Putin says he will sign anti-US adoptions bill
MOSCOW (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin said Thursday he will sign a controversial bill barring Americans from adopting Russian children, while the Kremlin's children's rights advocate recommended extending the ban to the rest of the world.
The bill is part of the country's increasingly confrontational stance with the West and has angered some Russians who argue it victimizes children to make a political point.
The law would block dozens of Russian children now in the process of being adopted by American families from leaving the country and cut off a major route out of often-dismal orphanages. The U.S. is the biggest destination for adopted Russian children — more than 60,000 of them have been taken in by Americans over the past two decades.
"I still don't see any reasons why I should not sign it," Putin said at a televised meeting. He went on to say that he "intends" to do so.
UNICEF estimates that there are about 740,000 children not in parental custody in Russia, while only 18,000 Russians are now waiting to adopt a child. Russian officials say they want to encourage more Russians to adopt Russian orphans.
Children's rights ombudsman Pavel Astakhov on Thursday petitioned the president to extend the ban to other countries.
"There is huge money and questionable people involved in the semi-legal schemes of exporting children," he tweeted.
Kremlin critics say Astakhov is trying to extend the ban only to get more publicity and win more favors with Putin. A graduate of the KGB law school and a celebrity lawyer, Astakhov was a pro-Putin activist before becoming children's rights ombudsman and is now seen as the Kremlin's voice on adoption issues.
"This is cynicism beyond limits," opposition leader Ilya Yashin tweeted. "The children rights ombudsman is depriving children of a future."
The bill is retaliation for an American law that calls for sanctions against Russian officials deemed to be human rights violators.
The U.S. law, called the Magnitsky Act, stems from the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer who died in jail after being arrested by police officers whom he accused of a $230 million tax fraud. The law prohibits officials allegedly involved in his death from entering the U.S.
Kremlin critics say that means Russian officials who own property in the West and send their children to Western schools would lose access to their assets and families.
Putin said U.S. authorities routinely let Americans suspected of violence toward Russian adoptees go unpunished — a clear reference to Dima Yakovlev, a Russian toddler for whom the adoption bill is named. The child was adopted by Americans and then died in 2008 after his father left him in a car in broiling heat for hours. The father was found not guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
The U.S. State Department says it regrets the Russian Parliament's decision to pass the bill, saying it would prevent many children from growing up in families.
Astakhov said Wednesday that 46 children who were about to be adopted in the U.S. would remain in Russia if the bill comes into effect.
The passage of the bill follows weeks of a hysterical media campaign on Kremlin-controlled television that lambasts American adoptive parents and adoption agencies that allegedly bribe their way into getting Russian children.
A few lawmakers claimed that some Russian children were adopted by Americans only to be used for organ transplants and become sex toys or cannon fodder for the U.S. Army. A spokesman with Russia's dominant Orthodox Church said that the children adopted by foreigners and raised outside the church will not "enter God's kingdom."
Critics of the bill have left dozens of stuffed toys and candles outside the parliament's lower and upper houses to express solidarity with Russian orphans.
___
Mansur Mirovalev contributed to this report
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
The bill is part of the country's increasingly confrontational stance with the West and has angered some Russians who argue it victimizes children to make a political point.
The law would block dozens of Russian children now in the process of being adopted by American families from leaving the country and cut off a major route out of often-dismal orphanages. The U.S. is the biggest destination for adopted Russian children — more than 60,000 of them have been taken in by Americans over the past two decades.
"I still don't see any reasons why I should not sign it," Putin said at a televised meeting. He went on to say that he "intends" to do so.
UNICEF estimates that there are about 740,000 children not in parental custody in Russia, while only 18,000 Russians are now waiting to adopt a child. Russian officials say they want to encourage more Russians to adopt Russian orphans.
Children's rights ombudsman Pavel Astakhov on Thursday petitioned the president to extend the ban to other countries.
"There is huge money and questionable people involved in the semi-legal schemes of exporting children," he tweeted.
Kremlin critics say Astakhov is trying to extend the ban only to get more publicity and win more favors with Putin. A graduate of the KGB law school and a celebrity lawyer, Astakhov was a pro-Putin activist before becoming children's rights ombudsman and is now seen as the Kremlin's voice on adoption issues.
"This is cynicism beyond limits," opposition leader Ilya Yashin tweeted. "The children rights ombudsman is depriving children of a future."
The bill is retaliation for an American law that calls for sanctions against Russian officials deemed to be human rights violators.
