Obama powers to re-election despite weak economy
»Play Video
WASHINGTON (AP) - President Barack Obama rolled to re-election Tuesday night, vanquishing former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney despite a weak economy that plagued his first term and put a crimp in the middle class dreams of millions.
"This happened because of you. Thank you" Obama tweeted to supporters in celebration.
Romney telephoned the president, then spoke to disappointed supporters in Boston. In a graceful concession, he summoned all Americans to pray for Obama and urged the night's political winners to put partisan bickering aside and "reach across the aisle" to tackle the nation's problems.
After the costliest - and arguably the nastiest - campaign in history, divided government seemed alive and well.
Democrats retained control of the Senate with surprising ease. Republicans did the same in the House, ensuring that Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, Obama's partner in unsuccessful deficit talks, would reclaim his seat at the bargaining table.
At Obama headquarters in Chicago, a huge crowd gathered waving small American flags and cheering. Supporters hugged each other, danced and pumped their fists in the air. Excited crowds also gathered in New York's Times Square, at Faneuil Hall in Boston and near the White House in Washington, drivers joyfully honking as they passed by.
With returns from 79 percent of the nation's precincts, Obama had 52.2 million, 49.5 percent. Romney had 51.7 million, 49 percent.
And the president's laserlike focus on the battleground states allowed him to run up a 303-203 margin in the competition for electoral votes, where the White House is won or lost. It took 270 to win.
The election emerged as a choice between two very different visions of government - whether it occupies a major, front-row place in American lives or is in the background as a less-obtrusive facilitator for private enterprise and entrepreneurship.
The economy was rated the top issue by about 60 percent of voters surveyed as they left their polling places. But more said former President George W. Bush bore responsibility for current circumstances than Obama did after nearly four years in office.
That boded well for the president, who had worked to turn the election into a choice between his proposals and Romney's, rather than a simple referendum on the economy during his time in the White House.
Unemployment stood at 7.9 percent on Election Day, higher than when he took office. And despite signs of progress, the economy is still struggling after the worst recession in history.
Obama captured Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Virginia, New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada, seven of the nine states where the rivals and their allies poured nearly $1 billion into dueling television commercials.
Romney won North Carolina among the battleground states. Florida was too close to call, Obama leading narrowly in a state where there were still long lines of voters at some polling places long after the appointed closing time.
Romney, who grew wealthy in business and ran the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City before entering politics, spoke only briefly to supporters, some of whom wept.
"I so wish that I had been able to fulfill your hopes to lead the country in a different direction," he said. "But the nation chose another leader and so Ann and I join with you to earnestly pray for him and for this great nation."
There was no doubt about what drove voters to one candidate or the other.
About 4 in 10 said the economy is on the mend, but more than that said it was stagnant or getting worse more than four years after the near-collapse of 2008. The survey was conducted for The Associated Press and a group of television networks.
In the battle for the Senate, Elizabeth Warren turned Republican Scott Brown out of office in Massachusetts, and Rep. Joe Donnelly captured a seat from GOP hands in Indiana.
Deb Fischer picked up a seat for Republicans in Nebraska, defeating former Sen. Bob Kerrey.
In Maine, independent former Gov. Angus King was elected to succeed retiring GOP Sen. Olympia Snowe. He has not yet said which party he will side with, but Republicans attacked him in television advertising during the race, and Democrats rushed to his cause.
In the presidential race, Obama won in the reliably Democratic Northeast and West Coast. Pennsylvania was his, too, despite two late campaign stops by Romney.
Romney won most of the South as well as much of the Rocky Mountain West and Farm Belt.
The president was in Chicago as he awaited the voters' verdict on his four years in office. He told reporters he had a concession speech as well as victory remarks prepared. He congratulated Romney on a spirited campaign. "I know his supporters are just as engaged, just as enthusiastic and working just as hard today" as Obama's own, he added.
Romney reciprocated, congratulating the man who he had campaigned against for more than a year.
Earlier, he raced to Ohio and Pennsylvania for Election Day campaigning and projected confidence as he flew home to Massachusetts. "We fought to the very end, and I think that's why we'll be successful," he said, adding that he had finished writing a speech anticipating victory but nothing if the election went to his rival.
