Feisty Clinton: We're strengthening embassy security

WASHINGTON (AP) - Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton delivered fiery rejoinders Wednesday to Republican critics of the Obama administration's handling of the deadly attack on a U.S. mission in Benghazi, facing off with lawmakers who included potential 2016 presidential rivals.
At times emotional and frequently combative, Clinton rejected GOP suggestions in two congressional hearings that the administration tried to mislead the country about the Sept. 11 attack that killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans. She insisted the State Department is moving swiftly and aggressively to strengthen security at diplomatic posts worldwide.
In her last formal testimony before Congress as America's top diplomat - but perhaps not her last time on the political stage - Clinton once again took responsibility for the department's missteps and failures leading up to the assault. But she also said that requests for more security at the diplomatic mission in Benghazi didn't reach her desk, and reminded lawmakers that they have a responsibility to fund security-related budget requests.
Three weeks after her release from a New York hospital - admitted for complications after a concussion - Clinton was at times defiant, complimentary and willing to chastise lawmakers during more than 5 ½ hours of testimony before two separate committees. She tangled with some who could be rivals in 2016 if she decides to seek the presidency again.
Her voice cracking at one point, Clinton said the attack and the aftermath were highly personal tragedies for the families of the victims who died - Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty - as well as herself.
"I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews. I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters and the wives left alone to raise their children," she told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at a packed hearing.
Clearly annoyed with Republican complaints about the initial explanation for the attack, she rose to the defense of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, who was vilified for widely debunked claims five days after the attack that protests precipitated the raid rather than terrorism.
Clinton said, "People were trying in real time to get to the best information." And she said her own focus was on looking ahead on how to improve security rather than revisiting the talking points and Rice's comments.
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pressed her on why "we were misled that there were supposedly protests and something sprang out of that, an assault sprang out of that."
"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans," she said, her voice rising and quivering with anger as she and Johnson spoke over each other.
"Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided they would go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."
If Johnson's comments drew an irritated response from Clinton, she notably ignored Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., when he said he would have fired her if he had been in charge and found that she had not read cables from her team in Libya asking for more security. Paul is a potential 2016 presidential candidate.
"Had I been president and found you did not read the cables from Benghazi and from Ambassador Stevens, I would have relieved you of your post," Paul said. "I think it's inexcusable."
Clinton and other officials have testified that requests for additional security did not reach her level, and a scathing independent review of the matter sharply criticized four senior State Department officials who have been relieved of their duties.
"I did not see these requests. They did not come to me. I did not approve them. I did not deny them," she said.
Later, before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Republican Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina repeatedly challenged Clinton's claim to have looked at the tragedy with "clear eyes," saying she should have personally ensured security at the mission.
He said Clinton had "let the consulate become a death trap" in denying requests for additional security and called it "malpractice."
Clinton said she could have let the review board's report remain classified and told Congress "goodbye" before leaving office. But she said, it's "not who I am. It's not what I do."
Absent from the Senate hearing was Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the man tapped to succeed Clinton, who is leaving the administration after four years. Kerry, defeated by George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election, is expected to win swift Senate approval. Clinton is to introduce him at his confirmation hearing on Thursday.
Politics play an outsized role in any appearance by Clinton, who was defeated by Barack Obama in a hard-fought battle for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. She is the subject of constant speculation about a possible bid in 2016.
A former New York senator and the wife of former President Bill Clinton, she is a polarizing figure but is ending her tenure at the State Department with high favorability ratings. A poll last month by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found 65 percent of Americans held a favorable impression of her, compared with 29 percent unfavorable.
On the panel at the Senate hearing were two possible 2016 Republican presidential candidates - Florida's Marco Rubio and Paul, a new member of the committee - as well as John McCain of Arizona, who was defeated by Obama in November 2008.
Clinton, 65, did little to quiet the presidential chatter earlier this month when she returned to work after her hospitalization. On the subject of retirement, she said, "I don't know if that is a word I would use, but certainly stepping off the very fast track for a little while."