The U.S. law, called the Magnitsky Act, stems from the case of Sergei Magnitsky, a Russian lawyer who died in jail after being arrested by police officers whom he accused of a $230 million tax fraud. The law prohibits officials allegedly involved in his death from entering the U.S.
Kremlin critics say that means Russian officials who own property in the West and send their children to Western schools would lose access to their assets and families.
Putin said U.S. authorities routinely let Americans suspected of violence toward Russian adoptees go unpunished — a clear reference to Dima Yakovlev, a Russian toddler for whom the adoption bill is named. The child was adopted by Americans and then died in 2008 after his father left him in a car in broiling heat for hours. The father was found not guilty of involuntary manslaughter.
The U.S. State Department says it regrets the Russian Parliament's decision to pass the bill, saying it would prevent many children from growing up in families.
Astakhov said Wednesday that 46 children who were about to be adopted in the U.S. would remain in Russia if the bill comes into effect.
The passage of the bill follows weeks of a hysterical media campaign on Kremlin-controlled television that lambasts American adoptive parents and adoption agencies that allegedly bribe their way into getting Russian children.
A few lawmakers claimed that some Russian children were adopted by Americans only to be used for organ transplants and become sex toys or cannon fodder for the U.S. Army. A spokesman with Russia's dominant Orthodox Church said that the children adopted by foreigners and raised outside the church will not "enter God's kingdom."
Critics of the bill have left dozens of stuffed toys and candles outside the parliament's lower and upper houses to express solidarity with Russian orphans.
___
Mansur Mirovalev contributed to this report
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
Being an adopted person at birth (American born but my adopted parents were Canadian citizens & Permanent American Residents), I can understand the appeal to adopt from outside this country. The amount of newborns/infants available in this country has diminished over the years while other countries numbers have gone up. Most people, generally, want to have a baby not necessarily a child or teenager. The waiting lists for adoptions have also grown longer in this country where the time frame in foreign countries is considerably shorter. It's also cheaper from another country. Our society is so focused on money that it carries over to the adoption process making it only available for upper class to be the majority able to adopt. Even back in the 70's, it was very expensive. My parents were lucky enough to have a lawyer friend who knew of a child that was going to be available and thus, got to privately adopt me and reducing some of the costs. My Mom always said I was an expensive little mouse (I was very little when born  4lbs 13 oz). Funny story...my parents learned about me in February and that I was due in April. Surprise! I came the day after they got the initial phone call. As an adult, I always arrive early to appointments or gatherings. Some things never change. :)
Â
But I digress. I am sad that many Russian children will not be able to come here and have a forever family to love them. I also feel for those parents-to-be that are in the process right now will be losing what they have been wanting for so long.
Buy American should be required. Every child deserves a home, but Americans need to adopt here, rather than spend thousands of feel good dollars in "adoption" fees" in China , Russia and other countries.
I think Russian kids are too much for Americans to handle. They are so much smarter. You go to another country and hear what people say about Americans. Heard so much negative stuff, how stupid/retarded brainwash American people are. And in some way I do agree with that, caused most Americans are dependent on medications around 70 to 80 % are dependable on antidepressants. What does the future holds for our kids. If we'll keep going the same way!
So he is fine with 740k kids rotting in Russian orphanages rather than being given a chance at a decent life.
Nice Putin. Not unexpected of a KGB hack though.
Good, we have enough kids running around over hear. China, Africa, when are you going to follow suit?
@dkgiovenco I bet they spell "here" better than you.
 @iamtroglodite  @dkgiovenco Lol, hard to make a point when the spelling is all wrong and everything. Thanks.
Well, at least we're fighting over child adoptions instead of nuclear disarmament this decade.
Â
Soooo, who cares. Much better to adopt USA first....Putin has picked the wrong cause this time.
"The bill is part of a larger measure created by Russian lawmakers in response to the United States Congressâ passage of the so-called Magnitsky Act. The act bars entry and freezes the assets of Russian citizens accused of violating human rights. The act was named after Sergei Magnitsky a lawyer who allegedly uncovered massive fraud by Russian officials. Magnitsky died in jail pending corruption charges."
Â
"The measure also includes a ban on organizations that assist in the adoption of children from Russia to the United States, claiming the ban would not allow such organizations to operate in Russia."
Doesn't this bill also outlaw charitable organizations that receive monies from the U.S.? Thus returning Russia to more of a communist, restrictive type state.
I have known 3 families who've adopted from Russia, and all three ended up having to send the kids away to special "farms" for psychotic children, because all 5 of the kids adopted were aspiring murderers. I say this ban is good for Americans.
 @The_AnnaCannard Aspiring murderers make good soldiers.
