Fact check: Flunking geography, history during final debate

WASHINGTON (AP) - Voters didn't always get the straight goods when President Barack Obama and Republican Mitt Romney made their case for foreign policy and national security leadership Monday night before their last super-sized audience of the campaign. A few of their detours into domestic issues were problematic too.
Romney flubbed Middle East geography. Obama got Romney's record as Massachusetts governor wrong.
At the same time, they injected a little more accuracy into two leading misstatements of the campaign: Romney's claim for months that Obama went around apologizing for America, and the president's assertion, going back to his State of the Union address in January, that the U.S. military's exit from Afghanistan will yield money to rebuild America.
A look at some of their statements and how they compare with the facts:
ROMNEY: "Mr. President, the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations. And by the way, they noticed that you skipped Israel. And then in those nations, and on Arabic TV, you said that America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated to other nations."
OBAMA: "Nothing Gov. Romney just said is true, starting with this notion of me apologizing. This has been probably the biggest whopper that's been told during the course of this campaign. And every fact checker and every reporter who's looked at it, governor, has said this is not true."
THE FACTS: Romney has indeed repeatedly and wrongly accused the president of traveling the world early in his presidency and apologizing for U.S. behavior. Obama didn't say "sorry" in those travels. But in this debate, Romney at last explained the context of his accusation: not that Obama apologized literally, but that he had been too deferential in his visits to Europe, Latin America and the Muslim world.
Obama said while abroad that the U.S. acted "contrary to our traditions and ideals" in its treatment of terrorist suspects, that "America has too often been selective in its promotion of democracy," that the U.S. "certainly shares blame" for international economic turmoil and has sometimes "shown arrogance and been dismissive, even divisive" toward Europe. Yet he also praised America and its ideals.
___
OBAMA: "What I think the American people recognize is, after a decade of war, it's time to do some nation-building here at home. And what we can now do is free up some resources to, for example, put Americans back to work, especially our veterans, rebuilding our roads, our bridges, our schools."
THE FACTS: If Romney's "apology tour" was a campaign whopper, so has been Obama's repeated claim that ending expensive wars meant the U.S. now has money to spend at home. There is no such peace dividend because the wars were financed largely by borrowing.
Yet Obama, too, watched his words a little more carefully Monday night, with his milder suggestion that "some resources" are freed up. That's a more plausible point, if only because U.S. "resources" include the ability to continue to go deeper in debt, but for the purpose of fixing roads, bridges and the like, instead of for making war.
___
ROMNEY: "Syria is Iran's only ally in the Arab world. It's their route to the sea."
THE FACTS: Iran has a large southern coastline with access to the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman. And it has no land border with Syria.
___
ROMNEY: Said that when he was Massachusetts governor, high-school students who graduated in the top quarter "got a four-year, tuition-free ride at any Massachusetts public institution of higher learning."
OBAMA: "That happened before you came into office."
ROMNEY: "That was actually mine, actually, Mr. President. You got that fact wrong."
THE FACTS: Romney was right. The John and Abigail Adams scholarship program began in 2004 when he was governor.
___
ROMNEY: "I said that we would provide guarantees, and that was what was able to allow these (auto) companies to go through bankruptcy, to come out of bankruptcy. Under no circumstance would I do anything other than to help this industry get on its feet. And the idea that has been suggested that I would liquidate the industry. Of course not. That's the height of silliness. I have never said I would liquidate the industry."
OBAMA: "Gov. Romney, you keep on trying to airbrush history here. You were very clear that you would not provide government assistance to the U.S. auto companies, even if they went through bankruptcy. You said that they could get it in the private marketplace. That wasn't true. They would have gone through a liquidation."
THE FACTS: It's true that Romney didn't preach liquidation of GM and Chrysler and that he saw his approach as a way to save the auto companies. But his was an improbable course. Opposing a government bailout, Romney instead favored private loans to finance the automakers' restructuring in bankruptcy court. His proposed government loan guarantees would only have come after the companies went through bankruptcy. At the time, however, both automakers were nearly out of cash and were bad credit risks. The banking system was in crisis and private money wasn't available. So without hefty government aid, the assets of both companies probably would have been sold in liquidation auctions.
