Unions vow political payback for Michigan right-to-work law

LANSING, Mich. (AP) - With defeat in the Michigan Legislature virtually certain, Democrats and organized labor intend to make enactment of right-to-work laws as uncomfortable as possible for Gov. Rick Snyder and his Republican allies while laying the groundwork to seek payback at the polls.
Shell-shocked opponents of the laws spent the weekend mapping strategy for protests and acts of civil disobedience, while acknowledging the cold reality that Republican majorities in both the House and Senate cannot be stopped - or even delayed for long by parliamentary maneuvers. Leaders vowed to resist to the end, and then set their sights on winning control of the Legislature and defeating Snyder when he seeks re-election in 2014.
"They've awakened a sleeping giant," United Auto Workers President Bob King told The Associated Press on Saturday at a Detroit-area union hall, where about 200 activists were attending a planning session. "Not just union members. A lot of regular citizens, non-union households, realize this is a negative thing."
Right-to-work laws prohibit requiring employees to join a union or pay fees similar to union dues as a condition of employment. Supporters say it's about freedom of association for workers and a better business climate. Critics contend the real intent is to bleed unions of money and bargaining power.
Hundreds of chanting, whistle-blowing demonstrators thronged the state Capitol last week as bills were introduced and approved hours later, without the usual committee hearings allowing for public comment. Even more protesters are expected Tuesday, when the two chambers may reconcile wording differences and send final versions to Snyder, who now pledges to sign them after saying repeatedly since his 2010 election the issue wasn't "on my agenda."
Republicans are betting any political damage will be short-lived. During a news conference with GOP leaders last week announcing their intent to press ahead with right-to-work measures, Snyder urged labor to accept the inevitable and focus on showing workers why union representation is in their best interest.
"Let's move forward, let's get a conclusion, let's get an answer and get something done so we can move on to other important issues in our state," he said.
On that point, at least, the governor won't get his way. Unions and their Democratic allies say this means war.
Allowing employees to opt out of financially supporting unions while enjoying the same wages and benefits as members undermines the foundation of organized labor, they contend. A UAW bulletin described it as "the worst anti-worker legislation Michigan has ever seen."
"You will forever remember the day when you thought you could conquer labor," Sen. Coleman Young II, a Detroit Democrat and son of the city's fiery late mayor, boomed during floor debate Thursday. "Be prepared to engage in the fight of your life."
But for all the defiant rhetoric, the opposition faces tough odds.
State law forbids repealing spending bills through referendums, and Republicans made the right-to-work measures immune by attaching a $1 million appropriation. So the only apparent way to nullify the policy, once enacted, will be to seize statehouse control through the ballot box.
Even after losing five House seats in November, Republicans will retain majorities in both chambers for the next two years - during which time they expect voter attention to turn to other topics. They redrew district lines in their favor after the 2010 Census, boosting their long-term prospects.
Also, as Snyder noted, fewer than 20 percent of Michigan workers are union members. Organized labor rolls and influence have declined in recent years, emboldening Republicans to challenge unions even in their historic Rust Belt stronghold.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker survived a recall attempt after curtailing collective bargaining for most public employees. After Indiana enacted a right-to-work law this year, voters in November gave Republicans a legislative majority so large they can conduct business without any Democrats present. Snyder and GOP lawmakers already had chipped away at Michigan union rights, even forbidding school districts from deducting dues from teachers' paychecks.
Another problem for opponents: Right-to-work has considerable voter support. A statewide phone survey of 600 likely voters conducted in late November by the Lansing firm EPIC-MRA found 54 percent favored the idea while just 40 percent opposed it, although they were evenly divided when asked whether Michigan should become the 24th state with such laws. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Senate Majority Floor Leader Arlan Meekhof, straining to be heard over jeering opponents in the chamber's gallery, argued last week that by enacting right-to-work, "we are announcing to the world that we are moving Michigan forward. We are for workplace fairness and equality and we are for job creation."
