Family: Elderly woman denied CPR wanted no intervention

SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — A woman who died after a nurse at her elder home refused to provide CPR had chosen to live in a facility without medical staff and wanted to pass away without life-prolonging intervention, her family said Tuesday.
Lorraine Bayless' family said in a statement to The Associated Press that it does not plan to sue the independent living facility where the 87-year-old woman died last week.
A 911 tape recounts a dramatic conversation between a dispatcher and a nurse who refused to cooperate with pleas for someone to start CPR as firefighters sped to the scene. The nurse's decision has prompted multiple state and local investigations at Glenwood Gardens in Bakersfield.
During the dramatic 7-minute, 16-second exchange, the dispatcher insisted the nurse perform CPR or find someone willing to do it.
Bayless did not have a "do not resuscitate" order on file at the home, city fire officials have said. Her family said, however, "it was our beloved mother and grandmother's wish to die naturally and without any kind of life-prolonging intervention."
Glenwood Gardens is an independent living facility, and company officials say no medical staff is employed there. The woman who identified herself as a nurse to the dispatcher was employed at the facility as a resident services director, the company said.
"We understand that the 911 tape of this event has caused concern, but our family knows that mom had full knowledge of the limitations of Glenwood Gardens and is at peace," the family's statement said.
The California attorney general was "aware" of the incident, said a spokeswoman, Lynda Gledhill. Bakersfield police were trying to determine whether a crime was committed when the nurse refused to assist the 911 dispatcher looking for someone to start CPR.
The nation's largest trade group for senior living facilities has called for its members to review policies that employees might interpret as edicts to not cooperate with emergency responders.
"It was a complete tragedy," said Maribeth Bersani, senior vice president of the Assisted Living Federation of America. "Our members are now looking at their policies to make sure they are clear. Whether they have one to initiate (CPR) or not, they should be responsive to what the 911 person tells them to do."
Bayless collapsed in the Glenwood Gardens dining hall on Feb. 26. Someone called 911 on a cellphone asking for an ambulance to be sent and eventually a woman who identified herself as a nurse got on the line.
Brookdale Senior Living of Brentwood, Tenn., the parent company of Glenwood Gardens, released a statement Tuesday saying the woman on the 911 call was "serving in the capacity of a resident services director, not a nurse."
It also said that by law, the independent living facility is "not licensed to provide medical care to any of its residents."
The family's statement called Bayless a "remarkable and intelligent woman" and said she was aware that Glenwood Gardens did not offer trained medical staff, yet opted to live there anyway.
"Caregivers, nurses and other medical professionals have very difficult waters to tread in the legal and medical landscape of our country today," the family said.
The California Board of Registered Nursing is concerned that the woman who spoke to the 911 dispatcher did not respond to requests to provide aid or to find someone who might want to help.
"If she's not engaged in the practice of nursing, there's no obligation (to help)," agency spokesman Russ Heimerich said. "What complicates this further is the idea that she wouldn't hand the phone over either. So that's why we want to look into it."
The Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department is cooperating with Bakersfield police in its investigation of the death that has drawn outrage from around the world.
The death shines a light on the varying medical care that different types of elderly housing provide — differences that consumers may not be aware of, advocates say.
Even if independent living homes lack trained medical staff, some say they should be ready to perform basic services such as CPR if needed.
"I would certainly hope someone would choose human life over a facility policy, said Robyn Grant, director of public policy and advocacy at the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care. "That's pretty rotten."
The family said it would not sue or try to profit from the death, and called it "a lesson we can all learn from."
"We regret that this private and most personal time has been escalated by the media," the statement said.
___
AP Science Writer Alicia Chang contributed to this report from Los Angeles.
Lorraine Bayless' family said in a statement to The Associated Press that it does not plan to sue the independent living facility where the 87-year-old woman died last week.
