Petraeus evades cameras, testifies before Congress
»Play Video
WASHINGTON (AP) - Ex-CIA Director David Petraeus was whisked clandestinely into a secure room beneath the Capitol, escaping waiting crowds of photographers and television cameras, to meet privately on Friday with members of Congress for the first time since he resigned over an extramarital affair with his biographer.
The retired four-star general, who until last week was one of America's most respected military leaders, discussed with the House and Senate intelligence committees the Sept. 11 attack against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead. He did not discuss his affair with Paula Broadwell, except to say his departure was not tied to the Libya attack. The scandal ended his career and has damaged others, and has led to a new CIA internal investigation.
The surreptitious entrance in the morning attested to the circus-like atmosphere of the scandal that has preoccupied Washington, even as the possibility of war loomed in Israel and the U.S. government faced a market-rattling "fiscal cliff" that could imperil a still-fragile economy. The tangled web has so far enveloped Petraeus; the top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen; two Florida socialites and a decorated FBI counterterrorism agent.
Lawmakers said the affair came up only briefly at the top of Petraeus' 90-minute appearance before the House committee.
"He did express deep regret to the committee for the circumstances for his departure" and reassured Congress that the Libya attack had nothing to do with his resignation, said Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I.
Petraeus also addressed his affair at the opening of the Senate hearing.
"He was very clear his resignation was tied solely to his personal behavior. He was apologetic and regretful but still Gen. Petraeus," Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said as he left the hearing early to catch a flight.
Unlike previous appearances at the Capitol, when Petraeus has walked through the front door and greeted reporters, he was sneaked inside the secure hearing room for the morning testimony in a manner more suited to a covert operative, through a network of underground hallways. Police closed down entire corridors in the Capitol.
Congress sets its own security and protective police presence for witnesses. It's not unusual for those asked to testify to negotiate with lawmakers the details of how they will be admitted. Executives and celebrities are sometimes also allowed to make a private entrance.
Petraeus, 60, acknowledged last week publicly that he had cheated on his wife of 38 years with Broadwell, who is 40.
The FBI began investigating the matter last summer but didn't notify the White House or Congress until after the election.
In the investigation, the FBI uncovered flirtatious emails between Allen and Florida socialite Jill Kelley, both of them married. President Barack Obama has put a promotion nomination for Allen on hold.
Petraeus, in his first media interview since he resigned, told CNN this week that he had never given classified information to Broadwell. She has said she didn't receive such material from Petraeus.
But the FBI found a substantial number of classified documents on Broadwell's computer and in her home, according to a law enforcement official, and is investigating how she got them. That official spoke only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the case. The Army has now suspended her security clearance.
The CIA on Thursday opened an exploratory investigation into Petraeus' conduct. The inquiry "doesn't presuppose any particular outcome," said CIA spokesman Preston Golson. At the same time, Army officials say that, at this point, there is no appetite for recalling Petraeus to active duty to pursue any adultery charges against him.
The retired four-star general, who until last week was one of America's most respected military leaders, discussed with the House and Senate intelligence committees the Sept. 11 attack against the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, that left four Americans dead. He did not discuss his affair with Paula Broadwell, except to say his departure was not tied to the Libya attack. The scandal ended his career and has damaged others, and has led to a new CIA internal investigation.
The surreptitious entrance in the morning attested to the circus-like atmosphere of the scandal that has preoccupied Washington, even as the possibility of war loomed in Israel and the U.S. government faced a market-rattling "fiscal cliff" that could imperil a still-fragile economy. The tangled web has so far enveloped Petraeus; the top American commander in Afghanistan, Gen. John Allen; two Florida socialites and a decorated FBI counterterrorism agent.
Lawmakers said the affair came up only briefly at the top of Petraeus' 90-minute appearance before the House committee.
"He did express deep regret to the committee for the circumstances for his departure" and reassured Congress that the Libya attack had nothing to do with his resignation, said Rep. Jim Langevin, D-R.I.
Petraeus also addressed his affair at the opening of the Senate hearing.
"He was very clear his resignation was tied solely to his personal behavior. He was apologetic and regretful but still Gen. Petraeus," Sen. Mark Udall, D-Colo., said as he left the hearing early to catch a flight.
Unlike previous appearances at the Capitol, when Petraeus has walked through the front door and greeted reporters, he was sneaked inside the secure hearing room for the morning testimony in a manner more suited to a covert operative, through a network of underground hallways. Police closed down entire corridors in the Capitol.
Congress sets its own security and protective police presence for witnesses. It's not unusual for those asked to testify to negotiate with lawmakers the details of how they will be admitted. Executives and celebrities are sometimes also allowed to make a private entrance.
Petraeus, 60, acknowledged last week publicly that he had cheated on his wife of 38 years with Broadwell, who is 40.
The FBI began investigating the matter last summer but didn't notify the White House or Congress until after the election.
