In gun debate, two sides speak different languages

WEXFORD, Pa. (AP) - Inside the Big Buck Sport Shop, where mounted moose and deer heads loom over rifles, handguns, targets and ammunition, the customers have no doubt: More gun laws will not save lives.
Fifteen miles south, in the city of Pittsburgh, many confronted by a steady stream of gun violence are just as certain: To reduce the carnage, stricter gun control is needed.
This divide has existed for decades, separating America into hostile camps of conservative vs. liberal, rural vs. urban. As the nation responds to the massacre of 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Conn., the gulf has rarely felt wider than now.
After the gunman invaded an elementary school with a Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle and magazines of 30 bullets each, there was a brief moment of unity amid the nation's grief. Across partisan divides, politicians said something must be done about weapons based upon military designs. Many wondered if even the National Rifle Association would adjust its staunch opposition to gun control.
Then both sides regrouped. With President Barack Obama pushing for a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and memory lingering of Obama's divisive 2008 comment that some Americans "cling to guns and religion," positions hardened.
Listening to the public discourse, and to citizens in places like Pittsburgh and the Big Buck Sport Shop, people seem to be speaking different languages entirely. Communication has broken down amid a flurry of accusations, denials, political maneuvering and catch phrases.
"You have to place some people in the category of 'you cannot communicate with them,'" Big Buck salesman Dave Riddle said Friday, standing between a rack of rifles and a glass case full of used handguns. "Their minds are set; they cannot change."
A short drive away, at the New Pittsburgh Courier newspaper, editor and publisher Rod Doss pondered how to tell gun enthusiasts about his belief that assault weapons should be banned.
"I don't know that they would hear me," Doss finally said. "Their culture is totally different. They've grown up around guns. It's part of their life and their lifestyle. It's second nature. Hunting, shooting, it's the love of guns."
Doss does not own a firearm: "I don't feel a need for any. I personally don't live in fear." His newspaper, which covers the African-American community, publishes detailed information on every Pittsburgh homicide because most are black-on-black crimes.
"I'm awestruck with their fascination with guns," Doss said of his suburban and rural neighbors. "When you look at it from that perspective, it's hard to relate to anything."
Locally, nationally, even globally, this is the issue that places people at odds - a fact seen by the passionate, often angry conversations that are ringing out across the world in the days since the Newtown shootings. Harry Wilson, author of "Guns, Gun Control and Elections: The Politics and Policy of Firearms," sees common misperceptions on both sides.
Wilson, a Roanoke College political science professor, would like gun control advocates to know: "Gun owners are not idiots. Gun owners are not in favor of gun violence. Gun owners are in many ways like them, and would genuinely like to see gun violence reduced. Obviously they have a different solution. But they're people too, just with different perspectives."
"And what I would want gun owners to know is, the large majority of people in favor of gun control don't really want to take all of your guns."
Guns were inseparable from America even before their enshrinement in the Second Amendment. With guns we secured the nation's independence, seized vast territory from indigenous peoples wielding arrows and tomahawks, and forged an ethos of personal freedom. Today, according to most estimates, there are about 250 million guns in our nation of 310 million people.
America has a higher rate of gun deaths than most similarly developed nations: 3.2 firearm homicides per 100,000 people in 2009, according to a report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. That compared with a rate of 0.5 per 100,000 in Canada; 0.2 in Spain; 0.2 in Germany; and 0.1 in the United Kingdom and Australia. No data was available for Russia.
To many gun enthusiasts, though, these numbers have nothing to do with guns themselves.
With so many guns in circulation, they say, people intent on killing will always find a way to do it. Nor do they fault high-capacity magazines, because it can take only seconds to reload a standard 10-bullet version.
Some even say the solution to gun violence is more guns - to deter, and to fight back against the bad guys.
"The easy, lazy conclusion is that (gun violence) has to do with firearms," said Sam Liberto, a business consultant shopping in Big Buck with his two young sons. "We should look at the root cause: parenting or lack thereof, mental illness, video games. The underlying forces are probably far more important."