But the mood soured among the Republican high command as the votes came in and Obama ground out a lead in critical states.
Like Obama, Vice President Joe Biden was in Chicago as he waited to find out if he was in line for a second term. Republican running mate Paul Ryan was with Romney in Boston, although he kept one eye on his re-election campaign for a House seat in Wisconsin, just in case. He won re-election to Congress.
The long campaign's cost soared into the billions, much of it spent on negative ads, some harshly so.
In a months-long general election ad war that cost nearly $1 billion, Romney and Republican groups spent more than $550 million and Obama and his allies $381 million, according to organizations that track advertising.
According to the exit poll, 53 percent of voters said Obama was more in touch with people like them, compared to 43 percent for Romney.
About 60 percent said taxes should be increased, taking sides on an issue that divided the president and Romney. Obama wants to let taxes rise on upper incomes, while Romney does not.
Other than the battlegrounds, big states were virtually ignored in the final months of the campaign. Romney wrote off New York, Illinois and California, while Obama made no attempt to carry Texas, much of the South or the Rocky Mountain region other than Colorado.
There were 33 Senate seats on the ballot, 23 of them defended by Democrats and the rest by Republicans.
Democratic Rep. Chris Murphy, a Democrat, won a Connecticut seat long held by Sen. Joe Lieberman, retiring after a career that included a vice presidential spot on Al Gore's ticket in 2000. It was Republican Linda McMahon's second defeat in two tries, at a personal cost of $92 million.
The GOP needed a gain of three for a majority if Romney won, and four if Obama was re-elected. Neither Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada nor GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was on the ballot, but each had high stakes in the outcome.
All 435 House seats were on the ballot, including five where one lawmaker ran against another as a result of once-a-decade redistricting to take population shifts into account. Democrats needed to pick up 25 seats to gain the majority they lost two years ago.
House Speaker Boehner, R-Ohio, raised millions to finance get-out-the-vote operations in states without a robust presidential campaign, New York, Illinois and California among them. His goal was to minimize any losses, or possibly even gain ground, no matter Romney's fate. House Democratic leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California campaigned aggressively, as well, and faced an uncertain political future after her party failed to win control.
In gubernatorial races, Republicans picked up North Carolina, where Pat McCrory won easily. The incumbent, Democratic Gov. Bev Purdue, did not seek re-election.
In a campaign that traversed contested Republican primaries last winter and spring, a pair of political conventions this summer and three presidential debates, Obama, Romney, Biden and Ryan spoke at hundreds of rallies, were serenaded by Bruce Springstein and Meat Loaf and washed down hamburgers, pizza, barbecue and burrito bowls.
Obama was elected the first black president in 2008, and four years later, Romney became the first Mormon to appear on a general election ballot. Yet one man's race and the other's religion were never major factors in this year's campaign for the White House, a race dominated from the outset by the economy.
Over and over, Obama said that during his term the nation had begun to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression. While he conceded progress had been slow, he accused Romney of offering recycled Republican policies that have helped the wealthy and harmed the middle class in the past and would do so again.
Romney countered that a second Obama term could mean a repeat recession in a country where economic growth has been weak and unemployment is worse now than when the president was inaugurated. A wealthy former businessman, he claimed the knowledge and the skills to put in place policies that would make the economy healthy again.
In a race where the two men disagreed often, one of the principal fault lines was over taxes. Obama campaigned for the renewal of income tax cuts set to expire on Dec. 31 at all income levels except above $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples.
Romney said no one's taxes should go up in uncertain economic times. In addition, he proposed a 20 percent cut across the board in income tax rates but said he would end or curtail a variety of tax breaks to make sure federal deficits didn't rise.
The differences over taxes, the economy, Medicare, abortion and more were expressed in intensely negative advertising.
Obama launched first, shortly after Romney dispatched his Republican foes in his quest for the party nomination.
