Plan for prom barring gays rocks small Indiana community

SULLIVAN, Ind. (AP) - A small Indiana community best known for its parks and corn festival has become the center of a national discussion about intolerance over a group's plans to host a "traditional" prom that bans gay students.
Residents and officials in Sullivan, a city of about 4,200 near the Illinois border, are scrambling to escape the uncomfortable spotlight cast when a teacher supporting the "traditional" prom for Sullivan High School said she believes people choose to be gay and that gays have no purpose in life.
"I just ... I don't understand it," Diana Medley, referring to gays, told Terre Haute television station WTWO.
The comments by Medley, a special education teacher in a neighboring school district, have gone viral and sparked online campaigns to have her fired. A petition on Change.org calling for her dismissal had generated more than 17,500 signatures from as far away as the United Kingdom as of Thursday, and a Facebook page supporting a prom that includes all students had more than 27,000 likes.
The fallout has surprised many residents, who say the issue roiling the community in an area known for coal mining and attractive parks is being blown out of proportion.
"We are conservative around here. That's just the way of this town," said Nancy Woodard, 60, who owns the Hidden Treasure Exchange store. "In any town in this county, you'll find four or five churches no matter how small the town. ... The Bible is a big belief system here.
"Everybody has jumped on this little town. To me, there isn't any need for it," she said.
Sullivan High School Principal David Springer said talk of the "traditional" prom began in January, after a student began circulating a petition demanding that gays be allowed to participate in the grand march at Sullivan's April 27 prom. The "traditional" prom would not be sanctioned by the district and wouldn't be held at the school.
Springer said the school, which has 545 students in grades 9-12, has never banned same-sex pairs from the event.
"I've been to eight grand marches and ... we always had girls go out together, and a lot of times they just didn't have a date," Springer said. "Our prom is open to all of our students."
But others say calls for a "traditional" prom, fueled by Medley's comments, speak to a larger climate in which gay students fear being bullied and aren't welcome.
"When someone says your kid has no purpose, how do you think that makes a parent feel?" asked Annette Gross, Indiana state coordinator for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), whose son came out at age 19.
Aaron Gettinger, a 20-year-old Stanford University student who graduated from Sullivan High in 2011, said he isn't surprised by the push for a "traditional" prom that would ban gay students. He said he was bullied daily because he is gay and encountered viewpoints similar to those espoused by Medley.
"It's just the way that it is," he said. "It's part of a way of thinking that the rest of the country needs to know still exists and goes on."
Organizers of the "traditional" prom declined to comment, and it's unclear whether the event will still happen.
School officials and the minister of a church where planners met Sunday have worked to distance themselves from the flap.
Dale Wise, the church's senior minister at Sullivan First Christian Church, said his church turned off its fax machine and took its website offline Tuesday because both were the target of hate mail and pornographic messages.
Wise said the planning group met at the church because it allows community meetings to take place there but the church "had no affiliation whatsoever" with the "traditional" prom effort.
Springer said his staff has been inundated with calls and emails about Medley, whom he noted doesn't work for his school. She teaches in the Northeast School Corp., a neighboring district.
Neither Medley nor Northeast officials returned calls seeking comment. The district issued a statement this week saying Medley was "expressing her First Amendment rights" and that "the views expressed are not the views of the Northeast School Corporation and/or the Board of Education."
Sullivan isn't alone in its struggles over how to handle same-sex couples at proms. A small southeast Missouri school district is facing a threat of legal action over a policy barring same-sex couples from attending prom together.
The Southern Poverty Law Center on Thursday accused the Scott County Central School District in Sikeston of discrimination and gave the district until Feb. 25 to revise the school dance policy or face a potential lawsuit.
Sullivan High School freshman Te'Airra Walters, 15, said it shouldn't be a big deal for a same-sex couple to attend prom together. She said she doesn't like the negative attention the controversy has attracted.