Liberto does think gun laws could be tightened, to track and collect more sale information. He's against an assault weapons ban but expects one to happen soon, as a first step to outlawing even more guns.
So after Newtown, Liberto hustled to buy the same type of semiautomatic rifle used by the school gunman. On his iPhone was a photo of his weapon's handiwork: an Osama bin Laden target that featured a face full of bullet holes.
"It's a target item," Liberto said of his purchase. "Unlike a hunting rifle or a sport shotgun it has less kick, a lighter weight. It's designed to be carried. It's just nice, a nice gun to shoot."
Liberto and Riddle, the Big Buck salesman, are officers of the Millvale Sportsmen's Club, where target shooters and hunters enjoy their pursuits. Riddle knows many people who enter competitions with the type of AR-15 used in Newtown.
The gray-bearded Riddle has been around firearms since he was born in rural Pennsylvania. To him, guns are no more dangerous than an axe or a bat.
What would he tell people who want more gun control?
"Let's go out and shoot a little bit," Riddle offers. "I'd take 'em out, introduce them to firearms, show them the safety aspects of it. I'd just go out and start shooting, have some fun. Shoot some paper targets, some cans. Shooting guns is a lot of fun, it really is."
That's incomprehensible to Pittsburgh resident Valerie Dixon, whose law-abiding 22-year-old son was killed in Pittsburgh a decade ago by a neighborhood thug with an illegal .357 Magnum.
"The original purpose of the Second Amendment was not a sport," she said. "I do think the laws need to be looked at. Look at lifestyles as they are today, as opposed to when they created the Second Amendment."
Dixon doesn't only blame guns for her tragedy. She said better parenting and education are among many other factors that need to change. But still: She says her son's killer was able to obtain the fateful gun within two hours.
"I believe in the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, but I believe there's a responsibility with our rights," said Dixon, who does not own a gun.
How to draw the line? That would require consultation and cooperation. Those who don't own guns might have to learn things from those who do. People who like to shoot military-style weapons might have to sacrifice some of their recreation.
Or sacrifice some of their way of life.
Over the Christmas holiday, James and Jennifer Shafer shot guns with their parents and young kids at their ranch an hour north of Pittsburgh. The Shafers feel the pain of parents who have lost children. The Newtown killings left them shaken. But the response scares them, too.
"You can't take away our right to protect ourselves," said James Shafer, a former Marine who has called his congressional representatives to voice his opposition to laws that limit guns.
"We're not going to give them up, that's plain and simple," he said.
"I don't know how to get on the subway in a big city," said his wife, Jennifer. "I've heard bad things about it, and I'm scared of it. But the subway is normal for other people . guns are the thread of our culture."
James' cousin, Erik Shafer, started buying guns a few years ago after he returned to his rural home and found it ransacked by burglars. Police took 20 minutes to arrive.
After listening to conversations about Newtown, "I honestly don't think there is a middle to meet in," said Erik Shafer, a small business owner with a wife and two young daughters.
Then what does the future hold? He sees no end to gun violence, no matter what laws are passed.
"How do you prepare yourself for an infinite way that people can be shot and killed?" Erik Shafer responded. "It's tough. I really don't know what the answer is."
___
AP Researcher Jennifer Farrar contributed to this report.
Fifteen miles south, in the city of Pittsburgh, many confronted by a steady stream of gun violence are just as certain: To reduce the carnage, stricter gun control is needed.
This divide has existed for decades, separating America into hostile camps of conservative vs. liberal, rural vs. urban. As the nation responds to the massacre of 20 children and six adults in Newtown, Conn., the gulf has rarely felt wider than now.
After the gunman invaded an elementary school with a Bushmaster AR-15 semiautomatic rifle and magazines of 30 bullets each, there was a brief moment of unity amid the nation's grief. Across partisan divides, politicians said something must be done about weapons based upon military designs. Many wondered if even the National Rifle Association would adjust its staunch opposition to gun control.
