Pope Benedict to resign, says I 'recognize my incapacity'
VATICAN CITY (AP) — Pope Benedict XVI said Monday he lacks the strength to fulfill his duties and on Feb. 28 will become the first pontiff in 600 years to resign. The announcement sets the stage for a conclave in March to elect a new leader for world's 1 billion Catholics.
The 85-year-old pope announced the bombshell in Latin during a meeting of Vatican cardinals, surprising even his closest collaborators, even though Benedict had made clear in the past he would step down if he became too old or infirm to do the job.
Benedict called his choice "a decision of great importance for the life of the church."
Indeed, the move allows the Vatican to hold a conclave before Easter to elect a new pope, since the traditional mourning time that would follow the death of a pope doesn't have to be observed.
It will also allow Benedict to hold great sway over the choice of his successor. He has already hand-picked the bulk of the College of Cardinals — the princes of the church who will elect the next pope — to guarantee his conservative legacy and ensure an orthodox future for the church.
Bishop Alexander Sample, who was just appointed Archbishop of the Portland archdiocese by Pope Benedict, said he received word of the resignation at about 6:30 a.m. Monday morning. He was in Marquette, Michigan, at the time.
"I was quite stunned by the announcement," Sample said. However, Sample said Pope Benedict has said in the past he would step down if he felt he could not meet the expected demands of his position as Pope.
He said the Pope has indicated that there "needs to be someone in the office who is really fully capable of fulfilling the office," Sample said. "I see this as a great, great act of humility on the part of our holy father."
There are several papal contenders in the wings, but no obvious front-runner — the same situation when Benedict was elected pontiff in 2005 after the death of Pope John Paul II.
The Vatican stressed that no specific medical condition prompted Benedict's decision, but in recent years, the pope has slowed down significantly, cutting back his foreign travel and limiting his audiences. He now goes to and from the altar in St. Peter's Basilica on a moving platform, to spare him the long walk down the aisle. Occasionally he uses a cane.
His 89-year-old brother, Georg Ratzinger, said doctors had recently advised the pope not to take any more trans-Atlantic trips.
"His age is weighing on him," Ratzinger told the dpa news agency. "At this age my brother wants more rest."
Benedict emphasized that carrying out the duties of being pope — the leader of more than a billion Roman Catholics worldwide — requires "both strength of mind and body."
"After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths due to an advanced age are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry," he told the cardinals.
"In order to govern the bark of St. Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary — strengths which in the last few months, have deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me," he said.
Popes are allowed to resign; church law specifies only that the resignation be "freely made and properly manifested." But only a handful have done it.
The last pope to resign was Pope Gregory XII, who stepped down in 1415 in a deal to end the Great Western Schism among competing papal claimants. The most famous resignation was Pope Celestine V in 1294; Dante placed him in hell for it.
When Benedict was elected at age 78, he was the oldest pope chosen in nearly 300 years. At the time, he has already been planning to retire as the Vatican's chief orthodoxy watchdog to spend his final years writing in the "peace and quiet" of his native Bavaria.
On Monday, Benedict said he would serve the church for the remainder of his days "through a life dedicated to prayer." The Vatican said immediately after his resignation, Benedict would go to Castel Gandolfo, the papal summer retreat south of Rome, and then would live in a cloistered monastery.
Contenders to be his successor include Cardinal Angelo Scola, archbishop of Milan, Cardinal Christoph Schoenborn, the archbishop of Vienna, and Cardinal Marc Ouellet, the Canadian head of the Vatican's office for bishops.
Longshots include Cardinal Timothy Dolan of New York. Although Dolan is popular and backs the pope's conservative line, the general thinking is that the Catholic Church doesn't need a pope from a "superpower."
Given half of the world's Catholics live in the global south, there will once again be arguments for a pope to come from the developing world.
Cardinal Antonio Tagle, the archbishop of Manila, has impressed many Vatican watchers, but at 56 and having only been named a cardinal last year, he is considered too young.
Cardinal Peter Kodwo Appiah Turkson of Ghana is one of the highest-ranking African cardinals at the Vatican, currently heading the Vatican's office for justice and peace, but he's something of a wild card.
All cardinals under age 80 are allowed to vote in the conclave, the secret meeting held in the Sistine Chapel where cardinals cast ballots to elect a new pope. As per tradition, the ballots are burned after each voting round; black smoke that snakes out of the chimney means no pope has been chosen, while white smoke means a pope has been elected.