___
ROMNEY on SYRIA: "What I'm afraid of is we've watched over the past year or so, first the president saying, 'Well, we'll let the U.N. deal with it.' And Assad — excuse me, Kofi Annan — came in and said we're going to try to have a cease-fire. That didn't work. Then it went to the Russians and said, 'Let's see if you can do something.' We should be playing the leadership role there."
OBAMA: "We are playing the leadership role."
THE FACTS: Under Obama, the United States has taken a lead in trying to organize Syria's splintered opposition, even if the U.S. isn't interested in military intervention or providing direct arms support to the rebels. The administration has organized dozens of meetings in Turkey and the Middle East aimed at rallying Syria's political groups and rebel formations to agree on a common vision for a democratic future after Syrian President Bashar Assad is defeated. And Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton brought dozens of nations together as part of the Friends of Syria group to combine aid efforts to Syria's opposition and help it win the support of as many as Syrians as possible. The U.S. also is involved in vetting recipients of military aid from America's Arab allies like Saudi Arabia and Qatar.
Romney is partly right in pointing out Obama's failure to win U.N. support for international action in Syria. But the Friends of Syria group has helped bring in hundreds of millions of dollars in humanitarian aid and other forms of assistance to Syrian civilians and the political opposition.
___
OBAMA: "What I would not have had done was left 10,000 troops in Iraq that would tie us down. And that certainly would not help us in the Middle East."
THE FACTS: Obama was suggesting that he had never favored keeping U.S. troops in Iraq beyond the December 2011 withdrawal deadline that the Bush administration had negotiated with the Iraqi government. Actually, the Obama administration tried for many months to win Iraqi agreement to keeping several thousand American troops there beyond 2011 to continue training and advising the Iraqi armed forces. The talks broke down over a disagreement on legal immunity for U.S. troops.
___
ROMNEY: "We have an enormous trade imbalance with China, and it's worse this year than last year and it's worse last year than the year before."
THE FACTS: That's true as far as it goes but the imbalance is far from unique to the Obama years. The U.S. has run a trade deficit with China since 1985 and the gap has widened nearly every year since. According to Chinese customs data, Beijing reported a $181.3 billion trade surplus with the United States in 2010. That grew to $202.3 billion last year. The surplus for the first nine months of this year was $161.9 billion, well ahead of the level at this point in 2011.
___
OBAMA: "You are familiar with jobs being shipped overseas because you invested in companies that were shipping jobs overseas. And, you know, that's your right. I mean, that's how our free market works."
THE FACTS: Bain Capital, the private equity company that Romney ran from 1984 to 2001, did invest in several companies that shifted American jobs and operations from the U.S. to China and other foreign nations. In one instance in 1998, Bain bought a 10 percent investment stake in Global-Tech, a Hong Kong firm that used mainland Chinese factories to make toasters and other appliances for U.S. manufacturers that were phasing out American operations and jobs. Romney held full Bain partnership stakes in that deal before the firm sold its holding later that year. Bain also invested in several firms that outsourced to Mexico in the early 2000s, but by then Romney had begun shifting away from Bain to a role running the Winter Olympic Games in Salt Lake City. And in almost all of these cases, it remains unclear how much oversight Bain had in the overseas shifts. The Romney campaign has said that Romney's holdings were mostly passive in nature, particularly after he left the firm.
___
ROMNEY: "In the 2000 debates, there was no mention of terrorism."
THE FACTS: There was passing mention of terrorism in the 2000 debates. In the Oct. 17, 2000, debate between Democrat Al Gore and Republican George W. Bush, Gore talked about his work in Congress to "deal with the problems of terrorism and these new weapons of mass destruction." And in the vice presidential debate, Democrat Joe Lieberman defended the Clinton administration's record of preparing the armed forces to "meet the threats of the new generation of tomorrow, of weapons of mass destruction, of ballistic missiles, terrorism, cyber warfare." Romney's larger point, that the U.S. did not anticipate anything on the scale of terrorist threat that existed, is supported by the light attention paid to the subject in the debates.