Then both sides regrouped. With President Barack Obama pushing for a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and memory lingering of Obama's divisive 2008 comment that some Americans "cling to guns and religion," positions hardened.
Listening to the public discourse, and to citizens in places like Pittsburgh and the Big Buck Sport Shop, people seem to be speaking different languages entirely. Communication has broken down amid a flurry of accusations, denials, political maneuvering and catch phrases.
"You have to place some people in the category of 'you cannot communicate with them,'" Big Buck salesman Dave Riddle said Friday, standing between a rack of rifles and a glass case full of used handguns. "Their minds are set; they cannot change."
A short drive away, at the New Pittsburgh Courier newspaper, editor and publisher Rod Doss pondered how to tell gun enthusiasts about his belief that assault weapons should be banned.
"I don't know that they would hear me," Doss finally said. "Their culture is totally different. They've grown up around guns. It's part of their life and their lifestyle. It's second nature. Hunting, shooting, it's the love of guns."
Doss does not own a firearm: "I don't feel a need for any. I personally don't live in fear." His newspaper, which covers the African-American community, publishes detailed information on every Pittsburgh homicide because most are black-on-black crimes.
"I'm awestruck with their fascination with guns," Doss said of his suburban and rural neighbors. "When you look at it from that perspective, it's hard to relate to anything."
Locally, nationally, even globally, this is the issue that places people at odds - a fact seen by the passionate, often angry conversations that are ringing out across the world in the days since the Newtown shootings. Harry Wilson, author of "Guns, Gun Control and Elections: The Politics and Policy of Firearms," sees common misperceptions on both sides.
Wilson, a Roanoke College political science professor, would like gun control advocates to know: "Gun owners are not idiots. Gun owners are not in favor of gun violence. Gun owners are in many ways like them, and would genuinely like to see gun violence reduced. Obviously they have a different solution. But they're people too, just with different perspectives."
"And what I would want gun owners to know is, the large majority of people in favor of gun control don't really want to take all of your guns."
Guns were inseparable from America even before their enshrinement in the Second Amendment. With guns we secured the nation's independence, seized vast territory from indigenous peoples wielding arrows and tomahawks, and forged an ethos of personal freedom. Today, according to most estimates, there are about 250 million guns in our nation of 310 million people.
America has a higher rate of gun deaths than most similarly developed nations: 3.2 firearm homicides per 100,000 people in 2009, according to a report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. That compared with a rate of 0.5 per 100,000 in Canada; 0.2 in Spain; 0.2 in Germany; and 0.1 in the United Kingdom and Australia. No data was available for Russia.
To many gun enthusiasts, though, these numbers have nothing to do with guns themselves.
With so many guns in circulation, they say, people intent on killing will always find a way to do it. Nor do they fault high-capacity magazines, because it can take only seconds to reload a standard 10-bullet version.
Some even say the solution to gun violence is more guns - to deter, and to fight back against the bad guys.
"The easy, lazy conclusion is that (gun violence) has to do with firearms," said Sam Liberto, a business consultant shopping in Big Buck with his two young sons. "We should look at the root cause: parenting or lack thereof, mental illness, video games. The underlying forces are probably far more important."
Liberto does think gun laws could be tightened, to track and collect more sale information. He's against an assault weapons ban but expects one to happen soon, as a first step to outlawing even more guns.
So after Newtown, Liberto hustled to buy the same type of semiautomatic rifle used by the school gunman. On his iPhone was a photo of his weapon's handiwork: an Osama bin Laden target that featured a face full of bullet holes.
"It's a target item," Liberto said of his purchase. "Unlike a hunting rifle or a sport shotgun it has less kick, a lighter weight. It's designed to be carried. It's just nice, a nice gun to shoot."
