'Frankenfish' may be coming to a dinner table near you
»Play Video
SALEM, Ore. – Some call it "Frankenfish."
It's a new genetically-engineered salmon that could soon land on your dinner table, and for the first time the FDA is looking at approving a genetically modified meat.
The meat is controversial and you might end up eating the new "super-fish" without even knowing it.
A company called AquaBounty started with a regular Atlantic salmon. It then added the DNA of a chinook salmon and an eel-like fish, which is how they made the super-fish.
The new DNA changes the hormones in the Atlantic salmon, making it grow quickly.
Scott Dahlman, with Oregonians for Food and Shelter in Salem, says the super-fish is safe to eat and is highly regulated by the FDA.
"There'll be a lot of curiosity about it to start off with," he says. "If it meets the needs of the people, if they're able to get what they want at a price that they want, and it's got the taste and characteristics they want, I think it will really take off."
But George Kimbrell with the Center for Food Safety in Portland believes the FDA is not doing a thorough enough job to make sure this scientific experiment is safe to eat and let loose on the world.
"Our position is this is a dangerous and irresponsible idea," he says.
Critics say 15 percent of farmed salmon escape. They believe the super-salmon could get out and cause damage.
Like something out of the movie "Jurassic Park," with its genetically engineered dinosaurs, some think the genetically engineered salmon will eat voraciously to keep up with their own growth, interbreed with other fish and weaken and destroy salmon in the wild. The fear is that jobs and fish could disappear.
"People don't want this fish. It has no redeeming social value. As we said, it creates only risk," says Kimbrell.
But supporters say AquaBounty is farming the fish securely by harvesting eggs on an island in Canada and flying them to landlocked tanks in Panama.
If they do escape somehow, supporters say the fish will all be female. They will also be sterile and so unable to breed.
"I mean, this is really just a new way to farm salmon, which is something we've actually been doing for years," says Dahlman. "It's just a new species of fish that some of these farmers might be using."
The FDA may soon approve the fish but whether you think it's a "super-salmon" or a "Frankenfish," you may not know if you're eating it. The FDA will not require labels telling you it's genetically engineered (GE).
"There's no requirement by the FDA because the FDA says that these things are not materially different," Dahlman says.
Kimbrell says many other countries require GE labels and he thinks Oregon and the entire United States should as well, especially for a creature he sees as a danger to humans, fish and jobs.
"People have a right to know," he says. "If this is going to be approved, and we think it shouldn't be, but if it is, it needs to be labeled."
Submit written comments to:
Division of Dockets
Management (HFA–305)
Food and Drug Administration
5630 Fishers Lane, rm. 1061
Rockville, MD 20852
Identify comments with the docket number: [Docket No. FDA–2011–N–0899]
For further information contact:
Eric Silberhorn
Center for Veterinary
Medicine (HFV–162)
Food and Drug Administration, 7500 Standish Pl.
Rockville, MD 20855
(240) 276–8247
email: abig@fda.hhs.gov
I get non GMO Soy milk. My opinions on this are Mute as I do not know enough in this area to comment.I would have to study both ends to better understand the issue at hand. I do know that genetic engineering can have its consequences for good or for ill.Â
Allll the more reason if we eat fish in our house it is fish we catch. We also buy gmo free this absolutely disgusts me. If more people filed complaints about this sort of thing it would not happen lets get off our duff and start making enough noise about gmo food people. Before its to late.
No wonder we have so many new and weird health issues going with us nowadays. All our food is being engineered and the natural species are no longer 100% natural. Who knows what we'll be eating 20 years from now given all these new experiments going on with our food supply.
 @Justanother1 Ever seen star kid? Cyber suit eats Burger, spits out a ball of of Unidentifiable ball of mass? The kid says What do I do with this? The cyber suit says eat it.
THIS COUNTRY IS HORRIBLE WHEN IT COMES TO GMO'S !!!!!!
 @Stephanie Riverman Probably the reason why we suffer so in health.
This is disgusting. Greed for profit by making fish grow faster. Do not buy farmed salmon under any circumstances!!!
Yeah, that will go great with my pink slime burger on hybridized wheat buns during the Summer BBQ season.
Â
Personally I think Science is more about making money that it is helping the human race these days.
the fine print says it may contain a small trace of human dna
@Phuzz Yuck, I'd hate to have human DNA in my body.
Do you think you can add a bit more unfounded scare mongering... or is the page already full?
Â
Failed to mention that these salmon are sterile. Why?
Failed to mention these salmon will be bred exclusively INLAND and not in contact with streams. Why?
Â
YOU are a reason America is growing more irrational.
The law of unintended consequences.Â
@beesknees Made to be broken?
Clearly mark the product so people will know and see how well it sells. It seems to me that people should have the knowledgeable choice.
If it is completely safe, why does the fact that it is genetically modified need to be concealed from the public to sell it?
To not mark the product for what it really is, is no more than deception to the consumer!
 @Freedom1267 After the salmon escape into the wild, the only way to tell them from wild salmon would be DNA testing, looking for genetic "markers." Genetic testing on all salmon caught seems impractical to me. Furthermore, the great danger, it seems to me, is that 1) the genetic mods will be less able to survive in the wild but 2) they will breed with wild salmon anyway, which will result in fewer wild salmon.
 @Freedom1267 Absolutely - all GMO products should be labeled. This is not a natural genetic modification, and the effects aren't known. People should know that they're buying a mixture of two kinds of salmon and some other fish. That said, I only buy wild-caught seafood.
Remember the book SILENT SPRING by Rachel Carson?
People say it's unsafe.Â
So enlighten me, what's the human risk?
We're eating a new species, derived from DNA, not some chemical carcinogen.
