Effort building to change U.S. marijuana laws

SEATTLE (AP) - An effort is building in Congress to change U.S. marijuana laws, including moves to legalize the industrial production of hemp and establish a hefty federal pot tax.
While passage this year could be a longshot, lawmakers from both parties have been quietly working on several bills, the first of which Democratic Reps. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon and Jared Polis of Colorado plan to introduce Tuesday, Blumenauer told The Associated Press.
Polis' measure would regulate marijuana the way the federal government handles alcohol: In states that legalize pot, growers would have to obtain a federal permit. Oversight of marijuana would be removed from the Drug Enforcement Administration and given to the newly renamed Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana and Firearms, and it would remain illegal to bring marijuana from a state where it's legal to one where it isn't.
The bill is based on a legalization measure previously pushed by former Reps. Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Ron Paul of Texas.
Blumenauer's bill would create a federal marijuana excise tax of 50 percent on the "first sale" of marijuana - typically, from a grower to a processor or retailer. It also would tax pot producers or importers $1,000 annually and other marijuana businesses $500.
His office said Monday it doesn't yet have an estimate of how much the taxes might bring in. But a policy paper Blumenauer and Polis are releasing this week suggests, based on admittedly vague estimates, that a federal tax of $50 per ounce could raise $20 billion a year. They call for directing the money to law enforcement, substance abuse treatment and the national debt.
Last fall's votes in Colorado and Washington state to legalize recreational marijuana should push Congress to end the 75-year federal pot prohibition, Blumenauer said.
Washington state officials have estimated that its legal marijuana market could bring in about half a billion dollars a year in state taxes.
"You folks in Washington and my friends in Colorado really upset the apple cart," Blumenauer said. "We're still arresting two-thirds of a million people for use of a substance that a majority feel should be legal. ... It's past time for us to step in and try to sort this stuff out."
Advocates who are working with the lawmakers acknowledge it could take years for any changes to get through Congress, but they're encouraged by recent developments. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week came out in support of efforts to legalize hemp in his home state of Kentucky, and U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., is expected to introduce legislation allowing states to set their own policy on marijuana.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has indicated he plans to hold a hearing on the conflict between state and federal marijuana laws and has urged an end to federal "mandatory minimum" sentences that lead to long prison stints for drug crimes.
"We're seeing enormous political momentum to undo the drug war failings of the past 40 years," said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, who has been working with lawmakers on marijuana-related bills. "For the first time, the wind is behind our back."
The Justice Department hasn't said how it plans to respond to the votes in Washington and Colorado. It could sue to block the states from issuing licenses to marijuana growers, processors and retail stores, on the grounds that doing so would conflict with federal drug law.
Blumenauer and Polis' paper urges a number of changes, including altering tax codes to let marijuana dispensaries deduct business expenses on federal taxes, and making it easier for marijuana-related businesses to get bank accounts. Many operate on a cash basis because federally insured banks won't work with them, they noted.
Blumenauer said he expects to introduce the tax-code legislation as well as a bill that would reschedule marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act, allowing states to enact medical marijuana laws without fear that federal authorities will continue raiding dispensaries or prosecuting providers. It makes no sense that marijuana is a Schedule I drug, in the same category as heroin and a more restrictive category than cocaine, Blumenauer said.
The measures have little chance of passing, said Kevin Sabet, a former White House drug policy adviser. Sabet recently joined former Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy and former President George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum in forming a group called Project SAM - for "smart approaches to marijuana" - to counter the growing legalization movement. Sabet noted that previous federal legalization measures have always failed.
"These are really extreme solutions to the marijuana problem we have in this country," Sabet said. "The marijuana problem we have is a problem of addiction among kids, and stigma of people who have a criminal record for marijuana crimes.
"There are a lot more people in Congress who think that marijuana should be illegal but treated as a public health problem, than think it should be legal."
Project SAM suggests people shouldn't get criminal records for small-time marijuana offenses, but instead could face probation or treatment.
While passage this year could be a longshot, lawmakers from both parties have been quietly working on several bills, the first of which Democratic Reps. Earl Blumenauer of Oregon and Jared Polis of Colorado plan to introduce Tuesday, Blumenauer told The Associated Press.