One memorable commercial showed Romney singing an off-key rendition of "America The Beautiful." Pictures and signs scrolled by saying that his companies had shipped jobs to Mexico and China, that Massachusetts state jobs had gone to India while he was governor and that he has personal investments in Switzerland, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
Romney spent less on advertising than Obama. A collection of outside groups made up the difference, some of them operating under rules that allowed donors to remain anonymous. Most of the ads were of the attack variety. But the Republican National Committee relied on one that had a far softer touch, and seemed aimed at voters who had been drawn to the excitement caused by Obama's first campaign. It referred to a growing national debt and unemployment, then said, "He tried. You tried. It's OK to make a change."
More than 30 million voters cast early ballots in nearly three dozen states, a reflection of the growing appeal of getting a jump on the traditional Election Day.
"This happened because of you. Thank you" Obama tweeted to supporters in celebration.
Romney telephoned the president, then spoke to disappointed supporters in Boston. In a graceful concession, he summoned all Americans to pray for Obama and urged the night's political winners to put partisan bickering aside and "reach across the aisle" to tackle the nation's problems.
After the costliest - and arguably the nastiest - campaign in history, divided government seemed alive and well.
Democrats retained control of the Senate with surprising ease. Republicans did the same in the House, ensuring that Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, Obama's partner in unsuccessful deficit talks, would reclaim his seat at the bargaining table.
At Obama headquarters in Chicago, a huge crowd gathered waving small American flags and cheering. Supporters hugged each other, danced and pumped their fists in the air. Excited crowds also gathered in New York's Times Square, at Faneuil Hall in Boston and near the White House in Washington, drivers joyfully honking as they passed by.
With returns from 79 percent of the nation's precincts, Obama had 52.2 million, 49.5 percent. Romney had 51.7 million, 49 percent.
And the president's laserlike focus on the battleground states allowed him to run up a 303-203 margin in the competition for electoral votes, where the White House is won or lost. It took 270 to win.
The election emerged as a choice between two very different visions of government - whether it occupies a major, front-row place in American lives or is in the background as a less-obtrusive facilitator for private enterprise and entrepreneurship.
The economy was rated the top issue by about 60 percent of voters surveyed as they left their polling places. But more said former President George W. Bush bore responsibility for current circumstances than Obama did after nearly four years in office.
That boded well for the president, who had worked to turn the election into a choice between his proposals and Romney's, rather than a simple referendum on the economy during his time in the White House.
Unemployment stood at 7.9 percent on Election Day, higher than when he took office. And despite signs of progress, the economy is still struggling after the worst recession in history.
Obama captured Ohio, Wisconsin, Iowa, Virginia, New Hampshire, Colorado and Nevada, seven of the nine states where the rivals and their allies poured nearly $1 billion into dueling television commercials.
Romney won North Carolina among the battleground states. Florida was too close to call, Obama leading narrowly in a state where there were still long lines of voters at some polling places long after the appointed closing time.
Romney, who grew wealthy in business and ran the 2002 Olympic Games in Salt Lake City before entering politics, spoke only briefly to supporters, some of whom wept.
"I so wish that I had been able to fulfill your hopes to lead the country in a different direction," he said. "But the nation chose another leader and so Ann and I join with you to earnestly pray for him and for this great nation."
There was no doubt about what drove voters to one candidate or the other.
About 4 in 10 said the economy is on the mend, but more than that said it was stagnant or getting worse more than four years after the near-collapse of 2008. The survey was conducted for The Associated Press and a group of television networks.
In the battle for the Senate, Elizabeth Warren turned Republican Scott Brown out of office in Massachusetts, and Rep. Joe Donnelly captured a seat from GOP hands in Indiana.
Deb Fischer picked up a seat for Republicans in Nebraska, defeating former Sen. Bob Kerrey.
In Maine, independent former Gov. Angus King was elected to succeed retiring GOP Sen. Olympia Snowe. He has not yet said which party he will side with, but Republicans attacked him in television advertising during the race, and Democrats rushed to his cause.
In the presidential race, Obama won in the reliably Democratic Northeast and West Coast. Pennsylvania was his, too, despite two late campaign stops by Romney.
Romney won most of the South as well as much of the Rocky Mountain West and Farm Belt.
