Fewer excited gun-buyers in Colo. and Conn. after shootings

WASHINGTON (AP) - In Connecticut and Colorado, scenes of the most deadly U.S. mass shootings in 2012, people were less enthusiastic about buying new guns at the end of the year than in most other states, according to an Associated Press analysis of new FBI data. The biggest surges in background checks for people who want to carry or buy guns occurred in states in the South and West.
The latest government figures reflect huge increases across the U.S. in the number of background checks for gun sales and permits to carry guns at the end of the year. After President Barack Obama's re-election, the horrific school shooting in Connecticut and Obama's promise to support new laws aimed at curbing gun violence, the number of background checks spiked. In Georgia, the FBI processed 37,586 requests during October and 78,998 requests in December; Alabama went from 32,850 to 80,576 during the same period.
Nationally, there were nearly twice as many more background checks for firearms between November and December than during the same time period one year ago.
"It's a fear there will be a crackdown," said Thomas Wright, who runs Hoover Tactical Firearms near Birmingham, Ala. Wright said he took on more employees to handle the sales crush after 20 children were killed in Newtown, Conn. "We used to have what was called our wall of guns. It's pretty much empty now." Every high-capacity magazine in Wright's store was sold out.
The government's figures suggested far less interest in purchasing guns late in the year in Connecticut and Colorado, where background checks also increased but not nearly as much as most other states. Twelve people died in July in a shooting at a Colorado movie theater. The numbers of checks in Colorado rose from 35,009 in October to 53,453 in December; checks in Connecticut went from 18,761 to 29,246 during the same period. Only New Jersey and Maryland showed smaller increases than Colorado in December from one month earlier.
In Connecticut, people were having second thoughts about whether it's a good idea to have a gun in the home after the Newtown shooting, the governor's criminal justice advisor, Michael Lawlor said. The gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, shot and killed his mother inside their home using weapons she had legally purchased before he drove to the school. Lanza shot his way into the building and carried out the massacre before committing suicide as police arrived.
Lawlor also said that, in Connecticut, it can take months to obtain a permit to buy a handgun.
A federal background check doesn't always indicate a new gun is purchased, but the firearms industry uses these numbers as an indicator of how well the gun business is doing.
Background checks typically spike during the holiday shopping season, and some of the increases in the most recent FBI numbers can be attributed to that. But the number of background checks also tends to increase after mass shootings, when gun enthusiasts fear restrictive measures are imminent.
After the Colorado shootings, the FBI conducted 1.5 million background checks across the country during August, compared to 1.2 million checks in June. Yet the Connecticut shootings energized gun buyers more: Background checks surged in December to nearly 2.8 million, compared to 1.6 million in October.
Even before the Colorado and Connecticut shootings, the gun industry was strong. Sales were on the rise - so much that some manufacturers couldn't make guns fast enough. Major gun company stocks were up, and the number of federally licensed retail gun dealers was increasing for the first time in 20 years. Many attributed the surge to Obama, whom the gun lobby predicted would be the most anti-gun president in American history.
After the Colorado shooting, during the final months of the presidential campaign, Obama and Congress expressed no interest in new gun laws. But just days after the Connecticut shootings, Obama said new gun laws would be a top priority.
"Gun owners are scared," said Dudley Brown, executive director of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a Colorado group that promotes gun rights.
People in the business are calling this rush to buy guns after the Newton shooting a "banic," meaning people are panicked that Obama would ban guns, said Bill Bernstein, owner of the East Side Gun Shop in Nashville, Tenn.
Tennessee saw among the highest increase in gun checks at the end of last year, with 91,922 background checks in December, up from 59,840 in November. Bernstein said sales after the Connecticut shooting "went on steroids."
Gregory Johnson, of Molalla, Ore., said he and his wife aren't afraid of Obama taking away their guns. He said they are signed up to take a required class to get a concealed license permit because they want to make sure they can protect themselves in a situation like the Dec. 11 shooting spree at an Oregon mall where a gunman killed two people before killing himself. Johnson was shopping in a Milwaukie, Ore., gun store Friday, looking for a small gun his wife could carry in her new job that will have her driving at times alone at night.
"I'm not expecting her to carry, but at least she has the option if she needs it, or at least have something available to her in her vehicle," Johnson said. "That's my priority, my wife's security."
Outside New Orleans, the manager of Gretna Gun Works, Jason Gregory, said surging sales were no cause for celebration. In Louisiana, background checks increased from 38,584 in November to 59,697 in December. Gregory said sales more than doubled in his store, spurred by politicians calling for tougher gun laws.