The pontiff had been due to attend World Youth Day in July in Rio de Janeiro; by then his successor will have been named and will presumably make the trip.
Benedict himself raised the possibility of resigning if he were simply too old or sick to continue on, when he was interviewed in 2010 for the book "Light of the World."
"If a pope clearly realizes that he is no longer physically, psychologically and spiritually capable of handling the duties of his office, then he has a right, and under some circumstances, also an obligation to resign," Benedict said.
The former Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger had an intimate view as Pope John Paul II, with whom he had worked closely for nearly a quarter-century, suffered through the debilitating end of his papacy.
The announcement took the Vatican — and the rest of the world — by surprise.
Several cardinals on Monday didn't even understand what Benedict had said during the consistory, said the Rev. Federico Lombardi, the Vatican spokesman said. Others who did were stunned.
"All the cardinals remained shocked and were looking at each other," said Monsignor Oscar Sanchez of Mexico who was in the room when Benedict made his announcement.
Benedict was born April 16, 1927 in Marktl Am Inn, in Bavaria, but his father, a policeman, moved frequently and the family left when he was 2.
In his memoirs, Benedict dealt what could have been a source of controversy had it been kept secret — that he was enlisted in the Nazi youth movement against his will when he was 14 in 1941, when membership was compulsory. He said he was soon let out because of his studies for the priesthood. Two years later he was drafted into a Nazi anti-aircraft unit as a helper. He deserted the German army in April 1945, the waning days of the war.
He called it prophetic that a German followed a Polish pope — with both men coming from such different sides of World War II.
Benedict was ordained, along with his brother, in 1951. After spending several years teaching theology in Germany, he was appointed bishop of Munich in 1977 and elevated to cardinal three months later by Pope Paul VI.
John Paul named him leader of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith in 1981 and he took up his post a year later. Following John Paul's death in 2005, he was elected pope April 19 in one of the fastest conclaves in history, just about 24 hours after the voting began.
___
Follow Nicole Winfield at www.twitter.com/nwinfield
___
Daniela Petroff contributed from Vatican City.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
No more Pope Popetine!
Time for a change put a woman in as Pope! Hey could be any worse than the last 1000 years with a man running the show mite even be better. No but seriously it is time for a change first change is let priests marry, second let women become priests. And finally let's put someone in the position that isn't "one foot in the grave already"! Â
 @RJP4674 Are you kidding? According to Christian religion, women as individuals are subservient to men. How do you think that would go down with the rest of the Pope's underlings? Not to mention the fact it's a bunch of underlings doing the election - the ones REALLY in control.
The resignation of Pope Benedict XVI is providing a golden opportunity for Catholic-bashers. There are calls from the media for the church to now âmodernize.â And many are focusing again on the pedophilia scandals. So there are vile tweets ripping this Pope and Catholics in general. First things first. Priests who engage in pedophilia are the scum of the earth. But these same anti-Catholic folks seem less concerned about this happening elsewhere. A John Jay College of Criminal Justice report reveals school teachers sexually abuse children at a higher rate than Catholic priests. Other studies support this as well. This same report shows twice the rate of child sexual abuse from the general male population. Is the Catholic Church perfect? Hardly. As with any organization it includes highly imperfect members. But the left is engaged in an ongoing culture war and no traditional institution is safe. Blasphemy to this crowd is the refusal to kneel before their godless altar of big government.
