Obama demands quick action to raise debt limit
»Play Video
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama demanded on Monday that lawmakers raise the nation's $16.4 trillion federal debt limit quickly, warning that "Social Security benefits and veterans' checks will be delayed" if they don't and cautioning Republicans not to insist on concessions in exchange.
"They will not collect a ransom in exchange for not crashing the economy," he said at the final news conference of his first term. "The full faith and credit of the United States of America is not a bargaining chip. And they better decide quickly because time is running short."
"We are not a deadbeat nation," Obama declared, less than a week away from taking the oath of office for a second term.
The president also said he will soon ask Congress to enact new gun legislation in the wake of the shootings a month ago that left 20 elementary students dead in Newtown, Conn. Facing stiff opposition from the National Rifle Association, he conceded lawmakers may not approve everything he asks for.
Among the proposals under consideration are a ban on assault-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines. Obama said he would unveil his proposals next week. He was meeting after his news conference with Vice President Joe Biden, his point man in producing gun control measures to present to Congress.
Obama made his remarks as a new Congress was settling in for its own new term, Republicans in control of the House and Democrats in the Senate.
Lawmakers face three distinct deadlines before April 1. The debt limit must be raised to prevent a default, a series of across-the-board spending cuts is to kick in on March 1, and funding for most government programs will run out on March 27.
Obama virtually dared Republicans to let the government shut down rather than renew funding beyond March 27. "It will hurt the economy," he said emphatically.
The president opened his news conference with a statement by saying that a vote to increase the debt limit "does not authorize more spending. It simply allows the country to pay for spending that Congress has already agreed to. These are bills we've already racked up and we need to pay them."
Jabbing at Republicans, he quoted House Speaker John Boehner's remarks of two years ago that allowing a default on U.S. obligations - the practical effect of failing to raise the debt limit - would be a disaster.
Obama said he was willing to consider future deficit cuts, but only if they are done independently from a vote to raise the $16.4 trillion debt limit.
In a blunt rebuttal to Republicans who say they will not agree to any more tax increases, the president said taxes and spending both must be on the table.
He said he is "open to making modest adjustments to programs like Medicare to protect them for future generations," and wants to close tax loopholes at the same time.
Obama spoke less than a week before his inauguration for a second term, and several days after he signed legislation that narrowly averted a "fiscal cliff" of automatic spending cuts and across-the-board tax increases.
Combined with other bills he signed earlier in the term, he said he and Congress have reduced deficits by about $2.5 trillion over a decade, somewhat less than the $4 trillion he said is necessary to get them down to a manageable size.
"I'm happy to have a conversation about how we reduce our deficits in a sensible way," he said, but added repeatedly he wasn't willing to let congressional Republicans use the debt limit as leverage in negotiations over spending cuts.
Failure to raise the debt limit would put the United States into a first-ever default, a step that Obama said could "blow up the economy."
Congressional Democrats have recently urged the president to lift the debt limit unilaterally. He said - as he has before - that he won't do it, that Congress had voted for the spending that resulted in federal borrowing, and should now agree to pay the bill.
When it came to gun legislation, the president sought to reassure sportsmen and hunters that they have nothing for worry about.
"The issue here is not whether or not we believe in the 2nd Amendment. The issue is whether there are sensible steps we can take so that the individual in Newtown can't walk into a school and gun down a bunch of children in a shockingly rapid fashion. Certainly we can do something about that," he said.
Short of legislation, the president said there were administrative actions he could take. Asked to provide an example, he said, "How we are gathering data, for example, on guns that fall into the hands of criminals and how we track that more effectively."
"They will not collect a ransom in exchange for not crashing the economy," he said at the final news conference of his first term. "The full faith and credit of the United States of America is not a bargaining chip. And they better decide quickly because time is running short."
"We are not a deadbeat nation," Obama declared, less than a week away from taking the oath of office for a second term.
The president also said he will soon ask Congress to enact new gun legislation in the wake of the shootings a month ago that left 20 elementary students dead in Newtown, Conn. Facing stiff opposition from the National Rifle Association, he conceded lawmakers may not approve everything he asks for.
