GOP warns Obama against tax increases, spending

WASHINGTON (AP) - Republicans warned Tuesday that President Barack Obama's second-term agenda would bring more tax increases and escalate deficit spending, vowing that they would guard against Washington-centric policies and help middle-class families rebound from years of tepid economic growth.
Republicans responded to Obama's State of the Union address with fresh appeals to voters on the economy, promises to rein in federal spending and address the future of entitlement programs like Medicare. The party sought to portray itself as an alternative source of policies to grow the economy after the president swept to re-election last November.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, delivering the Republican response, urged Obama to "abandon his obsession with raising taxes" and said the president had shifted the nation away from free-market economic principles that had helped middle-class families achieve prosperity.
"Presidents in both parties - from John F. Kennedy to Ronald Reagan - have known that our free-enterprise economy is the source of our middle-class prosperity. But President Obama? He believes it's the cause of our problems," Rubio said.
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, in a separate tea party response, said both parties had failed voters by driving up trillion-dollar deficits. "Washington acts in a way that your family never could - they spend money they do not have, they borrow from future generations, and then they blame each other for never fixing the problem," Paul said in prepared remarks.
Rubio appeared to wipe away sweat during his rebuttal from the Speaker's conference room in the U.S. Capitol. At one point, he reached out with his left hand and took a small swig from a Poland Spring water bottle. As the incident generated heavy attention on Twitter, Rubio later tweeted a photo of the water bottle.
Republicans sought to characterize Obama as overly reliant on government, even as the president made his case to the nation that he could generate new jobs without raising the federal deficit. Defending his policies against GOP critics, Obama said the nation needed a "smarter government" instead of a bigger one and pledged to increase federal spending to fix roads and bridges and boost the minimum wage.
Both Obama's address to Congress and the Republican responses around the Capitol sought to position each party as the champion of average Americans in a nation still grappling with high unemployment and a slow economic recovery. Republicans noted that the nation's jobless rate ticked up to 7.9 percent in January and the economy shrank at an annual rate of 0.1 percent in the final months of 2012.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Obama offered the American people "little more than more of the same 'stimulus' policies that have failed to fix our economy and put Americans back to work. We cannot grow the middle class and foster job creation by growing government and raising taxes."
Ohio Sen. Rob Portman accused Obama of promoting "the same big-government policies that have failed to get our economy up and running again."
Rubio, a rising star in the Republican party and a potential 2016 presidential contender, pointed to his Miami roots to address Obama's frequent portrayal of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney - and his party - as only caring about the wealthiest Americans. Rubio said he still lived in the "same working-class neighborhood I grew up in" and his neighbors "aren't millionaires" but retirees, workers and immigrants.
"His favorite attack of all is that those who don't agree with him - that we only care about rich people," Rubio said.
Rubio pre-recorded the same speech in Spanish for Spanish-language networks, a nod to Republicans who have said that they must address their deficit with Hispanic voters in order to compete effectively with Democrats in the future. Obama won 71 percent of Hispanics last year against Romney
Republicans responded to Obama's State of the Union address with fresh appeals to voters on the economy, promises to rein in federal spending and address the future of entitlement programs like Medicare. The party sought to portray itself as an alternative source of policies to grow the economy after the president swept to re-election last November.
Florida Sen. Marco Rubio, delivering the Republican response, urged Obama to "abandon his obsession with raising taxes" and said the president had shifted the nation away from free-market economic principles that had helped middle-class families achieve prosperity.
"Presidents in both parties - from John F. Kennedy to Ronald Reagan - have known that our free-enterprise economy is the source of our middle-class prosperity. But President Obama? He believes it's the cause of our problems," Rubio said.
Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul, in a separate tea party response, said both parties had failed voters by driving up trillion-dollar deficits. "Washington acts in a way that your family never could - they spend money they do not have, they borrow from future generations, and then they blame each other for never fixing the problem," Paul said in prepared remarks.
Rubio appeared to wipe away sweat during his rebuttal from the Speaker's conference room in the U.S. Capitol. At one point, he reached out with his left hand and took a small swig from a Poland Spring water bottle. As the incident generated heavy attention on Twitter, Rubio later tweeted a photo of the water bottle.
Republicans sought to characterize Obama as overly reliant on government, even as the president made his case to the nation that he could generate new jobs without raising the federal deficit. Defending his policies against GOP critics, Obama said the nation needed a "smarter government" instead of a bigger one and pledged to increase federal spending to fix roads and bridges and boost the minimum wage.
Both Obama's address to Congress and the Republican responses around the Capitol sought to position each party as the champion of average Americans in a nation still grappling with high unemployment and a slow economic recovery. Republicans noted that the nation's jobless rate ticked up to 7.9 percent in January and the economy shrank at an annual rate of 0.1 percent in the final months of 2012.
House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, said Obama offered the American people "little more than more of the same 'stimulus' policies that have failed to fix our economy and put Americans back to work. We cannot grow the middle class and foster job creation by growing government and raising taxes."
Ohio Sen. Rob Portman accused Obama of promoting "the same big-government policies that have failed to get our economy up and running again."
Rubio, a rising star in the Republican party and a potential 2016 presidential contender, pointed to his Miami roots to address Obama's frequent portrayal of Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney - and his party - as only caring about the wealthiest Americans. Rubio said he still lived in the "same working-class neighborhood I grew up in" and his neighbors "aren't millionaires" but retirees, workers and immigrants.
