NRA breaks its silence following school shooting

WASHINGTON (AP) — After four days of self-imposed silence on the shooting that killed 26 people inside a Newtown, Conn., elementary school, the nation's largest gun rights lobby emerged Tuesday and promised "to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again."
The National Rifle Association explained its unusual absence "out of respect for the families and as a matter of common decency" after Friday's shooting that left dead 20 children, all ages 6 or 7.
The group — typically outspoken about its positions even after shooting deaths — went all but silent since the rampage. As it faced public scrutiny online and in person, the group left many wondering how — if at all — it would respond to one of the most shocking slayings in the nation's history.
"The National Rifle Association of America is made up of 4 million moms and dads, sons and daughters, and we were shocked, saddened and heartbroken by the news of the horrific and senseless murders in Newtown," the organization said in a statement. "The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again."
The group said it would have a news conference to answer questions Friday, the one-week anniversary of the shootings.
Almost immediately after it became clear the extent of carnage, the group's Facebook page disappeared. It posted no tweets. It made no mention of the shooting on its website. None of its leaders hit the media circuit Sunday to promote its support of the Second Amendment right to bear arms as the nation mourns the latest shooting victims and opens a new debate over gun restrictions. On Monday, the NRA offered no rebuttal as 300 antigun protesters marched to its Capitol Hill office.
Yet on Tuesday, the NRA re-emerged, albeit more slowly than normal and with its somber statement.
After previous mass shootings — such as in Oregon and Wisconsin — the group was quick to both send its condolences and defend gun owners' constitutional rights, popular among millions of Americans. There's no indication that the National Rifle Association is prepared to weaken its ardent opposition to gun restrictions but it did hint it was open to being part of a dialogue that already has begun.
Its deep-pocketed efforts to oppose gun control laws have proven resilient. Firearms are in a third or more of U.S. households and suspicion runs deep of an overbearing government whenever it proposes expanding federal authority. The argument of gun-rights advocates that firearm ownership is a bedrock freedom as well as a necessary option for self-defense has proved persuasive enough to dampen political enthusiasm for substantial change.
Seldom had the NRA gone so long after a fatal shooting without a public presence. It resumed tweeting just one day after a gunman killed two people and then himself at an Oregon shopping mall last Tuesday, and one day after six people were fatally shot at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin in August.
The Connecticut shootings occurred three days after the incident in Oregon.
Since the Connecticut shootings, the NRA has been taunted and criticized at length, vitriol that may have prompted the shuttering of its Facebook page just a day after the association boasted about reaching 1.7 million supporters on the social media network.
Twitter users have been relentless, protesting the organization with hashtags like NoWayNRA.
The NRA has not responded to them. Its last tweets, sent Friday, offered a chance to win an auto flashlight.
Offline, some 300 protesters gathered outside the NRA's lobbying headquarters on Capitol Hill on Monday chanting, "Shame on the NRA" and waving signs declaring "Kill the 2nd Amendment, Not Children" and "Protect Children, Not Guns."
"I had to be here," said Gayle Fleming, 65, a real estate agent from Arlington, Va., saying she was attending her first antigun rally. "These were 20 babies. I will be at every rally, will sign every letter, call every congressman going forward."
Retired attorney Kathleen Buffon of Chevy Chase, Md., reflected on earlier mass shootings, saying: "All of the other ones, they've been terrible. This is the last straw. These were children."
"The NRA has had a stranglehold on Congress," she added as she marched toward the NRA's unmarked office. "It's time to call them out."
The group's reach on Capitol Hill is wide as it wields its deep pockets to defeat lawmakers, many of them Democrats, who push for restrictions on gun ownership.
The NRA outspent its chief opponent by a 73-1 margin to lobby the outgoing Congress, according to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, which tracks such spending. It spent more than 4,000 times its biggest opponents during the 2012 election.
In all, the group spent at least $24 million this election cycle — $16.8 million through its political action committee and nearly $7.5 million through its affiliated Institute for Legislative Action. Its chief foil, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, spent just $5,816.
On direct lobbying, the NRA also was mismatched. Through July 1, the NRA spent $4.4 million to lobby Congress to the Brady Campaign's $60,000.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
The National Rifle Association explained its unusual absence "out of respect for the families and as a matter of common decency" after Friday's shooting that left dead 20 children, all ages 6 or 7.
The group — typically outspoken about its positions even after shooting deaths — went all but silent since the rampage. As it faced public scrutiny online and in person, the group left many wondering how — if at all — it would respond to one of the most shocking slayings in the nation's history.