___
Associated Press writers Bradley Klapper, Robert Burns, Tom Raum and Stephen Braun in Washington, Charles Hutzler in Beijing and Tom Krisher in Detroit contributed to this report.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
Among fact checks, one reflects on how defective Pres. Obama is as a Commander in Chief. He attacked Gov. Romney sarcastically, with a "less" statement about <b>bayonets</b> which carried an implication they were obsolete.
Â
If Barack Obama had even a slight awareness of our military, he should realized that bayonets are a standard modern weapon used by the Marine Corps, and I believe the Army too.
Â
It's the same lack of diligence, or disinterest, that left Obama referring to a Navy Corpsman as a Corpse Man.
I wonder what Romney has not said. A day or two after the second debate THE NATION website posted an article how the Romneys made $15.3 million dollars on the bailout of General Motors. All this while slamming the President on the bailout of the Auto Industry. He did not disclose it to the Federal Elections Commission because he put it in his wife's name. Under the F.E.C. rules anything under $50 million dollars has to be disclosed to the F.E.C. I think they should open an investigation into this. The article can be found at http://www.thenation.com/article/170644/mitt-romneys-bailout-bonanza#
Â
I WONDER WHAT ELSE HE IS NOT SAYING TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC?
 @Scorpio Maybe that's why Romney never brought up Libya.
I've been through the entire ballot, and can't find a single individual who is worth spit. No detailed positions, plans and proposals. Not one.
Â
Normally, I vote ABADOR (Anyone But A Democrat Or Republican). But this year, with no real options, I'm sitting out the presidential election (for the first time since 1968).
 @ShallowEnder I hope you're still voting on the ballot measures though.
 @ShallowEnder Gotta be honest with you, SE, I've seriously considered doing the same thing.Â
Â
Especially in OR, my 'vote' (thanks to the electoral college) is going to President Obama anyway. I will vote on the local candidates/issues. But, insofar as the presidential election, my vote is already made, and neither one has earned my vote (IMO), so I may just leave it blank. For me, it would be the first time since I began casting ballots as well.Â
Â
Sad state of affairs, that's for sure.Â
 @ShallowEnder Come on Shallow, at least rip the Dems and Repubs out, spread the balance on a dart board, throw a dart and pick the closest one!
who's the lesser of the two tweedles? dee or dum
What we face is the choice between a President who supports equal rights for gays and women and one who supports a Constitutional amendment limiting gay rights and refuses to give a straight answer to a direct question concerning how to fix gender-based pay inequalities in this country.One of these men can guide us forward; the other will most assuredly move us backward.I refuse to vote for social policies of the 1950's
 @noneofyourbizzness Obama's position on gay marriage is relatively weak compared to what he's up against. He's not really even that strong of supporter of equal rights for gays.
I wasn't aware Romney was planning on bringing back racial segregation.
@PDXguy23 He has done more for the gay community the gay community than any of his predecessors.Being a heterosexual ally to my gay friends,family and co-workers I will support this President even though I tend to have more of a independent streak.He may not be perfect when it comes to gay issues but I truly believe that his support for women's reproductive choices and gay equality is deserving of my vote. http://www.scribd.com/doc/56836334/Gay-Rights-President-Obama-s-37-Accomplishments-For-LGBT-Americans
@noneofyourbizzness Gay equality is a train that will not be derailed, no matter how hard the religious right attempts. IMO, your priorities are skewed. Same sex marriage is coming whether we like it or not. So why don't we focus on what is relevent NOW. Jobs, our national debt, our economy, education and foreign policy. Whether on the right or the left, focusing on the "social issues" is what is actually holding us back from moving forward. Our nation is a sinking ship and it doesn't have a GD thing to do w/ same sex issues, abortion or gender equality.
Thats all you care about?  Who can get married?  Oh brother.  That has got to be the least important issue on the table.  Who the ef cares. If Joe wants to marry Bob I could give a rats arse! I care about where this country is going and it has been going down the toilet... I understand not everyone has morals.
@MrAchilles I can honestly answer the question that I actually have done better in the last four years.My income has risen.i'm not rich by any means but my standard has greatly improved.
My standard of living
@MrAchilles Are you saying that gay people and their supporters don't have morals? As a liberal atheist I absolutely refuse to vote republican even though I do agree on some issues.Voting republican to me would equate a vote for the religous right.I would never be able to forgive myself for making such a grave mistake.I'm not trying to convince anyone to vote for the President,but I won't be intimidated to ever back down from the issues that are important to me.