Liberto and Riddle, the Big Buck salesman, are officers of the Millvale Sportsmen's Club, where target shooters and hunters enjoy their pursuits. Riddle knows many people who enter competitions with the type of AR-15 used in Newtown.
The gray-bearded Riddle has been around firearms since he was born in rural Pennsylvania. To him, guns are no more dangerous than an axe or a bat.
What would he tell people who want more gun control?
"Let's go out and shoot a little bit," Riddle offers. "I'd take 'em out, introduce them to firearms, show them the safety aspects of it. I'd just go out and start shooting, have some fun. Shoot some paper targets, some cans. Shooting guns is a lot of fun, it really is."
That's incomprehensible to Pittsburgh resident Valerie Dixon, whose law-abiding 22-year-old son was killed in Pittsburgh a decade ago by a neighborhood thug with an illegal .357 Magnum.
"The original purpose of the Second Amendment was not a sport," she said. "I do think the laws need to be looked at. Look at lifestyles as they are today, as opposed to when they created the Second Amendment."
Dixon doesn't only blame guns for her tragedy. She said better parenting and education are among many other factors that need to change. But still: She says her son's killer was able to obtain the fateful gun within two hours.
"I believe in the Second Amendment and the right to bear arms, but I believe there's a responsibility with our rights," said Dixon, who does not own a gun.
How to draw the line? That would require consultation and cooperation. Those who don't own guns might have to learn things from those who do. People who like to shoot military-style weapons might have to sacrifice some of their recreation.
Or sacrifice some of their way of life.
Over the Christmas holiday, James and Jennifer Shafer shot guns with their parents and young kids at their ranch an hour north of Pittsburgh. The Shafers feel the pain of parents who have lost children. The Newtown killings left them shaken. But the response scares them, too.
"You can't take away our right to protect ourselves," said James Shafer, a former Marine who has called his congressional representatives to voice his opposition to laws that limit guns.
"We're not going to give them up, that's plain and simple," he said.
"I don't know how to get on the subway in a big city," said his wife, Jennifer. "I've heard bad things about it, and I'm scared of it. But the subway is normal for other people . guns are the thread of our culture."
James' cousin, Erik Shafer, started buying guns a few years ago after he returned to his rural home and found it ransacked by burglars. Police took 20 minutes to arrive.
After listening to conversations about Newtown, "I honestly don't think there is a middle to meet in," said Erik Shafer, a small business owner with a wife and two young daughters.
Then what does the future hold? He sees no end to gun violence, no matter what laws are passed.
"How do you prepare yourself for an infinite way that people can be shot and killed?" Erik Shafer responded. "It's tough. I really don't know what the answer is."
___
AP Researcher Jennifer Farrar contributed to this report.
This endless debate is wearing me out. All the talking in the world won't change that we have guns and won't give them up without a fight. Unlike Mr. Doss, I do own a gun, but like Mr.Doss, I also don't live in fear. I don't believe in leaving my safety up to others
The two sides are basically thus:
Â
1) We don't want guns and we're going to try to ban them from legal ownership, and legal gun owners are bad people who, like (union-hired) teachers, can't be trusted with guns because how do we know that these (union) teachers, etc, aren't going to wig out and kill students?
Â
(versus)
Â
2) We, a vast body of gun-owners in America already have them, we've always been able to get them, and you still haven't actually come and seized a single one of them. Nor have you convinced the tens of millions of gun-owning families that pacifism and disarmament prevents a woman from being raped, a bank from being robbed or a gun-free zone from being shot up. You're not going to come get them WITHOUT guns and if you bring guns, well... that doesn't very well work because that's the actual trigger-event for armed revolution, and all the guys you're coming to take the guns FROM include veterans who are trained in insurrection, insurgency and counterinsurgency. You cannot freaking win, so stop making threats because all you're doing is selling ammo.
Â
...is pretty much what it boils down to.
I have been making comments under a different account, and although they appear to show up in the forum in my browser, they do not actually show up in the discussion. It appears that somebody has the ability to null-route comments, perhaps so that you THINK you're posting. Just FYI.
