House to vote Wednesday on raise in debt limit

WASHINGTON (AP) - House leaders on Monday unveiled legislation to permit the government to continue borrowing money through May 18 in order to stave off a first-ever default on U.S. obligations. It is slated for a vote on Wednesday.
The measure marks a change in strategy for House Republicans, who have backed off demands that any extension of the government's borrowing authority be accompanied by stiff spending cuts.
The legislation is also aimed at prodding Senate Democrats to pass a budget after almost four years of failing to do so. It would withhold the pay of lawmakers in either House or Senate if their chamber fails to pass a budget this year. House Republicans have passed budgets for two consecutive years, but the Senate hasn't passed one since President Barack Obama's first year in office.
The current debt limit is $16.4 trillion. The legislation does not set a specific limit; rather it would automatically increase the limit by the amount required to fund U.S. government obligations through May 18.
But that date is not a hard deadline, because the Treasury would retain the limited ability to exercise so-called extraordinary measures and juggle certain accounts to buy limited additional time before a default on U.S. obligations. Such steps could buy several additional weeks beyond May 18.
The measure also contains a "no budget, no pay" provision that withholds pay for lawmakers if the chamber in which they serve fails to pass a congressional budget resolution by April 15. That's a provision designed to press the Senate to pass a budget.
On Sunday, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the Senate would do just that and would use it to call for follow-up legislation that would increase revenues.
Under Congress' arcane budget procedures, a congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that tries to set parameters for future legislation setting agency budgets and curbing federal benefit programs like Medicare.
Democrats have generally reacted coolly to the three-month extension, which would take the debt limit issue off the table for several months but leave other choke points in place, including sharp, across-the-board spending cuts that would start to strike the Pentagon and domestic programs alike on March 1 and the possibility of a partial government shutdown with the expiration of a temporary budget measure on March 27.
But failing to meet those deadlines would have far less serious consequences than defaulting on U.S. obligations like payments to bondholders.
"We should not be doing this three months at a time. We should resolve these issues, and we should not be playing games with the debt ceiling," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.
Republicans hope the need to deal with issues like the across-the-board cuts will cause Democrats and Obama to agree to spending cuts. Obama vowed he would not bargain over the debt limit. If the debt cap is not raised, the government would default on its obligations by as early as Feb. 15, Treasury says.
The measure marks a change in strategy for House Republicans, who have backed off demands that any extension of the government's borrowing authority be accompanied by stiff spending cuts.
The legislation is also aimed at prodding Senate Democrats to pass a budget after almost four years of failing to do so. It would withhold the pay of lawmakers in either House or Senate if their chamber fails to pass a budget this year. House Republicans have passed budgets for two consecutive years, but the Senate hasn't passed one since President Barack Obama's first year in office.
The current debt limit is $16.4 trillion. The legislation does not set a specific limit; rather it would automatically increase the limit by the amount required to fund U.S. government obligations through May 18.
But that date is not a hard deadline, because the Treasury would retain the limited ability to exercise so-called extraordinary measures and juggle certain accounts to buy limited additional time before a default on U.S. obligations. Such steps could buy several additional weeks beyond May 18.
The measure also contains a "no budget, no pay" provision that withholds pay for lawmakers if the chamber in which they serve fails to pass a congressional budget resolution by April 15. That's a provision designed to press the Senate to pass a budget.
On Sunday, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., said the Senate would do just that and would use it to call for follow-up legislation that would increase revenues.
Under Congress' arcane budget procedures, a congressional budget resolution is a nonbinding measure that tries to set parameters for future legislation setting agency budgets and curbing federal benefit programs like Medicare.
Democrats have generally reacted coolly to the three-month extension, which would take the debt limit issue off the table for several months but leave other choke points in place, including sharp, across-the-board spending cuts that would start to strike the Pentagon and domestic programs alike on March 1 and the possibility of a partial government shutdown with the expiration of a temporary budget measure on March 27.
But failing to meet those deadlines would have far less serious consequences than defaulting on U.S. obligations like payments to bondholders.
"We should not be doing this three months at a time. We should resolve these issues, and we should not be playing games with the debt ceiling," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.
Republicans hope the need to deal with issues like the across-the-board cuts will cause Democrats and Obama to agree to spending cuts. Obama vowed he would not bargain over the debt limit. If the debt cap is not raised, the government would default on its obligations by as early as Feb. 15, Treasury says.
Please  Mr. Obama........ for once just take your own advice with regards to the debt limit.Â
Â
I don't say this very often, but in this speech you are spot on.Â
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft9oyp4IEUU
Â
borrowing  ~40cents  of every dollar we spend IS NOT  the answer.Â
 @kramr Sorry that speech was just to get votes and slam Bush he did not really believe it as he has shown for 4 years...
For those who like to use the ceiling as a tool, you appear to not care about paying banks and foreign governments more money for no other reason but because of abstinence.
Â
If our debtors think we might not adjust the ceiling and may default, they will stop loaning us money, OR loan it to us at a higher rate.
Â
It's the same thing that happens when YOU borrow money. Let's say you have a Visa card and have hit the limit. When the bill comes you will be OVER the limit because of financing charges. If you go over, Visa will ding your credit. This means they (and MasterCard, AMEX and Discover not to mention your mortgage company) will ALL raise their rates next month and going forward. So you ask Visa for a limit raise. You already spent the money, complaining about it at this point only serves to hurt yourself.
Â
The same thing will happen to us. We don't ask for a higher "limit" on the money we borrowed (money that REPUBLICANS are just as guilty of borrowing as Democrats), then we will all pay more to finance that debt with nothing in return.
Â
The less stupid thing to do would be skip this fight now (I mean we raise this repeatedly in Republican administrations but no complaints from Republicans THEN!), and take the fight to the budget table where we are SUPPOSED to.
Â
Having the fight at this point is self destructive and foolish.
Â
Â
No spending cuts, no increase in debt limit. Hopefully those that are fiscally responsible will hold the line.
Â
The problem is that politicians are not fiscally responsible.
 @RalphCramdenÂ
Well they are when it's things not close to their heart.
Â
You can find politicians in some states take no issue with things like pork in aide packages when their states put that pork in, or when the aide comes to them.
Â
Send that same pork or aide to another state and they get all "fiscally conservative".
Â
The hypocrisy of that, and the fact that no politician seems to understand how the âwellâ works leads them always to want more money.
Â
I may not agree with Ron Paul, but he is about the only fiscally conservative person to actually have served in congress.
Â
Â
When it comes right down to it, it's all a bunch of bull sh#t
I like the idea of them forcing a pay stop, or passing a budget.
C'mon  R's  have a spine for once...... Â
Â
No raising the debt until immediate spending cuts are agreed to.Â
 @kramr What about the budget that they are legally obligated to have passed years ago but they still have not done anything about. I would tell them if you can't pass a budget we certainly can't authorize more spending. That would at least force the Democrats to put on paper what they want to spend money on and how much. Right now they can throw all the lies out they want because there's nothing on paper that commits them to anything.