elections have believed in evolution. The Republicans? Not so much: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RprOiBOGgMs
Â
@Max Quinn ...Here we go with another broad generalization.Do you think 100% of the GOP favors Creationism? Do 100% of the Democratic party believe in the Theory of Evolution? Does the Theory of Evolution define everthing you have "faith" in? After an economic collapse,you turned to a community organizer and part time Senator to fix our problems.That was the reason,right? Could it have been the "historic significance" of electing the first African American President? I'll take a money manager to fix the economy over this inexperienced President,any day!Â
@Festivus ...LOL...Thats a good one
I'll make this statement: a belief in creationism should disqualify from serving on the Congressional Science Committee. Â
Â
 @Max Quinn Seriously?  You want to talk down to a group because they believe in something?  You want to insult them because they don't believe in evolution and believe in a higher power?  You talk down to republicans for their beliefs and then turn around to call them racist and sexist without knowing all the facts behind their beliefs....give me a break.  Obama has this issue with NOT SPENDING MORE MONEY instead of trying to come up with a reasonable plan to cut useless spending to pay off the debt of this country.  So now you want to up taxes on those who made something of themselves?!  I work with the wealthy all day long and the first thing that everybody talks about is how they would be more than happy to pay more taxes if it wasn't being wasted on programs that make no sense.  Obama also has taken the most vacations funding by the taxpayers than any other president....but he is more likely to relate to the lower and middle class right? Â
 @Mike
You do remember that during the deficit ceiling debate, Obama offered 4$ in cuts for every $1 in additional revenue, right? Maybe not.
Â
The belief in evolution and in God do not necessarily conflict - or at least that's what the Pope believes. A belief in Creationism is fine if you want to hold it, but it is not science. It makes no sense and has no place in schools.
Â
Where did I call anybody racist and sexist? I was pointing out some numbers that are, in fact, real. Draw your own conclusions.
@Max Quinn.... You and I both know that facts and logic aren't always part of either parties campaigns.It  all revolves around who can sell the best lies and attract the larger voter base.Obama's campaign,by far, consisted of the better bunch of liars in this race, as he could only campaign on how bad his opponent was.Think about what you're saying,though. "Our party offers nothing but blatant giveaways to the wealthy and corporations ?"  Really ? That's an awfully broad generalization. Since your's is typical of the same cookie cutter belief system which attracted the majority vote this time, I'll remind you, so maybe you'll come to the realization that you have your own version of "reactionary social positions seasoned with a troubling dose of theocracy." If reality has no place in the Republican party,I guess I can say ,with 100% fact and logic,that truth has no place in the Democratic Party.
The face of the U.S. has changed. As has the emotional need for security from someone other then ourselves. So, please government. Take care of me because I can no longer live without you. Pitiful !
Alicia Perez,an immigration attorney says," I trust the government to take care of us.I don't trust the Republican party to take care of the people." What else can you say about the 47% that Romney was talking about?This was never just about the poor who depend on government handouts,but also successful people who hold this same mindset, promoting the government entitlement mentality.I think we can now, safely re-name this country to the Divided States of America
What the article failed to mention is that the number of people who suckle from the welfare teet has grown and THOSE are the people who will continue to vote Democrat because they dont want to lose their freebies or have to work for them.