In the investigation, the FBI uncovered flirtatious emails between Allen and Florida socialite Jill Kelley, both of them married. President Barack Obama has put a promotion nomination for Allen on hold.
Petraeus, in his first media interview since he resigned, told CNN this week that he had never given classified information to Broadwell. She has said she didn't receive such material from Petraeus.
But the FBI found a substantial number of classified documents on Broadwell's computer and in her home, according to a law enforcement official, and is investigating how she got them. That official spoke only on condition of anonymity because the official was not authorized to speak publicly about the case. The Army has now suspended her security clearance.
The CIA on Thursday opened an exploratory investigation into Petraeus' conduct. The inquiry "doesn't presuppose any particular outcome," said CIA spokesman Preston Golson. At the same time, Army officials say that, at this point, there is no appetite for recalling Petraeus to active duty to pursue any adultery charges against him.
They left out the most important part of his testimony...that his statement on Libya was altered, changed...by whom. Please report things accurately. Why is this report about Petraeus not on the home page of KATU.. really covering it up.
 @Jackie Sparks KATU has always been part of the problem. Half the important news stories go by the wayside with them.
The Commie libs are back to calling him BETRAEUS! That in itself is the biggest tell of all. On the run.
How come every other embroiled corrupted public bureaucrat has to be subjected to CSPAN prying televised eyes - and Petreus - who is no longer even employed by Uncle Sam - get to skate away from his testimony on the HILL without a camera in his face. And public accountability to all of us.
Â
Hey Petreus dude - you SHOULD be facing full court martial. But instead I will settle for you setting the record crystal clear - about how it was - Susan Rice, Barck Obama, Hilary Clinton and Leon Panetta were apprised of the truth in regard to the known terrorist threats against the Benghazi Embassy - and they did nothing about any of it.
Â
Turns out a movie had NOTHING to do with any of it. And it turns out - all of the above "players" - left behind four Americans in Libya, too. Unconscionably.
Just come clean you bumbling idiot.  Start acting like a President instead of a thug.
Here are some facts that are very interesting about all of this:
Â
-The FBI spied on the CIA director.
-Jill Kelley is an "honorary consul" and was given access to military bases despite not being in the armed services.
-Our president lied about what happened in Benghazi and its a giant cover up.
-Rockets and weapons from Libya are being used in Syria and in Gaza.
-Our government supported the "rebels" during the revolution with money and intelligence but they are al-quaeda.
-Our government still works with the "rebels" in Libya now and these "rebels" are being used in Syria.
-Our government is supporting the "rebels" in Syria.
-The anti-muslim movie was not the cause of the attack on the ambassador.
-The ambassador was killed near a "safehouse" not at the consulate location.
-The ambassador asked for more security but was not given anything extra.
Â
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attack_on_the_U.S._diplomatic_mission_in_Benghazi
Obama: "But, but, the War on Terror is over. Al Qaeda is supposed to be on the run. This can't be. Take any mention of terrorist from peoples talking points and put in the Muslim hating movie and we should be good."
Â
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/petraeus-to-testify-knew-libya-was-terrorism-from-start-source-says/
Obama lied. No surprise. No doubt the liberals will still support him.Â
 @last boyscoutÂ
Â
Yeah because Republican presidents have NEVER lied and a conservative has never told one.
Â
And when I tell you something that is not correct, it means I intentionally lied to you to deceive you because I have a bridge to sell you.
Â
You can blame ignorance, you might even have a case for incompetence, but intentional lies might be a conspiracy too far.
Â
@Repoman @last boyscout Repoman - Obama had his past four years of skating on Bush's legacy. This LIBYA FUBAR is beyond the pale - for any sitting president to chose to engage in.
Â
Only and solely because Obama was more engaged in self promoting himself.
And four Americans paid for all of that with their lives - and were consummately LEFT BEHIND. By Panetta, Rice, Clinton - and Obama.
Â
Not one bit George Bush's fault or responsibility. And dems decided to re-elect a low life LIAR like Obama? Really..... Really. Yup - you all did.
 @Repoman First, can't we stay in the present time just for once? And, Obama intentionally telling us that it was because of a video, in attempt to cover up the obvious existence of continued terrorism solely for his reelection, IS lying. Â
@last boyscout @Repoman The Obamination really did want to belive that the video ( put out in july ) was the cause of the embassy attack . I am sure that he thought that it being 9/11 and all , it was a coincidence that our embassy was being "harrased" by "locals" on the anniversery of the worst attack of the mainland of United States since the Civil War.
 @Repoman  @last boyscout Give me an F***ing break in what world did anyone in the government from the janitors on up believe this was all about a video for 6 weeks after it happened. You were out and out lied to by Obama and the main stream media to insure the worthless CEO of the US kept his job. If you can't see that you really are part of the 47% Mitt was talking about...
"The general was adamant there was no politicization of the process, no White House interference or political agenda," Schiff said. "He completely debunked that idea."