In a second round of questioning on Wednesday, Clinton testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee where Republican members pressed her on why cables and other memos about security deficiencies in Benghazi seemed to be ignored.
"The dots here were connected ahead of time. The State Department saw this was coming," said Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the panel. "The State Department didn't act."
Clinton told senators the department is implementing the 29 recommendations of the review board and going beyond the proposals, with a special focus on high-threat posts.
"Nobody is more committed to getting this right," she said. "I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure."
Clinton had been due to testify in December but postponed her appearances after fainting, falling and suffering a concussion while recovering from a stomach virus that left her severely dehydrated. She was then diagnosed with a blood clot near her brain and returned to work only on Jan. 7.
She won bipartisan well-wishes on her recovery, but while Democrats were quick to praise her for accomplishments as secretary of state, Republicans then hit her with withering criticism.
"It's wonderful to see you in good health and combative as ever," said McCain.
But in the same breath, he dismissed her explanation of events, the administration's response to warnings about the deteriorating security situation in Libya and even the attention paid to Libya after rebels toppled Moammar Gadhafi. "The answers, frankly, that you've given this morning are not satisfactory to me," McCain said.
To McCain, a friend that Clinton served with in the Senate, she replied matter-of-factly: "We just have a disagreement. We have a disagreement about what did happen and when it happened with respect to explaining the sequence of events."
Some Democrats raised the point that Congress had cut funding for embassy security.
"We have to get our act together," she told the panels, chiding House GOP members for recently stripping $1 billion in security aid from the hurricane relief bill and the Senate panel for failing for years to produce a spending authorization bill.
In something of a valedictory, Clinton noted her robust itinerary in four years and her work, nearly 1 million miles and 112 countries.
"My faith in our country and our future is stronger than ever. Every time that blue and white airplane carrying the words "United States of America" touches down in some far-off capital, I feel again the honor it is to represent the world's indispensable nation. And I am confident that, with your help, we will continue to keep the United States safe, strong, and exceptional."
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., expressed incredulity that the independent review board did not interview Clinton for its extensive report. She also complained about the department's "false narrative" that four employees lost their jobs over the attack.
"There's just been a shuffling of the deck chairs," said Ros-Lehtinen.
Clinton said earlier that she was not asked to speak to the review board but would have been available. She said the four employees have been removed from their jobs and have been placed on administrative leave, but federal rules prevent the department from taking more drastic steps.
Her testimony followed more than three months of Republican charges that the Obama administration ignored signs of a deteriorating security situation and cast an act of terrorism as mere protests over an anti-Muslim video in the heat of a presidential election. U.S. officials suspect that militants linked to al-Qaida carried out the attack.
At times emotional and frequently combative, Clinton rejected GOP suggestions in two congressional hearings that the administration tried to mislead the country about the Sept. 11 attack that killed Chris Stevens, the U.S. ambassador to Libya, and three other Americans. She insisted the State Department is moving swiftly and aggressively to strengthen security at diplomatic posts worldwide.
In her last formal testimony before Congress as America's top diplomat - but perhaps not her last time on the political stage - Clinton once again took responsibility for the department's missteps and failures leading up to the assault. But she also said that requests for more security at the diplomatic mission in Benghazi didn't reach her desk, and reminded lawmakers that they have a responsibility to fund security-related budget requests.
Three weeks after her release from a New York hospital - admitted for complications after a concussion - Clinton was at times defiant, complimentary and willing to chastise lawmakers during more than 5 ½ hours of testimony before two separate committees. She tangled with some who could be rivals in 2016 if she decides to seek the presidency again.
Her voice cracking at one point, Clinton said the attack and the aftermath were highly personal tragedies for the families of the victims who died - Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty - as well as herself.
"I stood next to President Obama as the Marines carried those flag-draped caskets off the plane at Andrews. I put my arms around the mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, sons and daughters and the wives left alone to raise their children," she told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee at a packed hearing.
