Scientists say baby born with HIV apparently cured

WASHINGTON (AP) - A baby born with the virus that causes AIDS appears to have been cured, scientists announced Sunday, describing the case of a child from Mississippi who's now 2½ and has been off medication for about a year with no signs of infection.
There's no guarantee the child will remain healthy, although sophisticated testing uncovered just traces of the virus' genetic material still lingering. If so, it would mark only the world's second reported cure.
Specialists say Sunday's announcement, at a major AIDS meeting in Atlanta, offers promising clues for efforts to eliminate HIV infection in children, especially in AIDS-plagued African countries where too many babies are born with the virus.
"You could call this about as close to a cure, if not a cure, that we've seen," Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health, who is familiar with the findings, told The Associated Press.
A doctor gave this baby faster and stronger treatment than is usual, starting a three-drug infusion within 30 hours of birth. That was before tests confirmed the infant was infected and not just at risk from a mother whose HIV wasn't diagnosed until she was in labor.
"I just felt like this baby was at higher-than-normal risk, and deserved our best shot," Dr. Hannah Gay, a pediatric HIV specialist at the University of Mississippi, said in an interview.
That fast action apparently knocked out HIV in the baby's blood before it could form hideouts in the body. Those so-called reservoirs of dormant cells usually rapidly reinfect anyone who stops medication, said Dr. Deborah Persaud of Johns Hopkins Children's Center. She led the investigation that deemed the child "functionally cured," meaning in long-term remission even if all traces of the virus haven't been completely eradicated.
Next, Persaud's team is planning a study to try to prove that, with more aggressive treatment of other high-risk babies. "Maybe we'll be able to block this reservoir seeding," Persaud said.
No one should stop anti-AIDS drugs as a result of this case, Fauci cautioned.
But "it opens up a lot of doors" to research if other children can be helped, he said. "It makes perfect sense what happened."
Better than treatment is to prevent babies from being born with HIV in the first place.
About 300,000 children were born with HIV in 2011, mostly in poor countries where only about 60 percent of infected pregnant women get treatment that can keep them from passing the virus to their babies. In the U.S., such births are very rare because HIV testing and treatment long have been part of prenatal care.
"We can't promise to cure babies who are infected. We can promise to prevent the vast majority of transmissions if the moms are tested during every pregnancy," Gay stressed.
The only other person considered cured of the AIDS virus underwent a very different and risky kind of treatment - a bone marrow transplant from a special donor, one of the rare people who is naturally resistant to HIV. Timothy Ray Brown of San Francisco has not needed HIV medications in the five years since that transplant.
The Mississippi case shows "there may be different cures for different populations of HIV-infected people," said Dr. Rowena Johnston of amFAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research. That group funded Persaud's team to explore possible cases of pediatric cures.
It also suggests that scientists should look back at other children who've been treated since shortly after birth, including some reports of possible cures in the late 1990s that were dismissed at the time, said Dr. Steven Deeks of the University of California, San Francisco, who also has seen the findings.
"This will likely inspire the field, make people more optimistic that this is possible," he said.
In the Mississippi case, the mother had had no prenatal care when she came to a rural emergency room in advanced labor. A rapid test detected HIV. In such cases, doctors typically give the newborn low-dose medication in hopes of preventing HIV from taking root. But the small hospital didn't have the proper liquid kind, and sent the infant to Gay's medical center. She gave the baby higher treatment-level doses.
The child responded well through age 18 months, when the family temporarily quit returning and stopped treatment, researchers said. When they returned several months later, remarkably, Gay's standard tests detected no virus in the child's blood.
Ten months after treatment stopped, a battery of super-sensitive tests at half a dozen laboratories found no sign of the virus' return. There were only some remnants of genetic material that don't appear able to replicate, Persaud said.
In Mississippi, Gay gives the child a check-up every few months: "I just check for the virus and keep praying that it stays gone."
The mother's HIV is being controlled with medication and she is "quite excited for her child," Gay added.
There's no guarantee the child will remain healthy, although sophisticated testing uncovered just traces of the virus' genetic material still lingering. If so, it would mark only the world's second reported cure.
Specialists say Sunday's announcement, at a major AIDS meeting in Atlanta, offers promising clues for efforts to eliminate HIV infection in children, especially in AIDS-plagued African countries where too many babies are born with the virus.
"You could call this about as close to a cure, if not a cure, that we've seen," Dr. Anthony Fauci of the National Institutes of Health, who is familiar with the findings, told The Associated Press.