"People from other schools around here are saying Sullivan is trashy," she said. "I think it's pretty much ridiculous."
Residents and officials in Sullivan, a city of about 4,200 near the Illinois border, are scrambling to escape the uncomfortable spotlight cast when a teacher supporting the "traditional" prom for Sullivan High School said she believes people choose to be gay and that gays have no purpose in life.
"I just ... I don't understand it," Diana Medley, referring to gays, told Terre Haute television station WTWO.
The comments by Medley, a special education teacher in a neighboring school district, have gone viral and sparked online campaigns to have her fired. A petition on Change.org calling for her dismissal had generated more than 17,500 signatures from as far away as the United Kingdom as of Thursday, and a Facebook page supporting a prom that includes all students had more than 27,000 likes.
The fallout has surprised many residents, who say the issue roiling the community in an area known for coal mining and attractive parks is being blown out of proportion.
"We are conservative around here. That's just the way of this town," said Nancy Woodard, 60, who owns the Hidden Treasure Exchange store. "In any town in this county, you'll find four or five churches no matter how small the town. ... The Bible is a big belief system here.
"Everybody has jumped on this little town. To me, there isn't any need for it," she said.
Sullivan High School Principal David Springer said talk of the "traditional" prom began in January, after a student began circulating a petition demanding that gays be allowed to participate in the grand march at Sullivan's April 27 prom. The "traditional" prom would not be sanctioned by the district and wouldn't be held at the school.
Springer said the school, which has 545 students in grades 9-12, has never banned same-sex pairs from the event.
"I've been to eight grand marches and ... we always had girls go out together, and a lot of times they just didn't have a date," Springer said. "Our prom is open to all of our students."
But others say calls for a "traditional" prom, fueled by Medley's comments, speak to a larger climate in which gay students fear being bullied and aren't welcome.
"When someone says your kid has no purpose, how do you think that makes a parent feel?" asked Annette Gross, Indiana state coordinator for Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbians and Gays (PFLAG), whose son came out at age 19.
Aaron Gettinger, a 20-year-old Stanford University student who graduated from Sullivan High in 2011, said he isn't surprised by the push for a "traditional" prom that would ban gay students. He said he was bullied daily because he is gay and encountered viewpoints similar to those espoused by Medley.
"It's just the way that it is," he said. "It's part of a way of thinking that the rest of the country needs to know still exists and goes on."
Organizers of the "traditional" prom declined to comment, and it's unclear whether the event will still happen.
School officials and the minister of a church where planners met Sunday have worked to distance themselves from the flap.
Dale Wise, the church's senior minister at Sullivan First Christian Church, said his church turned off its fax machine and took its website offline Tuesday because both were the target of hate mail and pornographic messages.
Wise said the planning group met at the church because it allows community meetings to take place there but the church "had no affiliation whatsoever" with the "traditional" prom effort.
Springer said his staff has been inundated with calls and emails about Medley, whom he noted doesn't work for his school. She teaches in the Northeast School Corp., a neighboring district.
Neither Medley nor Northeast officials returned calls seeking comment. The district issued a statement this week saying Medley was "expressing her First Amendment rights" and that "the views expressed are not the views of the Northeast School Corporation and/or the Board of Education."
Sullivan isn't alone in its struggles over how to handle same-sex couples at proms. A small southeast Missouri school district is facing a threat of legal action over a policy barring same-sex couples from attending prom together.
The Southern Poverty Law Center on Thursday accused the Scott County Central School District in Sikeston of discrimination and gave the district until Feb. 25 to revise the school dance policy or face a potential lawsuit.
Sullivan High School freshman Te'Airra Walters, 15, said it shouldn't be a big deal for a same-sex couple to attend prom together. She said she doesn't like the negative attention the controversy has attracted.