This comment has been deleted
This comment has been deleted
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uSXcV-r1Ifs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O164pnjpRz0
From the article, "That's incomprehensible to Pittsburgh resident Valerie Dixon, whose law-abiding 22-year-old son was killed in Pittsburgh a decade ago by a neighborhood thug with an illegal .357 Magnum."
Â
Stricter gun control laws would not have kept the thug from having the illegal weapon.
This comment has been deleted
 @Saltire I agree with you. The only thing stricter gun control laws will succeed in doing is to make it even more difficult for a law abiding person to buy a gun.
Â
 @Saltire Valerie Dixon could have had a gun and could have killed her assailant. But she like many others thought , Why would I need a gun?
We could always be like England with zero tolerance for guns....but then we wouldn't be free just like England that monitors their deadbeats to see if they are actually seeking employment.
 @TimBurr Your incorrect about 0 tolerance. They accept air riffles and some air rifles go up to 50 caliber.. How would you like one of those coming you way? a .22 air rifle can be just as deadly as a .22 or .25 pistol.
Only idiots and imbeciles would believe that more gun control laws will slow down or stop crime! Criminals just don't care about the laws.
Oh, I like that sign in the picture above... Â In the center is a pic of the business end of a revolver.... framed by "Rape This..!" Â Â
Let's see how this works. All gun manujfacturers are good guys. All new gun retailers are good guys. All new gun buyers are good guys. Somehow, bad guys get guns. The inescapable conclusion is that bad guys and crazy guys get guns from good guys. Some guns are stolen. Some are foolishly sold. Or maybe all the "good guys" aren't so good. Maybe they care more about profit than public safety. Another inescapable conclusion is that if there were not so many guns flooding the gun stores and, ahme, "gun shows," there would be fewer guns availabe to bad guys and fewer guns in their hands. And, yes, the NRA and the gun lobby (I suppose that is redundant) are correct in saying we need to do something with our mental health system and with our games and movies. But firearms ARE part of the problem, and we need to deal with that, too. But expanding the mental health system is going to cost money, and the same people who want everyone to have a gun are the same people who don't want to see government expanded. They want it eliminated.
@Mechanic why don't you just go out and nicely ask the rapists and Crips and cartels and psychos to turn in their guns. Once you've gotten through with the KNOWN criminals, you can start working on those of us without criminal records. Triage. Prioritize. How about that?
 @MechanicOne little problem with your theory about the 'good guys' being the only possible way for the bad guys to get guns... the US government has recently been outed as allowing or rather fostering the transfer of illegal weapons into the hands of drug cartels in Mexico. This only became an issue when one of them was used against a US agent. The question that nobody is asking is how many other times has this happened in an attempt to 'track down' the cartels? It's not like it's a secret that our government has given thousands of small arms and munitions to foreign peoples for uprisings/rebellions in the hopes that it would benefit out geo-political position. It's also no secret that the USSR collapsed more than 20 years ago and tens of thousands of military weapons got sold into the black market. The guns being sold by FFL dealers in the US and purchased by law-abiding citizens are NOT the problem. Some legal owners of guns are careless with their responsibilities as gun owners and don't keep them secured, but this is hardly the majority of the problem in this country. The REAL problem is too large complicated to point at any one thing, but rest assured that limiting legal ownership of guns will not fix the REAL problem.
 @OregonN8ive  @Mechanic I know only one way to cure violence and he was Killed 2000 years ago and he was an innocent man.
 @Mechanic and the same lawmakers that don't want armed guards at school are, themselfs protected by armed guard and their children in private schools are as well.
Â
Guess guns are only good for protecting themselves but not us!
Â
Hey, I have an idea, the president should get rid of all his armed guards....get rid of all the armed guards in the capitol building, get rid of all the armed guards for the presidents daughters and armed guards at ALL schools. Â Oh wait, the lawmakers who hate guns don't want that!