@scoreboard Anyone can bash, discuss or blaspheme all they want in regard to any religion, just as the religious do on a daily basis to one another and all non believers; this isnt a golden opportunity, its the continuation of its death throes and the opportunity is recognized the minute anyone applys critical thinking and observation tools to their daily repertoire. I know you aim to protect your faith, thats a sacrifice you chose - but if indeed you believe, truly, then your faith will stand on its own merit.Â
Â
I've heard you discuss freedom very adamantly on these forums before and many times i've been in agreement; you have to remember its a shared freedom, to believe or not. With all due respect and honesty, I find your belief system as well as all others to all be equal glimpses of the untrue. I would be a liar to others and myself, a great treachery in itself, if I were to state that I believe - I can't, just as you can - of which I accept you for it because I value our constitution and what it allows for more than all else.Â
Â
Best Wishes,
Atheist
@OliverNicholas@scoreboard
And I'll agree with you. The difference is that people need to be respectful of one another, regardless of how they believe. I don't agree with your non-belief in God, but I'll support your rights to it as long as you do the same for me. It's that way with anything.Â
Â
Unfortunately there are too many people out there on both sides that don't feel that way. There are those out that there that will just blatantly come out and say "You're going to hell because you don't believe!" and frankly that's not right.Â
Â
One other example is that there are so many people out there that think just because a very small percentage of the Catholic priests are/were pedophiles, that all of them must be and that's because of the way the media portrays them. They believe it just because the media says so. They don't do the research. I'm would never condone their actions but nonetheless, people need to realize that the overwhelming population of priests are good people that would NEVER do anything like this to a child. Growing up in a Catholic family and a predominantly Catholic community, I know better.Â
Â
Many liberals scream for tolerance, yet they don't practice it themselves and that also is wrong. You can't have your cake and eat it to.
Â
One does not have to like the Catholic Church or any religion for that matter, but people should not be bashing them because of the actions of a few or because they don't believe in God.
This comment has been deleted
 @OliverNicholas Again I pretty much agree with you. I'm not saying all liberals are intolerant or <insert your favorite religion> bashers. Many are, many aren't. It's those that are that really upset me. As long as they can be respectful (like yourself) I can handle that.Â
Â
No one should put me or anyone else down because of the way I believe or put you down for the way you believe or don't believe. Have a civil debate and that's fine but once one person resorts to name calling or other insults then they lose all credibility and I no longer want to debate with them. I try to never resort to that (although I'm not always successful).
Â
You too have a great day.
@scoreboard Iâm halfway with you. You are correct to say itâs unfair to label all priests pedophiles; but it is equally unfair to label anyone with a liberal mindset a religion basher? Iâm more a libertarian, if anything and in my opinion I feel that religion is the opiate of the credulous and wish thinkers. Thatâs my opinion and Iâm entitled to express that opinion, even if it hits home to your core values.Â
Â
Religion deserves no respect from me, itâs a tool for some, a life style for most. Just as you or others of different sects or denominations find that same distaste for say Islam, Hindu, or Atheism.Â
Â
To tell anyone that some ones beliefs are unquestionable is a great hindrance to social dialogue and progress, its healthy to question, just as its healthy to accept no arguments from authority, authorities have been wrong in the past and will so in the future.
Â
It is not my desire to force anyone to believe anything, I can only influence through my daily actions, my solace lies in the innate feeling I have to act humane towards others. Getting diverted by what you wish to believe detracts from examining facts and allowing evidence to speak for itself, examining those facts and the truths they bear out is critical to the success of our species.
Â
I will and do respect the individual, I do not have to nor will I respect their religion(s). Have a great day Scoreboard, I hope you find all you might look for in your new pope.
@scoreboard Iâm halfway with you. You are correct to say itâs unfair to label all priests pedophiles; but it is equally unfair to label anyone with a liberal mindset a religion basher? Iâm more a libertarian, if anything and in my opinion I feel that religion is the opiate of the credulous and wish thinkers. Thatâs my opinion and Iâm entitled to express that opinion, even if it hits home to your core values.Â
Â
Religion deserves no respect from me, itâs a tool for some, a life style for most. Just as you or others of different sects or denominations find that same distaste for say Islam, Hindu, or Atheism.Â
Â
To tell anyone that some ones beliefs are unquestionable is a great hindrance to social dialogue and progress, its healthy to question, just as its healthy to accept no arguments from authority, authorities have been wrong in the past and will so in the future.
Â
It is not my desire to force anyone to believe anything, I can only influence through my daily actions, my solace lies in the innate feeling I have to act humane towards others. Getting diverted by what you wish to believe detracts from examining facts and allowing evidence to speak for itself, examining those facts and the truths they bear out is critical to the success of our species.
Â
have a great day, and I hope you find all you might look for in your new pope.
 @scoreboard "...providing a golden opportunity for Catholic-bashers."
Â
There are some here who were probably once catholic, I being one of them. I used to wonder why there were only missalettes and no bibles in the pew. I started bringing one to church. I can remember the scornful looks I would get from the other parishoners. An apologist wanted to question me about why I had it instead of using the missalette.
Â
I started to read parts of the bible, curious as to why they don't allow it or encourage its use in mass.
