Susan Rice withdraws as secretary of state candidate

WASHINGTON (AP) - Susan Rice, the embattled U.N. ambassador, abruptly withdrew from consideration to be the next secretary of state on Thursday after a bitter, weekslong standoff with Republican senators who declared they would fight to defeat her nomination.
The reluctant announcement makes Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry the likely choice to be the nation's next top diplomat when Hillary Rodham Clinton departs soon. Rice withdrew when it became clear her political troubles were not going away, and support inside the White House for her potential nomination had been waning in recent days, administration officials said.
In another major part of the upcoming Cabinet shake-up for President Barack Obama's second term, former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska now is seen as the front-runner to be defense secretary, with official word expected as soon as next week.
For the newly re-elected president, Rice's withdrawal was a sharp political setback and a sign of the difficulties Obama faces in a time of divided and divisive government. Already, he had been privately weighing whether picking Rice would cost him political capital he would need on later votes.
When Rice ended the embarrassment by stepping aside, Obama used the occasion to criticize Republicans who were adamantly opposed to her possible nomination.
"While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character," he said.
"I am saddened we have reached this point," Rice said.
Obama made clear she would remain in his inner circle, saying he was grateful she would stay as "our ambassador at the United Nations and a key member of my Cabinet and national security team." Rice, too, said in her letter she would be staying.
Rice had become the face of the bungled administration account of what happened in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012 when four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, were killed in what is now known to have been a terrorist attack.
Obama had defiantly declared he would chose her for secretary of state regardless of the political criticism, if he wanted, but such a choice could have gotten his second term off to a turbulent start with Capitol Hill.
In a letter to Obama, Rice said she was convinced the confirmation process would be "lengthy, disruptive and costly." The letter was part of a media rollout aimed at upholding her reputation. It included an NBC News interview in which she said her withdrawal "was the best thing for our country."
Rice may end up close to Obama's side in another way, as his national security adviser should Tom Donilon move on to another position, though that is not expected imminently. The security adviser position would not require Senate confirmation.
Rice would have faced strong opposition from Senate Republicans who challenged her much-maligned televised comments about the cause of the deadly raid on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Her efforts to satisfy Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte and Susan Collins in unusual, private sessions on Capitol Hill fell short. The Republicans emerged from the meetings still expressing doubts about her qualifications.
"The position of secretary of state should never be politicized," Rice said. "As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S national security official who has served in two U.S. administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point."
Attention now shifts to Kerry, who came close to winning the presidency in 2004 and has been seen as desiring the State job. In a statement, he made no mention of his own candidacy but praised Rice, who was an adviser to him his in his presidential bid.
Kerry was an early backer of Obama and was under consideration to become his first secretary of state. Obama has dispatched Kerry to foreign hot spots on his behalf. Kerry played the role of Republican Mitt Romney during Obama's presidential debate preparations this year.
The longtime senator would be almost certain to be easily confirmed by his colleagues on Capitol Hill.
If Obama taps Kerry for State, the president will create a potential problem for Democrats by opening a Senate seat - one that recently defeated Republican Sen. Scott Brown is eyeing. Brown had been elected as Massachusetts' other senator in January 2010 after Democrat Ted Kennedy died, stunning the political world as he took the seat held by Kennedy for decades. Brown lost that seat in the November election.
House Democratic women had cast the criticism of Rice as sexist and racist - she is African-American - and some expressed disappointment with the news.
"If judged fairly based solely on her qualifications for the job, she would've made an extraordinary secretary of state," said Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Rice did not have a strong relationship with members of the Senate. Graham, who is the top Republican on the Appropriations subcommittee that handles foreign aid and the State Department, said he barely knew her.
In a brief statement, a spokesman for McCain said the senator "thanks Ambassador Rice for her service to the country and wishes her well. He will continue to seek all the facts surrounding the attack on our consulate in Benghazi."
Rice's decision comes ahead of the anticipated release next week of a report by an Accountability Review Board into the attack on the Benghazi mission. The report ordered by Clinton, focuses on the run-up to and the actual attack and is not expected to mention Rice's role in its aftermath.
Clinton is to testify about the report before Congress next Thursday.
At issue is the explanation Rice offered in a series of talk show appearances five days after the attack in Libya.
Rice has conceded in private meetings with lawmakers that her initial account - that a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Muslim video produced in the U.S. triggered the attack - was wrong, but she has insisted she was not trying to mislead the American people. Information for her account was provided by intelligence officials.
