Woman dies after nurse refuses to do CPR
»Play Video
BAKERSFIELD, Calif. (AP) — A nurse's refusal to give CPR to a dying 87-year-old woman at a California independent living home despite desperate pleas from a 911 dispatcher has prompted outrage and spawned a criminal investigation.
The harrowing 7-minute, 16-second call also raised concerns that policies at senior living facilities could prevent staff from intervening in medical emergencies. It prompted calls for legislation Monday to prevent a repeat of what happened Feb. 26 at the Glenwood Gardens in Bakersfield.
Lorraine Bayless collapsed in the dining room of the retirement home that offers many levels of care. She lived in the independent living building, which state officials said is like a senior apartment complex and doesn't operate under licensing oversight.
"This is a wakeup call," said Assemblywoman Mariko Yamada, chair of the California Assembly Aging and Long-term Care Committee. "I'm sorry it took a tragedy like this to bring it to our attention."
Yamada cautioned that while it's not yet known whether intervention would have saved the woman's life, "we want to investigate because it has caused a lot of concern and alarm."
Independent living facilities "should not have a policy that says you can stand there and watch somebody die," said Pat McGinnis, founder of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, a consumer advocacy group. "How a nurse can do that is beyond comprehension."
In all her years of advocating for the elderly, McGinnis said: "This was so horrifying. I've never seen this happen before."
State officials did not know Monday whether the woman who talked to the 911 dispatcher actually was a nurse, or just identified herself as one during the call. She said one of the home's policies prevented her from doing CPR, according to an audio recording of the call.
"The consensus is if they are a nurse and if they are at work as a nurse, then they should be offering the appropriate medical care," said Russ Heimerich, spokesman for the California Board of Registered Nursing, the agency that licenses health care providers.
The executive director of Glenwood Gardens, Jeffrey Toomer, defended the nurse in a written statement, saying she followed the facility's policy.
"In the event of a health emergency at this independent living community, our practice is to immediately call emergency medical personnel for assistance and to wait with the individual needing attention until such personnel arrives," Toomer said. "That is the protocol we followed."
Toomer offered condolences to the woman's family and said a thorough internal review would be conducted. He told KGET-TV that residents of the facility are informed of the policy and agree to it when they move in. He said the policy does not apply at the adjacent assisted living and skilled nursing facilities.
Multiple calls to the facility and its parent company seeking more information were not returned.
Unlike nursing homes, which provide medical care, independent living facilities generally do not.
"These are like apartments for seniors. You're basically living on your own. They may have some services provided by basic nursing staff, but it's not their responsibility to care for the individual," said Dr. Susan Leonard, a geriatrics expert at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Residents of independent living communities can still take care of themselves, but may need help getting to doctor's appointments. In skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes, many residents require around-the-clock care.
Staff members are "required to perform and provide CPR" unless there's a do-not-resuscitate order, said Greg Crist, a senior vice president at the American Health Care Association.
Bayless did not have such an order on file at the facility, said Battalion Chief Anthony Galagaza of the Bakersfield Fire Department, which was the first on the scene. That's when firefighters immediately began CPR, continuing until she reached the hospital.
Dr. Patricia Harris, who heads the University of Southern California's geriatrics division, said the survival odds are slim among elderly who receive CPR. Even if they survive, they are never the same. She said she would override the home's policy and risk getting fired "rather than watch somebody die in front of me."
During the call, an unidentified woman called from her cellphone, and asked for paramedics to be sent to help the woman. Later, a woman who identified herself as the nurse got on the phone and told dispatcher Tracey Halvorson she was not permitted to do CPR on the woman.
Halvorson urged the nurse to start CPR, warning the consequences could be dire if no one tried to revive the woman, who had been laid out on the floor on her instructions.
"I understand if your boss is telling you, you can't do it," the dispatcher said. "But ... as a human being ... you know, is there anybody that's willing to help this lady and not let her die?"
"Not at this time," the nurse answered.
Halvorson assured the nurse that Glenwood couldn't be sued if anything went wrong in attempts to resuscitate the resident, saying the local emergency medical system "takes the liability for this call."
Later in the call, Halvorson asked, "Is there a gardener? Any staff, anyone who doesn't work for you? Anywhere? Can we flag someone down in the street and get them to help this lady? Can we flag a stranger down? I bet a stranger would help her."
"I understand if your facility is not willing to do that. Give the phone to a passer-by. This woman is not breathing enough. She is going to die if we don't get this started, do you understand?"
The woman had no pulse and wasn't breathing when fire crews reached her, Galagaza said.