Clearly annoyed with Republican complaints about the initial explanation for the attack, she rose to the defense of U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice, who was vilified for widely debunked claims five days after the attack that protests precipitated the raid rather than terrorism.
Clinton said, "People were trying in real time to get to the best information." And she said her own focus was on looking ahead on how to improve security rather than revisiting the talking points and Rice's comments.
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., pressed her on why "we were misled that there were supposedly protests and something sprang out of that, an assault sprang out of that."
"With all due respect, the fact is we had four dead Americans," she said, her voice rising and quivering with anger as she and Johnson spoke over each other.
"Was it because of a protest? Or was it because of guys out for a walk one night decided they would go kill some Americans? What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."
If Johnson's comments drew an irritated response from Clinton, she notably ignored Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., when he said he would have fired her if he had been in charge and found that she had not read cables from her team in Libya asking for more security. Paul is a potential 2016 presidential candidate.
"Had I been president and found you did not read the cables from Benghazi and from Ambassador Stevens, I would have relieved you of your post," Paul said. "I think it's inexcusable."
Clinton and other officials have testified that requests for additional security did not reach her level, and a scathing independent review of the matter sharply criticized four senior State Department officials who have been relieved of their duties.
"I did not see these requests. They did not come to me. I did not approve them. I did not deny them," she said.
Later, before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Republican Rep. Jeff Duncan of South Carolina repeatedly challenged Clinton's claim to have looked at the tragedy with "clear eyes," saying she should have personally ensured security at the mission.
He said Clinton had "let the consulate become a death trap" in denying requests for additional security and called it "malpractice."
Clinton said she could have let the review board's report remain classified and told Congress "goodbye" before leaving office. But she said, it's "not who I am. It's not what I do."
Absent from the Senate hearing was Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., the man tapped to succeed Clinton, who is leaving the administration after four years. Kerry, defeated by George W. Bush in the 2004 presidential election, is expected to win swift Senate approval. Clinton is to introduce him at his confirmation hearing on Thursday.
Politics play an outsized role in any appearance by Clinton, who was defeated by Barack Obama in a hard-fought battle for the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination. She is the subject of constant speculation about a possible bid in 2016.
A former New York senator and the wife of former President Bill Clinton, she is a polarizing figure but is ending her tenure at the State Department with high favorability ratings. A poll last month by the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press found 65 percent of Americans held a favorable impression of her, compared with 29 percent unfavorable.
On the panel at the Senate hearing were two possible 2016 Republican presidential candidates - Florida's Marco Rubio and Paul, a new member of the committee - as well as John McCain of Arizona, who was defeated by Obama in November 2008.
Clinton, 65, did little to quiet the presidential chatter earlier this month when she returned to work after her hospitalization. On the subject of retirement, she said, "I don't know if that is a word I would use, but certainly stepping off the very fast track for a little while."
In a second round of questioning on Wednesday, Clinton testified before the House Foreign Affairs Committee where Republican members pressed her on why cables and other memos about security deficiencies in Benghazi seemed to be ignored.
"The dots here were connected ahead of time. The State Department saw this was coming," said Rep. Ed Royce, R-Calif., the chairman of the panel. "The State Department didn't act."
Clinton told senators the department is implementing the 29 recommendations of the review board and going beyond the proposals, with a special focus on high-threat posts.
"Nobody is more committed to getting this right," she said. "I am determined to leave the State Department and our country safer, stronger, and more secure."
Clinton had been due to testify in December but postponed her appearances after fainting, falling and suffering a concussion while recovering from a stomach virus that left her severely dehydrated. She was then diagnosed with a blood clot near her brain and returned to work only on Jan. 7.
She won bipartisan well-wishes on her recovery, but while Democrats were quick to praise her for accomplishments as secretary of state, Republicans then hit her with withering criticism.
"It's wonderful to see you in good health and combative as ever," said McCain.
But in the same breath, he dismissed her explanation of events, the administration's response to warnings about the deteriorating security situation in Libya and even the attention paid to Libya after rebels toppled Moammar Gadhafi. "The answers, frankly, that you've given this morning are not satisfactory to me," McCain said.