She reasserted that position in an opinion piece published late Thursday on The Washington Post's website, adding, "In recent weeks, new lines of attack have been raised to malign my character and my career. Even before I was nominated for any new position, a steady drip of manufactured charges painted a wholly false picture of me. This has interfered increasingly with my work on behalf of the United States at the United Nations and with America's agenda."
Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, is a Vietnam veteran, served two terms in the Senate and was a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee. Obama and Hagel became close while they served in the Senate and traveled overseas together. Hagel has been critical of his party since leaving the Senate in 2008, saying the GOP had moved too far right.
___
Associated Press writers Donna Cassata, Ken Thomas, Matthew Lee and Matthew Daly contributed to this story.
The reluctant announcement makes Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry the likely choice to be the nation's next top diplomat when Hillary Rodham Clinton departs soon. Rice withdrew when it became clear her political troubles were not going away, and support inside the White House for her potential nomination had been waning in recent days, administration officials said.
In another major part of the upcoming Cabinet shake-up for President Barack Obama's second term, former Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel of Nebraska now is seen as the front-runner to be defense secretary, with official word expected as soon as next week.
For the newly re-elected president, Rice's withdrawal was a sharp political setback and a sign of the difficulties Obama faces in a time of divided and divisive government. Already, he had been privately weighing whether picking Rice would cost him political capital he would need on later votes.
When Rice ended the embarrassment by stepping aside, Obama used the occasion to criticize Republicans who were adamantly opposed to her possible nomination.
"While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character," he said.
"I am saddened we have reached this point," Rice said.
Obama made clear she would remain in his inner circle, saying he was grateful she would stay as "our ambassador at the United Nations and a key member of my Cabinet and national security team." Rice, too, said in her letter she would be staying.
Rice had become the face of the bungled administration account of what happened in Benghazi, Libya, on Sept. 11, 2012 when four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, were killed in what is now known to have been a terrorist attack.
Obama had defiantly declared he would chose her for secretary of state regardless of the political criticism, if he wanted, but such a choice could have gotten his second term off to a turbulent start with Capitol Hill.
In a letter to Obama, Rice said she was convinced the confirmation process would be "lengthy, disruptive and costly." The letter was part of a media rollout aimed at upholding her reputation. It included an NBC News interview in which she said her withdrawal "was the best thing for our country."
Rice may end up close to Obama's side in another way, as his national security adviser should Tom Donilon move on to another position, though that is not expected imminently. The security adviser position would not require Senate confirmation.
Rice would have faced strong opposition from Senate Republicans who challenged her much-maligned televised comments about the cause of the deadly raid on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya.
Her efforts to satisfy Sens. John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Kelly Ayotte and Susan Collins in unusual, private sessions on Capitol Hill fell short. The Republicans emerged from the meetings still expressing doubts about her qualifications.
"The position of secretary of state should never be politicized," Rice said. "As someone who grew up in an era of comparative bipartisanship and as a sitting U.S national security official who has served in two U.S. administrations, I am saddened that we have reached this point."
Attention now shifts to Kerry, who came close to winning the presidency in 2004 and has been seen as desiring the State job. In a statement, he made no mention of his own candidacy but praised Rice, who was an adviser to him his in his presidential bid.
Kerry was an early backer of Obama and was under consideration to become his first secretary of state. Obama has dispatched Kerry to foreign hot spots on his behalf. Kerry played the role of Republican Mitt Romney during Obama's presidential debate preparations this year.
The longtime senator would be almost certain to be easily confirmed by his colleagues on Capitol Hill.
If Obama taps Kerry for State, the president will create a potential problem for Democrats by opening a Senate seat - one that recently defeated Republican Sen. Scott Brown is eyeing. Brown had been elected as Massachusetts' other senator in January 2010 after Democrat Ted Kennedy died, stunning the political world as he took the seat held by Kennedy for decades. Brown lost that seat in the November election.
House Democratic women had cast the criticism of Rice as sexist and racist - she is African-American - and some expressed disappointment with the news.
"If judged fairly based solely on her qualifications for the job, she would've made an extraordinary secretary of state," said Rep. Karen Bass, D-Calif., a member of the House Foreign Affairs Committee.
Rice did not have a strong relationship with members of the Senate. Graham, who is the top Republican on the Appropriations subcommittee that handles foreign aid and the State Department, said he barely knew her.
In a brief statement, a spokesman for McCain said the senator "thanks Ambassador Rice for her service to the country and wishes her well. He will continue to seek all the facts surrounding the attack on our consulate in Benghazi."
Rice's decision comes ahead of the anticipated release next week of a report by an Accountability Review Board into the attack on the Benghazi mission. The report ordered by Clinton, focuses on the run-up to and the actual attack and is not expected to mention Rice's role in its aftermath.