A doctor gave this baby faster and stronger treatment than is usual, starting a three-drug infusion within 30 hours of birth. That was before tests confirmed the infant was infected and not just at risk from a mother whose HIV wasn't diagnosed until she was in labor.
"I just felt like this baby was at higher-than-normal risk, and deserved our best shot," Dr. Hannah Gay, a pediatric HIV specialist at the University of Mississippi, said in an interview.
That fast action apparently knocked out HIV in the baby's blood before it could form hideouts in the body. Those so-called reservoirs of dormant cells usually rapidly reinfect anyone who stops medication, said Dr. Deborah Persaud of Johns Hopkins Children's Center. She led the investigation that deemed the child "functionally cured," meaning in long-term remission even if all traces of the virus haven't been completely eradicated.
Next, Persaud's team is planning a study to try to prove that, with more aggressive treatment of other high-risk babies. "Maybe we'll be able to block this reservoir seeding," Persaud said.
No one should stop anti-AIDS drugs as a result of this case, Fauci cautioned.
But "it opens up a lot of doors" to research if other children can be helped, he said. "It makes perfect sense what happened."
Better than treatment is to prevent babies from being born with HIV in the first place.
About 300,000 children were born with HIV in 2011, mostly in poor countries where only about 60 percent of infected pregnant women get treatment that can keep them from passing the virus to their babies. In the U.S., such births are very rare because HIV testing and treatment long have been part of prenatal care.
"We can't promise to cure babies who are infected. We can promise to prevent the vast majority of transmissions if the moms are tested during every pregnancy," Gay stressed.
The only other person considered cured of the AIDS virus underwent a very different and risky kind of treatment - a bone marrow transplant from a special donor, one of the rare people who is naturally resistant to HIV. Timothy Ray Brown of San Francisco has not needed HIV medications in the five years since that transplant.
The Mississippi case shows "there may be different cures for different populations of HIV-infected people," said Dr. Rowena Johnston of amFAR, the Foundation for AIDS Research. That group funded Persaud's team to explore possible cases of pediatric cures.
It also suggests that scientists should look back at other children who've been treated since shortly after birth, including some reports of possible cures in the late 1990s that were dismissed at the time, said Dr. Steven Deeks of the University of California, San Francisco, who also has seen the findings.
"This will likely inspire the field, make people more optimistic that this is possible," he said.
In the Mississippi case, the mother had had no prenatal care when she came to a rural emergency room in advanced labor. A rapid test detected HIV. In such cases, doctors typically give the newborn low-dose medication in hopes of preventing HIV from taking root. But the small hospital didn't have the proper liquid kind, and sent the infant to Gay's medical center. She gave the baby higher treatment-level doses.
The child responded well through age 18 months, when the family temporarily quit returning and stopped treatment, researchers said. When they returned several months later, remarkably, Gay's standard tests detected no virus in the child's blood.
Ten months after treatment stopped, a battery of super-sensitive tests at half a dozen laboratories found no sign of the virus' return. There were only some remnants of genetic material that don't appear able to replicate, Persaud said.
In Mississippi, Gay gives the child a check-up every few months: "I just check for the virus and keep praying that it stays gone."
The mother's HIV is being controlled with medication and she is "quite excited for her child," Gay added.
@EricaNochlin @KATUNews Great job connecting baby and local AIDS research. TY!
@cfpdx thanks! Interesting story.
@EricaNochlin Very Interesting, and every May, @PAGAC_Oregon has a World AIDS Orphan's Day event.
Grandma's oxygen therapy or innocent aids victim on welfare, hmm... tough call. Grandma's Medicare or gay prostitute who had sex with hundreds of other gay men? Easy call.
This comment has been deleted
What does one need to do to not be an innocent victim of this?
This comment has been deleted
@Festivus @TheUglyTruth @Oregon7812 Those who selfishly do non essential shopping, do not cover coughs sneezes or not wash hands.
@TheUglyTruth @Oregon7812 Now if we could only get more people to go out in public during flu season, we could get rid of a lot more of those non-innocents.
Nailed it!!!
without having read all the comments, i hereby state i agree with whatever one(s) made the most sense to reasonable people. i reserve the right to later, after the meds kick in and i read all the posts to alter my mind and disagree with everyione although it goes without saying i ALWAYS agree with certain posters and you know who you are. thoughts and prayers.  FACT!!
Abstinence Is Dependable Safety from sexual disease transmitters who are not always forthcoming or aware they are carriers. (I know this makes some angry to hear because it is Biblical sexual instruction of avoiding fornication and adultery and marriage of a man and woman). But if you are waiting 6 months to know your future, think about it. Also remember I is not only STD their is hepatitis, herpes, etc....It takes 6 no. to wait to see if you were infected after a "oh, BTW.." disclosure.