Â
This caught my attention:Â God's Second Commandment - "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth"Â Exodus 20:4-6 King James Version.
Â
The catholic bible doesn't say anything about graven images...why not?
Â
Catholics use many idols and graven images as part of their worship. They dress, pray to, kiss the feet of and have parades with statues, pictures (or icons), rosaries, holy cards, calendars, crosses, and crucifixes and candles.
Â
Does a crucifix violate this commandment?
Â
So I checked the catholic bible's version of the 2nd commandment: "You shall not take the name of the Lord God in vain" There's nothing here that refers to 'graven image'. Strike One.
Â
I used to wonder why I had to go to confession and confess my sins to Father Holierthanthou. I came across this passage in the KJ bible: "And call no man your father upon the earth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Matthew 23:9 Strike Two.
Â
There are other things the bible forbids that the catholic church dismisses..."And if thou wilt make me an altar of stone, thou shalt not build it of hewn stone: for if thou lift up thy tool upon it, thou hast polluted it." The church I used to go to spent a fortune on its new marble altar. So that's where my 10% of wages is going?... towards something that God condemns?
Â
The ringer tho was this passage:Â "And when thou prayest, thou shalt not be as the hypocrites are: for they love to pray standing in the synagogues and in the corners of the streets, that they may be seen of men. Verily I say unto you, They have their reward."Â Strike Three...
Â
I'm no hypocrite...that's why I stopped going to church. I became a born-again christian and started to read the bible from the beginning, until I came to this passage: "Now the serpent was more crafty than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. He said to the woman, âDid God really say, âYou must not eat from any tree in the gardenâ?âÂ
Â
A talking serpent? Am I wrong in saying that people who defend religion must also believe in talking serpents, because supposedly it is a book of truth...help me out here...anyone?
Â
Not everyone is a catholic basher...some just want to help others to see Catolicism in a different light.
Â
I forgot to mention...I used to be an altar boy but didn't like it because the priest used to smoke a lot and I couldn't stand his breath reeking of alcohol when he would talk to me.
Â
Â
Â
My insider information says Italian Cardinal Benito Sicola is in the running. If elected he will become Pope Sicola.
 @I812 That's funny. However, the reality of it, they never keep their given name when the become pope. They always choose to be named after a saint.
 @scoreboard  @I812 Grow a sense of humor scoreboard, will ya?!?!?  Those are both really funny!
 @Justanother1  @I812 I agree. See my comment above. These are funny. I was just trying to explain for those that may not have an understanding of how things work when a new pope is elected. :)
Â
It's all good!
@scoreboard How about Saint Bernard then?
 @I812  @scoreboard Yes, if he so chose to name himself that, he could but it's probably not going to happen.Â
I didn't know a pope could do that, I thought it was a lifetime appointment. Good for him tho recognizing he wasn't up to it. Bring on the popeful hopefuls!
 @pdx10 Typically they do but they are given the right to resign for any reason that may affect his ability to perform the duties of pope. It appears that his health is precluding him from traveling more than anything which is a task that is very important to the papacy.
My money's on Bono...
Â
http://www.katu.com/news/weird/Irish-bookie-gives-1000-to-1-odds-U2-will-be-next-Pope-190704331.html
Â
...however, Pope Sicola sounds refreshing.
Â
Â
What kinda drit on him would you have to have to get the pope to quit??
What did that pope butler have on him the one who was caught removing stuff from there??
 @uknow2 Just make something up.  That's all Catholic-bashers have to do.Down in New Orleans today there are Baptists standing in front of the Cathedral who will tell you how Catholics aren't even Christian.
 @uknow2 A picture of him crapping in the woods would probably do it.
A lot of posters here are apparently advocates of Hope and Change in the direction the Papacy should go in their opinion. The Papacy has been around for 2000 years and while there have been Popes who should never have been elected to the position, there have been countless others who have advanced the Faith. Finding the right successor to Pope Benedict XVI should not, can not, and will not become a political issue for the world. Politics and religion should be separate. Political issues for the physical here and now, and religious faith (whether you believe or not) for personal satisfaction and emotional comfort.
@jpk Put down the crack pipe! The catholic church is as political an entity as any. And why you are talking about personal satisfaction and emotional comfort why not talk about how the catholic church killed people who had different opinion and beliefs, how sins all of a sudden were not sins, and how the catholic church became the world's safe haven for child molesters and pedophiles.  Organized religion is about power, control, and money.