To McCain, a friend that Clinton served with in the Senate, she replied matter-of-factly: "We just have a disagreement. We have a disagreement about what did happen and when it happened with respect to explaining the sequence of events."
Some Democrats raised the point that Congress had cut funding for embassy security.
"We have to get our act together," she told the panels, chiding House GOP members for recently stripping $1 billion in security aid from the hurricane relief bill and the Senate panel for failing for years to produce a spending authorization bill.
In something of a valedictory, Clinton noted her robust itinerary in four years and her work, nearly 1 million miles and 112 countries.
"My faith in our country and our future is stronger than ever. Every time that blue and white airplane carrying the words "United States of America" touches down in some far-off capital, I feel again the honor it is to represent the world's indispensable nation. And I am confident that, with your help, we will continue to keep the United States safe, strong, and exceptional."
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla., expressed incredulity that the independent review board did not interview Clinton for its extensive report. She also complained about the department's "false narrative" that four employees lost their jobs over the attack.
"There's just been a shuffling of the deck chairs," said Ros-Lehtinen.
Clinton said earlier that she was not asked to speak to the review board but would have been available. She said the four employees have been removed from their jobs and have been placed on administrative leave, but federal rules prevent the department from taking more drastic steps.
Her testimony followed more than three months of Republican charges that the Obama administration ignored signs of a deteriorating security situation and cast an act of terrorism as mere protests over an anti-Muslim video in the heat of a presidential election. U.S. officials suspect that militants linked to al-Qaida carried out the attack.
Okay, next let's get Eric Withholder to testify about fast and furious. Oh yeah, that won't happen. Obozo doesn't want any more info to get out about the very guns he wants to ban that were allowed to be turned loose to the criminals. Yes Obama Administration you have transparency. I see right through you. Carry on Hil!
How can you tell when a politician is lying? Their lips are moving.
Good job. Closing the barn door after the horses are DEAD.
At least she has the balls to go it alone unlike the village idiot during the 911 hearings. He had to have 5 time deferment dick with him during questioning !
Kudos to this gentleman from Portland!! Â https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10151236762101275&set=a.180479986274.135777.177486166274&type=1&theater
More skirting the issue and crocodile tears. A Clinton being sincere and forthright? Gimme a friggin' break.
When the questions got tough, Hillary threw a little temper tantrum. It was like 'how dare you question me about this'. Not once did she answer any questions with any creditability.  Now that her political career is in the crapper, with no future, maybe she should admit her incompetence.
As if Mrs. Bill Clinton needed another one, Rand Paul ripped her a brand new one anyway. Great job Paul. That's the way to put someone in their place that's done a miserable job. She should have been fired. What a lying hypocrite. Any one can see time after time where she stated that a "video" was to blame.  She even told one of the fathers of one of the murdered men that the person responsible for "the video" will be punished. Liar. Liberal. Â
@last boyscout Rand Paul has never even held a post near or equal to that of Secretary of State or ever will.If he was President? It will never happenThis is like a a Pre K kid talking about knowing more than the Principal- when they dont even know anything close to their teachers. If he wants to be President he should stop emulating Sarah Palin for starters.Besides he failed to understand that he was talking to our next President.The Republican Party is becoming more irrelevant by the minute.
 @noneofyourbizzness  @last Hillary Clinton isn't that great. We are going to be pretty relevant in 2016.
@sargerator LOL did you just compare them to Hitler? Seriously?
@sargerator Psssh so what. Clearly you didn't listen to Obama's inaugural speech.
@TreeWizard @Sundowner @badcatÂ
Â
 "Bush was not really religiously vocal I felt "WTW ???
Â
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2005/oct/07/iraq.usa
@TreeWizard @badcat Â
Â
WTW ?? So thats what hitler was ? Just a believer ? WOW !
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @Sundowner Not by me.