To go up against all those obstacles, unions and Democrats will need solid organization, steadfastness and a persuasive case.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Sander Levin, who as a state legislator in the 1960s sponsored the labor law that right-to-work measures would overturn, called for a "massive education campaign" to remind voters of unions' role in building the middle class and explain how the new policy will weaken their ability to bargain for good wages and benefits.
"What's at stake is the cooperative, constructive labor-management relations that have ripened over the last 15 to 20 years," Levin said. "This governor is essentially saying that instead of collaboration, it's going to be dog-eat-dog."
Michigan Education Association President Steve Cook said Republicans pushed the one issue guaranteed to unite an often fractious labor movement.
Activists have filed a lawsuit claiming the state Open Meetings Act was violated when police temporarily barred doors to the Capitol during last week's debate. Other legal challenges are being considered, opponents said. Union members distributed leaflets Saturday at a college basketball game in the Upper Peninsula city of Marquette.
That's only the beginning, Cook said. While declining to discuss specific plans, he vowed labor would fight hard to unseat right-to-work supporters in 2014 and might try to recall some legislators even earlier.
"Whoever votes for this," Cook said, "is not going to have any peace for the next two years."
Shell-shocked opponents of the laws spent the weekend mapping strategy for protests and acts of civil disobedience, while acknowledging the cold reality that Republican majorities in both the House and Senate cannot be stopped - or even delayed for long by parliamentary maneuvers. Leaders vowed to resist to the end, and then set their sights on winning control of the Legislature and defeating Snyder when he seeks re-election in 2014.
"They've awakened a sleeping giant," United Auto Workers President Bob King told The Associated Press on Saturday at a Detroit-area union hall, where about 200 activists were attending a planning session. "Not just union members. A lot of regular citizens, non-union households, realize this is a negative thing."
Right-to-work laws prohibit requiring employees to join a union or pay fees similar to union dues as a condition of employment. Supporters say it's about freedom of association for workers and a better business climate. Critics contend the real intent is to bleed unions of money and bargaining power.
Hundreds of chanting, whistle-blowing demonstrators thronged the state Capitol last week as bills were introduced and approved hours later, without the usual committee hearings allowing for public comment. Even more protesters are expected Tuesday, when the two chambers may reconcile wording differences and send final versions to Snyder, who now pledges to sign them after saying repeatedly since his 2010 election the issue wasn't "on my agenda."
Republicans are betting any political damage will be short-lived. During a news conference with GOP leaders last week announcing their intent to press ahead with right-to-work measures, Snyder urged labor to accept the inevitable and focus on showing workers why union representation is in their best interest.
"Let's move forward, let's get a conclusion, let's get an answer and get something done so we can move on to other important issues in our state," he said.
On that point, at least, the governor won't get his way. Unions and their Democratic allies say this means war.
Allowing employees to opt out of financially supporting unions while enjoying the same wages and benefits as members undermines the foundation of organized labor, they contend. A UAW bulletin described it as "the worst anti-worker legislation Michigan has ever seen."
"You will forever remember the day when you thought you could conquer labor," Sen. Coleman Young II, a Detroit Democrat and son of the city's fiery late mayor, boomed during floor debate Thursday. "Be prepared to engage in the fight of your life."
But for all the defiant rhetoric, the opposition faces tough odds.
State law forbids repealing spending bills through referendums, and Republicans made the right-to-work measures immune by attaching a $1 million appropriation. So the only apparent way to nullify the policy, once enacted, will be to seize statehouse control through the ballot box.
Even after losing five House seats in November, Republicans will retain majorities in both chambers for the next two years - during which time they expect voter attention to turn to other topics. They redrew district lines in their favor after the 2010 Census, boosting their long-term prospects.
Also, as Snyder noted, fewer than 20 percent of Michigan workers are union members. Organized labor rolls and influence have declined in recent years, emboldening Republicans to challenge unions even in their historic Rust Belt stronghold.