Â
*takes out fork*
Â
"Let's eat!!!"
 @Improprietous Different fish species cannot interbreed, so this is not natural at all. And chemicals are used in the process. As long as they're labeled as exactly what they are - and the company doesn't try to sell them as either pacific salmon, atlantic salmon or the eel-like fish - that's okay. And as long as they are right about it being impossible for them to escape and sterile in any case.Â
 @Improprietous Yummy .  Cannot wait to see you when you sprout 4 ears and fins for arms and legs.
 @Leinenkugle's  @Improprietous LOL!
 @Leinenkugle's Um, you do realize that almost everything that you put into your mouth has been genetically modified, right?
Â
 @Improprietous
There are different kinds of modfication, many of which are just nature doing it's thing, slowly, and using natural selection. Humans however, especially those looking to make money, will plow ahead before knowing if what they are doing is going to cause a problem with our food supply 50 or 100 years down the road.
Â
I am less worried about what the GMO food will do in my body than I am what it will do in nature.
I cannot imagine who would want to eat farmed raised fish.  The meat is all mushy and nasty.  The only good salmon is the north Atlantic or Alaskan whose meat is firm and not fishing tasting.   Who knows what the long term extra will be from eating unnatural fish.  Anything for a fast buck.  Let us not forget that this has been given the OK from a Government  Agency.  That should make everyone think twice.
To not label GMOs (whether Frankenfish or veggies, etc.) is downright UNETHICAL. It removes the choice from the consumer. Also, if people are unable to evaluate what they are eating, there is a very real risk that , eventually, someone will unknowingly eat something they are highly allergic to and become gravely ill - even die. Let's face it. If they are doing it with fish and eels, it won't be too long before they start doing something like crossing corn with wheat, etc.
 @theprodigal You still have a choice.  Grow/raise your own.
Sherif Brody! We are going to need a bigger boat!
Stop with the GE food! We are not GOD!Â
 @washcomom Speak for yourself, mortal.  God is a job description, not a name.
The average Columbia salmon or sturgeon is downriver from Hanford. Bon appetit!As long as I continue to eat crawfish and dungeoness crab, I can't complain about what's in fish because what's in shellfish is pretty much whatever's in front of them. What's the point of freaking out about salmon if you're eating seafood out of, say, Lake Ponchartrain?
I wonder if the marketing department is going to stick with 'Frankenfish'? Â Seems like a tough sell.Â
Super fish is people.. PEOPLE!
@iamright555Â Â Â No, No. No., soylent green is people.
Good Lord. The end in sight. Horrific public labeling. Just give the people what "we" want - how is that again?Â
Â
We WANT this? God help us all. No WE don't.Â
Â
FYI - we want wild salmon - from the PACIFIC.Â
Â
At least KATU should be aware of that much.Â
 @englishdaisy I do.  Speak for yourself.
@englishdaisy But salmon are an endagered species.
I am concerned about the genetically modified salmon. My concern arises from fact that Aquabounty doesn't want their product labeled for what it is. When you go to buy a car, the car manufacturer has its name on the car. They do that because the car manufactures are proud of their product. The same holds true with prescription drugs you buy. As a person who was raised on a farm, we use to have this joke about the only product International Harvester won't stand behind is their manure spreader. The reason for that is obvious. When I see Aquabounty not wanting to stand behind their product, the reason is obvious. Something is wrong with it. If they were to stand behind their product and someone buy it and get sick, the sickness could be traced back to them. However, if they are allowed to not label their product, then it would be hard to trace problems that arise from its consumption back to them. By not forcing them to label their product, you are giving them a way to weasel out of responsibility for the damage their product will do. The fact that they are doing this in Panama point to other problems I see. For one thing, salmon is a cold water fish and doesn't do good in warm water. Cold water holds more oxygen then warm water. For the fish to not need cold, oxygen rich water tells me that it is no longer a salmon.Another point is that a few years ago, an oil company in South America polluted the land. Then, when the lawsuit reached court, the oil company said that the ground had been polluted by crude oil, but that the crude oil that polluted the ground didn't come from them and they would have to prove that it did. The point being made is that Aquabounty is going to hide behind banana republic laws to weasel out of responsibility for its product. We can't allow them to do this.Â
 @JeffÂ
I don't buy fish from any store that doesn't label where it comes from. Until we can force labeling I hope I will be able to count on the honesty of the stores to tell me if the fish comes from Panama.
You have these companies that feed the FDA with cash and then self police themselves and reassure all of us that what they are doing is ethical and for the betterment. Yeah, sure.
@HarryReams    So,,,, just who is it at the FDA that collects all this cash?
Big deal. They already have the mutant fish in the Willamette, along with the mutant frog and probably some more mutant species that have not been found yet.
Out law the sale in the U.S. Sell it overseas, wait a few years and see if anybody grows gills..Â
Reckless...
But,,, but,,,, salmon won't be an endagered species any more! Oh NOOOOOO
The only fish I eat are the ones I catch. If one of those Frankenfish grab my hook then I guess I will go ahead and cook it up. An Idea for Mcdonalds: McFrankenfish sandwiches!
they were all female in jurassic park as well
 @SR Yes, let's mistake a fictional movie as scientific fact, after all Hollywood is SO careful to fact check for their fiction.
@SR Quick, call the FDA!
"added the DNA of a chinook salmon and an eel-like fish, which is how they made the super-fish"
Excuse me? Are they going to make any effort to label this stuff? Eels are not kosher, many of us follow kosher food rules and eels are most certainly NOT kosher.
Â
 @GardenBug If you want it Kosher, raise it yourself.
@GardenBug No, that is one thing they pointed out in the video, there is no requirement to label them.