Sgt. Jason Matson of the Bakersfield Police Department said its investigation so far had not revealed criminal wrongdoing, but the probe is continuing.
First responders say often it's hard to find someone willing to provide CPR in an emergency.
"It's not uncommon to have someone refuse to provide CPR if they physically can't do it, or they're so upset they just can't function," Kern County Fire Department Deputy Chief Michael Miller said. "What made this one unique was the way the conversation on the phone went. It was just very frustrating to anyone listening to it, like, why wasn't anyone helping this poor woman, since CPR today is much simpler than it was in the past?"
___
Cone reported from Sacramento. Associated Press writers Garance Burke in San Francisco and Alicia Chang in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
The harrowing 7-minute, 16-second call also raised concerns that policies at senior living facilities could prevent staff from intervening in medical emergencies. It prompted calls for legislation Monday to prevent a repeat of what happened Feb. 26 at the Glenwood Gardens in Bakersfield.
Lorraine Bayless collapsed in the dining room of the retirement home that offers many levels of care. She lived in the independent living building, which state officials said is like a senior apartment complex and doesn't operate under licensing oversight.
"This is a wakeup call," said Assemblywoman Mariko Yamada, chair of the California Assembly Aging and Long-term Care Committee. "I'm sorry it took a tragedy like this to bring it to our attention."
Yamada cautioned that while it's not yet known whether intervention would have saved the woman's life, "we want to investigate because it has caused a lot of concern and alarm."
Independent living facilities "should not have a policy that says you can stand there and watch somebody die," said Pat McGinnis, founder of California Advocates for Nursing Home Reform, a consumer advocacy group. "How a nurse can do that is beyond comprehension."
In all her years of advocating for the elderly, McGinnis said: "This was so horrifying. I've never seen this happen before."
State officials did not know Monday whether the woman who talked to the 911 dispatcher actually was a nurse, or just identified herself as one during the call. She said one of the home's policies prevented her from doing CPR, according to an audio recording of the call.
"The consensus is if they are a nurse and if they are at work as a nurse, then they should be offering the appropriate medical care," said Russ Heimerich, spokesman for the California Board of Registered Nursing, the agency that licenses health care providers.
The executive director of Glenwood Gardens, Jeffrey Toomer, defended the nurse in a written statement, saying she followed the facility's policy.
"In the event of a health emergency at this independent living community, our practice is to immediately call emergency medical personnel for assistance and to wait with the individual needing attention until such personnel arrives," Toomer said. "That is the protocol we followed."
Toomer offered condolences to the woman's family and said a thorough internal review would be conducted. He told KGET-TV that residents of the facility are informed of the policy and agree to it when they move in. He said the policy does not apply at the adjacent assisted living and skilled nursing facilities.
Multiple calls to the facility and its parent company seeking more information were not returned.
Unlike nursing homes, which provide medical care, independent living facilities generally do not.
"These are like apartments for seniors. You're basically living on your own. They may have some services provided by basic nursing staff, but it's not their responsibility to care for the individual," said Dr. Susan Leonard, a geriatrics expert at the University of California, Los Angeles.
Residents of independent living communities can still take care of themselves, but may need help getting to doctor's appointments. In skilled nursing facilities and nursing homes, many residents require around-the-clock care.
Staff members are "required to perform and provide CPR" unless there's a do-not-resuscitate order, said Greg Crist, a senior vice president at the American Health Care Association.
Bayless did not have such an order on file at the facility, said Battalion Chief Anthony Galagaza of the Bakersfield Fire Department, which was the first on the scene. That's when firefighters immediately began CPR, continuing until she reached the hospital.
Dr. Patricia Harris, who heads the University of Southern California's geriatrics division, said the survival odds are slim among elderly who receive CPR. Even if they survive, they are never the same. She said she would override the home's policy and risk getting fired "rather than watch somebody die in front of me."
During the call, an unidentified woman called from her cellphone, and asked for paramedics to be sent to help the woman. Later, a woman who identified herself as the nurse got on the phone and told dispatcher Tracey Halvorson she was not permitted to do CPR on the woman.
Halvorson urged the nurse to start CPR, warning the consequences could be dire if no one tried to revive the woman, who had been laid out on the floor on her instructions.
"I understand if your boss is telling you, you can't do it," the dispatcher said. "But ... as a human being ... you know, is there anybody that's willing to help this lady and not let her die?"
"Not at this time," the nurse answered.
Halvorson assured the nurse that Glenwood couldn't be sued if anything went wrong in attempts to resuscitate the resident, saying the local emergency medical system "takes the liability for this call."