@noneofyourbizzness I get the feeling that the only thing that drives you is a passionate hatred of Christians. To hell w/ Jobs or the Economy. Just a burning disdain for Christians. Am I wrong, because pardon me if I am.
âWe then organized the strongest coalition and the strongest sanctions against Iran in history, and it is crippling their economy. Their currency has dropped 80%.â ...President Obama, in the middle of the great debate in respect of foreign policy. It is one of the most maddening moments of the whole campaign. What question does one imagine Mr. Obama was answering? It turns out to be that he was answering the question of whether either one of the candidates would be prepared to declare that an attack on Israel as being an attack on America. They both expressed friendship. And then started rattling on about sanctions. What I kept thinking is this: If Mr. Obama comprehends how bad it is for Iran that its currency has shed 80% of its value, why doesn't he comprehend that about a dollar that has lost 50% of its value under his presidency alone?In our own country between 2008 and 2011, federal welfare payments have jumped 32%. Food stamps have surged, with 71% more spending on the program in 2011 compared with 2008. Health payments, principally Medicaid, have climbed 37%.  Welfare programs soared to more than $1 trillion last year. The federal government accounted for $750 billion of that, while $250 billion came from the states, which leveraged federal payments into even larger expenses.  In addition, in our new entitlement nation, growing government dependency is ruining the very moral fiber and backbone of Americaâs traditional work ethic. Increasingly, the feds are paying more to not work, rather than providing after-tax incentives to go back to work.Then there was the question of Israel being attacked⦠Obama kept saying after they were attackedâ¦there most likely wonât be a need to react at that time as Israel will probably be wiped from the face of the earth as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promisedâ¦Never in my life have I seen politics so polarizedâ¦One thing is PLAINLY clearâThe leadership is NOT currently in Washington DC, or in anybody in the media that has lap-doggedly supported the current regime in DC.....
 @KHEB "at that time as Israel will probably be wiped from the face of the earth as Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has promised"
can you show where he promised this? Â I don't know how you get Israel will be wiped off the face of the earth from this....
Â
"âThe Imam (Khomeini) said this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time,â"
Â
When questioned about this, what was his clarification? Â Why did 60 minutes edit and cut off his answer instead of playing the most important part of it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=onNzrNEFs1E
Â
Â
Israel's Deputy PM Â admits Iran never said "wipe israel off the map
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s06R011d6Ig
Â
Â
Can you name one country Iran has invaded in the last 200 years? Â The US? Â How many times has Iran overthrown the US government and installed a dictator? Â How many times have we done it to them? Â Why did the US start the Iranian Nuclear Program?
Â
And even if Iran did want to do it,  how would they with a 3rd world army, airforce and navy be able to pull it off.  Especially with the US having 50 bases surrounding Iran and 3 air carrier groups in the Persian gulf not to mention the French and British carrier groups in the Persian gulf AND Israel with over 200 nukes!!!
Â
The sky is falling Chicken Little.....and you are buying right into it!
Â
Â
@B Smizzle ...
Simply, If The Obama Administration had done their job and protected the embassy as requested months earlierâ¦.4 Americans would be alive today Look for more stonewalling and foot-dragging on any State Department "investigation" until AFTER the November 6 election. They KNOW that if the level of incompetence and cover-up on the part of the Obama Administration as Benghazi becomes known to the public then the Obama re-election campaign is DEAD IN THE WATER Let's hope Obama/Biden/Clinton don't get any more Americans killed before they are voted out of office....The attack in Benghazi was going on for 6 hours and they were watching a video feed in real time at the State Dept. Why did Obama not order fast strike teams in from nearby locations? They could have been there in a couple of hours tops. Lives may have been saved and at least the scene would have been secured within hours. The Obama waits for two weeks before he gets âinvestigatorsâ to the scene? What a jokeâ¦â¦.
STEVENS DIED, OBAMA LIEDâ¦
BenghaziGate is STILL unfoldingÂ
Â
 @KHEB "How many times has Iran overthrown the US government and installed a dictator?  How many times have we done it to them?  Why did the US start the Iranian Nuclear Program?"