"They're causing such fear among the people," he said. "It's not the way the market should be working."
The latest government figures reflect huge increases across the U.S. in the number of background checks for gun sales and permits to carry guns at the end of the year. After President Barack Obama's re-election, the horrific school shooting in Connecticut and Obama's promise to support new laws aimed at curbing gun violence, the number of background checks spiked. In Georgia, the FBI processed 37,586 requests during October and 78,998 requests in December; Alabama went from 32,850 to 80,576 during the same period.
Nationally, there were nearly twice as many more background checks for firearms between November and December than during the same time period one year ago.
"It's a fear there will be a crackdown," said Thomas Wright, who runs Hoover Tactical Firearms near Birmingham, Ala. Wright said he took on more employees to handle the sales crush after 20 children were killed in Newtown, Conn. "We used to have what was called our wall of guns. It's pretty much empty now." Every high-capacity magazine in Wright's store was sold out.
The government's figures suggested far less interest in purchasing guns late in the year in Connecticut and Colorado, where background checks also increased but not nearly as much as most other states. Twelve people died in July in a shooting at a Colorado movie theater. The numbers of checks in Colorado rose from 35,009 in October to 53,453 in December; checks in Connecticut went from 18,761 to 29,246 during the same period. Only New Jersey and Maryland showed smaller increases than Colorado in December from one month earlier.
In Connecticut, people were having second thoughts about whether it's a good idea to have a gun in the home after the Newtown shooting, the governor's criminal justice advisor, Michael Lawlor said. The gunman, 20-year-old Adam Lanza, shot and killed his mother inside their home using weapons she had legally purchased before he drove to the school. Lanza shot his way into the building and carried out the massacre before committing suicide as police arrived.
Lawlor also said that, in Connecticut, it can take months to obtain a permit to buy a handgun.
A federal background check doesn't always indicate a new gun is purchased, but the firearms industry uses these numbers as an indicator of how well the gun business is doing.
Background checks typically spike during the holiday shopping season, and some of the increases in the most recent FBI numbers can be attributed to that. But the number of background checks also tends to increase after mass shootings, when gun enthusiasts fear restrictive measures are imminent.
After the Colorado shootings, the FBI conducted 1.5 million background checks across the country during August, compared to 1.2 million checks in June. Yet the Connecticut shootings energized gun buyers more: Background checks surged in December to nearly 2.8 million, compared to 1.6 million in October.
Even before the Colorado and Connecticut shootings, the gun industry was strong. Sales were on the rise - so much that some manufacturers couldn't make guns fast enough. Major gun company stocks were up, and the number of federally licensed retail gun dealers was increasing for the first time in 20 years. Many attributed the surge to Obama, whom the gun lobby predicted would be the most anti-gun president in American history.
After the Colorado shooting, during the final months of the presidential campaign, Obama and Congress expressed no interest in new gun laws. But just days after the Connecticut shootings, Obama said new gun laws would be a top priority.
"Gun owners are scared," said Dudley Brown, executive director of Rocky Mountain Gun Owners, a Colorado group that promotes gun rights.
People in the business are calling this rush to buy guns after the Newton shooting a "banic," meaning people are panicked that Obama would ban guns, said Bill Bernstein, owner of the East Side Gun Shop in Nashville, Tenn.
Tennessee saw among the highest increase in gun checks at the end of last year, with 91,922 background checks in December, up from 59,840 in November. Bernstein said sales after the Connecticut shooting "went on steroids."
Gregory Johnson, of Molalla, Ore., said he and his wife aren't afraid of Obama taking away their guns. He said they are signed up to take a required class to get a concealed license permit because they want to make sure they can protect themselves in a situation like the Dec. 11 shooting spree at an Oregon mall where a gunman killed two people before killing himself. Johnson was shopping in a Milwaukie, Ore., gun store Friday, looking for a small gun his wife could carry in her new job that will have her driving at times alone at night.
"I'm not expecting her to carry, but at least she has the option if she needs it, or at least have something available to her in her vehicle," Johnson said. "That's my priority, my wife's security."
Outside New Orleans, the manager of Gretna Gun Works, Jason Gregory, said surging sales were no cause for celebration. In Louisiana, background checks increased from 38,584 in November to 59,697 in December. Gregory said sales more than doubled in his store, spurred by politicians calling for tougher gun laws.
"They're causing such fear among the people," he said. "It's not the way the market should be working."
Funny how this is 100% contrary to everything i"ve read, heard, or the people I've spoken with that have been stocking up.