Â
FYI more people die in car wrecks than die by guns, should we outlaw cars?
"...publishes detailed information on every Pittsburgh homicide because most are black-on-black crimes."
Â
I am surprised. I would have never guessed that in a million years.
Easy way to solve the problem.....the white house and lawmakers think guns are bad.....set the example.....no armed guards guarding the president, the white house or the capitol building. Â Set the example then we will follow it. Â Oh yeah and all you media types and Hollywood stars that are against guns, take your kids out of the private schools with armed guards that you send them to! Â Or at least admit you are against guns in schools EXCEPT for the schools your children go to!
Â
Hypocrites!
 iTS PLAIN AND SIMPLE FOLKS..... , How does a law or a federal restriction fix this problem? The killer of the young innocent children in Newton broke many laws, but that didnât stop him from performing the act. If a law will fix the problem, why didnât the law against murder stop it?
Â
In 1927 there was another Painful disaster just like this , a killer felt that a gun was not enough , a man by the name of Andrew Kehoe, went through with the most deadliest of all school killings its called:
Â
"The  Bath School Disaster'...where there were 38 children and 2 teachers killed. 58 other people were injured. Kehoe used dynamite to blow up the school. ,,,,,Itâs not the gun that is evil. It was the evil person using the gun that was evil.and in this case the gun was not enough....Look it up folks,, If evil wants to rear its ugly head and kill and kill many you will not STOP it by legislating it out of existence, please dont fool your self!
@shadowwalker Don't confuse the issue with facts, shadowwalker.
@shadowwalker  Timothey McVeigh used fertilizer and gasoline to kill 168 people (19 of them children) in the Oklahoma City bombing. No gun needed (but one might have stopped him).
 @scared_citizen If the media starts dwelling on and sensationalizing just exactly how easy it is to make an IED which would kill everybody in a large room, that'll be the new way that suicidal whackjobs get attention. Whatever people fear the most is what they're going to do.Â
Guns don't have anything to do with violence, just as sex has nothing to do with rape. Violent people will always be violent, gun or not, and rapists will always be rapists. Increased gun control will not impact violence or rape in any way. It's all about power. My having a CWP and always packing at least gives me a fighting chance over whomever is trying to exert his/her power over me in a violent way.
How about this for a gun control law...Anyone using a firearm in the commission of a felony, whether it results in death or not...is sentenced to death, and sentence MUST be completed within 30 day, and MUST be by firing squad (or machine) using a firearm. LET THE PUNISHMENT FIT THE CRIME! Make it a Federal law and ANY state that does not pass legislation matching the Federal Law will lose ALL federal funds, including welfare and any other handouts! I think that with this, most (not all) criminals would leave the guns behind and probably start using knives of bombs or?????? Â
Of course they're speaking two different languages. The gun controllers know that nothing they propose will impact criminals, the target is actually the law abiding, as such they lie, they use guilty by association, and they're even in some circumstances talking about confiscation by force [Cuomo and Feinstein].
Â
On the other hand the gun owners realize that their guns are not machine guns, they know that they, the NRA, the NSSF, and companies like Bushmaster had nothing to do with any crime, and they never want to have to use their guns against another human.
Â
This is as diametrically opposed as it can get, but one is speaking from a position of lies and the other is speaking from a position of truth.
UNBELIEVABLE!! It was reported several days ago that Lanza never took the AR-15 into the school, he left it in his car. The ENTIRE shooting rampage was done with four handguns, none of which had high-capacity magazines, yet the Obama and media is STILL reporting falsehoods.
Â
http://video.today.msnbc.msn.com/today/50208495#50208495Â
 @moej Thanks for that link. My Dad keeps telling me he used the AR15 and doesn't believe it was actually in the trunk.Â
Â
http://kontradictions.wordpress.com/2012/08/09/why-not-renew-the-assault-weapons-ban-well-ill-tell-you/