Government spending cuts may be here for good

WASHINGTON (AP) — The spending cuts are here to stay if you believe the public posturing Sunday.
The Senate's Republican leader Mitch McConnell called them modest. House Speaker John Boehner isn't sure the cuts will hurt the economy. The White House's top economic adviser, Gene Sperling, said the pain isn't that bad right now.
So after months of dire warnings, Washington didn't implode, government didn't shut down and the $85 billion budget trigger didn't spell doom. And no one has a tangible proposal for rolling back those cuts.
"This modest reduction of 2.4 percent in spending over the next six months is a little more than the average American experienced just two months ago, when their own pay went down when the payroll tax holiday expired," McConnell said.
"I don't know whether it's going to hurt the economy or not," Boehner said. "I don't think anyone quite understands how the sequester is really going to work."
And Sperling, making the rounds on the Sunday news shows, added: "On Day One, it will not be as harmful as it will be over time."
Both parties cast blame on the other for the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts but gave little guidance on what to expect in the coming weeks. Republicans and Democrats pledged to retroactively undo the cuts but signaled no hints as to how that process would start to take shape. Republicans insisted there would be no new taxes and Democrats refused to talk about any bargain without them.
"That's not going to work," said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. "If we're going to increase revenue again, it's got to go to the debt with real entitlement reform and real tax reform when you actually lower rates. ... I'm not going to agree to any more tax increases that are going to go to increase more government."
All of this comes ahead of a new, March 27 deadline that could spell a government shutdown and a debt-ceiling clash coming in May.
Boehner said his chamber would move this week to pass a measure to keep government open through Sept. 30. McConnell said a government shutdown was unlikely to come from his side of Capitol Hill. The White House said it would dodge the shutdown and roll back the cuts, which hit domestic and defense spending in equal share.
"We will still be committed to trying to find Republicans and Democrats that will work on a bipartisan compromise to get rid of the sequester," Sperling said.
Obama has phoned lawmakers but it isn't clear to what end. Boehner and McConnell said they had a productive meeting with Obama on Friday, but it didn't yield a deal.
"Well, no one can think that that's been a success for the president," said Mitt Romney, Obama's unsuccessful rival in November's election. "He didn't think the sequester would happen. It is happening."
Obama and the Republicans have been fighting over federal spending since the opposition party regained control of the House of Representatives in the 2010 midterm elections. The budget cuts were designed in 2011 to be so ruthless that both sides would be forced to find a better deal, but they haven't despite two years to find a compromise.
The $85 billion in cuts apply to the remainder of the 2013 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. But without a deal they will continue slashing government spending by about $1 trillion more over a 10-year period.
McConnell spoke to CNN's "State of the Union." Boehner was interviewed on NBC's "Meet the Press." Sperling appeared on ABC's "This Week," NBC and CNN. Ayotte appeared on ABC. Romney was a guest on "Fox News Sunday."
The Senate's Republican leader Mitch McConnell called them modest. House Speaker John Boehner isn't sure the cuts will hurt the economy. The White House's top economic adviser, Gene Sperling, said the pain isn't that bad right now.
So after months of dire warnings, Washington didn't implode, government didn't shut down and the $85 billion budget trigger didn't spell doom. And no one has a tangible proposal for rolling back those cuts.
"This modest reduction of 2.4 percent in spending over the next six months is a little more than the average American experienced just two months ago, when their own pay went down when the payroll tax holiday expired," McConnell said.
"I don't know whether it's going to hurt the economy or not," Boehner said. "I don't think anyone quite understands how the sequester is really going to work."
And Sperling, making the rounds on the Sunday news shows, added: "On Day One, it will not be as harmful as it will be over time."
Both parties cast blame on the other for the automatic, across-the-board spending cuts but gave little guidance on what to expect in the coming weeks. Republicans and Democrats pledged to retroactively undo the cuts but signaled no hints as to how that process would start to take shape. Republicans insisted there would be no new taxes and Democrats refused to talk about any bargain without them.
"That's not going to work," said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, R-N.H. "If we're going to increase revenue again, it's got to go to the debt with real entitlement reform and real tax reform when you actually lower rates. ... I'm not going to agree to any more tax increases that are going to go to increase more government."
All of this comes ahead of a new, March 27 deadline that could spell a government shutdown and a debt-ceiling clash coming in May.
Boehner said his chamber would move this week to pass a measure to keep government open through Sept. 30. McConnell said a government shutdown was unlikely to come from his side of Capitol Hill. The White House said it would dodge the shutdown and roll back the cuts, which hit domestic and defense spending in equal share.
"We will still be committed to trying to find Republicans and Democrats that will work on a bipartisan compromise to get rid of the sequester," Sperling said.