Polis' measure would regulate marijuana the way the federal government handles alcohol: In states that legalize pot, growers would have to obtain a federal permit. Oversight of marijuana would be removed from the Drug Enforcement Administration and given to the newly renamed Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Marijuana and Firearms, and it would remain illegal to bring marijuana from a state where it's legal to one where it isn't.
The bill is based on a legalization measure previously pushed by former Reps. Barney Frank of Massachusetts and Ron Paul of Texas.
Blumenauer's bill would create a federal marijuana excise tax of 50 percent on the "first sale" of marijuana - typically, from a grower to a processor or retailer. It also would tax pot producers or importers $1,000 annually and other marijuana businesses $500.
His office said Monday it doesn't yet have an estimate of how much the taxes might bring in. But a policy paper Blumenauer and Polis are releasing this week suggests, based on admittedly vague estimates, that a federal tax of $50 per ounce could raise $20 billion a year. They call for directing the money to law enforcement, substance abuse treatment and the national debt.
Last fall's votes in Colorado and Washington state to legalize recreational marijuana should push Congress to end the 75-year federal pot prohibition, Blumenauer said.
Washington state officials have estimated that its legal marijuana market could bring in about half a billion dollars a year in state taxes.
"You folks in Washington and my friends in Colorado really upset the apple cart," Blumenauer said. "We're still arresting two-thirds of a million people for use of a substance that a majority feel should be legal. ... It's past time for us to step in and try to sort this stuff out."
Advocates who are working with the lawmakers acknowledge it could take years for any changes to get through Congress, but they're encouraged by recent developments. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell last week came out in support of efforts to legalize hemp in his home state of Kentucky, and U.S. Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., is expected to introduce legislation allowing states to set their own policy on marijuana.
Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., has indicated he plans to hold a hearing on the conflict between state and federal marijuana laws and has urged an end to federal "mandatory minimum" sentences that lead to long prison stints for drug crimes.
"We're seeing enormous political momentum to undo the drug war failings of the past 40 years," said Bill Piper, director of national affairs for the Drug Policy Alliance, who has been working with lawmakers on marijuana-related bills. "For the first time, the wind is behind our back."
The Justice Department hasn't said how it plans to respond to the votes in Washington and Colorado. It could sue to block the states from issuing licenses to marijuana growers, processors and retail stores, on the grounds that doing so would conflict with federal drug law.
Blumenauer and Polis' paper urges a number of changes, including altering tax codes to let marijuana dispensaries deduct business expenses on federal taxes, and making it easier for marijuana-related businesses to get bank accounts. Many operate on a cash basis because federally insured banks won't work with them, they noted.
Blumenauer said he expects to introduce the tax-code legislation as well as a bill that would reschedule marijuana under the Controlled Substances Act, allowing states to enact medical marijuana laws without fear that federal authorities will continue raiding dispensaries or prosecuting providers. It makes no sense that marijuana is a Schedule I drug, in the same category as heroin and a more restrictive category than cocaine, Blumenauer said.
The measures have little chance of passing, said Kevin Sabet, a former White House drug policy adviser. Sabet recently joined former Rhode Island Rep. Patrick Kennedy and former President George W. Bush speechwriter David Frum in forming a group called Project SAM - for "smart approaches to marijuana" - to counter the growing legalization movement. Sabet noted that previous federal legalization measures have always failed.
"These are really extreme solutions to the marijuana problem we have in this country," Sabet said. "The marijuana problem we have is a problem of addiction among kids, and stigma of people who have a criminal record for marijuana crimes.
"There are a lot more people in Congress who think that marijuana should be illegal but treated as a public health problem, than think it should be legal."
Project SAM suggests people shouldn't get criminal records for small-time marijuana offenses, but instead could face probation or treatment.
Another BAD idea from a generation of stupidity and ZERO common sense. Â How about a LOGICAL reason for doing this? Â No, pain and suffering can ALREADY be dealt with by OTHER legal means. Glaucoma is far better treated with current pharmaceutical means, Hmmmmm, yep those are pretty much the TWO stupid arguments that we have in favor of this BS.