The president was in Chicago as he awaited the voters' verdict on his four years in office. He told reporters he had a concession speech as well as victory remarks prepared. He congratulated Romney on a spirited campaign. "I know his supporters are just as engaged, just as enthusiastic and working just as hard today" as Obama's own, he added.
Romney reciprocated, congratulating the man who he had campaigned against for more than a year.
Earlier, he raced to Ohio and Pennsylvania for Election Day campaigning and projected confidence as he flew home to Massachusetts. "We fought to the very end, and I think that's why we'll be successful," he said, adding that he had finished writing a speech anticipating victory but nothing if the election went to his rival.
But the mood soured among the Republican high command as the votes came in and Obama ground out a lead in critical states.
Like Obama, Vice President Joe Biden was in Chicago as he waited to find out if he was in line for a second term. Republican running mate Paul Ryan was with Romney in Boston, although he kept one eye on his re-election campaign for a House seat in Wisconsin, just in case. He won re-election to Congress.
The long campaign's cost soared into the billions, much of it spent on negative ads, some harshly so.
In a months-long general election ad war that cost nearly $1 billion, Romney and Republican groups spent more than $550 million and Obama and his allies $381 million, according to organizations that track advertising.
According to the exit poll, 53 percent of voters said Obama was more in touch with people like them, compared to 43 percent for Romney.
About 60 percent said taxes should be increased, taking sides on an issue that divided the president and Romney. Obama wants to let taxes rise on upper incomes, while Romney does not.
Other than the battlegrounds, big states were virtually ignored in the final months of the campaign. Romney wrote off New York, Illinois and California, while Obama made no attempt to carry Texas, much of the South or the Rocky Mountain region other than Colorado.
There were 33 Senate seats on the ballot, 23 of them defended by Democrats and the rest by Republicans.
Democratic Rep. Chris Murphy, a Democrat, won a Connecticut seat long held by Sen. Joe Lieberman, retiring after a career that included a vice presidential spot on Al Gore's ticket in 2000. It was Republican Linda McMahon's second defeat in two tries, at a personal cost of $92 million.
The GOP needed a gain of three for a majority if Romney won, and four if Obama was re-elected. Neither Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada nor GOP leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky was on the ballot, but each had high stakes in the outcome.
All 435 House seats were on the ballot, including five where one lawmaker ran against another as a result of once-a-decade redistricting to take population shifts into account. Democrats needed to pick up 25 seats to gain the majority they lost two years ago.
House Speaker Boehner, R-Ohio, raised millions to finance get-out-the-vote operations in states without a robust presidential campaign, New York, Illinois and California among them. His goal was to minimize any losses, or possibly even gain ground, no matter Romney's fate. House Democratic leader Rep. Nancy Pelosi of California campaigned aggressively, as well, and faced an uncertain political future after her party failed to win control.
In gubernatorial races, Republicans picked up North Carolina, where Pat McCrory won easily. The incumbent, Democratic Gov. Bev Purdue, did not seek re-election.
In a campaign that traversed contested Republican primaries last winter and spring, a pair of political conventions this summer and three presidential debates, Obama, Romney, Biden and Ryan spoke at hundreds of rallies, were serenaded by Bruce Springstein and Meat Loaf and washed down hamburgers, pizza, barbecue and burrito bowls.
Obama was elected the first black president in 2008, and four years later, Romney became the first Mormon to appear on a general election ballot. Yet one man's race and the other's religion were never major factors in this year's campaign for the White House, a race dominated from the outset by the economy.
Over and over, Obama said that during his term the nation had begun to recover from the worst recession since the Great Depression. While he conceded progress had been slow, he accused Romney of offering recycled Republican policies that have helped the wealthy and harmed the middle class in the past and would do so again.
Romney countered that a second Obama term could mean a repeat recession in a country where economic growth has been weak and unemployment is worse now than when the president was inaugurated. A wealthy former businessman, he claimed the knowledge and the skills to put in place policies that would make the economy healthy again.
In a race where the two men disagreed often, one of the principal fault lines was over taxes. Obama campaigned for the renewal of income tax cuts set to expire on Dec. 31 at all income levels except above $200,000 for individuals and $250,000 for couples.