"People from other schools around here are saying Sullivan is trashy," she said. "I think it's pretty much ridiculous."
it's a small town, what do you expect. They fall under the stereotype: small town = small minds
Cupcakes for Diana Medley
I'm gay - gotta love me
>'The "traditional" prom would not be sanctioned by the district and wouldn't be held at the school.'
I see the thought police are on duty again.Â
Irrelevent of how I personally feel about the statements (if she was on duty, or acting as a representative of the school when she made them she may very well end up losing her job), or the 'traditional' prom idea, if it's a privately sponsored event that's not being held on public property.... I fail to see where the crime is.Â
Of course, in such 'gay acceptance' type of situations, it's probably best if I just remove logical thought from the process.Â
Are their actions/words hurtful? Yes.Â
Are their actions/words criminal? No.Â
Is this just the latest in the ever lengthening list of propogandist 'news' stories intended as social programming through shame? Yes.Â
In the end, I'm with saltire... At least it will let the Gresham baker have some peace and quiet once the lynch mob moves to Ill.Â
Thank you, Sullivan, Indiana. Thank you for taking the spotlight off the Oregon wedding cake controversy.
@Saltire When is a famous gay going to pay for a all gay prom
@Bert , good question. I wonder what the answer is.
As long as the school isn't providing it, there's not a damn thing illegal with private parties having a private function and inviting only those they choose to.
True enough, though this would also imply that she school system can't promote it either.
as long as a dude can be the prom queen it alright
Dale Wise, the church's senior minister at Sullivan First Christian Church, said his church turned off its fax machine and took its website offline Tuesday because both were the target of hate mail and pornographic messages.
Well, I'm not surprised. . Tolerance is only when you agree to their opinions. Any dissent is shouted down.
@disgustedman >'Tolerance is only when you agree to their opinions. Any dissent is shouted down.'
Yeah, there seems to be a LOT of that mentality going around.Â
Something tells me that you believe it's exclusively the dominion of the 'conservative' groups, though. Your belief, however, is decidedly in error.Â
@disgustedman Tolerance is a two way street....
@disgustedman Just remember when threats of hate are targeted then gays can be arrested as well. People are going to take a stand for or against this issue, and no matter which side pushes the hardest those who chose violence over a diplomatic solution are the true losers. so if you think sending hate filled messages is going to change any thing you got another thing coming, if you think threatening or bullying is going to get results, your sadly mistaken. People have had enough with it and they won't take it any more. maybe it is time to start posting the hateful things that are being said by the gay community, maybe it is time to start posting the threats against life and property which in my opinion go way to far. this is why I hate the gay community, you go against them..and they just as well throw hate in your face..Yeah they are about as peaceful as a bunch of vipers in a Snake den..some won't tolerate it either.Â
"I just ... I don't understand it,"
It's like listening to my liberal friends go "I just don't understand why people need clips that shoot 200 rounds" or the angry white guys on the forum going "I just don't understand why people need medical marijuana."Â Â
For the Nanny Statist, it's not about liberty or keeping your religious views to yourself, it's about banning everything they don't understand.
I don't understand it either, but, it's not my business to tell other Americans how to live.
wow....I finally agree 100% with you....even when I do give you crap, it's not that I disagree 100%...just in case you were wondering.
This comment has been deleted
@TheUglyTruth I was just going to make that very point when I read yours. Thank you. Very well said.
Gay people don't exclude straight people from attending, or participating in events such as parades, etc.
Get your facts straight
@pdxd Just out of curiosity.....
I know that you have said you are gay so I need to ask this. What would you personally think if they decided to have a Straight Pride parade? Would you say it's racist or bigoted or hateful? Â
@scoreboard @Bert @TreeWizard @pdxd NAACP and the black cacause in the fed gov
@Bert @scoreboard @TreeWizard @pdxd That too and BET - Black Entertainment Television.