Â
Pros:
Â
http://jefferson.library.millersville.edu/reserve/ENGL110_Schaik_BeneficialEffectsofMarijuana.pdf
http://www.benefitsofmarijuana.com/benefits.php
Â
I have been unable to find any credible scholarly articles that say anything about beneficial effects of RECREATIONAL marijuana use.
Â
And on the con side:
Â
http://www.drugfree.org.au/fileadmin/Media/Reference/THC-NeurocognitiveDoseDeficits.pdf
http://jama.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=396766
http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJM198903233201203
http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/marijuana-use-and-its-effects
http://www.mnn.com/health/fitness-well-being/stories/marijuana-use-may-raise-stroke-risk-in-young-adults
http://www.livescience.com/24558-marijuana-effects.html
http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/12/06/nih-marijuana-effects/1751011/
http://healthland.time.com/2013/01/15/new-research-questions-marijuanas-impact-in-lowering-iq/
http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/evidence99/marijuana/Health_1.html
http://www.cnn.com/2012/11/07/health/marijuana-research-roundup
Â
ANY QUESTIONS?
 @Reeldeal101 Think for your self, gawd man, the time of action prevails on the brevity of syncophants.
 @Reeldeal101 Even the freakin police union DOESN'T agree with you, lol.
 @Reeldeal101 The government has a "Patent" on the healing abilities of the cannabis, any questions?
So a year ago all the pro-MJ folks were screaming at the top of their lungs for the government to make MJ a legal substance and to tax it so all of our economic worries would be gone.
Â
Flash forward to the present and now that they've indicated that they'd be willing to do that and they've put a dollar figure on it they think that's not fair and too expensive and won't work. Â So what changed? Â Or were you blowing smoke up our asses this whole time?
Â
I thought it was only politicians that lied to the voters on a regular basis but it seems it's even the special interest groups such as those who are pro-MJ.
In Vancouver,Wa there was a person hit by a person on Grass,and I think was killed,not long ago.AA and NA are non-profit.And have saved millions of lives.Personaly I don't care,but the next time someone is driving 20 miles per hour in a 60 mile per hour zone,call a cop.
Taxing it is a good idea. Booze is taxed. Tobacco is taxed. So, why not?
 @Saltire I think they should go further. REQUIRE that anyone buying this stuff pay an additional tax in their taxes to help compensate for the incidents that arise from this new found wonderfulness.....
@Reeldeal101Â
Real deal you are salty, salty salty. If you are found to breathe air, we will take away your "new found wonderfulness"
Its funny you would fight the worlds most THERAPEUTICALLY ACTIVE herb such as cannabis, think your yourself.Â
More people are killed by vending machines in a given year than cannabis ever! We can obfuscate about fake problems or we can revel in the real ones.Â
Unsolved crime, prescription drug abuse, high rates of heart disease from smoking, unsolved sexual assault crimes, GMO's, The list is long, yet here you are making statements about cannabis and not everything else, how ironic.Â
The MULTI-BILLION a year 12-Step religious AA/NA cult treatment industry has destroyed millions & millions of people's lives...wrapping itself around every institution in the country.
Funny how once pot is legal...its users go from STRUNG-OUT DRUG ADDICTS needing LIFE-LONG TREATMENT & NA Meetings...TO...RESPONSIBLE MARIJUANA USERS who ARE NOT addicted to anything & do not need any treatment at all!
 @August100 Do the voices tell you these things?
 @Playanekes Don't be ridiculous...I'd be in prison if I did what those voices told me to do...
So whats going to make the black market MJ go away? Â IMHO, the only thing to make the black market MJ go away would be a very low price...... but then having the states/feds tax the hell out of it makes it kinda hard to sell cheap.Â
Â
So the legalization of MJ will still end up with folks in jail over pot..... the growing and selling of it, so in that respect Oregon and Washington are still the same.Â
 @kramr "So the legalization of MJ will still end up with folks in jail over pot..... the growing and selling of it"It's just like all the people going to jail for illegal distillation and moon-shining. The Nanny Statists Will Find A Way to put people in jail as long as there's freedom out there of which they don't approve.
Big pharma is in big danger, that's why the government is fighting this to a little ninny fight to no existence, they are merely a figure head for Big Pharma/ Government....see no difference, much bigger problem on horizon. Not just some stoners being less candid.