Clinton is to testify about the report before Congress next Thursday.
At issue is the explanation Rice offered in a series of talk show appearances five days after the attack in Libya.
Rice has conceded in private meetings with lawmakers that her initial account - that a spontaneous demonstration over an anti-Muslim video produced in the U.S. triggered the attack - was wrong, but she has insisted she was not trying to mislead the American people. Information for her account was provided by intelligence officials.
She reasserted that position in an opinion piece published late Thursday on The Washington Post's website, adding, "In recent weeks, new lines of attack have been raised to malign my character and my career. Even before I was nominated for any new position, a steady drip of manufactured charges painted a wholly false picture of me. This has interfered increasingly with my work on behalf of the United States at the United Nations and with America's agenda."
Hagel, a former Republican senator from Nebraska, is a Vietnam veteran, served two terms in the Senate and was a senior member of the Foreign Relations Committee. Obama and Hagel became close while they served in the Senate and traveled overseas together. Hagel has been critical of his party since leaving the Senate in 2008, saying the GOP had moved too far right.
___
Associated Press writers Donna Cassata, Ken Thomas, Matthew Lee and Matthew Daly contributed to this story.
To all those slamming Rice for "lying" lets look at the previous administration...these are just a few....were all of you who are outraged now, just as outraged then?  Of course not!
Â
Condi Rice -
Lied on national TV about the Aluminum Tubes in Iraq that could "only be used to make nuclear weapons" then was later promoted to .....anyone....anyone.....Sec. of State!
Â
Lied about knowing Bin Laden was determined to hit the US. Â Remember her testimony to congress saying as such then asked about the title of the August 8th memo "Bin Laden Determined to strike inside the US"
Â
Bush -
Lied about Iraq trying to buy yellow cake from Niger. Â He was told to take that out of his speeches because it could not be verified as fact. Â He took it out for 6 months but then put it back in and lied to the US public by repeating the lie in the state of the union address.Â
Â
Rumsfeld -
Lied about Iraq oil revenue paying for the war
Lied about WMD's in Iraq "He has them, it's a slam dunk"
Â
Also to all those who THINK Obama was watching the attack live and did not send help (no proof just second hand word of mouth) don't forget while WE ALL watched the Sep. 11th attacks unfold live on TV, Bush didn't send in any help he just sat with a stupid look on his face while reading my pet goat during the worst terror attack in American history.
Â
How's that view from inside the glass house!
Â
Â
 @B Smizzle You mean the "lies" about yellow cake they actually found? The "lies" about the WMD So-dam Insane actually USED on his own people? The "lies" about parts that could be used to make WMDs? The "doctored" satellite photos of people with materials scurrying out the back of factories when UN weapons inspectors arrived?
Â
What about those emails, several weeks in advance of the Benghazi attacks asking for more protection. They must have been lying too.  Funny how "they" promised to get to the bottom of this in a few weeks - which just happened to be after the election.
Â
The Naval Admiral that knew about the attacks and offered to send help but was ordered to stand-down. I guess he was removed from command, because he lied, and not because he defied orders and sent help anyway.
Â
What about the lies of illegal weapons in Mexico. You know the ones that have killed scores of people, including Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry - supplied by this administration?  The "truth" about getting to the bottom of this. Of course, Holder has nothing to hide. It has been two years (today) since Agent Terry's death and Holder has done nothing but stonewalled any attempt to get at the truth. No worries though, his boss "got his back" by asserting executive privilege. No word yet on whether Agent Nicolas Ivie was killed (less than two weeks ago) from weapons from the infamous "gunwalking" scheme.
Â
Don't even get me started on ObummerCare. "We have to pass it so we can find out what's in it." What we are finding is more lies.
Â
Â
 @Conspirator Wow, are you woefully misinformed....let me guess, you get the majority of your news from Fox....
Â
"You mean the "lies" about yellow cake they actually found?"
1. The Niger yellow cake document was a forgery!
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/11/04/international/europe/04italy.html?_r=0
http://www.snopes.com/politics/war/yellowcake.asp
2. You might be talking about the 550 tons of Yellow cake moved to Canada from Iraq....but oops....you only watch Fox news so you didn't actually get the truth about that did you?
http://crooksandliars.com/2008/07/06/yellowcake-uranium-found-in-iraq-bush-was-right-well-not-so-much
http://www.openleft.com/showDiary.do;jsessionid=56D20BFAE25E43F5D0AAE8675DCBD640?diaryId=6791
"If you check into this, you'll quickly find that the uranium a) was not weapons grade and b) was well known to the UN and IAEA and was being stored legally by Saddam's government. Â It was legally in Iraq according to international law."