"The National Rifle Association of America is made up of 4 million moms and dads, sons and daughters, and we were shocked, saddened and heartbroken by the news of the horrific and senseless murders in Newtown," the organization said in a statement. "The NRA is prepared to offer meaningful contributions to help make sure this never happens again."
The group said it would have a news conference to answer questions Friday, the one-week anniversary of the shootings.
Almost immediately after it became clear the extent of carnage, the group's Facebook page disappeared. It posted no tweets. It made no mention of the shooting on its website. None of its leaders hit the media circuit Sunday to promote its support of the Second Amendment right to bear arms as the nation mourns the latest shooting victims and opens a new debate over gun restrictions. On Monday, the NRA offered no rebuttal as 300 antigun protesters marched to its Capitol Hill office.
Yet on Tuesday, the NRA re-emerged, albeit more slowly than normal and with its somber statement.
After previous mass shootings — such as in Oregon and Wisconsin — the group was quick to both send its condolences and defend gun owners' constitutional rights, popular among millions of Americans. There's no indication that the National Rifle Association is prepared to weaken its ardent opposition to gun restrictions but it did hint it was open to being part of a dialogue that already has begun.
Its deep-pocketed efforts to oppose gun control laws have proven resilient. Firearms are in a third or more of U.S. households and suspicion runs deep of an overbearing government whenever it proposes expanding federal authority. The argument of gun-rights advocates that firearm ownership is a bedrock freedom as well as a necessary option for self-defense has proved persuasive enough to dampen political enthusiasm for substantial change.
Seldom had the NRA gone so long after a fatal shooting without a public presence. It resumed tweeting just one day after a gunman killed two people and then himself at an Oregon shopping mall last Tuesday, and one day after six people were fatally shot at a Sikh temple in Wisconsin in August.
The Connecticut shootings occurred three days after the incident in Oregon.
Since the Connecticut shootings, the NRA has been taunted and criticized at length, vitriol that may have prompted the shuttering of its Facebook page just a day after the association boasted about reaching 1.7 million supporters on the social media network.
Twitter users have been relentless, protesting the organization with hashtags like NoWayNRA.
The NRA has not responded to them. Its last tweets, sent Friday, offered a chance to win an auto flashlight.
Offline, some 300 protesters gathered outside the NRA's lobbying headquarters on Capitol Hill on Monday chanting, "Shame on the NRA" and waving signs declaring "Kill the 2nd Amendment, Not Children" and "Protect Children, Not Guns."
"I had to be here," said Gayle Fleming, 65, a real estate agent from Arlington, Va., saying she was attending her first antigun rally. "These were 20 babies. I will be at every rally, will sign every letter, call every congressman going forward."
Retired attorney Kathleen Buffon of Chevy Chase, Md., reflected on earlier mass shootings, saying: "All of the other ones, they've been terrible. This is the last straw. These were children."
"The NRA has had a stranglehold on Congress," she added as she marched toward the NRA's unmarked office. "It's time to call them out."
The group's reach on Capitol Hill is wide as it wields its deep pockets to defeat lawmakers, many of them Democrats, who push for restrictions on gun ownership.
The NRA outspent its chief opponent by a 73-1 margin to lobby the outgoing Congress, according to the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, which tracks such spending. It spent more than 4,000 times its biggest opponents during the 2012 election.
In all, the group spent at least $24 million this election cycle — $16.8 million through its political action committee and nearly $7.5 million through its affiliated Institute for Legislative Action. Its chief foil, the Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, spent just $5,816.
On direct lobbying, the NRA also was mismatched. Through July 1, the NRA spent $4.4 million to lobby Congress to the Brady Campaign's $60,000.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
December 15, 1791: The Second Amendment is adopted along with the rest of the Bill of Rights. The right to keep and bear arms was decided then. End of discussion. If you are willing to give up that right so easily for false security, what other rights will you be willing to give up? Thank you NRA for being the first civil rights organization. Gun bans don't work.
But... I mean, you all did see the deception the corporate owned media did suppressing the information on the 2 real shooters, no? I mean there are the audio files from the police radios, the video from the helicopter, 2 interviews of witnesses at the scene... anybody awake?
This comment has been deleted
 @HarryJuku By that logic, you would have lost your free speech rights long ago.
Why don't we just ban ALL guns for civilians? Â We can even make it a major crime to be caught with even a single bullet. Â Then we will have a nice safe country........ Just like Mexico.
 @Siwash FYI, guns are a constitutional right in Mexico, so I don't quite see your point.
