Breastfeeding baby doll: creepy or groundbreaking?

NEW YORK (AP) - We've got dolls that wet, crawl and talk. We've got dolls with perfect hourglass figures. We've got dolls with swagger. And we've got plenty that come with itty bitty baby bottles.
But it's a breastfeeding doll whose suckling sounds are prompted by sensors sewn into a halter top at the nipples of little girls that caught some flak after hitting the U.S. market.
"I just want the kids to be kids," Bill O'Reilly said on his Fox News show when he learned of the Breast Milk Baby. "And this kind of stuff. We don't need this."
What, exactly, we don't need is unclear to Dennis Lewis, the U.S. representative for Berjuan Toys, a family-owned, 40-year-old doll maker in Spain that can't get the dolls onto mainstream shelves more than a year after introducing the line in this country - and blowing O'Reilly's mind.
"We've had a lot of support from lots of breastfeeding organizations, lots of mothers, lots of educators," said Lewis, in Orlando, Fla. "There also has been a lot of blowback from people who maybe haven't thought to think about really why the doll is there and what its purpose is. Usually they are people that either have problems with breastfeeding in general, or they see it as something sexual."
The dolls, eight in all with a variety of skin tones and facial features, look like many others, until children don the little top with petal appliques at the nipples. That's where the sensors are located, setting off the suckling noise when the doll's mouth makes contact. It also burps and cries, but those sounds don't require contact at the breast.

Little Savannah and Tony, Cameron and Jessica, Lilyang and Jeremiah ain't cheap at $89 a pop. Lewis, after unsuccessfully peddling them to retailers large and small, now has them listed at half price on their website in time for the holidays this year.
"With retailers it's been hard, to be perfectly honest, but not so much because they've been against the products," he said. "It's more they've been very wary of the controversy. It's a product that you either love it or you hate it."
Stevanne Auerbach loves it. The child development expert in San Francisco, also known as Dr. Toy, evaluates dolls and other toys for consumers, lending her official approval to Breast Milk Baby.
"We felt that it had merit in dealing with new babies for the older child," she said, "and for the curiosity that children have in this area. Breastfeeding in Europe is acceptable and the doll has been successful there. We wanted to open up the opportunity."
Sally Wendkos Olds, who wrote "The Complete Book of Breastfeeding," also doesn't understand the problem.
"I think it's a very cute toy," she said. "I think it's just crazy what Bill O'Reilly was saying that it's sexualizing little girls. The whole point is that so many people in our society persist in sexualizing breastfeeding, where in so many other countries around the world they don't think anything of it."
Olds called Americans "prudish in many ways," adding the doll offers: "bodily awareness. It's realizing that this is OK."
Lewis blames lack of U.S. sales - just under 5,000 dolls sold in the last year - solely on phobia about breastfeeding, something widely considered the healthiest way to feed a baby.
"There's no doubt about that," he said. "The whole idea is that there's still some taboos here. They're difficult to justify and difficult to explain but they're out there. You mention breast and people automatically start thinking Janet Jackson or wardrobe malfunctions and all sorts of things that have absolutely nothing to do with breastfeeding."
Lewis considers Breast Milk Baby "very much less sexualized" than Barbie dolls or the sassy Bratz pack.
Olds, who lives in New York City, agreed, though she thinks the doll's full retail price is too high. "That's my only objection to it. It's a lot of money, but people spend a lot of money on their children in all sorts of ways."
Haven't little girls been mimicking the act of breastfeeding with their baby dolls for centuries without benefit of accoutrement?
"Why do we need anything with bells and whistles? Why did we need a Betsy Wetsy? Children like toys that do things," Olds said, invoking one of the first drink and wet dolls created back in 1935. "So this doll makes noises. She burps, she cries, she sucks very noisily. Big deal."
Lincoln Hoppe, a Los Angeles actor and father of five - all breastfed - said a young child who becomes a big sibling and sees mom nursing might enjoy the doll just fine. "After all, they're going to imitate mom anyway using whatever doll they've already got," he said.
But how about playdates? Out in public, he asked.
"It's already hard to tell a child they can't take 'that' toy with them to their sibling's soccer game." he said. "There may be a time and place for this doll, but I find the idea kind of creepy."
But it's a breastfeeding doll whose suckling sounds are prompted by sensors sewn into a halter top at the nipples of little girls that caught some flak after hitting the U.S. market.
"I just want the kids to be kids," Bill O'Reilly said on his Fox News show when he learned of the Breast Milk Baby. "And this kind of stuff. We don't need this."
What, exactly, we don't need is unclear to Dennis Lewis, the U.S. representative for Berjuan Toys, a family-owned, 40-year-old doll maker in Spain that can't get the dolls onto mainstream shelves more than a year after introducing the line in this country - and blowing O'Reilly's mind.
