Toyota tests cars that communicate with each other
SUSONO, Japan (AP) — Toyota Motor Corp. is testing car safety systems that allow vehicles to communicate with each other and with the roads they are on in a just completed facility in Japan the size of three baseball stadiums.
The cars at the Intelligent Transport System site receive information from sensors and transmitters installed on the streets to minimize the risk of accidents in situations such as missing a red traffic light, cars advancing from blind spots and pedestrians crossing the street. The system also tests cars that transmit such information to each other.
In a test drive for reporters Monday, the presence of a pedestrian triggered a beeping sound in the car and a picture of a person popped up on a screen in front of the driver. A picture of an arrow popped up to indicate an approaching car at an intersection. An electronic female voice said, "It's a red light," if the driver was about to ignore a red light.
The 3.5 hectare test site looks much like the artificial roads at driving schools, except bigger, and is in a corner of the Japanese automaker's technology center near Mount Fuji in Shizuoka Prefecture, central Japan.
Toyota officials said the smart-car technology it is developing will be tested on some Japanese roads starting in 2014. Similar tests are planned for the U.S., although details were not decided. Such technology is expected to be effective because half of car accidents happen at intersections, according to Toyota.
Managing Officer Moritaka Yoshida said Toyota sees preventing collisions, watching out for pedestrians and helping the driving of the elderly as key to ensuring safety in the cars of the future.
"We offer the world's top-level technology," he told reporters.
All automakers are working on pre-crash safety technology to add value to their cars, especially for developed markets such as the U.S., Europe and Japan. But the strongest sales growth is coming from emerging markets which are eventually expected to show more interest in safety technology.
Toyota's Japanese rival Nissan Motor Co. recently showed cars that were smart enough to stop on their own, park themselves and swerve away from pedestrians who suddenly jumped into the vehicle's path.
Toyota also showed a new feature that helps the driver brake harder to prevent bumping into the vehicle in front. Toyota officials said drivers often fail to push hard on their brakes in such situations because they get into a panic.
Toyota said the technology will be available "soon," without giving a date, and hinted it will be offered for Lexus luxury models. Luxury models already offer similar safety features such as automatic braking. Technology involving precise sensors remains expensive, sometimes costing as much as a cheaper Toyota car.
Toyota has also developed sonar sensors that help drivers avoid crashing in parking lots. One system even knows when the driver pushes on the gas pedal by mistake instead of the brakes, and will stop automatically.
Rear-end collisions make up 34 percent of car accidents in Japan, comprising the biggest category, followed by head-on collisions at 27 percent.
Cars that stop and go on their own, avoiding accidents, are not pure science fiction, experts say.
Alberto Broggi, professor at the University of Parma and an expert on intelligent transportation systems, said the idea of the accident-free cars is "very hot," and probably within reach on some roads within several years.
"I'm sure we will arrive to such a technology even if I don't know when exactly," he said.
The cars at the Intelligent Transport System site receive information from sensors and transmitters installed on the streets to minimize the risk of accidents in situations such as missing a red traffic light, cars advancing from blind spots and pedestrians crossing the street. The system also tests cars that transmit such information to each other.
In a test drive for reporters Monday, the presence of a pedestrian triggered a beeping sound in the car and a picture of a person popped up on a screen in front of the driver. A picture of an arrow popped up to indicate an approaching car at an intersection. An electronic female voice said, "It's a red light," if the driver was about to ignore a red light.
The 3.5 hectare test site looks much like the artificial roads at driving schools, except bigger, and is in a corner of the Japanese automaker's technology center near Mount Fuji in Shizuoka Prefecture, central Japan.
Toyota officials said the smart-car technology it is developing will be tested on some Japanese roads starting in 2014. Similar tests are planned for the U.S., although details were not decided. Such technology is expected to be effective because half of car accidents happen at intersections, according to Toyota.
Managing Officer Moritaka Yoshida said Toyota sees preventing collisions, watching out for pedestrians and helping the driving of the elderly as key to ensuring safety in the cars of the future.