Â
Well I can see why the White House arranged for the general to have an affair and then made it public in order to stop him from testifying... that was the conspiracy theory earlier this week, right? I lose track. KHEB, help!
 @Max QuinnÂ
I thought the current theory (in the world according the KHEB) is that Obama sent in people to kill those American's and watched it live on a drone feed.
Â
@Repoman @Max Quinn The FACTS support no theory - the facts support the actions of choice of Barack Obama. And it is all pretty damning and indefensible. Of Barack Obama.
Â
Not one bit a theoretical drama anymore. Turns out - these were all documented factual treasonous actions - on Obama, Clinton, Panetta and Rice's part.
Ok. What are the treasonous facts? And remember, the word treasonous has an actual meaning. It doesn't just mean "things you think people you don't like did."
 @Repoman  @Max Quinn According the to lying devil news station you guys all hate Petraeus says someone changed his memo stating it was a terror attack.
Â
Gee lets see who would benefit from it not being a terror attack let me see.... That is really a tough one it has to be Bushs fault everything else is. The idiot in charge certainly can't be blamed for anything that would be racist...
Â
Former CIA Director David Petraeus stoked the controversy over the Obama administration's handling of the Libya terror attack, testifying Friday that references to "Al Qaeda involvement" were stripped from his agency's original talking points -- while other intelligence officials were unable to say who changed the memo, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed. Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/11/16/petraeus-to-testify-knew-libya-was-terrorism-from-start-source-says/#ixzz2CPgOX8X2
 @Max Quinn  @Repoman He had been slam dunking the bin laden kill and touting how he had cleaned house on the terrorists before the election.
Â
It would have looked bad to have had a terror attack and first death of an ambassador in 40 years due to the people he claimed he had defeated...
Â
What legit reason would anyone have taken that stuff out for?
Â
I can't think of one including a doubt that it was terror?
Â
You editing the documents of the top guy in charge because you know better then him?
Â
Really?
 @FreedomRocks  @Repoman All that was also contained in the original article that was posted here when I made my comment. They've changed it.
Â
The memo went through several agencies and could have been changed from a number of reason ranging from legitimate doubts to CYA.
Â
And why would the president have benefited from it not being a terrorist attack in the middle of an election? He could have gone around the country proclaiming that 'they' attacked us over there, pointed out how it didn't happen here, pointed to the attacks that have been stopped under his watch (like the bombing of the NY subways), and then he could have sent the cruise missiles and drones flying through skies. It would have been great grist for the news mill.
Â
Â
 @Repoman  @Max Quinn You're right. Sorry. The x-ray vision drones. I forgot. Good catch!
Well, no duh terrorists attacked the building the question is, Just who was it that gave them the intell on How to attack is the key thing.
Â
 @lee986321Â
I have heard that there was intelligence found on one of the perpetrators bodies.
Â
I would like to know if that is accurate, and if so, where did that information come from.
Â
I am less concerned with an attacker by terrorists and more that they may have known enough to undermine our security.
Â
One is enemy action, the other is infiltration.
Obama doesn't care who died, or why, as long as he won his election.
 @moej That is a disgusting statement. I'm sure he does care, deeply.
And thats why he pumped up the hurricane which was about to die over Florida with our weather modification program...
@browntown @moej Yeah hedeeply cares about his Obamacare, and his election , not about the lives of U.S. citizens.
Why does it say "believed"? He told them that this morning and likely continues to believe such.
The head of the CIA believed it. The president of the United States, Secretary of State and the rest of the Obama administration didnt believe it. What does that tell you !!
Big shock one more daming piece of evidence against Obama coming out after the elections. Â
@jpdx00 That and he will not endorse same-sex marriage and wants all illegal aliens to have amnesty. Sick.
 @jpdx00 Another Republican manufactured "crisis".
@browntown ......ah, the ostrich mentality.
 @browntown  @jpdx00 and just who is responsible for the 111,482 wishing Texas to secede and the 6,091 for South Dakota to secede and the 7,281 to secede from West Virginia and the 21,905 Arkansas to withdraw from the United States? I suppose this is just another scare tactic....Oh and by the way Texas IS a Republic.
 @lee986321  @browntown  @jpdx00Â
Â
And Massachusetts is a commonwealth; it means nothing they are part of the nation now.
Â
Honestly, I say let them go. Texas would not do very well as a single nation. I would give them two years before they started a war with Mexico again. And without the other 49 states paying for Fort Hood, it would be a shadow of its former self.
Â
@lee986321 "they need there heads examined" that statement is funny coming from you.
 @browntown  @jpdx00 Like it or Not there are realities that must be coped with and if any one is to damn blind to see that there is something seriously wrong, then they need there heads examined. Even Some Democrats understand there is a deep wound in the US that is bleeding like an artery that has been severed in to, This Country is "Bleeding" to death because of what has occurred in Congress and because of what we have allowed to occur.