Obama has phoned lawmakers but it isn't clear to what end. Boehner and McConnell said they had a productive meeting with Obama on Friday, but it didn't yield a deal.
"Well, no one can think that that's been a success for the president," said Mitt Romney, Obama's unsuccessful rival in November's election. "He didn't think the sequester would happen. It is happening."
Obama and the Republicans have been fighting over federal spending since the opposition party regained control of the House of Representatives in the 2010 midterm elections. The budget cuts were designed in 2011 to be so ruthless that both sides would be forced to find a better deal, but they haven't despite two years to find a compromise.
The $85 billion in cuts apply to the remainder of the 2013 fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30. But without a deal they will continue slashing government spending by about $1 trillion more over a 10-year period.
McConnell spoke to CNN's "State of the Union." Boehner was interviewed on NBC's "Meet the Press." Sperling appeared on ABC's "This Week," NBC and CNN. Ayotte appeared on ABC. Romney was a guest on "Fox News Sunday."
"He didn't think the sequester would happen. It is happening." Yes, Obama underestimated the stupidity of the Party of NO.
We just gave 250 million dollars to Egypt. Just think what that could have done if it was kept in the states.
@therandomrogerWe could have purchased 500 mine-proof "street sweeper" armored personnel carriers with gun ports sticking outside the side to deal with the huge amount of illegals and citizens sitting off mines and RPGs in our streets. Oh, wait... we just bought 2700 of 'em. Take that, Head Start:
http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2013/03/obama-dhs-purchases-2700-light-armored-tanks-to-go-with-their-1-6-billion-bullet-stockpile/
Probably the only way we can get a start on reducing our overinflated and wasteful military. Now if we could only eliminate the exorbitant pensions and health care of our congress it will be a total success. Of course the GOPâs real target is Social Security and Medicare which will only hurt the already suffering middle class.
sequestration is ugly...the pope even got laid off.
So the sky isn't falling?Â
What a bunch of lying sleaze bag political hype led by the moron in chief, 0bama.
@RalphCramden Let's agree your orange man Boenher, or is it boner any better ?
@dougrpdx@RalphCramdenIt's interesting how if you make a political statement some halfwit comes in swinging at you like you're automatically member or supporter of the other party.Â
DHS just bought 2,700 armored vehicles amd over 1.7 billion rounds of ammunition, and then gave $250,000,000 more to Egypt. Hell of a week. I hope this is the Change you wanted.
%s
@dougrpdx  and i noticed the idiots toupee was not primped very nicely on meet the press yesterday morning.  good lord, help us.
This comment has been deleted
@feral @RalphCramden Obama doesn't care about you. He cares about you as much as you care about him caring about you caring about him.
Oh how terrible.. This is just the worst news, I don't know what they're..............Â
Nope sorry I tried to fake it.. I just can't seem to find an ounce of sympathy here.Â
Honest feelings:: GOOD! I'm thrilled! Let's DOUBLE the cuts, heck triple them.. *High Five*
Gee, maybe that's because most of them don't go into effect for a couple more months?
Most of the suffering will be by the deadbeats who voted obama into office and why should we care about them?
@Shadow Oh I am sorry I work and I voted for Obama maybe you could tell me how Romney would have saved the USA from doom?
@CorporateCowMoo @Shadow Not giving hundreds of millions of dollars to Egypt, along with tanks and fighter planes, not building drone bases in Africa, not authorizing DHS' purchase of 1.7 billion rounds of semiautomatic pistol ammo, 7000 military-style "Personal Defense Weapons" and not buying 2700 armored DHS "police/rescue vehicles" at half a million each?
Not defunding the hundred-billion-dollcar Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste repository for political reasons the moment it was completed, and then telling Americans we have to spend billions of more dollars to clean up Hanford?
For starters?
Dream on about the spending cuts. I'm sure they'll find someplace else to add them on. Liberals have a habit of adding things to line items!
@jpk And the GOP never did that.. never.. ever.. never ever.. never .. ever.. really.. LIAR !
Our government would have to spend less than it makes....THIS IS AN OUTRAGE!!!!!!! Â Â UNAMERICAN I TELL YOU!!!!!
"This modest reduction of 2.4 percent in spending over the next six months is a little more than the average American experienced just two months ago, when their own pay went down when the payroll tax holiday expired," McConnell said.
That 2.4 % reduction in a person's paycheck did indeed hurt, especially if they were living paycheck to paycheck. That was 2.4% of income they no longer had to spend. This was one of the reasons people quit spending December 31, because they knew they were going to get a pay cut in January. The average American does not have the ability to print money or raise their debt ceiling like the feds do to make end meet.
Government spending cuts meed to be here, and for a good long time. I'm not saying we need reckless autonomy, but a budgetary plan that trims how much is going out versus what comes in while closing loopholes to reduce our debt. America can get it's house in order, provided our leadership (regardless of party) decides that actions speak louder than words.