Later in the call, Halvorson asked, "Is there a gardener? Any staff, anyone who doesn't work for you? Anywhere? Can we flag someone down in the street and get them to help this lady? Can we flag a stranger down? I bet a stranger would help her."
"I understand if your facility is not willing to do that. Give the phone to a passer-by. This woman is not breathing enough. She is going to die if we don't get this started, do you understand?"
The woman had no pulse and wasn't breathing when fire crews reached her, Galagaza said.
Sgt. Jason Matson of the Bakersfield Police Department said its investigation so far had not revealed criminal wrongdoing, but the probe is continuing.
First responders say often it's hard to find someone willing to provide CPR in an emergency.
"It's not uncommon to have someone refuse to provide CPR if they physically can't do it, or they're so upset they just can't function," Kern County Fire Department Deputy Chief Michael Miller said. "What made this one unique was the way the conversation on the phone went. It was just very frustrating to anyone listening to it, like, why wasn't anyone helping this poor woman, since CPR today is much simpler than it was in the past?"
___
Cone reported from Sacramento. Associated Press writers Garance Burke in San Francisco and Alicia Chang in Los Angeles contributed to this report.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
Hate to say it, but in this sue-happy country, can you really blame the nurse or the nursing facility for refusing to do CPR for fear of being named in a lawsuit? The irony here is that although Glenwood refused CPR in order to avoid being sued, now they're going to be sued for NOT doing CPR. They lose, either way.
Sorry Folks: Just as Dr's take an Oath, Nurses take a pledge...... If she is not fired the nursing board should take action on her license!!! The Pledge:
"I solemnly pledge myself before God and in the presence of this assembly: To pass my life in purity and to practice my profession faithfully. I will abstain from whatever is deleterious and mischievous and will not take or knowingly administer any harmful drug. I will do all in my power to maintain and elevate the standard of my profession and will hold in confidence all personal matters committed to my keeping and all family affairs coming to my knowledge in the practice of my calling. With loyalty will I endeavor to aid the physician in his work and devote myself to the welfare of those committed to my care."
People should remember two things: (1) there is no legal obligation to perform CPR on anyone, or for that matter, to help anyone. An employer, ethics and morals may require it, but the law cannot force you to help someone else or punish you legally for not doing it; and (2) CPR has a very low success rate. The public imagines that it's some miracle treatment, but only 7% of people who receive CPR survive, and of those, only 3% survive unharmed and normal. (Source: NPR, Radiolab)
@NWGuy You are absolutely correct.
I respectfully disagree. We don't blame the facility for doing it legally or illegally, we blame them because a nurse ignored to help. Policy or not, it was still a bad behave.Â
Secondly, even the rate is as low as 1%, it is still worth providing CPR.
Well I worked in a senior care facility and we were required to know and apply CPR, in fact we all had to have CNA training and licenses, so this woman sounds like a tool.
if this was my grandma and they refused to help her i would make sure they would be charged with criminal negligent homicide and make sure the person or people do jail time for this crime. then would be the civil suit. omg i just cant wrap my brain around the idea people just watched her die.
@Denese Nelson See? That's the source of this whole mess of a situation. Everyone's first instinct is to sue. Legal proceedings that sometimes allow any idiot to extort money from institutions are what indirectly caused the nurse to refuse to do CPR and it's why every doctor in this country practices defensive medicine.
@Denese Nelson If this were my 87 year-old grandma, I'd do the same. If this were my 62 year-old mother, however, a lawsuit would be the least of their worries...
@Denese Nelson So if you passed a lake with someone drowning, but didn't jump in to save that person, would you want to be held criminally liable? What is you saw someone suffering from malnutrition because they had no food or money, so they were starving - would you want to be held legally liable for not giving them food? What if someone is in a car accident and is severely injured; should you be arrested and prosecuted for failing to stop and help them?
There is ABSOLUTELY no reason to refuse to save a persons life if you are physically able to do so. NONE. I would have lost my job before letting someone die. I would have been sued before I let someone die. There would be absolutely no reason to make me not save someones life if I was capable of doing so.
If I had an elderly family member in this facility I would do all that I could to either A. pull them out of this facility and put them into a facility that actually cared and had integrity about themselves and human lives in general or B. Talked to whomever was in the care of the facility to see if could persuade them to leave.
This story is sickening and so is the Glenwood Gardens. I hope they get in trouble.