"His favorite attack of all is that those who don't agree with him - that we only care about rich people," Rubio said.
Rubio pre-recorded the same speech in Spanish for Spanish-language networks, a nod to Republicans who have said that they must address their deficit with Hispanic voters in order to compete effectively with Democrats in the future. Obama won 71 percent of Hispanics last year against Romney
Democrats, Tax and spend, rinse and repeat. Period.
Giving illegals amnesty, gun control and rasing taxes...Obama is starting to sound more and more like Ronald Reagan.
Lucy....LUCY ! wea' my agua !
Obama is just another tax & spend liberal. Â They never change. Â He is doing a good job of destroying this country.
 @sortbait And what was Ex-Pres. Bush?  A spend but don't tax (the rich) war monger?
Â
No President is perfect and you need to get your head out of "you know were"! Â One of the reasons the Republicans lost is because of comments like yours. Â All opinion and the facts telling a different story.
The Republican party is worried about the middle class? Â Thanks, I needed a laugh this morning.
Man, I've seen some odd hair plugs in my day, but you's think he would have a few more done.
So I guess it is business as usual...all legal law abiding citizens should put their hands up in the air again as a hostage, again.
Â
Posturing, subterfuge, lies (LOTS), promises and zero unified help from our congressmen on both sides of the river that is between us... and the can is kicked again and again down the road
Â
I believe in the NO Budget NO PAY rule and it is served to every one of these congressmen clowns, no matter their colors
Spending had got to stop.
Â
We are going to go down economically and there is not stopping it. More and more economists are bracing for impact with reality.
http://articles.marketwatch.com/2013-02-06/commentary/36938931_1_global-economy-gdp-growth-rate-unforeseen-shock
@RalphCramden Just like the 9.0 Cascadia earthquake Ralph, it's not if, but when.
@Torino_v2
Exactly. We can't do this forever. It will come to an end.
I'm not a republican. Have been unaffiliated since 1980. But what is wrong with trying to protect the citizens from having to pay more money to a wasteful government ?
@Rob C 503 because people have come to believe that taxes are too high right now when they're at the lowest level since the years prior to the Great Depression. Coincidence that both depressions happened when taxes were at unbelievably low rates? I think not. And if you want to cut waste from the government, start with the DoD. Nearly half of the $600B budget is spent on black projects, most of which will never go anywhere. Next downsize the military and close ALL foreign military bases. That's nearly half the current deficit in one east swoop. Next raise taxes across the board to Clinton levels and were close. Now close ALL subsidies and congratulations, were running a surplus.
@Ramsesthegreat How about across the board cuts, like, sequestration? I'll go along with higher taxes if spending actually gets cut. Mind you, not a Washington D.C. cut in the rate of increase, but an actual reduction in spending year over year.Â
 How about the Connie Mack plan? You know, Ron Paul has some great ideas about getting our spending in order.
@Ramsesthegreat @Torino_v2 No, that's not what I mean at all. If you recall, sequestration was the result of our leaders' inability to compromise on which cuts to make. I would prefer a more gradual cut and re-prioritization in spending, but it's becoming clear sequestration may be the only way to cut spending. I certainly don't want our country to end up like Greece, but, that's where we're headed.
Congress and the President have the ability to make small cuts over time, not the severe austerity measures taking place in Europe. As I suggested, the Penny Plan makes such sensible cuts spread over time to lessen the impact and, thus, make them more palatable.
I just can't agree with your argument that we must continue to spend borrowed money. Which economists do you speak of? I would really like to read any research and opinions they've put out. I know the ones I've read say this level of spending is unsustainable and dangerous.Â
The bottom line is, we've built a $16T house of cards. I would prefer to take off one card at a time, not continue building until it falls.Â
In my opinion.
@Torino_v2 @Ramsesthegreat you mean use the European model of austerity? Look at how well that's working for them. They're moving back into another recession due to it. The fact is, and any decent economist will agree, government spending increases economic growth at a nearly 3x higher rate than tax cuts and spending cuts do. The government is the largest employer in the country and is one of the largest contractors of private business. Cutting government spending like the Republicans want to do would destroy those private sector jobs.
@Ramsesthegreat Â
Â
Looks like you stymied 'ol rob. Probably the rest of the "we're taxed WAY too much" crowd too ! They have no clue because fauxe nooze, boner , and the turtle have convinced them the uber wealthy will be here to save the day !
They need to also warn the idiot against allowing illegals to stay in our country. This is like rewarding a criminal by letting him keep the fruits of his crime......NO WAY!!!!!!
@FreerideNOT It's time to deal with reality, 20 million illegal aliens aren't leaving. Marco Rubio has the best solution to the illegal immigration problem I've heard yet, it's very similar to what President Obama proposed in the SOTU speech.
Pragmatism has to prevail at some point. Our opportunity as a country to deport the 20 million illegals has long since past. As the saying goes, possession is 9/10 of ownership. Let's grant temporary status, put them in line, document them, collect back taxes/fines and then let them become citizens after 10 or 15 years.
@FreerideNOT Tough subject. Rubio's grandfather came here illegally.
 @Max Quinn Tricky Cubans. Mike Huckabee betch.
@TreeWizard @Max Quinn Ah ! good 'ol squirrel eat'n huck !