Romney said no one's taxes should go up in uncertain economic times. In addition, he proposed a 20 percent cut across the board in income tax rates but said he would end or curtail a variety of tax breaks to make sure federal deficits didn't rise.
The differences over taxes, the economy, Medicare, abortion and more were expressed in intensely negative advertising.
Obama launched first, shortly after Romney dispatched his Republican foes in his quest for the party nomination.
One memorable commercial showed Romney singing an off-key rendition of "America The Beautiful." Pictures and signs scrolled by saying that his companies had shipped jobs to Mexico and China, that Massachusetts state jobs had gone to India while he was governor and that he has personal investments in Switzerland, Bermuda and the Cayman Islands.
Romney spent less on advertising than Obama. A collection of outside groups made up the difference, some of them operating under rules that allowed donors to remain anonymous. Most of the ads were of the attack variety. But the Republican National Committee relied on one that had a far softer touch, and seemed aimed at voters who had been drawn to the excitement caused by Obama's first campaign. It referred to a growing national debt and unemployment, then said, "He tried. You tried. It's OK to make a change."
More than 30 million voters cast early ballots in nearly three dozen states, a reflection of the growing appeal of getting a jump on the traditional Election Day.
In the spirit of reaching across the aisle and trying to make peace after such a hard-fought election, I just want to say to all the Romney supporters out there that I sincerely appreciate how you feel...I know what it feels like to sit helplessly as the country re-elects the other guy and wonder WTF is wrong with people?
Â
I empathize with you, and I can assure you that although four years seems like an unbearable amount of time from where you sit today, before you know it 2016 will be here and you'll have another shot at electing your guy whoever that may be.
Â
For what it's worth just know this....as your stomach turns thinking about 4 more years, as your head pounds, as your blood pressure elevates.....I will be laughing at you. I will be laughing my ass off AT you. I will be basking in the delight of knowing that you will wake up every morning for the next one thousand four hundred and sixty days bemoaning the fact that Obama is still president.
Â
God bless America!
 @Solipsist01 You apparently enjoy being an obnoxious child and being the epitome of a small-minded arse. Congratulations on your new low.
 @mikew Your juvenile name calling and hysterical lack of perspective only detract from those valid points that you may have. You can do better.
@mikew @Solipsist01 You had to expect these kind of comments after such a bitter,nasty race.While I'm still on a high from last night.I can see how many liberals feel after reading nothing but hate and vitriol for this President for the last 5 years on this forum.
@mikew I'm curious what is behind your motivation to take it upon yourself to be the de facto moderator of this forum? You might consider trying to come to terms that you can't control what everyone says on a forum that you are not the owner of.You might consider starting up a blog yourself so you can make the rules.Who knows,you might end up getting famous like Brietbart.
 @whirledworld Criticism of the past gloating in victory, the personal vitriol toward President Obama (as distinct from disagreement with his policy choices) and the "opposition is evil" hyperbole that we hear from hyper-partisan Republicans is very well deserved. However, that is not a license for Obama supporters to engage in similar behaviors - in this case, gloating and the "opposition is evil" from Obama supporters.
Such behavior contributes to the uncompromising bitterness and partisan rancor that is poisoning our nation.
 @mikew  @noneofyourbizzness point worthwhile being mentioned
 @noneofyourbizzness By the way, I wonder if you have yet acknowledged your own hypocrisy in support of Solipsist01 posts. Or are you simply another bitter partisan who contributes to what you pretend to condemn?
 @noneofyourbizzness While it's understandable, it's still wrong. Not only is it rude but it exacerbates the bitterness and the uncompromising partisanship that many of these same people claim to dislike.
@mikew....thank you...I've been working on it.
Almost time for the crying to begin..............Funny thing is that all those Freeloaders will be just as SOL as those who cannot afford to pay for everybody's health care Tax in a few short yrs.......It will be too late to Draw and Quarter all those involved in Fostering this disaster on the US taxpayers when the Economy collapses....from Obamcare........Hope all You people who voted this Terrorist in office starve to death before I do.....