Â
Let me guess....this is all just opinion even though it happend! OWNED!
Â
US overthrow of Iran in 1953 - Operation Ajax
http://www.lewrockwell.com/latulippe/latulippe41.html
Â
Â
Atoms for peace
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atoms_for_Peace
Â
The United States then launched an "Atoms for Peace" program that supplied equipment and information to schools, hospitals, and research institutions within the U.S. and throughout the world. The first nuclear reactors in Iran and Pakistan were built under the program by American Machine and Foundry.
 @KHEB Also I LOVE the fact that I simply asked you to provide the quote of the President of Iran saying he is going to wipe Israel off the face of the earth as you stated! Yet you can't do it! The fact you can't back up what you say is very telling! You know it and I know it.....It is just eating you up too....
 @KHEB What opinion are you talking about....I asked a question, you have no answer. Also i am not arguing with you, I am trying to have a civil conversation to understand how you come to your conclusions! I want to hear your logic, no matter how illogical it is. The fact you can't answer a simple question tells us something.....you don't have the first clue what you are talking about! I am also posing question already knowing the answer in the hop you will do some research. I mean I know taking an hour away from the Idiot Box is taxing but give it a try.
Â
Oh, and it is not opinion...Iran has not invaded a country in 200 years and the US did overthrow their democratically elected government in 1953! FACTS, not opinion! But if I do have opinions, point them out! The only reason you don't "respect" my point of view is because I bring up uncomfortable facts about the situation that no one in the MSM will touch!
Â
Can you name one country Iran has invaded in the last 200 years? Â The US? Â How many times has Iran overthrown the US government and installed a dictator? Â How many times have we done it to them? Â Why did the US start the Iranian Nuclear Program?
Â
And even if Iran did want to do it,  how would they with a 3rd world army, airforce and navy be able to pull it off.  Especially with the US having 50 bases surrounding Iran and 3 air carrier groups in the Persian gulf not to mention the French and British carrier groups in the Persian gulf AND Israel with over 200 nukes!!!
@B Smizzle ..
My father once told me it was a waste of time and effort to stoop to the level of someone who's opinion you do not respect let alone argue with them..
Â
Why would you argue with someone whoâs opinion you do not respect.
Â
 @KHEB After two days of scouring the web you still can back up what you say, but I can. The reason you have heard one fact is becasue this is a message board so you read them not hear them.....again, if you are so smart and sooooo right, my questions should be very easy to answer. All you have is name calling.Â
Â
Your voting rights should be taken away, the ignorant should never be allowed vote!
Â
Answer the questions.....
can you show where he promised this? Â I don't know how you get Israel will be wiped off the face of the earth from this....
Â
Can you name one country Iran has invaded in the last 200 years? Â The US? Â How many times has Iran overthrown the US government and installed a dictator? Â How many times have we done it to them? Â Why did the US start the Iranian Nuclear Program?
Â
And even if Iran did want to do it,  how would they with a 3rd world army, airforce and navy be able to pull it off.  Especially with the US having 50 bases surrounding Iran and 3 air carrier groups in the Persian gulf not to mention the French and British carrier groups in the Persian gulf AND Israel with over 200 nukes!!!
 @B Smizzle ..,.looks like you have run out of you meds...better hit the clinic soon.  No, I've not heard one fact out of you that ever made sense so go bug someone else before you really lose it....
 @KHEB Must suck to go against facts when your reality is just an illusion!  Yes, I think you should address me.  If what I say is nonsense then point it out and back up your claims with facts like I do!
Â
I can hear you now in 1941 Germany "They're burning Jews? Â That's just nonsense"
Â
Or I can hear you now today...."my TV would never lie to me, the 5 minutes I watched on the news said Iran = bad"
Â
Waiting for any intelligent response....but from you, it will never happen. Â Shoot my argument down.....I am waiting!
 @B Smizzle ...you think you make so much sense I should bother addressing your nonsense... ???
 @KHEB Thanks for not answering any of my questions and completely changing the subject.  It is so easy to win a debate with you as you have to recourse against facts!
Â
Answer the questions....