"Fewer excited gun-buyers"
Â
The terribly biased AP thinking potential future gun owners are salivating to get a hold of the EVIL gun. But wait, there are two states that aren't gun-hoo as the rest.
Guns are fun.
More propaganda from the eye of soron.
Well a good reason to get a gun  is what happening in Chicago  with 446 school age children shot  last year with strongest gun laws in the country ...... MEDIA SILENT..... link   http://www.youpolls.com/details.aspx?id=12155  Also  i want to make a point about assault weapons as why do the police need assault weapon and huge firepower as they do cause  the bad guy has  huge firepower and assault weapons and the police know if even outlawed the bad guys will still have huge firepower.When  the police give up there assault and auto weapons so will the  average citizen but the cops know they need that kind of firepower to stop some of the bad people.
 @riderofthelegend "the cops know they need that kind of firepower to stop some of the bad people." Yup! What's often forgotten is that the police aren't actually the first responders, they are just the second. The citizens at the scene of the crime are the first responders and they are on their own until they have the opportunity to summon the cops to come draw the chalk outlines.
Some of the folks posting here are coming close to invoking the name of George Soros...
Â
Though, he does control the AP, at least that's what World Net Daily, says:Â http://apcheck.blogspot.com/2011/05/how-george-soros-secretly-directs.html
Â
This article is dumb. Anything to do with guns and Connecticut is hot right now and this reporter is scraping the bottom of the bucket to find a Connecticut angle on the story.
Â
But to go from this article to uncovering a conspiracy for 'social engineering' is to give too much credit to the AP and KATU. Especially KATU. KATU's sole agenda is to get ratings. Towards that end, if it bleeds, it leads. If it's a hot topic, then it gets posted regardless of what it says.
 @Max Quinn It's hardly a conspiracy theory to believe that the AP participates in social engineering attempts. Although, I suppose that a more accurate term would probably be social grooming. It's not a new phenomenon, nor is it (by en large) denied by the mainstream media. The 'media' has been manipulated by people in order to elicit response from the consumer of that media. This has happened since the birth of the printing press, and continues to this day. What people allow into their conscious, or sub-conscious minds becomes reality. IE- If you believe that everyone is a jerk, you tend to only see people as jerks. The problem, IMO, is how pervasive the wordsmithing has become. Just in the last week or so here on K2, the topic of gun buyers has been associated with terms like 'excited' and 'frenzied'. On the surface, they're just adjectives. In a social programming (social grooming) perspective, they are terms that are most often associated with persons acting without cohesive thought.
Â
 Your point about sensationalistic headlines is spot-on. Just take K2 comments section for example. 'hits' (how many people visit and/or comment) are what determine advertising fees. When K2 posts incendiary topics, and gets 'hits', their revenue goes up. As such, it only stands to reason (from a business standpoint) that they would continue to fan the flames.Â
Â
It's just sad that we live in a time where simply reporting the facts isn't considered news anymore. It seems that, thanks to the 24/7/365 anytime/anywhere, the 'news' media that we consume has ceased to be informative. Instead, it's become divisive and sensationalistic.Â
Â
...which, of course, leads back to the discussion about 'they wouldn't print it if it didn't sell'.Â
Â
Â
 @Max Quinn On the national level KATU is just carrying what the AP feeds, with some amount of editorial and publisher oversight as to what they decide to reprint and what they do not.
If a non-local story is not reported by AP, for whatever reason, you will probably not find it on KATU. The "conspiracy" is on the international level and even extends to Rupert Murdoch, which is all over the entire spectrum of indie news right now... but not in the mainstream media, which includes Fox due to the fact that Murdoch has been speaking with Obama to advocate banning automatic weapons, and stating his opinion publicly. (But not on Fox, because his viewers would turn on him in a heartbeat.)The guy who got shot by a mom in her attic with a Saturday Night Special on Friday bleeds, but doesn't lead. Instead we get to read stories about Lindsay Lohan. Once you see the pattern developing, you can't not see it.
 @Playanekes That's the problem - once you see the pattern, you can't not see it. Rup might well hate assault weapons, but he keeps that off his network not because he worries about infuriating people, but because he worries about them changing the channel.Â
Â
The mom-in-attic story leads in its market - Georgia. Not here. If it happened here, do think KATU would ignore it in order to pursue an agenda?Â
Come on max, just look at "the number 23" fur keyrist sake !