'UNICEF estimates that there are about 740,000 children not in parental custody in Russia, while only 18,000 Russians are now waiting to adopt a child. Russian officials say they want to encourage more Russians to adopt Russian orphans.'
Â
That's good. And, similarly, Americans (US citizens and LPRs) should adopt more American kids. Â It's hard enough for a kid without a family to acclimate to a new family, but doubly difficult when that change involves a new family AND a new country. Â Putin is using common sense.
Children are always pawns of politician and unions.
What with all we hear about banning abortion, why aren't Americans stepping up and wanting  to adopt all those babies and give mothers the true choice of being adopted versus abortion. Would American babies put up for adoption be less worthy than Russian, Korean, Indian or Chinese babies? Makes you wonder.
 @peckishpete A lot of people adopt outside us because it's cheaper and faster.... But I totally agree with you.
That's okay, Kommrad Putin. We don't want your ugly, stupid, retarded kids here anyway. We have enough disfunctional kids in this country that we can't take care of as it is!
I see no problem with this. I think Putin is trying to stop human trafficking in the guise of "adoption". Families over there are selling off babies to survive .Â
Putin has no soul.
There are so many children in the U.S. who need to be adopted. Why are people adopting children from Russia? Is it easier to do? Are they being adopted by those who are not qualified to adopt here?
 @PointblankÂ
The paperwork to adopt in the US is too time consuming and costly for most. The vast majority of it was government regulations and anal government employees.
Â
Russia was pretty easy to do and red tape was minimal.
Â
China is also easy which is the place most of these folks who want to adopt will go to.
What's the going rate to adopt an American child? I ask, because I have friends adopting triplets from a Central American country and their bill is expected to total at least $30k.
 @OSUx2Â
Except that the adoption agency does the investigations and is very fast and efficient. The government is slow and requires a ton of paperwork.
 @RalphCramden  @OSUx2 The thing about the cost/complexity argument to me is, that that is a mere drop in the bucket compared to the overall cost of raising a kid. It may be relatively more time and trouble, but compared with the fun/joy/trouble/frustration/etc in store for them later, the initial fees really pale in comparison. Â
Â
Also, another fundamental tenet of rule in the realm of international politics/charity/foreign aid is: 'help the people in the place where they live'. In removing people from their native cultures, it does, over time, tear away at the fabric of a society to some degree. Â The flip side of that coin is: we can't possibly take all the orphaned children throughout the world that need a home -- heck, we don't even take care of the ones here that need help now.
Good grief, no wonder nobody does adoptions from this country. That's ludicrous. With all of the kids in government care now, that's just insane.
Â
As a side note, my friends did have to go through all of what you mentioned to do the Central American adoption.
 @OSUx2Â
Cost is about 20-40K out of pocket. In the US they have to have home inspections, social workup, and lots of other red tape.
Â
We had a friend do a US adoption and it cost about 50k. They did a Chinese adoption and the cost was about 10k. They said they would never to another US adoption because of all the hoops they had to go through and how long it took to get everything approved.
 @OSUx2 Well, when I was adopted in 1973, the cost was about 12,000. BUT that was a private adoption so it was considerably cheaper. I would venture a guess to say it would run 25k to 40k considering inflation. However, I could be wrong and it could be higher. Also, you have to take the age of the child into consideration. An infant probably costs more than say a 7 year old. It's the old supply and demand. Most parents want infants so they can raise them from the start rather than have to deal with previous bad parenting.
@Pointblank Well why don't we ship our children off to Russia?
 @JTesla  @Pointblank There's a lot of children here in the USA that would benefit from that. Once they found out their IPhones won't work in Russia they would want to come back though!
Â
 @Pullerdawg  @JTesla  @Pointblank Supporters of transnational adoptions ALWAYS overlook the kids HERE that need a home NOW.  I really detest the practice of seeking foreign kids when we have so many here that need help now.
 @JTesla  @Pointblank Good point JTesla. Imagine the outcry that would happen in the USA if we were adopting out kids to Russia or China or Eastern Europe or Egypt or Africa... even England!  Can US orphans be adopted by foreigners?Â
Read this article in the New York Times.  It gives some interesting details on the Dima Yakovlev case including the negligent father's name, some statistics, and some quotes from the Russian perspective such as [Speaker Boris Gryzlov declared himself âindignant.â Foreigners want Russian children, he said, because they are âgenetically smarter and healthier.â]  LOL!. Wow, there are some serious issues on both sides that need to be resolved.
Â
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/04/world/europe/04adopt.html?_r=0