Man with PDX ties suspected of killing Calif. cops, dies in shootout
»Play Video
SANTA CRUZ, Calif. (AP) — Two police detectives were shot and killed while investigating a sexual assault complaint, and a suspect was also fatally shot after a brief chase, authorities said.
The veteran officers, one male and one female, were shot around 3:30 p.m. as they went to a suspect's home to follow up on the case. Their deaths were confirmed by Santa Cruz County Sheriff Phil Wowak.
The suspect, 35-year-old Jeremy Goulet, was shot and killed a short time later while authorities were pursuing the gunman, the sheriff's office said.
Goulet has a Portland connection. He was convicted in 2008 of peeping on a woman while she showered in her Northwest Portland home. He was sentenced to three years of probation. A jury also found him guilty of carrying a gun without a concealed weapons permit, The Oregonian reported in 2008.
Goulet was caught after a man and his girlfriend confronted him outside their Northwest Portland home three different times. Goulet pulled out a gun but after a struggle, the man held down Goulet until police arrived.
After the officers were shot in Santa Cruz Tuesday, nearby residents received an automatic police call warning them to stay locked inside. About half an hour later, more than a dozen semi-automatic gunshots echoed down the streets in a brief barrage of gunfire that killed the suspect.
Authorities say Goulet fired on them before they shot and killed him.
Police Chief Kevin Vogel said Sgt. Loren Butch Baker, a 28-year veteran, and Detective Elizabeth Butler, a 10-year veteran, were shot and killed.
"There aren't words to describe this horrific tragedy," he said. "This is the darkest day in the history of the Santa Cruz police department."
Goulet was arrested Friday after a co-worker at a Santa Cruz coffee shop alleged he went to her house and made inappropriate sexual advances. The Santa Cruz Sentinel reported that he was fired the next day.
To investigate the complaint, the detectives went to the house where Goulet was living and an altercation ensued, leading to the officers being fired upon, authorities said.
The detectives called for backup and neighbors also summoned police. Responding officers located Goulet a short time later. The sheriff's office said he was killed in the gunfire that followed.
After the shootings, police went door-to-door in the neighborhood, searching homes, garages, even closets to determine whether there might be additional suspects.
Police, sheriff's deputies and FBI agents filled intersections, some with guns drawn, in what is ordinarily a quiet, residential neighborhood in the community about 60 miles south of San Francisco.
A store clerk a few buildings away from the shooting said the barrage of gunfire was "terrifying."
"We ducked. We have big desks so under the desks we went," said the clerk, who spoke on condition of anonymity and asked that her store not be identified because she feared for her safety.
Two schools were locked down during the shooting. The students were later evacuated by bus to the County Government Center about half a mile away.
As darkness fell, helicopters and light aircraft patrolled above the neighborhood, which is about a mile from downtown Santa Cruz and the Santa Cruz Beach Boardwalk. The campus of University of California, Santa Cruz, is about five miles away.
The city's mayor, Hilary Bryant, said in a statement that the city was shocked over the shootings.
"Tonight we are heartbroken at the loss of two of our finest police officers who were killed in the line of duty, protecting the community we love," the statement said. "This is an exceptionally shocking and sad day for Santa Cruz and our Police Department."
Goulet worked as a barista at a coffee shop in the Santa Cruz harbor. He was convicted in Portland, Ore., in May 2008 of peeping at a 22-year-old woman who was showering in her condominium and of carrying concealed weapon, according to a Portland newspaper, The Oregonian.
He was put on probation but, after a dispute with his probation officer, was sentenced to two years in jail.
The violence comes amid a recent spate of assaults in the city, which community leaders had planned to address in a downtown rally scheduled for Tuesday. That, along with a city council meeting, was canceled after teary-eyed city leaders learned of the deaths.
Those shootings include the killing of a 32-year-old martial arts instructor who was shot outside a popular downtown bar and restaurant; the robbery of a UC Santa Cruz student who was shot in the head; a 21-year-old woman who was raped and beaten on the UC Santa Cruz campus; and a couple who fought off two men during a home invasion.
___
Associated Press writer John S. Marshall in San Francisco and KATU News in Portland, Ore. contributed to this report.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
How was this person not locked up for 10 years following the first incident!?!
I find it difficult to believe that two trained detectives would allow a suspect, that they were interviewing, to overcome them. At least the suspect will no longer be around to get what he got in Portland: probation! He got his just reward: the death penalty!
Well, getting a bit more info from a police website, I discovered Goulet not only killed the two cops, but was wearing body armor at the time. He also stole one of their official vehicles. His father is quoted as saying his son was a "ticking time bomb" and had three firearms.
Congrats Oregonians...you turned a harmless Peeping Tom into a Homicidal Maniac......WAY TO GO!
@August100 Crucifying him in Pioneer Square would have served as a warning to others, but, let's face it: You liberals will have none of that. We can't even keep serial killers in prison because of Oregon's justice policy.