"We've had a lot of support from lots of breastfeeding organizations, lots of mothers, lots of educators," said Lewis, in Orlando, Fla. "There also has been a lot of blowback from people who maybe haven't thought to think about really why the doll is there and what its purpose is. Usually they are people that either have problems with breastfeeding in general, or they see it as something sexual."
The dolls, eight in all with a variety of skin tones and facial features, look like many others, until children don the little top with petal appliques at the nipples. That's where the sensors are located, setting off the suckling noise when the doll's mouth makes contact. It also burps and cries, but those sounds don't require contact at the breast.

Little Savannah and Tony, Cameron and Jessica, Lilyang and Jeremiah ain't cheap at $89 a pop. Lewis, after unsuccessfully peddling them to retailers large and small, now has them listed at half price on their website in time for the holidays this year.
"With retailers it's been hard, to be perfectly honest, but not so much because they've been against the products," he said. "It's more they've been very wary of the controversy. It's a product that you either love it or you hate it."
Stevanne Auerbach loves it. The child development expert in San Francisco, also known as Dr. Toy, evaluates dolls and other toys for consumers, lending her official approval to Breast Milk Baby.
"We felt that it had merit in dealing with new babies for the older child," she said, "and for the curiosity that children have in this area. Breastfeeding in Europe is acceptable and the doll has been successful there. We wanted to open up the opportunity."
Sally Wendkos Olds, who wrote "The Complete Book of Breastfeeding," also doesn't understand the problem.
"I think it's a very cute toy," she said. "I think it's just crazy what Bill O'Reilly was saying that it's sexualizing little girls. The whole point is that so many people in our society persist in sexualizing breastfeeding, where in so many other countries around the world they don't think anything of it."
Olds called Americans "prudish in many ways," adding the doll offers: "bodily awareness. It's realizing that this is OK."
Lewis blames lack of U.S. sales - just under 5,000 dolls sold in the last year - solely on phobia about breastfeeding, something widely considered the healthiest way to feed a baby.
"There's no doubt about that," he said. "The whole idea is that there's still some taboos here. They're difficult to justify and difficult to explain but they're out there. You mention breast and people automatically start thinking Janet Jackson or wardrobe malfunctions and all sorts of things that have absolutely nothing to do with breastfeeding."
Lewis considers Breast Milk Baby "very much less sexualized" than Barbie dolls or the sassy Bratz pack.
Olds, who lives in New York City, agreed, though she thinks the doll's full retail price is too high. "That's my only objection to it. It's a lot of money, but people spend a lot of money on their children in all sorts of ways."
Haven't little girls been mimicking the act of breastfeeding with their baby dolls for centuries without benefit of accoutrement?
"Why do we need anything with bells and whistles? Why did we need a Betsy Wetsy? Children like toys that do things," Olds said, invoking one of the first drink and wet dolls created back in 1935. "So this doll makes noises. She burps, she cries, she sucks very noisily. Big deal."
Lincoln Hoppe, a Los Angeles actor and father of five - all breastfed - said a young child who becomes a big sibling and sees mom nursing might enjoy the doll just fine. "After all, they're going to imitate mom anyway using whatever doll they've already got," he said.
But how about playdates? Out in public, he asked.
"It's already hard to tell a child they can't take 'that' toy with them to their sibling's soccer game." he said. "There may be a time and place for this doll, but I find the idea kind of creepy."
I can and see Both sides, While for some this is a positive, it is also Gender oriented, something that may make the Gay and lesbian community a tad jealous. at any rate I see this as appropriate for ages that this is designed for, Dolls are a great way to teach children values and facts of life. we may not like what is being made but if you do stop and think about it, it opens up a new dialog between parents and girls and it is necessary one as well.
Girls need to be taught that they are special and unique just as boys are special and unique. This teaches what the girls gender is in part about, the loving and caring for a kid in the future. As for kids having kids, well, I guess you havn't heard of different countries with regards to age of consent. Again we may not like but we are not the police of the world.
In my own opinion, I feel that certain interest groups may find this Dangerous to there cause as it teaches what gender orientation is for.
 @lee986321 I'm gay, and I'm not the least bit jealous. I mean, what would there be to get jealous over?
Breast feeding is great if that is what you decide to do, but this doll is kind of creepy.
And we wonder why teenage pregnancy is on the rise? We have these young girls in training from very young ages about caring for babies and making them want babies of their own, pretty soon you have a 12 year old who finds out she can have a real baby and the rest is history. How about letting the kids be kids for a change and keep the adult stuff to the adults?????
 @HuskyKMA With that level of logic, boys would aspire to have super powers, and when they discover around age 12 that they can build muscle mass, they would be headed towards being superman, or the hulk with the rest being history......right?
 @HuskyKMA Maybe we should market a baby that gives little girls excruciating abdominal pain for 36 hours and then cries every two hours for six months.  Hows about a little truth in advertising?
Totally a breastfeeding advocate here, and it's great when people who can breastfeed choose to do so, but can we stop with the things that could potentially make it seem offensive? Â Why this doll needs to be on the market I am not sure. Â It's great for little girls to have dolls, they can learn how they can help take care of siblings and such, but I'm pretty sure that until someone is a mother they are not going to help breastfeed a child.