Among the proposals under consideration are a ban on assault-style weapons and high capacity ammunition magazines. Obama said he would unveil his proposals next week. He was meeting after his news conference with Vice President Joe Biden, his point man in producing gun control measures to present to Congress.
Obama made his remarks as a new Congress was settling in for its own new term, Republicans in control of the House and Democrats in the Senate.
Lawmakers face three distinct deadlines before April 1. The debt limit must be raised to prevent a default, a series of across-the-board spending cuts is to kick in on March 1, and funding for most government programs will run out on March 27.
Obama virtually dared Republicans to let the government shut down rather than renew funding beyond March 27. "It will hurt the economy," he said emphatically.
The president opened his news conference with a statement by saying that a vote to increase the debt limit "does not authorize more spending. It simply allows the country to pay for spending that Congress has already agreed to. These are bills we've already racked up and we need to pay them."
Jabbing at Republicans, he quoted House Speaker John Boehner's remarks of two years ago that allowing a default on U.S. obligations - the practical effect of failing to raise the debt limit - would be a disaster.
Obama said he was willing to consider future deficit cuts, but only if they are done independently from a vote to raise the $16.4 trillion debt limit.
In a blunt rebuttal to Republicans who say they will not agree to any more tax increases, the president said taxes and spending both must be on the table.
He said he is "open to making modest adjustments to programs like Medicare to protect them for future generations," and wants to close tax loopholes at the same time.
Obama spoke less than a week before his inauguration for a second term, and several days after he signed legislation that narrowly averted a "fiscal cliff" of automatic spending cuts and across-the-board tax increases.
Combined with other bills he signed earlier in the term, he said he and Congress have reduced deficits by about $2.5 trillion over a decade, somewhat less than the $4 trillion he said is necessary to get them down to a manageable size.
"I'm happy to have a conversation about how we reduce our deficits in a sensible way," he said, but added repeatedly he wasn't willing to let congressional Republicans use the debt limit as leverage in negotiations over spending cuts.
Failure to raise the debt limit would put the United States into a first-ever default, a step that Obama said could "blow up the economy."
Congressional Democrats have recently urged the president to lift the debt limit unilaterally. He said - as he has before - that he won't do it, that Congress had voted for the spending that resulted in federal borrowing, and should now agree to pay the bill.
When it came to gun legislation, the president sought to reassure sportsmen and hunters that they have nothing for worry about.
"The issue here is not whether or not we believe in the 2nd Amendment. The issue is whether there are sensible steps we can take so that the individual in Newtown can't walk into a school and gun down a bunch of children in a shockingly rapid fashion. Certainly we can do something about that," he said.
Short of legislation, the president said there were administrative actions he could take. Asked to provide an example, he said, "How we are gathering data, for example, on guns that fall into the hands of criminals and how we track that more effectively."
For once Mr. President...... PLEASE take your own advice
Â
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ft9oyp4IEUU
""""""Obama demands quick action to raise debt limit"""""
Â
I sure hope the R's have the nads to at least demand some immediate spending cuts before cranking up the limit.
@kramr ...
It's the job for Congress to legislate, not Obama's. Our Founding Fathers wanted the branches to be balanced, and not have a king. BTW, Congress has the purse strings, and they need to take responsibility for their actions and not "go with what the President says" and then blame them laterâ¦
If you can't pay your credit card bills, does the company raise your borrowing limit? Didn't think so
@T T This is a different situation. Here the credit card company is the one doing the spending, placing a limit, and then looking to raise said limit... for itself. The root of the problem is not the limit, but the spending. If you don't want to raise the debt ceiling, then you have to stop promising to spend so much.
No to raising debt limits. Yes to reducing spending limits. Come on joker, you just spend 20M of our tax money on your Christmas vacation with a fiscal crisis and three more to go. Stop the wars. Quite spending SS on the wars and stealing from the SS from the veterans and others. And congress, impeach this joker. What we have is the emperor with no clothes. Remember that story.
@None The $20 million figure is for all his Hawaii vacations to date as President, not just the latest.
No to raising debt limits. Yes to reducing spending limits. Come on joker, you just spend 20M of our tax money on your Christmas vacation with a fiscal crisis and three more to go. Impeach rather than inaugurate.
Here's a novel idea - cut spending to crap like Obamacare and other useless government programs such as welfare to illegals and those to damned lazy to get a job.