A 911 tape recounts a dramatic conversation between a dispatcher and a nurse who refused to cooperate with pleas for someone to start CPR as firefighters sped to the scene. The nurse's decision has prompted multiple state and local investigations at Glenwood Gardens in Bakersfield.
During the dramatic 7-minute, 16-second exchange, the dispatcher insisted the nurse perform CPR or find someone willing to do it.
Bayless did not have a "do not resuscitate" order on file at the home, city fire officials have said. Her family said, however, "it was our beloved mother and grandmother's wish to die naturally and without any kind of life-prolonging intervention."
Glenwood Gardens is an independent living facility, and company officials say no medical staff is employed there. The woman who identified herself as a nurse to the dispatcher was employed at the facility as a resident services director, the company said.
"We understand that the 911 tape of this event has caused concern, but our family knows that mom had full knowledge of the limitations of Glenwood Gardens and is at peace," the family's statement said.
The California attorney general was "aware" of the incident, said a spokeswoman, Lynda Gledhill. Bakersfield police were trying to determine whether a crime was committed when the nurse refused to assist the 911 dispatcher looking for someone to start CPR.
The nation's largest trade group for senior living facilities has called for its members to review policies that employees might interpret as edicts to not cooperate with emergency responders.
"It was a complete tragedy," said Maribeth Bersani, senior vice president of the Assisted Living Federation of America. "Our members are now looking at their policies to make sure they are clear. Whether they have one to initiate (CPR) or not, they should be responsive to what the 911 person tells them to do."
Bayless collapsed in the Glenwood Gardens dining hall on Feb. 26. Someone called 911 on a cellphone asking for an ambulance to be sent and eventually a woman who identified herself as a nurse got on the line.
Brookdale Senior Living of Brentwood, Tenn., the parent company of Glenwood Gardens, released a statement Tuesday saying the woman on the 911 call was "serving in the capacity of a resident services director, not a nurse."
It also said that by law, the independent living facility is "not licensed to provide medical care to any of its residents."
The family's statement called Bayless a "remarkable and intelligent woman" and said she was aware that Glenwood Gardens did not offer trained medical staff, yet opted to live there anyway.
"Caregivers, nurses and other medical professionals have very difficult waters to tread in the legal and medical landscape of our country today," the family said.
The California Board of Registered Nursing is concerned that the woman who spoke to the 911 dispatcher did not respond to requests to provide aid or to find someone who might want to help.
"If she's not engaged in the practice of nursing, there's no obligation (to help)," agency spokesman Russ Heimerich said. "What complicates this further is the idea that she wouldn't hand the phone over either. So that's why we want to look into it."
The Kern County Aging and Adult Services Department is cooperating with Bakersfield police in its investigation of the death that has drawn outrage from around the world.
The death shines a light on the varying medical care that different types of elderly housing provide — differences that consumers may not be aware of, advocates say.
Even if independent living homes lack trained medical staff, some say they should be ready to perform basic services such as CPR if needed.
"I would certainly hope someone would choose human life over a facility policy, said Robyn Grant, director of public policy and advocacy at the National Consumer Voice for Quality Long-Term Care. "That's pretty rotten."
The family said it would not sue or try to profit from the death, and called it "a lesson we can all learn from."
"We regret that this private and most personal time has been escalated by the media," the statement said.
___
AP Science Writer Alicia Chang contributed to this report from Los Angeles.
Sounds like a rookie mistake at Dr Kavorican health care facility or free advertising
This comment has been deleted
@lousecraptonMedicine and health care isn't about saving lives. It's about doctors/nurses/practitioners working WITH patients to find appropriate treatments, even if that means death with dignity. I hope you were being sarcastic. Otherwise, wow, how ignorant.Â
It's a shame that this family has to go with what should be a private matter concerning the passing of a loved one to a media frenzy.My own 85 year old mother has specifically many times over the years specified how she does not wan't any live saving measures at the end.
@noneofyourbizzness Leave it to some sap 911 operator to play doctor and the media to rabble over it. Â
At least they followed her wishes, even if others (here) have a problem with that.