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker survived a recall attempt after curtailing collective bargaining for most public employees. After Indiana enacted a right-to-work law this year, voters in November gave Republicans a legislative majority so large they can conduct business without any Democrats present. Snyder and GOP lawmakers already had chipped away at Michigan union rights, even forbidding school districts from deducting dues from teachers' paychecks.
Another problem for opponents: Right-to-work has considerable voter support. A statewide phone survey of 600 likely voters conducted in late November by the Lansing firm EPIC-MRA found 54 percent favored the idea while just 40 percent opposed it, although they were evenly divided when asked whether Michigan should become the 24th state with such laws. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percentage points.
Senate Majority Floor Leader Arlan Meekhof, straining to be heard over jeering opponents in the chamber's gallery, argued last week that by enacting right-to-work, "we are announcing to the world that we are moving Michigan forward. We are for workplace fairness and equality and we are for job creation."
To go up against all those obstacles, unions and Democrats will need solid organization, steadfastness and a persuasive case.
Democratic U.S. Rep. Sander Levin, who as a state legislator in the 1960s sponsored the labor law that right-to-work measures would overturn, called for a "massive education campaign" to remind voters of unions' role in building the middle class and explain how the new policy will weaken their ability to bargain for good wages and benefits.
"What's at stake is the cooperative, constructive labor-management relations that have ripened over the last 15 to 20 years," Levin said. "This governor is essentially saying that instead of collaboration, it's going to be dog-eat-dog."
Michigan Education Association President Steve Cook said Republicans pushed the one issue guaranteed to unite an often fractious labor movement.
Activists have filed a lawsuit claiming the state Open Meetings Act was violated when police temporarily barred doors to the Capitol during last week's debate. Other legal challenges are being considered, opponents said. Union members distributed leaflets Saturday at a college basketball game in the Upper Peninsula city of Marquette.
That's only the beginning, Cook said. While declining to discuss specific plans, he vowed labor would fight hard to unseat right-to-work supporters in 2014 and might try to recall some legislators even earlier.
"Whoever votes for this," Cook said, "is not going to have any peace for the next two years."
Nice job Michigan!  Don't back away from these union thugs. Let's just hope their childish threats don't turn into physical violence.
Unions, the American terrorist.
There is all about freedom. The freedom to not be forced to join a union and to not be forced to pay dues to the unions.
 @RalphCramdenÂ
Â
Nobody forces you to work for a union.
Â
I got my electrical license and practiced in Oregon (OREGON) without every being a member of the IBEW. It was tough, but I was able to do it.
Â
The only time you are obligated to join a union is when your employer tells you, you must as a condition to work at a location.
Â
Now I KNOW you won't tell employers they cannot have requirements (like I don't know no pot use?) that are above or beyond the scope of law.
Â
This flies in the face of employers making that requirement. You are directly telling people, "No you cannot require people to follow what rules you set forth."
Â
Oh and in Oregonâs âright-to-workâ you donât have to join a union to work at a union shop either. But you are required to pay the same money out of your check.
Â
So even in the socialist âhellâ that is Portland, you arenât required to be a member of a union, but you still have to pay the same money for the same pay as everyone who is.
Â
The purpose of this legislation is not to undermine unions, but to allow employers who want to pay people less to circumvent contracts that require them to so they can keep peopleâs wages low.
Â
I mean without crappy wages, how can you afford to give inflated (and undeserved) bonuses to CEOâs who liquidate companies?
Â
Â
Â
union thugs and the democrat party...... the ultimate circle jerk of politics...
Yeah giving workers more choice is a bad thing! Â What are the unions afraid of?Â
@B Smizzle probably a lowering of the average wage, a lowering of healthcare benefits, a lowering of workplace safety, and an increase in the average level of poverty. All of those things is lower in right to work states with e exception of poverty which on average sits 12% higher in them.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @B What part of giving people individual choice don't you understand?  If unions are so great don't you think when someone takes the job and has the choice will CHOSE to join the union, especially if all the "facts" you quote (nothing to back them up) are true?  I would like to see the stats proving the 12% higher poverty level in right to work states.  Sources please
Â
That said, I work a job that is traditionally a union job.  I get better pay, great benefits and more vacation than union labor doing the same job.  Not only that, but I have been there the least amount of time yet have moved ahead of almost everyone there because I work my tail off and do a better job than everyone else.  Is that the way things should be done or should it be done like the union where the person who has been there the longest gets the job?  Tell me, which one mirrors real life?