"We offer the world's top-level technology," he told reporters.
All automakers are working on pre-crash safety technology to add value to their cars, especially for developed markets such as the U.S., Europe and Japan. But the strongest sales growth is coming from emerging markets which are eventually expected to show more interest in safety technology.
Toyota's Japanese rival Nissan Motor Co. recently showed cars that were smart enough to stop on their own, park themselves and swerve away from pedestrians who suddenly jumped into the vehicle's path.
Toyota also showed a new feature that helps the driver brake harder to prevent bumping into the vehicle in front. Toyota officials said drivers often fail to push hard on their brakes in such situations because they get into a panic.
Toyota said the technology will be available "soon," without giving a date, and hinted it will be offered for Lexus luxury models. Luxury models already offer similar safety features such as automatic braking. Technology involving precise sensors remains expensive, sometimes costing as much as a cheaper Toyota car.
Toyota has also developed sonar sensors that help drivers avoid crashing in parking lots. One system even knows when the driver pushes on the gas pedal by mistake instead of the brakes, and will stop automatically.
Rear-end collisions make up 34 percent of car accidents in Japan, comprising the biggest category, followed by head-on collisions at 27 percent.
Cars that stop and go on their own, avoiding accidents, are not pure science fiction, experts say.
Alberto Broggi, professor at the University of Parma and an expert on intelligent transportation systems, said the idea of the accident-free cars is "very hot," and probably within reach on some roads within several years.
"I'm sure we will arrive to such a technology even if I don't know when exactly," he said.
Won't work in the Portland area. Â They drivers there aren't smart enough to use it.
The only inter-car communication system I want is the one that lets me say, "Hey dumb-*** get out of the passing lane if you're only going 45!".
Two drivers is one too many.
Â
I already disable the electronic stability control on my Jeep because first, I respond faster and then I end up fighting the vehicle for control.
Â
I don't like the idea of a vehicle driving me.
Â
Some donât' take issue with it noting that for decades we have had auto-pilots in planes ad they actually fly better than living pilots.
Â
Well let me tell you why these two things are different.
Â
First there is miles between planes and even the ground. Should the automatic system make a mistake, it has a few seconds to correct itself. Second, the plane gets checkups each time it is flown and major overhauls after a number of hours of flight.
Â
Most people don't even changes their oil regularly.
Â
So properly compare the two systems, one must drive a car only on freeways (planes don't need to make stops at lights) where either side of the road is 500 feet away (planes get 2 miles of buffer and 10,000 feet of clearance) and there is no other car for 700 feet.
Â
Now you can compare them.
Â
But of course this is not the situation. I am two seconds behind the car in front of me, and less than a second from the median or the shoulder. And that is if I giver minimum safe distance. Anyone drive 2 on a weekday? If you're giving the guy in front 2 seconds, you're behind the guy who cut you off getting between him and you.
Â
So I hesitate to get comfortable with automated systems. Â I work on automated systems and see their failure rate. It concerns me literally on day-to-day biases. But people make mistakes and since folks seem to think texting and talking on the phone are more important than seeing to the control of a 5,000lb vehicle, I can see why they are attracted to these systems.
Â
Anything to relieve themselves of responsibility.
Â
Â
 @Repoman I don't like it when the doors lock when I put my car in drive, let alone this. I would rather have an old Dodge with no computer, no power steering, no ac, no power brakes!
 @randomdudeÂ
Â
Â
I had a Chevy Corsica that did that. I pulled the fuse that went to the power door locks to prevent it. If I wanted that door locked, I would lock it.
Â
My Favorite vehicle of all time was a 1972 Ford Courier. Manual brakes, manual steering, manual transmission. My friend used to joke everything was manual, including the engine (and donât worry the driver is his own airbag). But I loved that thing. I could actually work on it without expensive diagnostic equipment. I had to sell it because I didnât want to keep more than three vehicles and there is not enough room in that small rig for a child-seat.