Sheesh people. Find something worth having a tizzy fit over, please?
This is so 1998 that between this and Furby, I'm wondering who sucked us all into a time machine.
Wait there is a pink and blue ribon? Pink ribbon is for breast cancer Blue ribbon is for possibly to prevent forms of child abuse?
Against child abuse. The National Exchange Clubâs national project, the Prevention of Child Abuse, was adopted in 1979 with the encouragement of National President Dr. Edward North, Jr., a physician from Jackson, Mississippi, who observed increased incidences of abuse through his medical practice. The emblem of the project is a blue ribbon. The club sponsors numerous Blue Ribbon Campaigns and Child Abuse Prevention Month in April. In the wake of the Penn State child sex abuse scandal, the Penn State Nittany Lions football team announced that they will wear a blue ribbon to support child abuse victims.[1]
Eh ok, I guess this is better then the two girls that were "pretending to breast feed" it on and then plastering it on FB,
IN RE: to the mother that posted her kids on breast feeding:
What's next - the giving birth baby?
 @Sick_n_Tired Got to have the "having sex" dolls first...
@RandyH - Oh jeez - that's too funny. LOL You wanna make a bet that China is already working on that doll? They're making it just to send the citizens of the good ol' U.S. of A. into a frenzied panic. Do ya ever wonder why there is a Starbuck's on every other corner no matter where you go??? How many characters am I allowed?Â
 @Sick_n_Tired ~  ...chuckle, chuckle...  I actually have a response to that, but I'm pretty sure it would get censored...  :-)
@margay1 - Heh heh heh heh heh .... heh heh heh heh... Too bad, eh?
 @Sick_n_Tired I'm guessing it would be a doll that looks like an adult, that pops out a baby.
 @pdxd  @Sick_n_Tired they have that, but it costs to much money lol. it is used by doctors.
I Have no acceptable comments on this particular offbeat story.
Swim- if Offbeat remember....the Jenna Jamison doll will be out soon....
I'll teach you all of my tricks
So essentially, you'll be keeping us abreast of the situation?
I'm tittillated already.
Start hanging out with Wendy.Â
That'll change.
I think we need to let little kids BE little kids - and stop trying to take their imaginations away from them...
How about a doll you eat as a pill, and when you poop it out, it's a baby!
 @brautigan Well, I don't know which would be worse, that, or a jelly bean sized egg that has chocolate dirt to fertilize, and then 9 minutes later, a gummy baby pops out.....
I'm all for breastfeeding. It's perfectly natural. But I find this doll offensive. Let's let little girls be little girls. If they see women breastfeeding and want to emulate that they can do it without a doll that makes sucking sounds when held against a fake breast with a microchip in it. Today's children don't have to imagine very much because we provide everything for them so they don't have to. It is up to a parent to teach, or not, a child about breastfeeding. Toy manufacturers should stay out of it.
 @mkamom First of all, I'm not a fan of the doll, but it would be up to parents whether or not to purchase the baby for their children. The toy manufacturer isn't making that decision. Besides, the flower petals have the microchip.
One question. Why?
This comment has been deleted
Where the heck is that dam thumbs down button?
Wow, I spend a week at NASCAR and look what happens....sheesh, what am I gonna do with you two?
GRRRRRRRRR, Baby.
My Austin Powers' moment is on the deer story (shag)
Wendy, what, are you doing Austin Powers now?
@swimbad @Kushfan I didn't call him anything. If he doesn't behave, I'll re-post it.
 @WendyTeagarden  @Kushfan Wow Wendy,  you must have really kicked up your heals on that one!
Dammit!!
Â
I didn't think you'd scroll down this far.
Â
Â
@Kushfan liar. I deleted it
Yeah, but you weren't called what Wendy called me.
Â
It was so bad KATU deleted it.
 @Kushfan Don't start that now, it took a long time to get rid of it.
Really??
Â
C'mon man.
 @Kushfan Typical woman, not saying she isn't unique in many ways though.
Duh!
@Kushfan but are you:
A) bowing
B) on your knees
C) curtsying
Ok, yeah you're right. What's wrong with me??
Of course calling you man is WAAAY worse than you called me.
And "C'mon man" is just a generic expression.
But if it will make you happy, and we can still be friends, I'll try it again.
Â
C'mon ma'am.
 @WendyTeagarden Ha ha ha!!!
 @WendyTeagarden Oh okay, was it a catalog for inflatable objects?
@pdxd I referred to Kushfan's catalog orders and he wasn't in the mood today.
@Kushfan  not if you call me "man"
OK, good. Â I thought it was prissy for a minute. Â
Â
We're still friends?
 @WendyTeagarden I missed it. What was the general comment that was deleted?
I deleted it just for you
 @phastphx Because the "Breed Me" baby was considered to be in poor taste.