Â
"All of those things is lower in right to work states"
You mean all of those things ARE lower?  Second, Michigan is currently NOT a right to work state.....Flint, Detroit, two bastions of economic activity huh!
Another step in our race to the bottom. Pretty soon all jobs will be minimum wage and without benefits. But hey, then all of our powerful internation corportion execs will then bring back jobs to America because they we won't be much better off than the workers in Bangladesh and China. And the rich get richer on the backs of employees who get poorer and poorer.
@peckishpete   Doubtful. My career path has paid me quite well with full benefits and guess what? NO union required.
 @wonderingÂ
Â
It did because there were other people, likely union people, who demanded that pay scale.
Â
My friend worked as a non-union welder for Zeidel. He was paid very well with benefits. Better than his counterparts who worked for Gunderson.
Â
Every year the union (Teamsters) came in and gave a speech about how great it would be to be a member. Now for years it was a joke until one day it wasn't. Gunderson just about closed and Freightliner did as well. Tons of heavy welding jobs gone in less than a year. When the union offered higher wages (actually it was about 10% more) the guys started talking about joining.
Â
Now my friend works for a trucking company (as a driver). The talk was all it took to get him fired.
Â
Now the guys make the same wages they did 10 years ago and pay 3x as much for health coverage. Without union presence, there is nothing to compare wages to now. And people get less because of it.
Â
So just because you have never worked for a union does not mean you have not benefited. You think you got a 40 hour workweek, weekends and minimum wage from the goodness of a CEOâs heart?
Â
 @peckishpete They can still join a Union if they want too they just have freedom of choice.
@peckishpete  Well, why don't you blame who is really at fault...... and that is Americans as a whole who demand the lowest possible price over made in america.
"You will forever remember the day when you thought you could conquer labor," Sen. Coleman Young II, a Detroit Democrat and son of the city's fiery late mayor, boomed during floor debate Thursday. "Be prepared to engage in the fight of your life."
Â
Â
Conquer? No, just letting you know that UNIONS won't be allowed to run roughshod over the taxpayers.....
Right to work law is called justice.
@sortbait what do you have against better wages, better healthcare, better working conditions, and lower rates of poverty. Because all of those are better in non right to work states.
 @Ramsesthegreat  @sortbait What do you have against choice?  If unions are so great won't everyone just choose to join them instead of no join them?Â
Â
"Because all of those are better in non right to work states."
Sources please!
 @Ramsesthegreat Been to Detroit lately? Looked at the latest balance sheets from the state of Michigan lately?
@Ramsesthegreat .......you can get it without resorting to extortion !
@Rob C 503 sadly in today's corporate America, you can't. With the likes of Wal-Mart and these other super corporations setting wages as low as they legally can, and in some cases as low as they can regardless of legality, it creates a situation where wages stagnate and usable income falls each and every year as inflation rises but wages don't. This is what's happened in this country over the last 30 years and is the reason the middle class is shrinking and dying.
The Republicans just can't help themselves. Democrats will take over after the 2014 elections and repeal this. And that momentum will carry over into several other right-to-work-for-less states.
Union member by and large are the most childish people on the planet.  Hell, teachers gladly  screw the kids in their demand for mo money.
@kramr yet CEOs are more than happy to screw over tens of thousands of families so that they can make a few million more in bonuses. Where's your outrage over that?
 @Rob C 503 @Ramsesthegreat  @kramrÂ
None because I work for a living.
Â
It's like asking how many kings you know or how many dictators you know. If you knew one, you likely knew more than enough.