@TreeWizard @Sundowner Bill Clinton is one of the most admired,popular Presidents in modern history.
 @TreeWizard Now THAT'S funny!  I had my youngest child that year!
 @Sundowner No. From reading he seemed like one to me. I also have heard a lot of democrats that weren't happy with him. Don't get me wrong he seems like a great guy. Unlike Bill Clinton.
 @TreeWizard Ahhh...I admire the work he's done since leaving the Presidency.  His humanitarian efforts are to be respected, IMO.  Were you even alive when he was President?
Â
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @Sundowner  @badcat Because he is a P*ssy.
@TreeWizard @Sundowner @badcat President Carter is a very devout Christians yet the right wingers hate him with a passion.
 @TreeWizard Very well said.  Your distinction between Republican and Republican't is noticeable.  That's probably why you and I have settled into a decent series of conversations and I sincerely appreciate that.
 @Sundowner  @badcat Mmm, I think you will see a difference this election. Bush was not really religiously vocal I felt, and after he left office the Republican party has been soul searching;which, has brought out some religiously vocal people.
 @TreeWizard  @badcat I'm OK with that....that's a "to each his own" thing.  It's the extremists that scare off the majority of us and they are VERY vocal in your party.  I would suggest they've hijacked your party and left "normal" religious people in the dust. Â
 @Sundowner  @badcat NOT say he is a greatest by any stretch.
 @Sundowner  @badcat Some of are greatest Presidents have been pretty Religious people. Obama is religious.Â
 @Sundowner  @badcat Genuinely good post. "We don't want to hear people insulting Hispanics (any illegal I will) because some 'might' have entered the country illegally." Won't follow that. I see what you are saying. several of the top points I dealt with the same thing under Bush. I guess it just comes down to what you think is right and wrong, that's why we have two different parties with two different ideas. And yes am pro-choice and pro-gay marriage and I am a Republican not a Republican't.
 @TreeWizard  @badcat I'm entirely non-religious, but seriously, is that who you want leading our country?  Someone who actually believes that kind of stuff?  I'm not bad-mouthing Mormons any more than I would Scientologists or the Westboro Baptist Church (OK, they suck), but when zealotry rears its head (think of snake handlers), is that who people want?  That's just downright scary to me.  A person that believes certain underwear is "special" or whose intelligence tells them that holding poisonous snakes will get them into "heaven" is whack.  The far right wing of the Republican party is teeming with them. Â
 @TreeWizard  @badcat Here's one of the areas I see where major problems exist for the Republican party:  They (not necessarily you) don't "get" who's out here.  We're plain old folk who want safe, healthy, prosperous lives for ourselves and our children/loved ones.  We don't want to be blasted with vitriol every time we turn on the news....we don't want to hear whack jobs (birthers for starters) on FoxNews blathering crazy talk, conspiracy theories, rhetorical talking points whenever the President reads a speech from a teleprompter.  We want decent health care without anyone telling us we have a magical trap door in our vagina to prevent pregnancy from 'legitimate' rapes.  We want acceptance and respect for our gay family members/friends.  We want our parents/grandparents to be comfortable and not scrape to get their meds.  We don't want to hear people insulting Hispanics because some 'might' have entered the country illegally.  Many of us belong to unions that have made our work life bearable and we don't want that infringed on.  In other words, just as in relationships, marriage, work, play, we want to feel like we matter.  We don't feel that when backs are turned on our wants and needs. Â
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @badcat OK I lied I did.
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @badcat I didn't bring him up.
@TreeWizard @badcat Why are we even talking about Romney at this point? He is just a irrelevant after thought who is quickly fading into obscurity.
 @badcat "who believes that he's going to get his own planet someday, that the Garden of Eden was located in Missouri, and that Joseph Smith read golden plates out of a hat with magic stones." that is not religious extremism. That is just what he believes.
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @badcat He wasn't a Religious extremist.Â
 @TreeWizard Only if you're a racist. Crazy =/= Black. How can you not understand the difference between race and religious extremism?!? See, this is why I told you that you need to do A LOT of research before you form an opinion. I'm not sure you even understand the terminology.