 @Glenn Pierce I'm not a fan of President Obama either but is all the hyperbole necessary? It strikes me as way over the top.
@mikew...you don't watch Fox News much, do you. Those people live and breath hyperbole.
@Morgan/Wilson2012 @mikew The aftermath is almost more delicious. http://www.forbes.com/fdc/welcome_mjx.shtml http://www.forbes.com/sites/helaineolen/2012/11/08/mitt-romneys-campaign-cancels-staffers-credit-cards-in-the-middle-of-the-night/ http://www.dailykos.com/story/2012/11/08/1159254/-How-the-Secret-Service-Said-Goodbye-to-Mitt-Romney http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/08/megyn-kelly-karl-rove-obama_n_2094796.html?1352412297&ncid=edlinkusaolp00000009
Contacted
@mikew Have you can't acted the KATU webmaster to voice your concern?Perhaps they can off you a job as moderator.That way you can personally delete the comments that don't past muster to you.
 @mikew  @noneofyourbizzness Liberal Dems have earned the right to gloat. Rubbing the Tea Party's nose in the heaping pile of paranoid hyperbole they've been spewing since Obama took office is WAAAAAY over due.
 @noneofyourbizzness And your defense of obnoxious gloating behavior in no way contributes to that nastiness? You seem to relish hypocrisy.
 @noneofyourbizzness It is occasionally worth an attempt to raise the level of discourse when I have the free time available. Usually, I simply lack the time to do so.
And no, I'm not a monitor for KATU. Indeed, it seems KATU hasn't bothered cleaning up their forums in quite a long time. Perhaps they've found a way to make money by allowing trolls to infest their site?
oh, I've GOT to check that forum out.....thanks for the tip.
@Solipsist01 I was talking to Mikew.He has been on here scolding *everybody*.It was a ugly nasty election.Its to be expected.Even over at the CBN (pat Robertson ) forum has turned ugly.Thats just the way politics have become in this country.
@noneofyourbizzness....now THAT is funny....maybe they'll hire me on once my term is up.
@mikew @Solipsist01 Are you a payed KATU monitor? This forum has been a crap pile for a long time.Why are you upset about it now?
though I appreciate the comparison I cannot begin to emulate the level of idiocy that Fox has mastered....though I will not give up trying.
 @Solipsist01 Your comments on this forum suggest that they are not alone in doing so. Have you perchance looked into a mirror lately?
What's that German word that means taking pleasure in someone elses suffering?....I can't remember but whatever it is I'm feeling it right now after reading your post.
 @Solipsist01 Did your parents not teach you how to be a graceful winner?
@Morgan/Wilson2012 @mikew You cant even make this baloney up.It's priceless. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ApoP-qxCN-k http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=2H0IMOIgfj0
@Morgan/Wilson2012 @mikew the term "school marm" comes to mind.
 @mikew Your pathetic attempt to always have the last word and liberally peppering condescension upon others deserves contempt. Did you just learn the word "boorish?" You seem to be pretty fond of it. Gold Star!
@mikew....I find your posts much more enjoyable if I imagine you wearing a top hat and a monacle.
 @Solipsist01 Your boorish behavior richly deserves contempt. Congratulations on being an arse.
@mikew....yes they did but under the circumstances I have decided instead to grab Romney supporters by the scruff of their necks and drive their faces into a huge pile of crap.
Ok, everyone. Just stop, relax, and take a Valium (or 2).If you all take your valium you might stop fighting and get along enough to move on. Sound like a bunch of bratts going at eachothers throats!
@iamtroglodite How about smoking a bowl?
Here's the graph of employment over every recession since WWII.
Â
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-sPfziaoh_zk/UJO_Ko1jN_I/AAAAAAAAUhY/h8gK1lomSwI/s1600/JobLossOct2012.jpg
Â
Given the trend line, yes I AM looking forward to 4 more years. Â
Questions to ask now.
Will Food Stamp spending double again in 4 years under our Food Stamp President?
Will more than 1/6th of the population be exempt (are now) from Obamacare in 4 years?
Will gas prices be $10 / gallon in 4 years because of coal regulations?
Will (bankrupt) "green" energy schemes be invested in again?