 @JustAnotherPerson  @Siwash My understanding is that there is only one gun store in Mexico that sells to civilians and that it is very difficult for an ordinary Mexican citizen to get a legal firearm. You pretty much have to be extremely wealthy and/or politically connected.
 @Siwash If we did that, where would Mexico get all its guns?
I am sooo confused... How exactly are stricter gun laws going to create world peace? Or even decrease crime rates? If some Psychopath wants to commit murder with a gun, they are going to find the means to do it. Someone please explain to me how they can stricken gun laws without making guns completely illegal?
Â
We've heard it all before... Guns don't kill people. People kill people.
A very liberal and antigun Senator gets a gun permit but doesn't want us to be able to carry guns.
http://www.mrctv.org/videos/feinstein-1995-her-concealed-carry-permit-i-know-urge-arm-yourself-because-thats-what-i-did
Â
She doesn't want us to be able to protect ourselves. Only she should be allowed to do that.
Gun sales hit recored levels.
http://www.wkrn.com/story/20377667/weekend-gun-sales-break-records-following-ct-shooting
Â
Expect to see sales of guns go sky high as politicians talk about adding more gun laws.
in the 1930's German government took away the guns of the people and look what happened not 26 but thousands died.
This comment has been deleted
 @HarryJuku We have learned and been awakened more as to what our government is doing, we are not blind or stupid, I saw the helicopter video of the police catching 1 man and there is audio of the police radios where they mention 2 people and it is basically impossible for an autistic young man to re-load 3 times 4 guns in order to shoot so many. Sorry... not buying this one, or the last one, or the one before that. Go ahead and follow directions, you'll find yourself in a gas chamber you were told was a shower. duh
 @HarryJuku You mean that the NRA is respectful of the mourners. Unlike the slobbering left wing politician constitution haters?
Â
Darn that NRA, who do they think they are; being  conscientious to the families and friends of the victims? Gee, maybe a-s-sholes like Harry jokeu can learn a thing or two about being HUMAN from them. Of course, then he would not be a troll anymore.
 @Jack_Bauer  @HarryJuku Yeah, we're pretty happy ole Harry isn't them either.
 @Jeepers  @NotAChance  @Jack_Bauer  @HarryJuku He's just like all liberals.....he doesn't respond when you confuse him with facts.
@NotAChance @Jack_Bauer @HarryJuku and surprise, he doesn't respond...... Shocking.
 @HarryJuku What are these mysterious things that you believe that people have just now learned about the NRA? Is this another of your crackpot conspiracy theories?
This comment has been deleted
 @HarryJuku Your paranoia is running away with you. And much of the NRA is funded by members (like myself) who, while I don't agree with everything that they do, their efforts to protect civil rights is worth support.
From Wikipedia: Â Patrick Henry, in the Virginia ratification convention June 5, 1788, eloquently argued for the dual rights to arms and resistance to oppression: Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
Â
Â
@Kocollins Where is the quotation here? How much of it did you make up? If you cite someone else's words, quotation marks are obligatory.
@Mechanic lol show me in the commenting rules that states I have to do any of that.
What is this about giving up freedom for security? weren't we warned about this from MR Jefferson?
im having a deja vu le vu vu vu say sister soul!   lets continue to talk meds and semi autos until were blue in da face and then watch nuttin happen. its what we do!
Now Chrissie a.k.a. "Tingles" Matthews wants to ban all semi-automatic firearms.
Â
When are all you libs coming clean, and just admit what you want is to ban ALL firearms (disregarding the fact that criminals and the cartels will still own them).
@NotAChance And you need a semi-auto with a thirty round magazine for what? You gonna mince that deer right in the field so you don't have to dress it out? There are too many guns out there. Putting more on the street and keeping them easy to get is not the answer. Nobody is talking about taking away your semi-auto firearms. But things like the .223 were designed to be unstable and to tumble on impact, thereby destroying the maximum amount of tissue. These are not hunting weapons, and you can quit pretending they are.
 @Mechanic  @NotAChance The second amendment is not about hunting and it is dishonest of you to suggest that it is.
@NotAChance @mikew @Mechanic I prefer my .17 hmr, but yeah I guess my AR does that to.
 @mikew  @Mechanic Point to ONE statement where I stated these were intended as hunting weapons Mechanic. And by they way, they're considered to be one of the best varmint weapons out there. Not deer, varmint. But I don't hunt.