@Pers Retiree I'd agree with you and then we'd both be right, but what would be the fun in that? Â
To Ely... Well, you are a nurse, and not a research medical scientist. Â There is a huge difference in deep understand on immunology, cellular biology, and all that other science stuff that require clinical trial and not hearsay. Â So, yes, you are right, you are absolutely not a research scientist, A+ (which they don't give out anymore, A's are the highest grade) in a single class notwithstanding.
What I'm trying to say is, your one class and observations is not the same as someone who devotes decades into studying the pathogens and other such medical terms.
One anecdotal example of someone you positively cannot verify due to patient confidentiality is not proof.  How did you know he had poor insurance, or simply isn't good at his career to keep his job? Â
I don't like big pharma and the price they charge us. Â They seem to get away with it while all other nations limit what they can charge. Â But that's not the point here.
No formal documents released from a credible source has provided conclusive evidence. That's the end all basis on medical research.
It shows that you are a nurse, not a research medical scientist. Â But I appreciate what you do daily because without it, people would suffer. Â Nurses are healers of the body and heart.
Folks, the key words in the above story are "apparently cured". Â As a Registered Nurse, I have a decent understanding of HIV and AIDS. Â To say that an infant, born with HIV, is "apparently cured" after cramming carcinogenic medication down their throats since birth is horrific as a large percentage of babies born testing HIV positive will, themselves, shed the virus on their own as their own immune system matures. Â It can take up to 18 mos. to two years for their immune system to mature enough that it can dispose of the Virus. Â It appears as though, for one reason or another, the parents and Doctors decided to cram this infant full of chemicals and poison to promote big pharma and HIV medications when, if left alone, there would have been a more than good chance that this child would have shed the virus on their own.
At least now corporate media can write stories about cures, which then promotes pushing harmful chemicals on babies who most likely will not need them, and just backs up big pharmas agenda.
An article from "AliveAndWell.org" states:
"Do Pregnant Women Who Test HIV Positive Give Their Babies AIDS?
At least 75% of babies born to HIV positive mothers will test HIV negative without medical intervention. (90) Studies have shown that for properly nourished HIV positive expectant mothers receiving regular prenatal care, over 90% of their children test negative with no drug therapy. (91) Mainstream medical experts acknowledge that children need up to 18 months to develop their own immune response and discard the antibodies passed on to them from their mothers, and note that HIV testing before 18 months of age does not yield conclusive results. (92) Despite this widely accepted fact, several states require mandatory HIV antibody testing for newborns in public hospitals. (93)
As explained previously, HIV antibody tests do not indicate the presence of actual virus and are unable to determine if the antibodies it detects are even HIV antibodies. Newer "viral load" tests do not detect actual virus and are not approved for diagnostic use. Even when administered after 18 months of age, neither test can determine if a child is actually infected with HIV. Despite these facts, the tests are routinely used to diagnose HIV infection in newborns and children. The results of these inaccurate and improperly applied tests are the basis for all claims regarding transmission rates of HIV from mother to child, and for declaring that a baby "has HIV."
Expectant mothers who test HIV positive are commonly advised to abort or to take AZT, a highly toxic chemical compound originally created for use as a cancer treatment. AZT works by blocking the formation of DNA -- a process essential to sustaining life -- and destroying all growing cells, particularly new cells produced in the bone marrow where the immune system is generated. AZT is a known carcinogen, mutagen, and teratogen, and until recently it was contraindicated for use during pregnancy. (94)"
Please don't believe everything that you are fed by corporate media and do your own research.
Here's a link if anyone is interested:
http://www.aliveandwell.org/html/mothers_babies/mothersbabies.html
@Ely Then it should be a simple matter to find another case of an infant born HIV positive (NOT the mother, the child) who then went into spontaneous remission.
I'll wait.
@Ely Not to downplay your passion, but you're a nurse, not a research medical scientist.  The site you point out is just another opinion, not a medical fact.  I'll wait for a formal research document from say, Johns Hopkin's before I believe some .org site.  The reason being that I had coworkers who tried the same on Alzheimer's, citing all sorts or crazy "internet" findings.Â
@Benjamin Schniffle Not to downplay your passion for medical research, but it is very difficult to investigate the early stages of HIV in infants.  Reason being, up to ages 15 mos. to 24 mos. the Mother's HIV antibodies will remain in the infant's system. This does not mean that the infant's own cells are infected with the virus.  The primary tests utilized to diagnose HIV in infants, children, and adults, does so by finding the HIV antibodies; however, the tests cannot tell the difference between maternal antibodies and an infant's own antibodies.  Therefor it is possible for an infant to test positive, as the test picks up the maternal antibodies, yet the infant themselves is not actually infected.