Whatever you believe is up to you!
All of you idiot folks who post these stupid comments....why did you come here? Uhhh...couldn't figure out why the Pope's picture is featured with the headline??? I mean really...do you just pop up your ugly heads to post something derogatory or hate-filled??? Really shows how stupid you are :( Too bad.
It makes me laugh seeing all the hateful comments by people who claim that it's the catholic church that preaches the very same thing.  Treat others as you would want to be treated.
I hear he's got plans for his own start-up
 @Solipsist01 Men's wear?
Â
Good luck to you, sir. But really - who cares? Is there a religion section this should be posted on? I don't see how this is news - for anyone but the
@englishdaisy "But really - who cares?" I'll give you a reason to care. There are some in Christian circles that teach the false prophet in the book of Revelation will be the Pope (I'm not sure I agree with that teaching. The limited study I have been able to do does not appear to support that teaching). Let's say - just for the sake of argument - those people are correct. This means that every time a successor to the Papal throne is appointed/elected, the new Pope could be the false prophet.
Â
Many of us on the right have been "sounding the alarm" (so to speak) about the rights of the people being slowly stripped away. The Bible makes it very clear the Beast (a.k.a. the Anti-Christ) will control every aspect of human life in every corner of the globe. This will not be possible unless all rights have been stripped away by the government(s). I have longed believed this will happen in my lifetime. Now back to the issue of the Pope. If indeed the teaching I mentioned in the first paragraph is correct, the man chosen to succeed Pope Benedict XVI could be the false prophet of prophecy. If he is, that means we are much closer to the end (and the complete stripping away of rights) than even I believed. You do care about your rights, correct?
@englishdaisy It's news for those of us who are Catholic. Don't like it, don't read it.
Hopefully the church will elect someone this time who wants to move the church forward and not someone who wants to keep the church in the 1400s
 @Ramsesthegreat Wouldn't it be nice to get a Pope with a post-Gregorian calendar reform vision?
Not catholic, don't care.
@The Resistance I wonder why any news source keeps us apprised of the personnel actions of this one church. Why is that KATU?
Â
I wonder why KATU thinks this is news - at all. Hey KATU - slow news day? Apparently.
 @englishdaisy I agree! I think KATU is run by the Jesuits!
Are you f****ing kidding me? Â
 @The Resistance Then why even bother to post? No one cares that you don't care.
 @gofigure  @The Resistance Irv cares!
@gofigure @The Resistance Obviously you do @gofigure or you wouldn't have commented.
 @gofigure  @The Resistance I care that he doesn't care more than I care about the Pope, because I also do not care.Â
 @gofigure  @The Resistance That's not true, I care that he don't care!
'Pope Benedict XVI said Monday he lacks the strength to fulfill his duties and on Feb. 28 will become the first pontiff in 600 years to resign. '
Â
Benedict called his choice "a decision of great importance for the life of the church."
Â
It's pretty rare when I find more integrity in the Catholic higherarchy than the US government institutions (specifically, the Supreme Court.)
Â
The difference being that in theological higherarchies, they're still accountable to someone (theologically speaking). In the US elected officials ranks, and supreme court, there is no such prerequisite. So long as the PR and spin machines keep going, and the electorate continues to vote parties before abilities, neither office answers to anyone.Â
 @MarkKpic And that's not even counting the child molesters!
 @swimbad  @MarkKpic Because we all know that the only people who molest children are Catholics. Jews, Baptists, Mormons, atheists, agnostics and Muslims NEVER molest children, huh?
 @scoreboard   Your comment does not have anything to do with my comment but you are happy just to run with the other ignorants on this board!
 @Playanekes   Nice twist to my comment, comprehension is always lacking in your HS comments.
 @Playanekes  @swimbad  @MarkKpic Exactly plus the overwhelming majority of the Catholic priests are NOT molesters. However, the media only reports the few bad apples for the sensationalism.Â
Â
I am certain that less than 2% of the ordained priests are child molesters. While I would never condone this action and it should be 0%, it's the bad apples that give the 98% a bad name.Â
Â
As you stated above, I don't think anyone could name any organization, religious or otherwise, that doesn't have their bad apples.
So he's going to become an ex benedict?
Â
(ok, confession, heard it on the radio)
@randola    Say 3 hail Marys'