Â
Â
"The "lies" about the WMD So-dam Insane actually USED on his own people? "
1. Those weapons were sold to him by the US and sold to him in the 80's....old news!
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-153210/Rumsfeld-helped-Iraq-chemical-weapons.html
2. Funny, in 1988 when we were supporting Iraq in their war against Iran, we didn't care that they were using Chemical Weapons. Â Also when Saddaham used chemical weapons in the Halabaja attack in 1988, what did the US do....blamed Iran. Â Then when we wanted to attack Iraq 20 years later, we blamed it on them.Â
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/17/opinion/17iht-edjoost_ed3_.html
http://www.iranaffairs.com/iran_affairs/2007/08/halabja-and-che.html
3. What WMD's were ever found?
Â
"The "doctored" satellite photos of people with materials scurrying out the back of factories when UN weapons inspectors arrived?"
Sources please! Â The only place that happened was on Fox news and in your mind. Â But hey you said it, the photos were doctored...guess we can't believe them (even though it never happened)
Â
"What about those emails, several weeks in advance of the Benghazi attacks asking for more protection"
What about the memo several weeks in advance of the 9/11 attacks titled "Bin Laden deterimed to strike inside the US" which spelled out plans for AQ to hijack planes and crash them into buildings....yet nothing was done about it?
Â
"The Naval Admiral that knew about the attacks and offered to send help but was ordered to stand-down"
Which naval admiral....his name, source please. The only thing that came out was 2 CIA agents were told to stand down but this came from "unnamed sources" and the first to break it was Fox news....sorry, this story smells like kaka-dooty! Â Show proof!
Â
Funny too, then you go on a rant about Holder and Obama-care.....but you don't answer the questions I pose. Â So please answer the questions....
Â
How do you feel about Bush lying, Condi lying then getting promoted to Sec of State, Rummy lying....answers please. Â Or just go point by point on this message.
Â
You really need to quit watching Fox news.....in a poll it has been proven Fox news watchers are the least informed!
Â
Â
Â
Â
 @Rob C 503  @B Your silence speaks volumes....=)
 @Rob C 503  @B The personal attack is nice....but maybe you can show me what "propaganda" I am spreading?  Go ahead, take your time....point by point, show me what I said that was wrong and refute it with links and facts.   it is all propaganda it should be easy for you to do!
Â
Oh wait, you can't thus the personal attack.....you know how you win a debate on this message board? Â When they attack you and not your message!Â
Â
Â
@B Smizzle ....Pravda is waiting for you !
Can I just say - Hallelujah! She saw the light! Maybe Obama needs a change of personnel to really shake up his presidency, and do good things.Â
 @washcomom Glad someone saw the light, because obozo sure hasn't.
Kerry as Secretary of State? What a joke.
@theobserver ........that would make it to phony hypocrites in a row.
 @Rob C 503  @theobserver Funny when Condi Rice lied to the public on TV....remember Condi assuring us those aluminum tubes Iraq bought could only be used for enriching weapons grade uranium.... that started a war she was then promoted to Secretary of State....I don't remember the republicans getting their panties in a tizzy when that happened!
Â
 @Rob C 503  @B ??????
Â
Attack me but not the facts I post.....WINNING!
@B Smizzle You're really into panties aren't ya.
 @Rob C 503  @theobserver Two, right?Â
Incompetent. Benghazi still haunts her nightmares. A 10 year old could read the Regimes talking points and go on multiple talk shows just as well.
One by one Obama's regime crumbles. Mrs. Bill Clinton, then Susan Rice. Tic Toc, Tic Toc...Â
@last boyscout .......not fast enough !
It took her too long to withdraw....proves she wasnt good for the job.
"While I deeply regret the unfair and misleading attacks on Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates the strength of her character,"
Â
reworded
Â
"While I deeply regret the fair and truthful facts about Susan Rice in recent weeks, her decision demonstrates people saw through the BS"
Having an ambassador that can't discern between truth and falsehood is bad enough but as Secretary of State.............oh wait. We already have one who can't do that !!!
 @Rob C 503 And what about Condi Rice lying about the aluminum tubes in Iraq that could "only be used to make nukes"  except that wasn't true and she knew it.  It got us into a war in Iraq then she was promoted to Sec of State....were you as outraged then? Â
 @Rob C 503  "We already have one who can't do that !!!" But haven't you hear?  It's all a vast right-wing conspiracy...
@HenryBowman .......good one Henry.
Good!:)
Although I'm not sure she was the best candidate for the position, I applaud her for stepping away so that the process can hopefully move forward in a more positive manner. The position is too important and the person that fills the role needs to be able to work with the White House and the Senate from both sides of the aisle.
