Gregoire: Feds haven't yet decided whether to block new pot laws

SEATTLE (AP) - Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire said Tuesday the federal government still hasn't decided whether to take action to block new laws legalizing marijuana in her state and Colorado.
Gregoire met with Deputy Attorney General James Cole in Washington, D.C. She told Cole she would prefer to know "sooner rather than later," because Washington state is in the process of getting ready to decriminalize pot, which is still illegal under federal law.
"I told them, 'Make no mistake, that absent an injunction of some sort, it's our intent to implement decriminalization,'" Gregoire told The Associated Press. "I don't want to spend a lot of money implementing this if you are going to attempt to block it."
Initiative 502 passed last week with 55 percent of the vote in the state. It decriminalizes the possession of up to an ounce of marijuana beginning Dec. 6. The state would license the growing, processing and labeling of marijuana, but state officials have a year to come up with those rules before sales can begin.
Colorado also passed a measure legalizing the drug.
Federal lawyers are reviewing the two new state laws, trying to determine what their response will be, Gregoire said.
"It's not a simple analysis for them," she said. "There's a difference between our two initiatives, and they want to look at that. They clearly want to know how things are going to flow, how regulations develop, how enforcement would be taken, taxes would be gathered."
She said she pressed Cole as to whether the ultimate federal response would treat both Washington and Colorado the same way, and Justice Department officials indicated to her that that was their intent.
In Washington, home-growing marijuana for recreational reasons remains barred, as does the public display or use of pot. The measure also establishes a standard blood test limit for driving under the influence, and Gregoire says the head of the Washington State Patrol has to begin training officers to enforce that portion of the measure.
"He can't wait, he's got to start doing this," Washington's governor said.
Gregoire said she promised to keep the Justice Department fully informed as to the progress the state is making in implementing the new marijuana law.
Colorado's governor and attorney general spoke by phone Friday with U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder, with no signal whether the U.S. Justice Department would sue to block the marijuana measure.
If Colorado's marijuana ballot measure is not blocked, it would take effect by Jan. 5, the deadline for the governor to add the amendment to the state constitution. The measure allows adults to possess up to an ounce of marijuana, and six marijuana plants, though public use of the drug and driving while intoxicated are prohibited.
Colorado's new law also directs lawmakers to write regulations on how pot can be sold, with commercial sales possible by 2014.
Copyright 2012 The Associated Press.
the feds need to have a few puffs off the peace pipe before they make any decisions. THe people voted, now its time for the govt to impliment what the PEOPLE chose to do.
I understand that employers can still maintain a Zero Tolerance Policy. However , now someone can continue to draw unemployment benefits because, while they may be applying, they cannot get a job because they continually fail a potential employers drug screening.
"Gregoire: Feds haven't yet decided whether to crush the will of the people with the iron fist of fascism"Â Â There ,fixed the title for ya katu.
Probably because they all are dropping there jaws at all the states wanting to secede.
What I don't get is that they will hand out DUI's based on your blood level, not level of impairment. Â Well all know that THC stays in your system for a long time. Â So even if you haven't smoked in days you could still fail a DUI blood test for THC.
 @Ixyavi Actually, you can get a DUI based on impairment even if your BAC is well below the limit. I have heard of people being charged for DUI with blood alcohol levels at half of the legal limit.
@Nobody @Ixyavi some people should just NOT drive
@Ixyavi  Just refuse the test.  The Fifth Amendment says that YOU can not be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against yourself . My blood is mine and I refuse to give you any and if I did, I refuse to let you use it against me. Blood found at a crime scene (not taken from somone's living body) can be used as evidence.
Â
Law Enforcement officers, judges and attorneys that get pulled over for DUI do it all the time and have taught us how to sidestep the law. There may be consequences of refusing but it will give enough doubt that you can get out of this.Â
If you refuse the test then they will draw you're blood by force. I have seen and heard of the Police sticking people by force to get thier blood. Refuse and they will get it one way or another. Not to mention lose you're Lic. for 1 year.
@Ixyavi The perfect parasitic police state scam... your catchin' on... kudos.
Both initiatives violate federal law. So there is no ambiguity. Either the feds need to reschedule pot or block both initiatives.
Â
Not enforcing the law is not an option. We have too many laws that are not enforced and therefore they really mean nothing.
Â
The bottom line for me is that the feds need to stay out of the affairs of the states and leave us alone. They try to control us too much as it is.
This comment has been deleted
So they are going to give blood tests? So how does that work when you pull someone over, are all officers trained to draw blood and have the test in hand?Â
 @CorporateCowMooÂ
They have paramedics that do the blood draws. Trust me, if they think someone is DUII they will do all the tests.
Â
And yes, they have all the equipment ready to go. The blood goes to the crime lab and is handled just like every other piece of evidence.
 @RalphCramden Oh, joy!  That means these samples will be handled just as incompetently as, oh . . . , say, as well as OJ's (allegedly, anyway) 'bloody glove'?  I feel ever so much better, Ralph . . . . thanks.
@cpt.iceman "It showed he was High on Coke and was Pregnant"- had to be in Portland- keep portland weird
@RalphCramden @Gravity Works! I knew a person who came up with a dirty blood test. It was mixed up with someone elses test.. They had todo another and found out he was clean. It showed he was High on Coke and was Pregnant.
 @Gravity Works! Â
Â
The chain of custody works pretty well the vast majority of time. Not to worry about evidence getting lost. While it does happen most of it will show up in court and if challenged will be included in the proceedings.
Now that pot is legal I have a house for sale if anyone is interested