See, I went to school to study this sort of thing. Â I got an A+ in my Microbiologies and in the study of Immunology. Â Believe me when I say that Research Scientists and Big Pharma have a LARGE agenda. Â One of the last HIV patients I worked with lost his job due to his HIV status, had to go on disability, and then had to declare bankruptcy and had his house go into foreclosure. Â Why? Â Because his HIV meds were costing him over $40,000 a year.
But then, what do I know? Â I'm a Nurse....not a Research Medical Scientist.
@Benjamin Schniffle You mean a research document from the SAME Johns Hopkins that employs the Doctor who was part of the medical team that deemed this infant "functionally cured"?
Yeah....no conflict of interest there, huh?
I'm with Lo Pan, I'm just not buying it.Â
@cwpholder That's because you spent all your savings on those genuine sunken chariot wheels. Hahaha!!
@badcat @cwpholder Still, I wish I could cruise the red sea in a mini sub with windows!Â
@Ramona You are in rare form tonight, m'friend! But you forgot to stipulate a *yellow* submarine. That's ok, it has windows and we'll pick you up shortly....  =)
I don't buy it
HIV? Health Insurance Victim?
@jpk As opposed to socialized medicine, or paying full price out of pocket? I thought conservatives were in favor of for-profit insurance denial plans?
@badcat @jpk The secret reason I only tell few is I will pay double to avoid paying for a poor unknown fat michael moore!
@jpk HIV is not a joke. Grow up.
@Old29 @jpk nor are gay bath houses, housesapparently!
Actually, it has been around long enough that we are allowed to make fun of it. Didn't you see the South Park episode? Jeesh.
This comment has been deleted
They also discovered a cure for AIDS in South Park. Large injections of cash directly into the vein.
How To Survive A Plague is a compelling fascinating,heart wrenching Oscar nominated documentary on the early days of AIDS and the group ACT UP who was instrumental in raising awareness and fighting for early releases of new drugs.(it's on streaming Netflix)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/How_to_Survive_a_Plague
This comment has been deleted
@feral Self-declaration?
If this is true, it is indeed a wonderful breakthrough...and hopefully, will lead to other ways of fighting this virus ~ and, even better, preventing the infection in the first place... Â They have a long way to go yet, but each step is a good thing..! Â Â
Fantastic news, although this should have happened ten years ago. We need more funding for medical research. Right now the only significant research comes from an industry that wants to keep selling pills for profit. We can do better.
@badcat You just made me think, how did we used to educate without drugs for A.D.D. and go to work before anti depressants. How did grandpa cope before Viagra?
@Ramona Grandpa coped with booze. The real question is how did Great-Grandma cope before electricity and plastics? lol
@badcat @Ramona .....oh...
@Ramona Grandpa coped a little too well...
@Max Quinn Yeah good point that I never thought of till you pointed it out, they should at least include a TV and remote with each prescription no doubt!
@badcat Everyone is fighting for every dollar right now. Those high pharmaceutical costs? Some of that goes to research. Wish it was an easier road than to keep asking for more money.Â
@washcomom @badcat There are old diseases coming back from immigration that are drug resistant. And what about beast cancer why no cure? ( I did not study bio cuz blood and Gore sensitivity and I am guessing here are viruses considered easier to kill than are cancers?)
Way to work in immigration to this argument.
If this is truthful and not media-hype Alar/cold-fusion nonsense...  all politics and snark aside, it's profound. I sure hope it's the real deal.
@Playanekes ......me too !
Well, the baby got major treatment upon birth (A doctor gave this baby faster and stronger treatment than is usual) and so this "Could" be the reason, but I hope people will not take this to mean that a"Cure" is coming quickly.
Another reason for those infected with this plague to never give up hope and to always remember all of our friends and family members who didn't live long enough to take advantage of the medical advances.
I hope this is accurate. And true.
If so, expect a news conference from Obama congratulating his administration on this break through of science. Followed by Al Gore, the inventor of the Internet and the global warming mogul who made hundreds of millions of dollars on something scientists have yet to prove.
@Rob C 503Â Pure trash of a comment. Â You and your foolish partisan political rants have nothing to do with this thread. Â Grow a brain cell.
@Silver Surfer ........my, a little testy aren't we. Not enough waves today?
@Rob C 503Â Just tired of juvenile sht.
@Silver Surfer @Rob C 503 Seriously! Rob, stuff it already.