 @DeaconBugg ~  Good luck finding someone who can stand on their own two feet and not be a rubber stamp for the WH and for whoever's power-housing the Senate these days...Â
 @margay1 Thank you for your reply. Isn't that the truth. The process of nominating someone has become so petty and inappropriate that it's difficult to find independent minded candidates for the position, or any position. I'm continually amazed at some of the questions that are asked of these candidates that cross the line of what's pertinent to the job and what's simply an attempt to dig up dirt for political gain. I believe many talented people are excluded from these opportunities because they haven't led a perfect life. Most independent and talented people are full of shortcomings and failures that have fueled their desire for accomplishment. We need more of them and less of the "cookie cutter' type candidates.
 @margay1 They'll find someone that hasn't paid their taxes and is just another pathological liar.. so s/he can fit right in with this administration.
Good anybody who will blatantly lie to the public even if she was told too by her boss Obummer should not have that job.
 @FreedomRocks Did you feel the same way when Condi Rice lied about the aluminum tubes in Iraq then got promoted to Sec of State?
@FreedomRocks by that same thinking, President Bush blatently lied to the American public when he stated there were WMDs in Iraq. He believed there were at e time, and Mrs, Rice believed what she had been informed had happened.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @FreedomRocks Slight difference is that in Bushes case the CIA and other resources were actually telling him the did have WMD's. In Rice's case they told her it was terrorism and not due to a stupid youtube video no one had ever seen. Yet she went out for 6 weeks and told us it was the video knowing that was not true.
Â
One is called lying the other is not having accurate facts. I realize the left is always confused when it comes to lies and truth and double standards on everything...
 @FreedomRocks  @Ramsesthegreat Were you as outraged at Bush for knowingly lying about Iraq trying to by Yellow cake in the state of the union address?  Were you as outraged about Condi Rice lying about the Al tubes in Iraq then getting promoted to Sec. of State....
Â
See when YOU chose to watch the media that not only does not tell half the story but just lies like Bush and Condi did, don't expect to be informed!
Â
Try to google it, I am sure you can find video clips of Condi testifying to congress saying "we didn't know they would attack us" then telling everyone the name of the memo read in August was titled "Bin Laden determined to strike inside the US" or Bush being told to take the Yellow Cake claim out of his speeches.......
Â
Facts, both parties lie and do not have your interests in mind
 @FreedomRocks  @Ramsesthegreat "the CIA and other resources were actually telling him the did have WMD's"
No, actually they were all telling him Iraq DID NOT have WMD's they just cherry picked what they could and only reported the cherry picked lies! Â The fact that you don't know that is astounding! Â Â Remember, Bush knew that Iraq DID NOT try to buy yellow cake from Niger and was told to take it out of his speeches.....then, 6 moths later he stated the lie to the nation in the state of the union address....so yes, he did lie and knowingly so!
Â
Second, Condi Rice went on TV and knowingly lied about the aluminum tubes in Iraq that helped start the war, then got promoted to Sec of State....were you as outraged then?Â
Â
"Â realize the left is always confused when it comes to lies and truth and double standards on everything..."
I realize people on the right are always confused when it comes to lies and truth and double standards on everything.....this coming from a life long republican. Â Condi lied go promoted and the right did NOTHING! Â Bush lied and the right says "he was just misinformed"
Â
You are making yourself look foolish!Â
 @Ramsesthegreat  @FreedomRocks Ya you would have to tune to something other then lame stream media to hear that one week after the attack the head of the CIA testified to congress that it was obviously terrorism.
Â
Then Oblama and Rice went on their video tour for another 5 weeks on morning TV, late night TV, etc... blathering on about how this video caused all the problems.
Â
If you choose to watch the media that only tells the half of the story that makes the DEMS look good then don't expect to be informed.
Â
Try to google it I am sure you can find video clips of the guy testifying to congress...
@FreedomRocks I have yet to hear any indisputable proof from an unbiased spice showing that she knew it was terrorism and failed to state it. Please be so kind as to show unbiased sources showing her statements that she knew without a doubt that it was terrorism. And btw, I don't know where you got the 6 weeks number because just two days after the initial attack she went on record stating that it was an unprovoked terrorist attack.
She was altogether too snarky for the job.  A Secy of State has to be at least a little diplomatic. Besides, I would never want her as President of the United States, which would happen if something happened to Obama, Biden and Boehner.
@hewhoo You forgot Inouye - he is the President pro tempore of the Senate and is ahead of the Secretary of State in the line of succession..