Â
Fortune 500 CEOs are like little kings of smaller (or sometimes not so small) fiefdoms. They often have never "worked" 40 hours (although they may have put in 70+) in a week, some have come from more money than any 10 of us combined will ever earn in our lifetime, and don't understand how to buy groceries.
Â
Likely few of these people know what it's like to work a wage job. Same goes for many people who work in the Republican system. They were born to privilege and don't want that to go away. Many others actually did work hard, but don't want others to see the same success (competition), so they too work to keep "the masses" down.
Â
Either way it means none of us will ever meet one of these folks face to face.
@Ramsesthegreat I've ranted about CEOs and unions pretty much evenly. The unions are no different than liberals or republicans who think they're somehow entitled to jobs from the government or corporate sector. As a small business owner I marvel at the entities fighting over who gets better benefits, and who's "entitled" to what.
@Ramsesthegreat ........how many CEO's do you know personally?
Another race to the bottom and some here are so ignorant to the issues of capitol vs. labor....When they lower their wages YOURS are next....bunch-o-fools !
@sargerator  Ya, cause its so preferable to watch jobs go ot other states.... bunch-0-fools
Sounds like Civil War is knocking at America's doors.
 @lee986321 Would that surprise you?
I'm certain it's just a coincidence, but whenever there is a photo of Union protesters, obesity among the throngs seems to be the norm. That aside, screw them. We need our own 'taxpayers Union', then WE will decide what state and government employees will be paid. And not the other way around. Â
This comment has been deleted
@wahoo ......oh, very nice. Wanna be a comedian. Go do stand up
Jeez, this sounds like freakin Soviot Union. "You gave employees the right to choose? THIS MEANS WAR!!"
I thought America was all about freedom. Guess that era is over.
@The_AnnaCannard ......yup, it's over because government knows what's best for you and society. And it's pathetic !
Ah yes, home of the brave and land of the free - where ALL men are created equal - where every person, no matter their station in life can pursue the American dream - but only if you are a "party member".
@Conspirator ......sounds kinda like communism doesn't it? Like Orwell wrote...... All animals are created equal. Some animals are more equal then others.
 @Rob C 503  @Conspirator I think Orwell would be shocked to see things are far worse than even could have dreamed up.
@Playanekes ........."resources".......and just who do you think pays for those "resources" ? A government that confiscates property from some and makes it available to all. That's Orwell's farm.
@Rob C 503 you still have the free will to think what you want, start a company if you want, change your career or go to college or live in a park if you feel like it. No matter which you choose there are resources available to help you. Are our lives REALLY that miserable or are people just whining because success and comfort still aren't easy enough? Have people ever heard of Frederick Douglass?
@Jamie ..........Jamie I've thought the very same thing myself !
This is about equality - so that all workers can receive minimum wage. This will help the state when state employees all receive minimum wage and teachers stay in the classroom instead of striking and picketing for yet more pay and benefits. Teachers do have it tough, union wages, state benefits, lifetime retirement benefits, 12 months salary for working 9 months and 3 months paid vacation every year, not to mention a few extra weeks off every year for strikes and protests.
@The Voice of Reason go be a teacher if you think they have it so easy. I'm betting the 80-90 hour work weeks, most of it being off e clock grading and continuing their education, will change your mind really quick. All for that extremely high average salary of $35,000 per year. Yeah, being a teacher is the easiest job out there!
 @The Voice of Reason Actually the wages suck, the benefits are paltry, and their retirement benefits are increasingly becoming crappy...but they do work 9 months of the year, I will give you that!
Unions.........legalized extortionists.
@Rob C 503 agreed.
Another reason to get rid of the unions. Why should I be forced to join a union as a condition of employment and why are state workers in a union? Unions have too damned much power and need to be abolished.
Unions created the Middle Class.
@campergeneral unions do a good job taking the credit for small business owners and the rise of the corporate sector which is still largely non-union even though 20-something programmers can make six-digit figures there.
 @campergeneral Unions are more trouble than they're worth.
This comment has been deleted
@campergeneral .........that's your opinion. That doesn't make it a "fact".