The anti-gun media really should just shut the heck up if they truly want fewer guns on the street. Â
Â
Sensationalizing gun violence just makes people more paranoid and makes them want to meet firepower with firepower, NOT to disarm. Â I'd say the media has succeeded in exactly the opposite of their intended agenda. Â Isn't it ironic... don'cha think?
Â
In stead of the sloppy journalism citing just the raw numbers instead of the percentages here you go:Â
2012 Oct to Dec % Difference is 53% for CO, 56% for CT, 121% for OR, and 73% for WA.Â
Compare that toÂ
2011 Oct to Dec % Difference is 42% for CO, 19% for CT, 53% for OR, and 31% for WA.
Taking it a step further and looking at the percentages for all the states, we can see that CO and CT are hardly the lowest,Â
Â
AL,145% TN,130% DE,124% MS,123% OR,121% VA,119% KS,115% TX,113% GA,110% OK,110% FL,107% OH,107% LA,105% RI,104%Â NV,103% AZ,101% NE,97% WY,97% IN,86% NH,86% ID,84% NM,84% MO,84% SC,83% NC,81% WA,73% WV,73% AR,71% CA,69% PA,67% MD,65% UT,64% IO,62% NY,60% MI,59%
Â
CT,56%VT,54%CO,53%
Â
SD,49% NJ,48% AK,46% IL,44% MT,42% GU,37% WI,35% PR,34% MA,32% MN,29% HI,28% ME,27% ND,20% KY,18% DC,-4% VI,-22% MP,-100%
Guam, Puerto Rico AND Northern Mariana Islands  are states now...sheeez...where have I been !
 @sargerator  I wasn't being picky, I simply used all the data the FBI provided. Which by the way, the FBI included them in a document about the states' numbers, so who am I to exclude them.
 @ChrisJ82 Nicely done!
Â
...BTW, make no mistake, it's not 'sloppy journalism', it's metaphor laiden social programming. There's really nothing 'sloppy' about it. It's intentional, and it's pervasive among most 'news' outlets.Â
Â
According to AP articles published on K2, gun buyers are all 'excited' and 'zelots'. Not a logical or rational one among them.Â
Â
Â
'Fewer excited gun-buyers in Colo. and Conn. after shootings.'
Â
Oh goodie, now the gun buyers are 'excited'!Â
Â
Sensational adjectives are the refuge of lazy authors....
or social programming attempts. Â
Â
Â
"They're causing such fear among the people," he said. "It's not the way the market should be working."
Â
It's not fear of dying or getting shot. It's fear that government will make huge restrictions on the guns that innocent law abiding citizens can own.
Holy misleading headline batman! A more accurate one would be, "Gun buying slightly more muted in CO and CT than rest of country."
Â
Since the media these days really truly hates giving us lowly proles their sources beyond just saying "the FBI," here you go for the official numbers, http://www.fbi.gov/about-us/cjis/nics/reports/20130102_1998_2012_state_monthly_totals.pdf
 @ChrisJ82 To clarify, these are the monthly and cumulative total of NICS firearm background checks for 2012. The AP can spin it however the hell they want for their agenda but all you have to do is look at the data.
Â
There were 30,531 checks in Colorado in Jan2012., an average of 33,000ish through November, and 46,192 firearm background checks for Colorado in December while the AP is trying to brainwashing you into thinking there are fewer "excited buyers."
Â
By the way, here's Oregon
17,368(Jan) 23,339(Feb, etc) 25,401 20,442 16,915 17,331 16,380 18,294 20,203 19,989 27,133 44,246(December) for a total of 267,041
Â
Washington:
33,742 44,047 46,610 41,366 37,315 37,742 34,518 39,036 36,883 43,051 50,452 74,447 519,209Â Â Over half a million background checks in Washington in 2012, with December showing nearly double the monthly average.
Thers is no shortage in America, maybe some closer to the shooting locations are showing respect
( as they should ), the only shortage is the availability of guns and ammo, keep up the hype katu....
Boy uses AR-15 to defend himself and his sister in late December. Story not carried by KATU or the national media. News at Never:
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMg0FQS6Fqo
 @Playanekes Guns can be used for defense.
Â
Four other recent stories from Harris County that didn't make KATU:
Â
1/3:Â A shooting at an apartment complex about 12:30 p.m. Wednesday afternoon has left a woman dead and a man critically wounded.
Â
12/23:Â Â A 2-year-old is dead after finding a firearm that belonged to his grandfather and accidentally shooting himself in the stomach while playing with the weapon.
Â
12/23:Â Â A man shot and killed his mother before shooting and killing himself Friday night in Harris County.