I still do not like how the whole thing transpired. If a DNR was on file then the facility should have told 911 right away. I would still be moving mom and dad.
@Luckylucy "Bayless did not have a "do not resuscitate" order on file at the home," per article above.
@Luckylucy then move them, keep them alive by artificial means against their wishes and enjoy paying for their care until the day you die.Â
@Luckylucy From the sound of it the nurse that was on the phone will 911 didn't exactly sound like the top of his/her class.
This is EXACTLY why DNRs and health care directives are so important. This entire media fiasco could have been avoided had the deceased simply filed health care directives with the assisted living facility.
Agreed, it is refreshing someone stick by their word as far as the family of the deceased.
Still, this remains a very creepy situation. What if she was choking on a piece of meat, would they do anything about that?
This just doesn't sit easy at all.
@Lo Pan  You don't do CPR on someone who's choking on a piece of meat.
As Roseanna Roseannadana would say, "Oh...that's very different! Nevermind."
@pdx10  The Gilda Radner character of Miss Emily Litella would start out by saying, "What's all this I hear about...." and then mention a twisted, misunderstood news topic (like "presidential ear-recshun" 'stead of "election") until someone at SNL corrected her, and then she would get all huffy and give her classic, "Oh..... Nevermind!"   Roseanne Roseannadanna just gave child-like kinda-gross descriptions of food and body stuff, I think...
Nice family for not trying to profit on this whole deal.
As for the rest there is a lot of finger pointing.
Wow! Â This went just about as I had expected. Â An independent third party made the 911 call, not the facility. Â The family isn't upset with the staff or the facilities (but are probably more than a little p.o.'d that their mother/grandmother's passing has caused such an uproar and they weren't able to honor her the way they would have preferred).
Now the nurse is being dragged through the proverbial mud and probably going to be called in front of the licensing board (and she may not have had a valid nursing license to begin with since that wasn't her "job" which could have contributed to her insistence that she not perform CPR) and so is the facility.
I'd love HALF of this attention to be paid to the substandard care many of these "facilities" offer at the expense of the patients. Â Time to redirect attention where it needs to go. Â And, hopefully, it opened dialogs in families who needed a jump-start to discuss end of life decisions and their wishes.
@CTWU  Wasn't a nurse. She was a "resident services director," which I assume is an over-embellished term for a typical admin staff. It may be that she didn't even know how to do CPR.
I posted earlier, when this story broke, that here was more to this story.
87 years is a good run. And she felt she was at the end of the line. Her choice.
God love ya Ms. Bayless !
Basically the media coverage has inflicted more damage to the family than the nurse who refused to perform CPR
I am glad that Bayless was allowed to die, per her wishes.  However, it probably would be better to have a DNR on file if you want to be certain that measures are not taken to revive you.
@felines99 ....absolutely right. Health care directives are imperative.
@Rob C 503Â And have them done while you are young and have a firm understanding of what the directives mean. Â You can always modify or amend them as needed.
Having a medical power of attorney and a financial power of attorney are also very helpful (and a will or at least something written and notarized that might, at least, be recognized by the court if needed). Â You never know when you may not be in a position to convey your wishes to others.
@CTWU You and I have obviously been through estate planning. And end of life planning. It's all important and you've posted good advice.
No lawsuit by the family. Â Well, I imagine there are a lot of unhappy lawyers out there.Â
@Shadow  Don't worry. They'll be calling and trying to bait the family before they can wipe away the tears.
Condolensces to the Bayless family. Refreshing to hear that you are abiding by mom/grandmas wishes. Still sorry for your loss.
Why was 911 called?
@Bert Because the article states someone used their cell phone.  It was probably another resident or a visitor to the facility who was not aware of the restrictions the facility had on assisting their clients.  It wasn't the facility at all who called.
@Bert So that the paramedics or coroner could do their thing.
So it's a happy ending after all.