Â
can you show where he promised this? Â I don't know how you get Israel will be wiped off the face of the earth from this....
Â
Can you name one country Iran has invaded in the last 200 years? Â The US? Â How many times has Iran overthrown the US government and installed a dictator? Â How many times have we done it to them? Â Why did the US start the Iranian Nuclear Program?
Â
And even if Iran did want to do it,  how would they with a 3rd world army, airforce and navy be able to pull it off.  Especially with the US having 50 bases surrounding Iran and 3 air carrier groups in the Persian gulf not to mention the French and British carrier groups in the Persian gulf AND Israel with over 200 nukes!!!
Â
Go ahead, point by point....be specific!
Â
Â
 @B Smizzle  @KHEB Sounds like more military industrial complex, scare tactics, war mongering and corporate marching orders . you knew they would resort to fear as the election got down to the wire. that's the republican political machine for you
 @KHEB Can you agree that most of the contributing factors regarding entitlement levels were set into motion before the Obama was elected? And that given the depth of the financial collapse (in which a larger degree of wealth was lost than in the great depression), that recovery would take 4 to 10 years by most estimates and it's naive to think anything less.
Â
All you guys think there was some magical happy fantasy land before Obama, and when Obama stepped in all of the sudden entitlements went up and it's his fault and the US is becoming an evil Islamic backing, gun controlling third world country, and it's blatantly false.
Â
(I don't blame Bush, I blame a system that allows it to happen).
Â
Anticipated KHEB comeback- "get your head out of your arse" OR "I know you are but what am I?".
 @KHEB     "If Mr. Obama comprehends how bad it is for Iran that its currency has shed 80% of its value, why doesn't he comprehend that about a dollar that has lost 50% of its value under his presidency alone?"
Â
I'm not sure I agree with the 50% - but it is not too far off.   You can't just keep printing $ and expect it not to devalue the currency.
Â
 @NorthernBlackBear  @KHEB What dim bulb is insinuating that the dollar has lost 50% of its purchasing power in the last 4 years?  That has to be about the 1) most asinine and 2) most disprovable statement made this election.
 @NorthernBlackBear When and if the increase money supply leads to excessive inflation, and after that inflation has reduced the value of the dollar by 50%, then the point will be valid.
Â
 @Festivus    Hummmm.
Â
The amount of money in circulation is a measure of inflation.
Â
In 2008 that was 853 billion.
Â
Today it is 1136 billion.
Â
By that measure inflation is 33%.  Â
Â
$ has been poured into this economy to kick start it, unless it is pulled back out (as the Fed has said it will do) it results in inflation.Â
Â
 @NorthernBlackBear  @KHEB We don't print money either, the Fed does, aka central bank, and this little cartel of rich people decide the monetary policies, with no government oversight, they lend to money to the US and the US has to pay it back with interest. For every dollar printed, the US automatically loses money. It's the banks way of keeping everyone in debt.
Â
The never ending printing press is not Obama's fault either.
Â
Next?
 @MrAchilles "seems everyone is one sided and not willing to balance the facts."
Â
THAT we agree on!
We hold the world reserve currency right now and we have only had it for the last 150 years, before that it was the UK. Many leaders have already been in secret meetings to take this from the US because of Obama. I am spent... it is so disturbing reading all the ignorance in this forum. Please do not take that personal, seems everyone is one sided and not willing to balance the facts. If I want in one hand and shat in the other, which one will fill up first?
OBAMA 2012! Â FORWARD!
 @eyeonchina âForward for Stalin.â -1941-42
 @TimBurr  @eyeonchina Can you name 5 specific ways he is like Stalin?
@B Smizzle @TimBurr @eyeonchina OK. Most intelligent independents and even conservatives don't ACTUALLY think Obama is a socialist. But we do bristle at the very suggestion of "distribution of wealth". It is a notion that strikes to the very heart of independence and free pursuit of liberty. So yeah, sometimes the Stalin reference gets thrown out there and we don't say "Cmon now, lets not be too hasty." F distribution of wealth and F anyone who supports it.
 @TimBurr  @eyeonchina Again, can you name 5 specific ways he is like Stalin?  Mitt Romney said he want's to move this country forward, is he Stalin too?