Also, this happened in California. You're not even an effective troll because you just make yourself look like a total numbskull.
@Playanekes @August100 It all started in Portland.
@Playanekes @August100 To crucify? so identify with the romans now? out to put people on a cross? and only the "liberals" keep that from happening? more beer bubba, why not take your drooling drawl back to your swamp? at least your kind gets to cross burn and so many more fans of your swamp gas! Thank you so much for your insights!
So what are his ties to the Portland International Airport(PDX)?
@water_skipper Actually, Portland International Airport is KPDX. (Troutdale is KTTD, Hillsboro KHIO, Scappoose is KSPB, Aurora is KUAO, Corvallis is KCVO, etc.    Still feeling snarky?
Did you type that with your eyes closed?
So do we blame the gun for this is or the criminal system that allowed this guy to get back out after only 2 years?
I also bet his gun was not legally owned or purchased...hey gun grabbers don't let any of that bother you though. We all know you want to take our guns so this guy can peep and rape his way through the gun free zones...
Yes - I blame the gun.
@Oregon7812 We already know you're a left-leaning anti-gun nut so no surprise there that you would choose to blame an inanimate object commonly used as a tool as opposed to the person using the tool or the legal system that failed to lock them up and keep them away from the tool.
Â
When you're lacking the intelligence for critical thought it's much easier to just pick the simplest solution to ever problem.
Sorta like to the carpenter everything can be fixed with a hammer and to the liberal everything can be fixed by taking away people rights and freedoms to those they disagree with...
@FreedomRocks There's no evidence that his guns were illegal... but hey don't let that bother you.
http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/localnews/ci_22676902/santa-cruz-police-shooting-suspect-jeremy-goulet-had
"According to a police bulletin, Goulet was the owner of three guns, including a .40-caliber semi-automatic Sig Sauer and a Baretta...'He's always had guns. He likes to go target shooting and stuff like that. More of a collector,' Ronald Goulet said.'
@Max Quinn @FreedomRocks I assume his early crime in PDX was a felony and as a convicted felon any gun he had was illegal for him to own...or are you not aware of that...
@Max Quinn @FreedomRocks Ya hard to believe a guy willing to shot someone is less of a risk being out and in sexual treatment then locked up for 20 years.
Sometimes you really have to wonder about the intelligence of some of our legal system workers and this is one of those.
I hope the prosecutor on this one has many restless nights know his lack of effort cost to families their dad and mom.
@FreedomRocks @Max Quinn Thanks for looking into this. I'll agree - I don't understand his plea deal in Portland, especially since a gun was involved in the crime.
@Max QuinnWow PDX really let the public down and cost two officers their lives by not doing their job...apparently they were willing to let this guy off with almost no penalty.
Had he chosen to take 60 days of sexualOffender treatment he could have been out in as little as 60 days.
 Clearly what we need is not more gun laws but to put in jail those who refuse to aggressively enforce the laws we have when guns are used in crimes...doubt we will see the ant-gunners putting in bills to do that in my lifetime though...
From Oregon live...
http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2008/10/peeping_tom_chooses_jail_time.html
And so at a hearing in Multnomah County Circuit Court this week, Goulet was given the choice of two years in jail, or serving a 60- or 90-day jail sanction for the probation violation and continuing the sex-offender treatment he'd recently started. Prosecutor Greg Moawad asked for the latter, saying getting Goulet through sex-offender treatment was in the best interests of public safety.
Goulet instead chose the two years of jail time.
Im the guy that got into the fight with him in Portland... Im not shocked at all that he did this... Â I always thought it was ridiculous his light sentence. Â The jury really dropped the ball on this case.
@Danny Thomas They do that kind of ball dropping way way to often...
Those shootings include the killing of a 32-year-old martial arts instructor who was shot outside a popular downtown bar and restaurant; the robbery of a UC Santa Cruz student who was shot in the head; a 21-year-old woman who was raped and beaten on the UC Santa Cruz campus; and a couple who fought off two men during a home invasion.
HMMM...wonder why the last part was included. EVERYONE knows that guns are evil weapons and showing them (guns) in a positive way is forbidden in the media.
"oncealed weapons permit,"
For the thousandth time, in Oregon it's a Concealed Handgun License. The differences are substantial.
Do your reporters use the phrase "Driving Permit" or "Marriage Permit"Â Â What about a permit to practice law?Â
KATU, people have pointed this out to you countless times. What you should do is just say "thingie.", ie, "He had a concealed military-style assault weapon thingie." Make sure you use the word "assault."...
"About half an hour later, more than a dozen semi-automatic bullets..."
Okay, good. There's no such thing as a "semi-automatic bullet" and a .357 or .44 or a 30.06.... oh, to hell with it. The media doesn't WANT to precision, credibility or accuracy... I just bet there's some editor in the back jilling off and giving reporters a bonus every time they can invoke "semi-automatic" or "concealed weapons permit" in a story.
@Playanekes It's KATU.
