Wyden: Release of drone info to lawmakers 'encouraging first step'

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Barack Obama has directed the Justice Department to give Congress' intelligence committees access to classified legal advice providing the government's rationale for drone strikes against American citizens working with al-Qaida abroad, a senior administration official and Democratic lawmakers said Wednesday.
A drumbeat of demands to see the document has swelled on Capitol Hill in recent days as the Senate Intelligence Committee prepares to hold a confirmation hearing for John Brennan, who helped manage the drone program, to be CIA director.
Those demands were only intensified by the leak this week of an unclassified "white paper" on how decisions are made to target U.S. citizens abroad that the Justice Department confidentially sent to key lawmakers last year. The unclassified memo says it is legal for the government to kill U.S. citizens abroad if it believes they are senior al-Qaida leaders continually engaged in operations aimed at killing Americans, even if there is no evidence of a specific imminent attack.
The senior official said Obama decided to send lawmakers the classified rationale on Wednesday as part of his "commitment to consult with Congress on national security matters." Obama directed the Justice Department provide the Senate and House intelligence committees access to classified advice from its Office of Legal Counsel that the white paper is based on, the official said.
Legal opinions produced by the legal counsel's office are interpretations of federal law that are binding on all executive branch agencies.
The administration official spoke on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to discuss the matter by name.
Earlier Wednesday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said Obama was engaged in an internal process deliberation to determine how to balance the nation's security needs with its values. He said Obama was committed to providing more information to Congress, even as he refused to acknowledge whether the drone memo even existed.
"He thinks that it is legitimate to ask questions about how we prosecute the war against al-Qaida," Carney said. "These are questions that will be with us long after he is president and long after the people who are in the seats that they're in now have left the scene."
Eleven senators, including Democrat Ron Wyden of Oregon, called on Obama to provide lawmakers "any and all legal opinions" that outline the president's authority to use legal force against Americans.
Wyden, a member of the Senate Intelligence Committee, told The Associated Press that Obama called him Wednesday evening to alert him to the decision to release the legal opinions. The president pledged to launch a "very extensive" public discussion on the government's ability to target Americans abroad, Wyden said.
"This is an encouraging first step," Wyden said. "There is now an opportunity to build on it."
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., committee's chairman, said in a statement that the legal opinion would be provided to her committee by Thursday morning. The confirmation hearing will be held Thursday afternoon.
Justice's unclassified 16-page white paper says that it is lawful to target al-Qaida linked U.S. citizens if they pose an "imminent" threat of violent attack against Americans and that delaying action against such people would create an unacceptably high risk. Such circumstances may necessitate expanding the concept of imminent threat, the memo says.
"The threat posed by al-Qaida and its associated forces demands a broader concept of imminence in judging when a person continually planning terror attacks presents an imminent threat," the document added.
A September 2011 drone strike in Yemen killed Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, both U.S. citizens. A separate drone strike two weeks later killed al-Awlaki's 16-year-old son, a Denver native. The strikes came after U.S. intelligence concluded that the elder al-Awlaki was senior operational leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula plotting attacks on the U.S., including the abortive Christmas Day bombing of an airplane landing in Detroit in 2009.
The memo does not require the U.S. to have information about a specific imminent attack against the U.S. But it does require that capture of a terrorist suspect not be feasible and that any such lethal operation by the United States targeting a person comply with fundamental law-of-war principles.
Copyright 2013 The Associated Press.
KATU.com reporting on this topic: Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden's push for this rationale:
So, if someone is a U.S. citizen and in a combat zone fighting for the other side, our military shouldn't be allowed to track them down? If they are fighting for the Taliban, they take their chances just like all the rest.
what part of you can't trust Obama with anything don't you understand. He is a narcissistic sociopath who could care less about this country or the american people, he hates everything about it all.All of his policies are designed to bring it down.
I don't agree with Obama on many things but this I support him 100%.
Â
It's called National Security.
Good. The executive branch needs constant oversight whenever it cites national security as a reason for doing anything.
@Max Quinn I know that we don't agree on much; but our page is the same here. Whoever is in the Oval Office, this is true.
Wasn't the left all up in arms over water boarding under Bush?
But now they kill U.S. citizens with no trial under Obama?
Â
Hypocrites...?
@Nocturnal Daydreamer Waterboarding was used exactly 3 times. Results are classified but no more classified than the many drone strikes that killed people, not just made them think they were dying.
Â
Don't get me wrong, I'm on board with both methods as long as the rules are clearly defined and congress can stop it if it gets out of hand.
Â
I'll make it clear: Drone attacks kill someone every time, usually more than 1 someone. Waterboarding has never killed anyone. You decide the ethics of the matter.
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer That's funny. In the first place Bush started the drone program. In the second place of the eleven senators that are calling for accountability, 8 are democrats and 3 are republicans. But don't let me stop you from spewing propaganda with every breath. I am always in the mood for a laugh.
 @USCitizenWhat do you find funny about it?
Â
Â
 @Dr. Rawdog  @USCitizen No, it is sad and pathetic.
 @USCitizen So its wrong to water board non US citizens but it is ok to kill US citizens?
Â
Â
 @Nocturnal Daydreamer It's your reasoning, you seem to be comparing the constitutional rights of non US citizens to the rights of US citizens.
BUSH : Drones bad
OBAM: Drones good
How's New York treating ya Ron?? C'mon back to Oregon and see what's happening with the people you're supposed to represent. You can do that from Mahattan, can ya?
This comment has been deleted
@Dr. Rawdog ........think so, eh?
I suppose it'll be all over WikiMedia soon! Politicians and their staffs can't keep their mouths shut.
I'm glad someone is watching this. Even drone use within the US needs a good look to double check privacy concerns.
Don't drone me bro...
Senator Wyden, among others, is asking for clarification of policy. Without this clarification there is no oversight of the Executive Branch.
Â
I am a conservative voter, and I have no problems with the drone attacks cited in this article. Unfortunately, there have been many other drone attacks, some of which Senator Wyden would like to know the legal limits the Executive Branch used to order them.
Â
I applaude Senator Wyden for opening a dialog that is asking the Executive Branch for more information, even if it is a bit soft-soap. At this time, Senator Wyden is unwilling to confront the President; however it does show that he has limits to how far he is willing to let the President operate without congressional oversight.
Â
From a conservative voter; well done Senator Wyden.
Thank you for defending senior al-Qaeda leaders that were born in the US. Targeting them would only serve to devastate the perpetual war Bush decided to start in the middle east. We can't feel good about ourselves without trillions spent on defense each year in a war we cannot win through traditional means. al-Qaeda has no country we can invade with our massive army and firepower. Their conscription of US "Citizens" into their organization was precisely the tactic they needed to keep this going as we can now muck around with defending liberty or something. Thank you Sen. Wyden. Thank you GOP. Gerd Blerss 'Murica.Um. Sarcasm implied.Â
@grimnir_ Wow ... all of those words and you managed to say nothing useful. You did manage to define your level of literacy.
Thank you Sen. Wyden.