Â
Waiting for an intelligent reply!
 @B Smizzle  @TimBurr  @eyeonchina The post is about "Forward." A slogan used by Stalin, Hitler Youth, Mao, Wisconsin, Nixon etc. through history. Why a President would choose such a word knowing it's past usage SHOULD bring up several red flags. But it doesn't, because people are blind.
@eyeonchina You mispelled foward... http://www.theblaze.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Screen-Shot-2012-10-22-at-3.46.05-PM.png
Neither one of them is fit to be a gatekeeper at Chuck E. Cheese, let alone President of the United States. 300 million plus people in this country and this is who the two bloated non-thinking money hungry parties put forth - NO THANKS! Please take a look at all of the candidates running for President. I was looking through the voters pamphlet with my daughter and she had a very good question, one most adults don't think to ask - "How come we don't hear about the other candidates?" Namely because they don't have the deep pockets as the other parties and they are a threat to the status quo.
Â
Democracy needs ALL of our involvement, not just some of the time or when itâs convenient - all the time.  Whatâs happened is the Democratic and Republican parties have hijacked this nation in a bitter power struggle, all the while hurting its citizens and crushing our founding document(s) and our rights - while not even living up to a shred of their party's paradigm.  As for rights, you must use and continually fight for them, or lose them. Vote, vote, vote, and when doing so please inform yourself to no end - this change starts at the individual level.
 @OliverNicholas I would like to disagree with you.......unfortunately I can't. Dem and Rep parties seem to care much more about their parties than the people.
Â
But, the real kicker is your last sentence. It amazed me that in the Clackamas County light rail election last month, way less than half of the people voted. A truly sad commentary on democracy. As you say, democracy will only work if the people get involved, vote, and do so intelligently.
@Nobody: Democracy might work if people vote, but when all of the candidates aren't worthy of the office and/or their parties care nothing about what drives our country, it's middle class, our votes mean little. I simply don't see a Presidential candidate, and certainly not a party, that is currently worthy of my vote, and remain undecided.
Â
On a side note, I'm blown away by how much people think either major candidate or party is good for this country. In reality, they both stink to high heaven.
"Obama said while abroad that the U.S. acted 'contrary to our traditions and ideals' in its treatment of terrorist suspects" - It did (extraordinary rendition, CIA black sites, and torture).
"America has too often been selective in its promotion of democracy" - It has. Look at our treatment of Latin America over the past 100 years.
"The U.S. 'certainly shares blame' for international economic turmoil" - In 2009 that was an accurate statement given the Wall Street-sponsored financial crisis.
"[The US]Â has sometimes 'shown arrogance and been dismissive, even divisive' toward Europe" - It has. Remember the run-up to Iraq and Rummy calling any European who questioned the need for an invasion a member of "Old Europe"?
Â
Whether these statements were all made a part of a 'tour' or not, they are all true. America has done great things for the world, but not everything it has done has been good or motivated by good. To not acknowledge this is to think like child.
Obama was a broad?? Wow, that explains a lot. BTW, the childish behavior that Obama displayed last night was down right embarrassing and shameful to the United States, this is not a joke, this is the Presidential race and there is no room to be clowning around trying to get laughs with his rhetoric comments. It was disgusting in every sense of the word!
 @MrAchilles As a late politician once said in a debate as way of zinging his opponent, "There you go again." Ignore substance, stick to trivial things.
Â
I don't understand why the word "abroad" confounds you. It just means that he was traveling.
 @MacNCheez  @Max  @MrAchilles I don't find it humorous because it's not funny... I mean not funny - I can laugh at offensive, but that just wasn't funny. Though, I guess it got you chuckling...
@Max Quinn @MrAchilles A broad = A chick, A female. Wow that explains a lot = Females get emotional and react w/out rational, objective thought. Now do you get the chauvanistic joke. I know you don't find it the least humorous, because of course progressive elites have zero sense of humor and must maintain strict adherence to political correctness. I feel like I just hurt myself.
 @MrAchilles Seriously, what point were you making?
Â
"Obama was a broad?? Wow, that explains a lot." I honestly, don't understand what you were saying.
Dont get your undies in a bunch over abroad.. my goodness.