 As soon as people wake up and start researching the psyc meds that ALL the mass shooters have been on, like anti-depressents, they hopefully will come to their senses and address the real problem. Even Michael Moore stated after making bowling for Columbine, that the issue is the medications that are being given to children, and it's not about guns, and he's about as left as they come. So Harry, what is LOLOLOLOL as that baby talk? There is no we'd in you, but weed, probably!
This comment has been deleted
 @HarryJuku Who is the "we" of whom you speak?
This comment has been deleted
@NotAChance @HarryJuku @mikew he's in for a rude awaking if that's the case. He should also be careful what he wishes for, all tips gun talk is going to push people further right than left.
 @HarryJuku  @mikew Oh, there's a nationwide vote coming up concerning gun control that the PEOPLE will vote on, Harry? Please tell us all about it.Â
 @HarryJuku  @mikew They have already voted to ruin America, so this would be redundant.
 @HarryJuku You seem to have a rich imagination but are very short of specific facts. But that seems to fit your pattern in your comments.
God bless these children, my heart is with them and their loved ones. Shame on the media vultures for interviewing surviving children right after this massacre. Kudos to the NRA for being decent and waiting before commenting about this tragedy.
@The Resistance Right. They have an indefensible position, so quite sensibly they are not talking about it. When they do have their big announcement on Friday, I can guarantee you it will be all about mental health and nothing about guns. Nothing about shutting down the gun shows where anyone (that's right, ANYONE) can walk in and get a gun. They will say nothing about 30 round clips. They will say nothing about internet sales. They will say nothing about buying 20 guns at a time to ship to Mexico. Oh, wait. They might mention all that. If so, it will be to defend all that nonsense.
@Mechanic Again with the lies. Its the only way you liberals can accomplish anything. No such thing as a 'gun show loop hole'. Buying a gun at a show is identical to buying one at a normal gun shop. Background checks, 4473 form etc... all of it.
Quit being a liar, or quit being a left wing zombie, believing all the lies you constitution hating leaders tell you.
Â
Mechanic congratulations, not a single thing you said above even comes close to being true. Thank you for proving your complete lack of knowledge on the subject. Why don't you go back to commenting on the weather or something, because clearly you have nothing to add that's relevant.
 @Mechanic  Your comment indicates that you are an anti-NRA extremist and lack an open mind to reasonably engage in debate.
 @The Resistance These kids weren't blessed. They were murdered needlessly. If you don't like the coverage, don't watch it. And I'm sorry, but silence was not the decent reaction to this.
@Max Quinn @The Resistance Of course it is Max. Silence is a historically honored way to show respect. You don't have to dig very far to find that to be true.Â
Â
What, Max, is your definition of decent? Shoving a microphone into the face of a traumatized community to garner rating points? Pushing a political bone in the face of a tragedy that we are only now beginning to see the true face of? Don't bother, your opinion is worth less than nothing to me.
@Max Quinn @agateriver you should make it more illegal to steal guns then, because that seems to be the biggest problem currently.
 @JTesla  @Jack_Bauer I dont doubt it was a combination of several factors. As I said before, they are not stupid.
@Jack_Bauer Come on now, they weren't waiting for the facts. They waited because it was the best course of action for the long term health of the organization policies. I'm not a fan of the NRA as an organization, but I would have advised them to do the same thing.
 @Mechanic  @agateriver Why do you lie? is it because you cant support your agenda/ideology by using the truth? The NRA didnt get to where it is because the people who run it are stupid. They wait to see the facts etc...
Notice how they seem to change every day? new info comes out?
Grab a clue dude.
 @Mechanic  @agateriver False. The NRA was similarly quiet after the shooting of Congresswoman Gabby Giffords. If you just make stuff up, it shoots your credibility right down the tubes.
The NRA has figured out that speaking out while people are in the midst of emotionally-driven irrational uproar isn't effective. If they wait until people calm down then they can be more effectively addressed at a rational level.
@agateriver They have been quiet because they don't dare open their mouths. They have never been quiet before. ALWAYS on the day after some massacre they come out with the same BS that "Guns don't kill people....." and that "more people should carry guns."
@Max Quinn @agateriver --- I limit my exposure to the media, but my curiosity brings me the comments section to get a feel for what people are thinking. In this society evil people will continue to do horrible things to other humans and the media jackals will feed the frenzy. Stop reporting the name after the initial confirmation of the murderer's identity.
 @agateriver Likewise. I haven't spent my time glued to the TV watching the coverage - if you don't like it, don't watch.Â
Â
But no, standing sheepishly in silence saying God Bless and Jesus, Jesus how did this happen? when we perfectly well how this happened is not a sign of respect. A person who should not have had a gun had one. Again. Silence is not an option.