@scoreboard @TreeWizard @pdxd You forgot the black entertainment awards
@TreeWizard @scoreboard @pdxd That's not my point. I just know of some gay people out there that would consider it to be discriminatory. Frankly I don't think it would be since there is a Gay Pride parade. I think the same could be said for Black History Month or the United Negro Fund. What if we wanted a White History Month or a United Caucasian Fund. Would those be discriminatory? I don't think they would be since other races have similar things offered to them.
I was just curious what pdxd's thoughts on it were.
@scoreboard @pdxd We don't need a Straight pride parade.
@TheUglyTruth Straight people can go to gay parades. Your argument doesn't make sense.
This comment has been deleted
I do hope you read my commit. For just a moment, please rewrite your post changing the word "gays" to the word "blacks".....Remember there was a time blacks were not considered equal, they couldn't go to a white man's church....I am sure you know history...Now, over the years, blacks are know as equal. Perhaps, you could now change the word "gays" to "Jews". Â Moral, the gay population is not forcing straight to do anything that the blacks or Jews didn't do. Every one deserves to be treated equally, with the same respect, fairness and to be accepted. Â Once, this is understood and Everyone is treated the same, then everyone can believe what they want, minus the races thoughts....At one point, the N word was common place and today we have a black man running our nation.Â
@TheUglyTruth @Playanekes The problem arises when you have a teacher who believes that certain people "have no purpose" in life. How is she going to interact with individuals who fall into such a category??? On an unconscious level at least, her behavior will be affected by her deep-rooted (and bigoted) beliefs. If she is in a profession which involves shaping the futures of our youth, she needs to keep such views to herself -- First Amendment or not.
@TheUglyTruth @Playanekes "understanding of people's viewpoints needs to be a 2 way street"
try telling that to a bible thumper. Â it's one thing to have a difference of opinions and beliefs. Â it's a whole other thing to tell everyone else how wrong they are because they believe in Thor and Zeus
A school prom should be ALL inclusive!!!!
Thus all students who attended the school and their dates should be allowed.
@FreerideNOTÂ Even the students that could be illegal.
"People from other schools around here are saying Sullivan is trashy," she said. "I think it's pretty much ridiculous."
I'd say that's ridiculous, if a pair of girls want to attend the prom as friends, or as girl-friends, what's the difference? It's been known for years that often times heterosexual teens use prom-night to have sex, but, no, we don't need to worry about the teen-sex or possible teen pregnancy, we need to worry about 2 girls, or 2 guys showing up together.
@pdxd Excellent. My wife went to her prom with another girl. There was nothing romantic about it...  their boyfriends were at boot camp. You couldn't have PDA on the dance floor or in the school... (well...you couldn't get caught)... so what's the issue?Â
Meanwhile, if the rest of us didn't get laid after prom, we were doing it wrong. Â
@Playanekes "Meanwhile, if the rest of us didn't get laid after prom, we were doing it wrong"
I may not agree with you often but you crack me up Play! Â Friggen LOL!!!!!!
Straight people say something negative about gays and they are considered biggots, racists, etc. Â Gays say something negative about straight people and they are just exercising their rights. Â Here's a deal that should satisfy all. Â Let the straight students have their prom and let the gays have theirs. Â I'll bet you won't see a stampede of straight students wanting to attend the gay dance. Â And if the straight students throw a fit because they aren't welcome at the gay prom, they will be chastised beyond belief by the media.Â
@Shadow hey Shadow, I wonder if you still believe blacks should ride in the back of the bus
"The comments by Medley, a special education teacher in a neighboring school district, have gone viral and sparked online campaigns to have her fired."
Of course. We need to punish people for exercising free speech and 1st amendment rights.
@RalphCramden is she being punished for exercising her rights or being punished for being ignorant and bigoted?
@diddy_bop
Being ignorant and bigoted is not a punishable offense. Unless of course one is against the first amendment and thinks that only "correct" speech is protected.
@RalphCramden but is she really being punished? is it not free speech also on behalf of the general public who calls out her bigotry? free speech only protects you against the government