NICE PICÂ ........LMAO......
 @TimBurr I have to laugh at the comments you're garnering, sir. Honestly--who knows? I'd love to believe it really was only needing four more years, but the pattern suggests the complete opposite. Time will tell. Even though the libs have ridiculed me for it on this board--because after all, we're going to prosper in another four years time-- I am very glad I know basic skills like cooking and baking with and without recipes, how to sew, knit, and the like, as well as animal husbandry and human medicine, so that if something bad does happen, I can help me and mine. Unlike the liberals, who will likely go extinct with the grocery stores and clothing shops if the economy fails. I quoted the ant and the grasshopper--people who play in the summer sun with no concern for the fact excess can only be eclipsed by famine and austerity. We'll see what Obama is truly made of now that he has no need to worry about campaigning for re-election in another four years...and if his minions are still so adulating and adoring once they realize he's not out for anyone but himself.
 @MissLissaJ  @TimBurr " Unlike the liberals..."
Â
And there you have it. Â You think in caricatures and generalizations, expect to be taken seriously, then profess shock and umbrage when you're not.
Â
Not much of a surprise there.
 @TimBurr Gas prices are lower now than they were during the Bush administration in 2008.
 @pdxd Nov. 3, 2008âU.S. Gas prices drop to $1.72 a gallon
Â
Right now regular is at $3.60 and has been above $3 for a long time - 2 years. FAIL !
Â
http://ycharts.com/indicators/gas_price
 @TimBurr  @pdxd High gas prices are one of the main reasons we need to develop green energy strategies. You can't power everything forever on finite resources. Better we invest the money and energy into new technologies before China, an ACTUAL Communist state, does and kick our butt.
 @TimBurr Well, since we don't have a Republican in the White House to spend us into oblivion in order to fight a war to avenge his daddy, a healthcare system which forces folks into bankruptcy if they aren't able to land a job with a decent insurance plan and happen to get sick (or have a spouse or child get sick), a Vice President who was a former CEO of the oil company which profited from the aforementioned blunder-fest of a war, or a senate which sides with flat-earthers and creationists who insist that excessive carbon dioxide in the atmosphere doesn't cause the planet's temperature to rise, I'd say we'll do juuuuuuuuust fine. I'd also look into those "failed" green jobs you mentioned; China's investing in solar/green technology and if you don't want to live in a Marxist state I'd suggest we invest more money and manpower into these industries to give us the better edge. In the 1970's the gov't subsidized large parts of the semiconductor industry to get us out ahead of the Japanese, but I guess you're right, that was a terrible mistake from which the United States and the world has suffered terribly.
 @Morgan/Wilson2012 Yea that whole "green" initiative thing was such a success.
Take the blinders off please.
Â
http://www.dividedstates.com/list-of-failed-obama-green-energy-solar-companies/
All the negative comments by Democrats calling Republicans names and all the negative comments by Republicans calling Democrats names is sad. It's not a question of which party is better, but how to make America better. What to do to come together and work for that goal. Your name calling and bashing each other defeats that purpose and divides the nation further. How many of you work with or have friends or relatives from a different political party? Does being in a different party make that friend or relative a bad person? How many of you would call names to people of other parties names to their faces instead of while sitting behind a computer screen? Not many I'd guess. If this nation doesn't work together and compromise it will fail. Before any of you partisan people out there start pointing fingers saying it's "the other sides fault", it's easy to find many many examples of where both side obstructed and refused to work with the other. It starts with us, the common voter. If we act like we have all seen the past few months with the calling names and bitterness, how can anyone expect more of the people we sent to represent us in Washington D.C.?Â
This comment has been deleted
 @Solipsist01 You just proved my point. Great job.
 @Solipsist01 Apparently you have nothing better to do than troll. How sad for you.
with a courrupt and dishonest press providing protection and promotion, the American people bought it again....................hook line and sinker.
Like Harvey below said robby, "Let the whining begin".
@usa2swimpattycrabby ,,,,,,,not whining patty. Fact !
 @usa2swimpattycrabby That's a rather boorish comment. Didn't your parents ever teach you about graceful winners and good losers?