Anything for votes, huh, Earl?
I'm against any mind altering drug being legalized, but, the idea of making a lot of money by taxing it is absurd. Â Potheads, for the most part have been growing their own for years, so who in their right mind, thinks they are going to start paying taxes on it. Â They will continue to grow their own and the Mexican drug cartels will continue running the show. Â This could end up being a larger problem than drunk driving with people high on pot, talking on cell phones and driving at the same time. Â At least the boozers do pay taxes on their liquor.Â
 @Shadow Doubt it. Some people will grow pot, and if they're busted they'll have to pay back taxes or lose their property. Other people--especially those who don't have space or inclination to cultivate marijuana--will pay the tax for the extra convenience.
 @Shadow Really. I make my own beer and other alcohol and know a lot who do, we aren't paying any taxes on it! All I see is you reaching so far for a rationalization that you forgot to use common sense. I suspect there are a lot of people you call potheads who, like me, have multiple advanced degrees and make well over 6 figures.Â
Â
You have taken something you can only make assumptions about (because you clearly don't know) and use it to make your point. All I can say is.....weak.
The Government is going to open MJ up to Corporations to exploit for Corporate profits...there goes the neighborhood.
Â
I wonder how many tax loopholes and subsidies and concessions the Government will have to give up before Corporations are interested in taking this "New" industry over.
Â
That is what is great about MJ prohibition; it is the only truly functional free marketplace in America where buyer and seller meet an price is determined exclusively by supply and demand no administrative agency overhead and there are no unfair advantages won by corporate lobbyists.Â
It's about friggen time!
I'm 67 years old. I've never smoked Mj or for that matter, anything else including cigarettes. I do believe however, that mj should be made legal. I don't believe it's any worse than alcohol getting high wise, now health issues, thats another thing. People are going to use it whether it's legal or not so tax it and at least get some legal benefits from the revenue it will generate.
 @ritfam I have to admit that I tried Mj. I didn't inhale much though.
 @Pointblank
Â
You're doing it wrong.
$50.00 per ounce tax? They can't pass that up. Eventually they will succumb to greed.
Societal misanthropes only have posted so far.
Â
Vending Machine Deaths are more numerous than deaths from Marijuana.....true story.
Earl must have been smoking too much pot. Â His thinking is wack wack/
 @sortbait wack wack/ says the pot critic.
This comment has been deleted
Hate to be sarcastic, but why "change" laws, if even existing federal law is subject to discretionary compliance by the political powers that be?
Pretty sad...this is the first step to the Corporate takeover of MJ. The people must stand up for their right to grow for personal use under any scenario; otherwise, it will just turn into another opportunity/excuse for Law Enforcement to enter private homes and search on the "probable" cause e.g. without warrant anytime they smell MJ and look for guns or pot plants or anything the find and they will always find something....or just kill your dog for sport.
 @Icarus So just grow, there are some lines to be crossed, only you have the answer to what is right or wrong.
 @Bio SphereÂ
Â
As soon as they define MJ as a corporate product then big pharma will start packaging it for medical and they will eliminate the Medical MJ ....grow at home program....and corporations will lobby for increased penalties for grow at home....and the FDA will concur...because of "quality" issues. Â And, the only remaining source will be Corporations and the price will skyrocket and the product quality will be schyte.
 @Bio Sphere  @Icarus i thought h2o2 was hydrogen peroxide.Â
 anywho, legalize people!!! they'll charge for it at the stores and people will grow their own.
 @Icarus You can buy tomato's at any grocery store, but some still garden.
When Pharma throws down the estimated 800 million for a USDA Class III test study that will the medical use, ok, you might have a point, the only problem is that it won't happen because you can't patent an herb, that's the beauty. Certain things are un-patentable they are always in the common interest, like h30, it is a wonder cure, but never patented and therefore no serious medical study was ever done on it, that would be hydrogen peroxide. Read up a little bit, your on a good track.
Big pharma is in big danger, that's why the government is fighting this to a little ninny fight to no existence, they are merely a figure head for Big Pharma/ Government....see no difference, much bigger problem on horizon. Not just some stoners being less candid.