Â
12/20:Â Authorities have identified a 30-year-old woman who was found shot to death outside a home in far southwest Harris County early Thursday morning.
 @Max Quinn How come you're not dredging up baseball bat, knife or hammer crimes?
 @Playanekes I think you do know what you are talking about. I wish all gun owners were as informed as you.Â
Â
So, knowing what you know, how do we keep guns out of the hands of guys like Adam Lanza (understanding that we can never be 100% successful)?
 @Max Quinn Oh, of course they did. They also mentioned that he was an experienced baseball player. My grandmother thwarted an intruder in Corbett with a shotgun because she couldn't possibly have wielded a bat or a knife with any proficiency. The AP will carry a story anytime somebody uses something other than a gun to stop a crime, to be sure. No doubt about that.
 @Playanekes I could. AP carried the story of the OR senator who defended his home with a bat.
 @Max Quinn Maybe in your house.
Â
The difference between you and me, I'd guess, is the currency of your training and the depth of your expertise.My CHL is valid through 2015 and my Oregon DPSST-Armed certification is current and has paid for itself. I keep the Oregon Department of Public Safety Standards and Training's Private Security Armed Officer Training Manual (may 2008) right here on my desk for all those times some flower-sniffing anti-gunner wants to suggest I don't know what I'm talking about.
Â
I recommend that ALL gun holders and people who are interested in guns seek re-training and reevaluating of their storage, safety and security practices. OR, if you all want, you can listen to hippies lecture their theories at you like they're experts. Option B is for them to lecture you and then, like Feinstein, admit that they have weapons. ie, they want to ban the kind that YOU like, and determine for you what you should have based on what they prefer for their particular situation.
 @Max Quinn  @Playanekes Of course a gun is WAY more likely to be used in an accident/suicide or to commit a crime.
This article reminds me of Star Wars Episode I, a poorly written piece of slop that seems to have only been done to profit off hype. All it is lacking is midi-chlorians. âexcitedâ yet the numbers in those states show rather large gains, perhaps they should have researched why the gains arenât as great in New Jersey and Maryland instead of trying to pin the tail on the Colorado/Connecticut donkey.
Just keep the anti-second Amendment rhetoric going, KATU. You carry national stories about how people FEEL about guns, but you don't carry stories such as these:
Â
"LOGANVILLE, Ga. âA woman hiding in her attic with children shot an intruder multiple times before fleeing to safety Friday."
Â
KATU, you didn't carry the story about the San Antonio mall shooting either, because no innocent people were harmed.. Sins of omission. Meanwhile you're carrying a story about a Kuwaiti journalist jailed for Twitter insults. I guess because a journalist is involved, even though he/she is halfway around the world, it's MUCH more relevant and important to your readers' lives than any number of the gun stories you choose to omit.
Â
Somehow, we're supposed to care about how people in Colorado think about their personal choice to buy weapons, as long as we don't get to hear stories about when they're actually used by citizens to prevent a Texas mall shooting only days after our own mall shooting. Well, THAT'S not as relevant as whether people in Connecticut are excited about buying guns.
Â
I guess we're supposed to give a s--t about a journalist going to jail, but not a woman in Georgia defending her family with a home intruder with a weapon that the Brady Campaign says is really only used to commit crime. Shameful, KATU.
 @Playanekes It's reminiscent of the whole Trayvon Martin media swarm coming into the election season.
Â
The national 'news' media (as well as 'entertainment' media) has become a social programming outlet for socio-ideological groups first and foremost.
Â
...and, for the record, this reality exists on BOTH sides of the ideological spectrum. For every Rush Limbaugh and Lars Larson, there's a Rachel Maddow or David Sarasohn.Â
 @Playanekes "I guess we're supposed to give a s--t about a journalist going to jail," - Let's not forget the silence regarding David Gregory, the journalist who by law should be going to jail. Granted, it's a law equally asinine to the twitter law in Kuwait, but one that people like David Gregory want applied to the rest of us.
 @ChrisJ82 Haven't heard much about Piers Morgan's ethical issues in the UK either, have you?Here's something really huge that the media is sitting on: Rupert Murdoch, who owns Fox News, is an anti-gunner and has been quietly pressuring Obama to ban "automatic weapons", Tweeting anti-gun messages to his followers, and gagging Fox News from talking about guns: http://www.salon.com/topic/rupert_murdoch/
Â
WHILE he was gagging fox out of some apparent respect for the dead, he was sending private messages to his Twitter followers, his chronies and the White House.
Â
Â