@scoreboard except that the ACA has been shown by independent studies to be solvent and profitable, thereby reducing the deficit.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @scoreboard You just keep believing that......
 @Ramsesthegreat  @scoreboard I suggest you read this article. It probably won't change your liberal thinking but it's something that you should take the time to read.
Â
http://reason.com/archives/2012/04/10/no-obamacare-wont-reduce-the-deficit
@scoreboard I will keep believing independent, accredited, knowledgable accountants and economists. You keep believing Fox News and its fear and scare tactics.
Get out of these wars.Get out of the Middle East.Stop meddling in the business of other countries and slash the bloated military budget for starters.
@noneofyourbizzness yup, the defense budget is equal to the entire annual deficit. It should be the first thing cut.
I don't like the fact they have been stealing our SS for years for WARS. Now our Vet and People on SS going to suffer!!!
Â
Why delay Social Security benefits and veterans checks if the debt ceiling isn't raised?  I'll bet there are a million areas where they could cut spending and still cover SS recipients and veterans. This sounds like a scare tactic similar to the Portland uses to get more money out of the taxpayer for prisons. "Pay more taxes or we'll have to let some really bad people out of jail."
Â
It sounds like the US Government would benefit from the services of a good financial planner, preferably one that doesn't have a stake in the US Government.
@JohnQ.Public ...
How about halting all payments to the Senate, The House and their staffers, Presidential Cabinet and everyone else in the Government....??
Keep hands off the senior's SS, they contributed to that fund their entire working lives! You raided it now put the money back! And the same goes for the Veterans Benefits - they put their lives in harm's way to protect this country. Sadly, Obama doesnât understand the hard working middle class who are barely surviving nor what our veterans mean to this country..
The sky is falling, give me money!
Hmmm... that's weird our president wants to borrow more money to waste. Why is it that out of all he cuts he could pick, he chooses social security and our vets. I will tell you why, because he is a crooked politician that's why.
 @poorsob This is not about borrowing, it's about paying the bills that are due (for monies already spent). The bogus thing is that this turns into a debt issue which needs to be separate discussion.
 @deejm2112  @poorsob Well we've been borrowing and spending at a record rate under his rule. Dems want a debt ceiling increase so this is a good time to force dems to spend less. Can you name any point in our lifetimes when dems voluntarily reduced spending? It has not happened nor will it ever happen as dems stay in power by giving free money to their "constituents".
 @Shawn Alley  @deejm2112 Exactly.
 @deejm2112 If we are still borrowing (which we are!) then it does not matter if it is this money or that money. Waste is waste and we do it every day. Unfortunately we re-elected the king of wasting money. I guess America is just fine with that, however, I am not.
 @sargerator The King !!! and you sure have not changed. Still have your head in the sand and blaming Bush for everything even the current disaster!
 @sargerator Well....well....tell me about the promise Obama made to cut the deficit in half by the end of his first term. When is he going to do that? Inquiring minds what to know (as well as the majority of Americans).
"we re-elected the king of wasting money." That was 2004 when there were 2 off budget wars that were supplemented by "emergency" appropriations bills that kepted them off budget !
Â
But you don't want to know how we got here !
Â
"Once a small blip among federal outlays, emergency supplementals have exploded since 2002, when the Republican Congress let a key legislative restriction on their use expire. In May 2007, President Bush signed into law the biggest supplemental bill in history,"
Â
http://reason.com/archives/2008/04/07/the-trillion-dollar-war
Obama "demands" quick action. I just love the way he works cooperatively with people.
@Nobody ....
All sides admit in the last fight Obama got everything he wanted without concessions. Now he's going to try it again. Guess what? People will only go so far in a one-sided relationship. Eventually, they're going to create a list of what Congress gave, versus what Obama gave, and they won't like the tally. And then they'll start refusing to compromise, because all of their compromises were met with all take and no give.