@TreeWizard @badcat And he couldn't even get his facts right.
@TreeWizard @last I didn't say "ruled" I said "influenced" You obviously didn't get it this last election.Women voters rejected the Republican Party in huge numbers because of the remarks by the religious kooks in your party.Also they need to get off of their anti-gay bandwagon if they expect to remain even somewhat relevant.The voters sent a message loud and clear that the social policies of your backwards antiquated party of old white Christian men is no longer palatable.But of course that will not deter the religious extremists from causing election defeats.
 @badcat So you are saying he is un-electable because he is Mormon? Isn't that like not electing Obama because he is black?
 @TreeWizard  @badcat True.  And Sarah Palin had nice eye wear.  That and $120 will get you a bag of weed.
 @TreeWizard And he's still a religious extremist who believes that he's going to get his own planet someday, that the Garden of Eden was located in Missouri, and that Joseph Smith read golden plates out of a hat with magic stones. Unelectable. Sorry, try again.
 @badcat Mittens had beautiful hair, and an amazing stare during the debates.  Â
 @TreeWizard Mittens wears magic underwear. Fact.
 @badcat aren't*
 @badcat Never heard Mittens say women are people. I don't know what the invisible sky captain is. Obama was a Muslim that converted to Christianity. LOL
 @TreeWizard And that's what you've been saying all along. Just like your party leadership has been saying that the invisible sky captain is punishing us and Obama is a Muslim and women aren't people, blah, blah, blah....
 @badcat They all are "theocratic lunatics" yes you are so informed. All the Democratic party is run by deadbeat social welfare abusers. SEE I can do it also.
 @TreeWizard I don't have time to break it all down and spoon feed it to you. Go do your own research and figure out why and how all your party leaders are theocratic lunatics. I don't have time for a dissertation. They are religious extremists, and if you look into them, one by one, you'll see that it's a fact. Start with their own websites.
 @badcat that's not explaining. That's just restating the same thing.
 @TreeWizard Your party is ruled by religious extremists.
 @badcat Explain it to me than.
 @TreeWizard That's probably why you're so confused.
 @noneofyourbizzness  @TreeWizard  @last I don't see how the Republican party is "ruled by religious extremists".Â
Party
@TreeWizard @last As long as your part continues to be influenced by religious extremists you will never ever win another Presidential election
@last boyscout Hey she will be the next president get use to it. I watched that today you have been watching a re-run of Pee-Wee Herman. Ron Paul the closest he gets to the White House is if he pays for the tour.
 @Ghetto Baby  @last Republicans are guaranteed to win 2016.Â
@TreeWizard @Ghetto Baby @last There is only one hope for Republicans to win in 2016. Chris Christe. But I doubt the wingnuts will let him get the nomination.
@TreeWizard @badcatÂ
Â
 HA ! squirel eat'n huckahillbilly....hilarious !
Â
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yj3QAzSWVA4
@TreeWizard @Ghetto Baby @last Just like 3 months ago, don't hold your breath
 @badcat Meh my predictions are facts
 @TreeWizard That you use the words "prediction" and "fact" interchangeably is pretty solid evidence that you have no idea what you're talking about.
 @Sundowner  @badcat I will stand by my prediction/fact.
 @TreeWizard @badcat You're so cute when you talk that way.  Wrong, but cute.  Don't believe me?  Ask kramr....he's had to eat much humble (laced with crow) pie saying things like that.  =)
 @badcat I never did.
 @TreeWizard Funniest thing I've read all day!! Didn't you people say that about 2012? =D Â
Â
The most annoying thing about democracy -- if you're an extremist -- is that you have to appeal to the MAJORITY. And unfortunately for you, the majority of Americans want peace, gun control, safe abortions, school lunches, gay marriage, social security and health care. Take heart, because you still have gerrymandering and control of the House. But if the MAJORITY really got their way, Democrats would have control of both houses. And we will.