Another elder bites the dust in this new Omama Paradigm - it is for real and there is so much more to this story that we only got a smattering off because it is all the Republicans fault and falls right on the heels of the Sequester. What less did we expect - doom & gloom from the Donkeys and I am have having a real hard time arguing with the Left Wing Liberal Loons and this article ain't bipartisan - it is Tabloid Journalism to scare us all...Â
@boned How did you make this about President Obama, the sequester, the Republicans, the "Left Wing Liberal Loons", the "Donkeys"??  WTH are you talking about?
@Sundowner @boned I understood what he was saying.
@Sundowner @TreeWizard He is talking about the Obama paradigm.
@TreeWizard Please share?
If she had ended up doing CPR and getting fired, when the tape hit the media this meat head could've written her own ticket
There is an unfortunate reality at work here on many different tangents. The press is (as evidenced by the accompanying article) pushing this as a "I was worried about getting sued" reaction. It does not appear that was the case.Â
>"I understand if your boss is telling you, you can't do it," the dispatcher said. "But ... as a human being ... you know, is there anybody that's willing to help this lady and not let her die?"
>"Not at this time," the nurse answered.
How many times have stories been posted about a retail employee who chased down a criminal, only to be fired for going against company policies? This circumstance is roughly equal to that. The employee is following a stated company policy forbidding them from offering medical assistance. Irrelevent if the victim were to live, and the one offering aid was heralded as a hero. Or, if the victim dies, it's entirely likely that the person who went outside company policies would end up losing their job.Â
Right or wrong, good or bad, the question (undoubtedly) going through that womans mind is "can I afford to lose my job?"
And, there you have it. The net sum of a human life, once again, summed up by dollars and cents.Â
For all the venom being heaped upon this woman, the truth is that most people would have probably had the exact same reaction in the same circumstance. Knowing full well that this woman was frail, elderly and undoubtedly experiencing a life threatening medical emergency... and at the same time debating if their life is worth my families survival.Â
Now, the discussion from that point comes to why the company policy is that no CPR or other life saving intervention is allowed. And, once again, I strongly suspect that the answer would come down to dollars and cents. If someone who worked there attempted CPR and (just for example) broke the victims sternum (a not uncommon result of inexperienced or untrained persons attempting CPR to elderly victims), and that injury caused additional pain or hospitalization, the company could then be held liable in a civil lawsuit. Yes, I'm aware of 'good samaritan' laws. But, all the liars... er, rather lawyers, would have to do is raise enough of a question in a juries mind that the paitent could have survived long enough for EMTs to arrive for the effort to be considered to be not 'life saving'.Â
...and then the question becomes, well.... what would I do if my mother, father, brother, sister were caused injury by someone working for a multi-billion conglomerate?
As I stated above, this is just another unfortunate reality of the times we live in. Both that the business has a 'no help' policy, and that the woman felt compelled to follow that policy.Â
Welcome to America.Â
Many years ago a co-worker and I were asked to perform CPR on a gunshot victim (by a 911 operator).  Neither of us knew what to do but we couldn't just stand by and not help.  Sadly it didn't matter as the victim didn't survive but I am proud to say that when asked, we helped.
The irony, both of us knew the victim but didn't realize it until hours later when informed.
Any able body could perform CPR.
I realize sequestration is hard on all of us but damn!!
She was 87. she had a nice long life.
@TreeWizard True.. I can only hope for 87..
But my great grandma lived to be 96! She lived in her own house and even kept a garden until she was 94! Then the "wise head of the family" decided to put her in a nursing home. She broke her hip within 6 months and it was all down hill after that..Â
I hate those places! I volunteered in one as a teenager and it was terrible.Â
@cwpholder That's to bad that she had to leave her home.
@TreeWizard @cwpholder Yeah, it was sad.. I was only a little girl then or I would've brought her to live with me. :)  <3
@BentnWasted I've got a bit of a problem, too...
At the beginning of the Feb. 26 call, the nurse asked for paramedics to come and help the woman who had collapsed and was barely breathing. CAN'T DO CPR if they are breathing and beating. that would be assault.
@32jim2Â Nice catch!
This just in, the care center employee WAS NOT a nurse.  Instead she was identified as a resident services director.
Yet in the video the employee very clearly stated to the 911 operator, "I am a nurse". I don't understand why she would lie about that. The entire situation is sad ... this woman did not have to die.
@pdxtvguy ... They are pulling damage control..wait for clarification. As I understand it she identified herself as a nurse to the 911 ....
@KHEB @pdxtvguy Here's my theory on that.  It probably was a nurse that called and spoke with a dispatcher.  But there was no identity made to that dispatcher or law enforcement as to who actually placed the call.  Now some activities director is being thrown under the bus to protect the nurse that called.