Sen. Barack Obamaâs Floor Speech, March 20, 2006 â âThe fact that we are here today to debate raising Americaâs debt limit is a sign of leadership failure. It is a sign that the U.S. Government canât pay its own bills. It is a sign that we now depend on ongoing financial assistance from foreign countries to finance our Governmentâs reckless fiscal policies. ⦠Increasing Americaâs debt weakens us domestically and internationally. Leadership means that âthe buck stops here.â Instead, Washington is shifting the burden of bad choices today onto the backs of our children and grandchildren. America has a debt problem and a failure of leadership. Americans deserve better.â
 @KHEB It wouldn't be polite of me to call Obama a liar. So, I'll just call him a Liberal instead.
 @last boyscout  @KHEB Having a hard time telling the difference.....
@scoreboard @last boyscout @KHEB because conservatives are so well known for telling the truth, right? Like how Ryan said that his plan would fix medicare, yet in actuality would have killed it within 8 years.
Let me take over the budget, Mr. President and Congress. I can do better than any one of the 545 of you!Â
KING BO
More debt, more spending, more taxes. This is not a game Mr. President. There are no "chips" on the table. Let's cut spending. Raise taxes on everyone if we must, but not as a first choice. It will hurt, but no more than default does. Taxation does not enable and economy, it enslaves it. Debt does not support freedom, it opposes it.
Â
And when the debt is raised, after we have spent the borrowed gains, and taxation can no longer provide an easy ponzi to pay; will our creditors understand? Will our government still appear benevolent?
Â
History contains the answer, but we tell ourselves that we have changed. We are more educated, we are more special than those who came before us. We are the greatest generation. So it is that we are convinced of our enlightened humanity.
Â
We are fools, all of us. We will pay the fools price; maybe not today, while we dance and sing but tomorrow when our children are called to pay a Piper they did not choose for themselves.
I think I'll now ask all those credit card outfits I have accounts with to immediately raise my debt limit!
@jpk A better analogy would be that the credit card company went out and bought lots of stuff with their own credit cards, now they are debating if they should raise the debt limit on their own cards. They will, and then go on another shopping spree.
 @jpk Unfortunately, they will probably agree. Why? Because unlike the government, credit card companies know that they will get paid. The government has no intention of ever paying their debts.
Really? Deficit spending doesn't add to the debt? Where, exactly, do these morons think it goes? The only explanation is that they are completely clueless and absolutly believe what they're saying. Don't expect things to get much better as long as this gaggle of economically illiterate imbeciles are in charge.
What a joke. I can't believe you people voted for this guy. Good job Lib Dib's
 @Fuelman76 People voted for him to keep getting their free stuff... Without handouts dems are nothing.
"Â on guns that fall into the hands of criminals and how we track that more effectively." BEcause Fast and Furious worked out
Different day...same old BS. And continue to blast the GOP.  Government of the U.S., get your noses out of the air and go to work for the voters that put you there or get the heck out and let's get some people in who care about America and her well-being.
Why is it every time the budget is in near crisis mode the first thing they always want to cut is veteran's and the elderly's benefits. Weren't those earned and paid for by the recipient? I am sick and tired of having my house used as a poker chip by politicians who seem to have no respect for the people they are supposed to serve. Cut foriegn aid, cut NASA, cut the DOD and DOJ. Right there is an easy $100,000,000,000..... Stop paying for businesses that can't earn a profit. Stop spending a million dollars so the Pres can take his wife out. He should pay for that like all other married men do.
Â
I am a totally disabled veteran, not a poker chip!
@MickRoh You have earned your benifit, as have I. Still we are not the only who recieve benifit. There are others who recieve benifit too, but they offered no sacrifice to earn it. Will they cut all benifits or just those you mentioned? Maybe, but Planned Parenthood and the Sierra Club will always get theirs first.
 @MickRoh....And quit sending billions of dollars to countries that hate us...ie: Pakistan.
 @Bdou Or Egypt
 @MickRoh They cut NASA, but you're absolutely right. God forbid we cut foreign aid.
What ever happened to that living within your means crap that's been spouted. We can't raise the limit forever, no matter what Obama seems to think.
@Thebigboot Actually Congress seems to think we can raise the limit forever, because they keep spending the money without any concern as to their self imposed limit.
 @Thebigboot I guess he hopes he can keeping raising the limit and endlessly spending for the next 4 years and then at that point he could care less about the repercussions. He just gave himself Secret Service protection for life, undoing a 1994 law which was supposed to limit it to 10 years.Â