@Playanekes "About half an hour later, more than a dozen semi-automatic shots echoed down the streets"
It does not say bullets, it says shots, Â and it's been 2 hours since they updated it. Â Last Updated:Â Feb 27, 2013Â at 6:43 AM PST, you commented at 8am.
Reading Fail.
Don't read or comment when you're angry....oh, wait.
And your rant over permit of license is amusing.  Everyone seems to use those terms interchangeably, really not worth getting that worked up over. Â
@trololol  You're right. Semi-automatic shots.
If somebody shoots you through the head a la Lincoln, Kennedy or MLK, does it MATTER whether they were "semi-automatic shots"
And here's the next question:Â Â Why are all the cops carrying military-style assault weapons designed to "inflict as many casualties in the shortest amount of time," if they're only going after one guy?
Is that in case the newspaper delivery ladies show up?
Also, I earned my degree in Journalism from a two-time Pulitzer winner, Jon Franklin, who would have graded down or failed students for repeatedly misusing terms they don't understand.Â
You can stay up in your tree grunting and flinging crap, for all I care. They should be held to a professional standard. The journalism business is on the decline because it's losing credibility.
"inflict as many casualties in the shortest amount of time," - what are you quoting that from?
@Playanekes I think the story was edited after you posted. I, too, read semi-automatic bullets.
Many journalists do not even use a current stylebook anymore. I asked a copy editor for her previous year's stylebook, and she told me that she no longer updates them annually.
He had way too much testosterone. Wishing the cops didn't get killed, but glad this guy is gone from society.Â
Sounds like they need to arm everyone in Santa Cruz.
How come Mr. Goulet's SEX OFFENDER TREATMENT PROGRAM failed him?
@August100 Society has decided to let a caught guy peeping on a woman and illegally carrying a gun get off with PROBATION.
That's why. ANOTHER UNENFORCED GUN LAW!!!
This comment has been deleted
@Playanekes @Dr. Rawdog If you'd read around a bit, you'd find the RV park manager called law enforcement repeatedly, beginning in January.  HTH.
@Playanekes And lets add those making threats on Ginny Burdick or anybody posting here get a visit from law enforcement and since you put that in print already, please please keep your gun handy, so you can surrender and go to trial as that guy in Colorado who did the same thing....your such a prize.
@Dr. Rawdog @Playanekes @August100 CHANGE THIS:Â
Enforce the gun laws on the books.
Stop putting people on probation for gun crimes.
Stop releasing serial killers into the public.
Stop releasing guys who murdered their grandmothers with axes.Â
If somebody makes death threats against an RV park manager, it doesn't matter if he has a CHL. Call the police BEFORE he comes back and shoots the place up.
FFS.
@Dr. Rawdog@Playanekes@August100
Ya but sadly what you and others want to change is nothing that would have stopped this guy. You just want to make sure he can use his illegal gun to peep and rape his way through the anti gun zones without worrying about anyone shooting back...
It could have been much worse. Â Cops are just lucky he didn't have any hammers.
@trololol I suppose if we outlaw all firearms, incidents like this won't occur?
@Torino_v2 @trololol Just spinning the gun advocates cry from a couple of weeks ago that hammers kill more people than assault weapons.
Yes, I think we would definitely be a correlation between less firearms and less firearm crime. Â
@KATUNews oh oh
Damn gun shot and killed two police officer all by it's self!
This comment has been deleted
@feral
1. They are banned in California. 2. They are banned for people convicted of carrying them illegally. 3. They are banned for convicts. 4. They are banned in Santa Cruz.Â
The bans really worked, didn't they?
It is also illegal to sexually assault people, peep through their windows, and kill people.
Your emotional reaction to firearms prevents you from using logic to form your opinions.
Yes, they are banned. But because there are so many people that disagree with the bans in other parts of the country, they are also readily available.
California already has some of the strictest gun laws in the nation. It didn't stop this guy.
@feral  Why don't we just ban sex crimes and murder?
@feralÂ
Should cars be banned after a drunk driver kills people?
If the sole purpose of a car was to be used as a weapon, then yes.
The sole purpose of a gun is to kill. Unless you're Elvis who would use it to change TV channels.
@Oregon7812
A car was not meant to kill so if it kills then it is defective. A gun in meant to kill so if it kills it did what it was supposed to do.
Either way a car and a gun are inanimate objects and incapable of killing anyone unless there is a human operating it.
@feral Pretty sure guns were already banned for this guy as an ex-con. Didn't help much, did it?
@feral The real question you should be asking is why was a man that showed a propensity to carry a gun illegally while commiting crimes just given probation?????  He should have been given 10 - 15 years for the gun charge alone.  If we continue to be soft on gun crime we are going to continue to have gun using criminals commiting heinous crimes!!!
@Siwash @feral So you support a handgun registry and background checks! Great your making progress!
Exactly. I agree with you on this one Ralph!
@Social Glimpse @Siwash @feralÂ
Yes, a handgun registry would have stopped this for sure. Laws and regulations always stop criminals.