@pdxtvguy Â
I just saw that too. I'm wondering why we should believe anything on the news anymore. I suppose someone called her a 'nurse' and then they all picked it up without ever verifying it.
Now the refusal makes sense. Resident services directors would not have to know CPR. There probably isn't a nurse on duty in the facility.
@ormom @pdxtvguy ... Since when does a nursing home, assisted living, etc. not have a registered nurse on duty at all times.... Check out their web-site, they clearly state they have nursing care in the facility... Don't be in such a hurry to obsolve just to be obstinate.....
@ormom @KHEB That's correct. Fox news reported that within the same facility there is a choice: assisted living(with nurses) and independent care. They are given a choice and sign off on whichever they choose. I'm sure the independent care is less expensive. I guess you get what you pay for.
@KHEB
I heard the woman lived in what is called independent living, i,e,, a retirement center. No nursing staff is required because no personal care is provided by the facility staff. Even if they have several designations of care levels on a campus, independent living would not have nursing care.
I'm a state certified caregiver, we are required to be CPR trained. Why the excuse that they have to wait for paramedics? Sounds as tho this nurse was simply lazy and may have had a grudge against this poor defenseless elder woman. How can anyone with a conscience stand by, do nothing and watch while someone suffers and dies. I pray there will be some kind of repercussion for her failure to respond.
@John-Maria Hall First of all, the woman was still breathing so no CPR anyway. Second, it wasn't an excuse, it's their policy. Probably to avoid law suits against them and their employees, who since they aren't RN's, can be paid less and thus keeping the overhead low to offer less expensive care. It is and always will be about the money. How can there be repercussions for someone doing what they're told and the consumer signing off on their policy?
When a relative of mine was unresponsive, the nursing home called me and told me they had called an ambulance, which took her to the hospital, and on the way to the hospital, she came out of it and lived for another two years. Â Â
Thats basically the same policy used at most centers in Oregon...Wait for medical personnel to arrive.
quality of life ends in 3-6 minutes after someone's heart stops beating. NO one wants to be a bed ridden vegetable and that is what you become if your brain goes without oxygen for 3 minutes or more. hopefully when i get old i won't get restarted and live as a vegetable for another 10 years.
She should lose her license regardless of policy. She as discredited her oath.
I think that I will go somewhere else when I go to live in an Assisted Living Facility
There are a lot of people assuming that there was a DNR.  I don't think there was.  I would guess that if there was a DNR on file at the facility that that information would have been provided to the 911 operator.  It was repeated over and over again that the reason the nurse refused to assist in life saving activities was because her boss and the facility's policies prevented her from doing so.
She knew that when asked if there was anyone outside of the facility that could help she said no because it's a gated community. Â The public, other than visitors to the residents, are not allowed even close to the front door. Â If this person is a registered nurse, they should loose that certification. Â If they are not, then they should leave that job for one that cares about other living human beings.
@pdxtvguy if there was a DNR, why would they call 911
@KATUNews Investigate! Shut that joint down! They have people with no ethics or compassion!
Wow! So many judgmental comments with so few facts (e.g., did her POLST indicate DNR). Typical on this board.
POLST forms indicate whether a patient wants CPR or not. Assuming the patient had a POLST form filled out with her doctor, which I would guess is likely with an 87-year-old in assisted living, maybe the nursing facility was fearful of litigation of performing CPR against the will of a frail old woman.Â
Inhumane. Â
This not meant to be âcoldâ, just factual. Â This is truly sad and I feel for everyone involved.
CPRÂ Â http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Cardiopulmonary+Resuscitation+(CPR)
âCardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a procedure to support and maintain breathing and circulation for a person who has stopped breathing (respiratory arrest) and/or whose heart has stopped (cardiac arrest).â
A trained, 30 year certified EMT has already posted here that CPR isnât done on someone breathing. âgarys43077â
Good Samaritan Law  Oregon Revised (2012)
Good Samaritan Liability Protection   ORS 30.800, 30.803, 30.805, 30.807
30.800 Liability for emergency medical assistance.
Protection is not a slam dunk.  Here the woman was breathing and her heart was beating.  The medical definition of when to apply CPR is not met.     Hence she (or anyone) may not have been protected under the Good Sam Law 30.800 (2).    Â
@NorthernBlackBear Good post. And everyone reading please note that there is NO LAW in Oregon that requires you to help another. It may not seem moral - and maybe morality could and should impel your conscience to help another - but that is not the same as making it a legal duty on the public to help another. Otherwise, we'd all be facing criminal liability every time we failed to help another in need, including the hobo panhandling on the street corner.