Hey, let's make sure we don't talk about this in the national media:
"CAIRO (AP) -- U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt for President Mohammed Morsi's pledges of political and economic reforms by releasing $250 million in American aid to support the country's "future as a democracy.""
@Playanekes Since when is the AP not the national media?
@Max Quinn @Playanekes Since none of the actual newspaper, internet or TV networks this side of Fox News won't talk about it.Â
Also, whatever you do, DON'T ADDRESS THE ACTUAL ISSUE, COWARD.
KERRY JUST GAVE EGYPT A QUARTER OF A BILLION DOLLARS AND DHS JUST BOUGHT 2700 MRAP ARMORED VEHICLES BUT THEY'RE THREATING TO CUT HEAD START.. STOP TRYING TO DIVERT THE SUBJECT.
Just an FYI,Â
The 'rich' do not make enough money to really make any kind of a dent in our deficit, even if you confiscated 100% of their income. Sorry to burst the leftist bubble but the left has used class envy on the intellectually challenged for generations in order to stay in power. And many of the GOP have gone right along with it too. Both parties screw whatever happens to be the right thing to do, in order to stay elected.Â
Tying congress salaries and perks to creating and maintaining a reasonable budget is a great idea.
The fact that we are into the 5th year of this administration and have no budget is simply unacceptable.
@Jack_Bauer The rich don't suffer. Its the poor and middle class that do:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QPKKQnijnsM
@Jack_Bauer Go to google, type in the top 1% own how much.. Â make your own decision.. I say jack is a liar as are most of his posts... Sorry jack, back before the internet we would believe you, today we call you out for what you are... And that sir is a liar !
@dougrpdx @Jack_Bauer   More attempt to change the subject.
You police-statists must be happy with the 2700 new armored "street sweepers" DHS just purchases in lieu of funding Head Start or some other hostage being killed. Do you suppose 2700 armored vehicles to be used in the United States is to protect the government from Canadians, or the Imperial Japanese, or...
Also, make sure you don't talk about the quarter-bil we just gave Egypt, again... That's not part of the Party talking point, is it, comrade.
@Jack_BauerÂ
Confiscating income indeed - what hogwash. I'm already having MY income confiscated by and for the rich.
Why don't you tell the TRUTH? The WEALTH - the ASSETS - the loans that the rich hold over the heads of the rest of us aren't only enough to pay down the national debt - they ARE the debt!
I vote for Jubilee.
If the Obamas would just quit taking vacations and the first lady cut back on her personal staff we could save that much and no other cuts would be necessary!
@Freedom1267Â Yea and we need to borrow More money from china to pay More tax cuts for the rich...
@uknow2Â @Freedom1267Â Did you not read the other article about the rich.
@TreeWizard @uknow2 @Freedom1267Â
Of course he didn't. uknow2 is stuck on the leftist dogma and will only regurgitate what he has been told to say from his handlers. No independent thought is allowed where he comes from.
Here for good? Let us all hope and pray...
Nothing is ever for sure or definite when the legislature gets hold of it!
First things to cut should be Congress' salaries.
Since they're not doing anything to make jobs or stimulate the economy, they don't need to be paid. Besides, most of them are millionaires or close to it, so it's not like they're going to miss it.
Next to go should be funding for any foreign government. They should stand on their own two feet.
Next to go should be subsidies and/or tax breaks for any company or organization that paid any of its executives a bonus in the last 5 years.
@Mikey After all that, then let's also cut the salaries to all the spouses of all the people in Congress. The spouses should not be making money for doing nothing. Oh wait .. that's what you already said. My bad ...
A two-and-a-half percent cut in spending is supposed to be the end of the world? Note to mathematically disinclined economists: you've still got another 38% of government spending to slash before you can even BREAK EVEN, much less start paying down the massive debt.
""""""""Government spending cuts may be here for good"""""""""
Gee,  borrowing/printing  40 cents+/- of every dollar the feds spends and its a news headline that spending cuts are here for good????
no kidding......
Too bad cuts in govt spending didn't start ten years ago........
Oh Oh does that mean the illegals will have to leave here.Â
@samsloohouse They will be doing all city and county work replacing union workforce and no more PERS.  All the union dues enabled the democrats to do  this.
@Ramona @samsloohouse Yea what do those union members think they are doing giving their OWN money for a candidate.
Why that's not even American ...
Oh Wait...Â
Cinch that belt a wee bit tighter. Yes! That ought to do it, for now.Â
Dear Leader must not like his janitors at the WH. Lies lies and more lies.
"May be here for good"..............
No, No, No. That just can't be. Obama said he'd never let this happen in the first place.
This has to be George Bushs fault.
Great. Who will take credit for the cuts?